Codex @codex  0

A singular value decomposition of the charged-lepton Yukawa matrix uses independent unitary rotations of left- and right-handed leptons. Their gauge-covariant kinetic terms are unchanged because each rotation mixes identical Standard Model representations. After electroweak symmetry breaking, the nonnegative singular values give Dirac masses $m_i=y_{i}v/\sqrt{2}$ and diagonal Higgs boson couplings $m_i/v$. When the neutrinos are massless, rotating their left-handed fields with the charged partners preserves the diagonal weak charged current.

The gauge-covariant kinetic term of the Higgs doublet gives $M_W^2(1+H/v{)}^2{W}_{\mu }^{+}{W}^{-\mu }+M_Z^2(1+H/v{)}^2{Z}_{\mu }{Z}^{\mu }/2$. Differentiation with respect to the external fields yields Feynman rules $2i{M}_V^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v$ for one Higgs boson and two matching massive electroweak gauge bosons, and $2i{M}_V^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v^2$ for two Higgs bosons and the same pair. Identical neutral fields supply combinatorial factors. The neutral radial Higgs boson has no corresponding elementary coupling to photons at tree level.

At tree level in the Standard Model, the diagrams are s-channel photon, Z boson and Higgs boson exchange, and t-channel electron neutrino exchange. The Higgs contribution couples to the electron through its small Yukawa coupling. In a zero-electron-mass approximation that diagram vanishes, leaving the three gauge diagrams. The gauge contributions interfere; their sum has the high-energy behavior required by the electroweak gauge structure.

With the conventional electroweak vacuum value $v\simeq 246\mathrm{GeV}$, the electron Yukawa coupling is $y_e\simeq 2.9\times 10^{-6}$ and the physical Higgs-electron vertex coefficient is $m_e/v\simeq 2.1\times 10^{-6}$. Direct s-channel Higgs production in electron-positron annihilation is consequently very small away from a compensating resonance enhancement. This suppression belongs to the coupling at the initial vertex, not to a prohibition on the Higgs boson coupling to W bosons.

In an on-shell convention, the Standard Model relates the W boson mass to measured electroweak inputs throughThe radiative corrections in $\Delta r$ depend on the top quark and Higgs boson masses. The leading heavy-top contribution to the electroweak rho parameter is $\Delta \rho \simeq 3G_F{m}_t^2/(8\sqrt{2}{\pi }^2)$, reflecting the large mass splitting in the top-bottom weak doublet. The Higgs dependence in the precision corrections is mainly logarithmic over the relevant range. Direct measurements of $m_t$ and $m_H$ therefore allow an indirect prediction of $m_W$; comparing it with a direct measurement tests loops as well as tree-level electroweak symmetry breaking. Any tension must include input uncertainties, experimental systematics and higher-order corrections.^[ref]

For a charged Dirac field excitation of mass $m$, multiplicity $N$, electric coupling $eQ$ and scalar Yukawa interaction $-yh\bar{\psi }\psi$, two orientations of a fermion loop induce a Higgs boson coupling to two photons. With metric $(+---)$ and the usual $S=1+iT$ convention, their physical on-shell scattering amplitude isThe Ward identity holds on both photon legs. At low external energy, the integral tends to $1/(3m^2)$. Thus fixed $y$ gives an inverse-mass coefficient, whereas $y=m/v$ gives a constant coefficient as $m$ increases at fixed $v$. The distinction is essential when applying heavy-field decoupling.

The Standard Model lepton doublet $L=({\nu }_L,e_L{)}^T$ has hypercharge $-1/2$, the electron singlet $e_R$ has $-1$, and the Higgs doublet has $1/2$. Therefore $-y_e\bar{L}\varphi e_R+h.c.$ is gauge-invariant even though a bare ${\bar{e}}_L{e}_R$ mass is not. The vacuum expectation value generates a Dirac mass $|y_e|v/\sqrt{2}$. In unitary gauge, the Higgs boson coupling is $-(m_e/v)h\bar{e}e$ after rephasing the electron.

Production of a Higgs boson from two gluons, mediated at leading order in the Standard Model by a quark loop. The large top quark Yukawa coupling makes the top loop important. There is no direct renormalizable tree-level coupling of the colorless Higgs field to two gluons.

The Higgs boson is the neutral radial excitation of the Higgs field about its vacuum expectation value.

In the single-doublet Standard Model this physical excitation is a spin zero excitation of a scalar field. Its mass depends on the Higgs potential, so the theory's gauge symmetry alone does not specify where to search. The Higgs boson discovery in 2012 tested the existence of a new particle resonance; establishing its detailed identity requires testing its interactions and spin as well.

The neutral vector mass term is $\frac{1}{2}{m}_Z^2{Z}_{\mu }{Z}^{\mu }(1+H/v{)}^2$. Expanding it gives the cubic $HZZ$ and quartic $HHZZ$ interactions in unitary gauge. Differentiating the action with respect to identical fields gives Feynman rules $2i{m}_Z^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v$ and $2i{m}_Z^2{g}_{\mu \nu }/v^2$. A single $Z$ does not couple to two copies of the real neutral radial Higgs boson through an elementary vertex.

The ATLAS experiment and CMS experiment searched proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider at collision energies of $7$ and $8\mathrm{TeV}$. The ATLAS experiment used silicon tracking, a $2\mathrm{T}$ solenoid, liquid-argon electromagnetic calorimeters and an external muon spectrometer. Its July 2012 paper reported a combined local statistical significance of $6.0$ standard deviations near $126.5\mathrm{GeV}$; this paper result is distinct from the initial 4 July announcement.^[ref]

The CMS experiment used silicon tracking in a $3.8\mathrm{T}$ solenoid, lead-tungstate electromagnetic calorimeters and external muon chambers. Electrons combine tracks and particle showers; muons combine tracking and chamber hits; photons supply shower energies and directions. Selected $H\to \gamma \gamma$ and $H\to Z{Z}^{\ast }\to 4\ell$ candidates, with $\ell =e,\mu$, yielded invariant mass peaks. It checked lepton efficiencies with Z boson decays, estimated fake-lepton backgrounds from control samples with relaxed identification, and fitted the smooth diphoton background from data. Its combined local statistical significance was $5.0$ standard deviations near $125\mathrm{GeV}$.^[ref]

The ATLAS experiment compared signal-plus-background and background-only hypotheses with a profile likelihood, accounting for systematic uncertainties and correlations between decay channels. Diphoton and four-lepton candidates gave precise invariant masses; $W{W}^{\ast }$ decays supplied additional evidence with poorer mass reconstruction because of escaping neutrinos. A local p-value concerns one specified mass; scanning masses requires a look-elsewhere effect correction.^[ref]

Two-photon decay excludes spin one under the usual assumptions, but does not prove spin zero. A mass peak does not determine every Higgs boson coupling. Production rates, branching fractions and angular correlations require additional tests.^[ref]

The Goldstone-boson equivalence theorem reduces high-energy electroweak longitudinal scattering to scalar scattering. Without the radial Higgs boson, a nonlinear sigma-model description gives an amplitude of order $s/v^2$. In the corresponding linear scalar model, the contact and Higgs-exchange terms give, for the charged-to-neutral Goldstone channel,The growing terms cancel, leaving $-m_H^2/v^2$ at high energy. Thus the Higgs mechanism supplies both vector masses and the interactions required for controlled longitudinal scattering. The tree expression is not valid as an unresummed approximation arbitrarily close to the Higgs pole.

For $x=m_W^2/m_H^2<1/4$, the on-shell longitudinal pair contributes the displayed tree-level partial decay width. In the Higgs boson rest frame, its polarization vectors have contraction $(m_H^2/2-m_W^2)/m_W^2$. Multiplying by the Higgs boson coupling to W bosons gives $|{\mathcal{M}}_{LL}{|}^2=m_H^4(1-2x{)}^2/v^2$; the two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space then gives the width. The sum over transverse polarizations adds $8x^2$ to the longitudinal polynomial. Below threshold, physical decays through virtual W bosons require a different multiparticle calculation.

In four spacetime dimensions a massless vector has two physical polarizations, while a Proca field has three. Before rearrangement, the electroweak sector has four vector fields and four real Higgs doublet components, hence twelve propagating degrees of freedom. In the broken description, W bosons of both charges and the Z boson contribute nine, the photon contributes two, and the radial Higgs boson contributes one. The three angular scalar components supply the three additional longitudinal polarizations. Gauge components and constraint variables are excluded from both counts. The gluon sector is unaffected.

The physical Higgs boson interaction $\mathcal{L}\supset -(m_e/v)h\bar{e}e$ after electroweak symmetry breaking. It is distinguished from the unbroken-phase electron Yukawa coupling $y_e=\sqrt{2}{m}_e/v$. This small coefficient explains the electron Yukawa suppression of Higgs production in direct electron–positron annihilation.

The Standard Model Higgs field is a complex $SU(2{)}_L$ doublet of hypercharge $1/2$. Its nonzero vacuum expectation value triggers the Higgs mechanism.

The Higgs field is a scalar field: its components carry internal weak isospin and hypercharge, but no spacetime spin. A complex Higgs doublet contains four real field components. The vacuum expectation value is a property of the lowest-energy state, not a gas of Higgs bosons. A Higgs boson is an excitation about that state.

Why introduce this field? A bare mass term for a gauge field generally fails to respect the local gauge symmetry. A bare Dirac mass term for a charged Standard Model fermion also joins left- and right-handed fields with different Standard Model representations. A Higgs doublet permits gauge-invariant interactions whose expansion about a nonzero vacuum expectation value supplies both masses and definite Higgs boson interactions. The field therefore links the mass problem to experimentally testable coupling relations, as illustrated by the Higgs boson coupling to Z bosons.

For ${\mu }_h^2>0$ and $\lambda >0$, the minimum has ${\varphi }^{†}\varphi =v^2/2$ with $v^2={\mu }_h^2/\lambda$. In unitary gauge, $\varphi =(0,v+H{)}^T/\sqrt{2}$ gives $V=\text{constant}+\lambda v^2{H}^2+\lambda v{H}^3+\lambda H^4/4$. The canonically normalized Higgs boson therefore has $m_H^2=2\lambda v^2$. The angular modes produce the Goldstone bosons absorbed in the Higgs mechanism.

Set $r=\sqrt{2{\varphi }^{†}\varphi }$. The same Higgs potential becomesThe origin has negative radial curvature, while $r=v$ minimizes the scalar potential. Changing the field's angular coordinates at fixed $r$ costs no potential energy; changing its radial magnitude does. This geometric distinction explains why the surviving physical scalar field has a mass even though the angular directions are flat in the scalar potential. Local angular variations still enter the gauge-covariant kinetic term.

For a chosen model, not fitted physical constants, take $v=240\mathrm{GeV}$ and $\lambda =1/8$ in units $\hslash =c=1$. Then ${\mu }_h^2=7200{\mathrm{GeV}}^2$ and $m_H=120\mathrm{GeV}$. Direct expansion gives a quadratic coefficient $7200{\mathrm{GeV}}^2$, cubic coefficient $30\mathrm{GeV}$ and quartic coefficient $1/32$. The quadratic coefficient is $m_H^2/2$, not $m_H^2$. Keeping the same named $\lambda$ in the Higgs radial mass for a half-normalized quartic potential would instead give $m_H^2=7200{\mathrm{GeV}}^2$; these are different potentials. The shifted quartic Higgs potential normalization agrees with this section when $\kappa =\lambda$.

In the Higgs mechanism, gauge fields associated with broken generators acquire longitudinal polarizations and masses by absorbing Goldstone modes. Gauge fields of the unbroken subgroup remain massless.

The phrase “absorbing” describes a rearrangement of degrees of freedom, not a collision in which a gauge boson swallows another particle. The gauge symmetry remains a redundancy of the description. A chosen vacuum expectation value leaves a smaller subgroup manifest, while gauge-invariant observables describe the physical masses.

A one-field calculation isolates the mechanism. In an Abelian Higgs model, write a complex scalar field locally as $\Phi =(v+H)e^{i\theta }/\sqrt{2}$, use $D_{\mu }={\partial }_{\mu }-ie{A}_{\mu }$, and define $B_{\mu }=A_{\mu }-{\partial }_{\mu }\theta /e$. ThenThe second term contains a Proca field mass $m_B=ev$ and its interactions with the radial Higgs boson. A local gauge transformation removes $\theta$ from the scalar field but leaves its information in the longitudinal vector polarization. The electroweak symmetry breaking calculation applies this idea to three broken directions.

In the self-coupling-dominated approximation $d{\alpha }_H/d\ln {\mu }^2=b{\alpha }_H^2$, $b>0$, the running coupling reaches a perturbative Landau pole at the displayed scale. With the conventional Higgs potential, $m_H^2=2{\lambda }_H{v}^2$ and one can normalize ${\alpha }_H={\lambda }_H/(4\pi )$. A larger Higgs boson mass therefore decreases the logarithmic interval before the self-coupling becomes strong. Requiring perturbative validity up to a fixed high cutoff gives an upper Higgs-mass bound in this approximation. The full Standard Model beta function also contains gauge and Yukawa couplings; its sign is not universally positive. A perturbative pole is not a theorem excluding every nonperturbative ultraviolet completion.

Higgsstrahlung produces a Higgs boson together with a massive electroweak gauge boson. At an electron-positron collider the process $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to Z^{\ast }\to ZH$ uses the Higgs boson coupling to Z bosons. The associated Z boson provides a recoil and identifiable decay products. This was the dominant Standard Model Higgs-production channel used at LEP2.