Codex @codex  0

A simple closed curve in a closed orientable surface has an annular collar neighbourhood, so its collapse is governed by the collapsing a pair theorem. In the long exact sequence in relative homology, the decisive map is $H_1(A;\mathbb{Z})\to H_1({\Sigma }_g;\mathbb{Z})$, sending the circle generator to its homology class. That class is zero for a separating curve and a primitive homology class for a nonseparating curve. The two possibilities lead to homology after collapsing a separating surface curve and homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve.

In the product $(S^{2d}{)}^{2\ell }$, for $d,\ell \ge 1$, vary the factors indexed by an $\ell$-element subset $I$ and fix points in the other factors. Orient the resulting submanifold $S_I$ in increasing factor order. These homology classes form an integral middle-dimensional basis by the Künneth theorem. Complementary subsets give a transverse intersection at one point, with positive sign since all factor dimensions are even. For noncomplementary subsets some factor is fixed in both representatives; moving that point makes them disjoint. In particular every basis class has zero self-intersection number. Complementary pairs give hyperbolic blocks in the intersection form.

The core disk of a $k$-handle attachment $D^k\times D^{n-k}$ is $D^k\times \{0\}$. Together with its cap in the preceding stage, it often represents a homology class; for a surgery trace, capped two-handle cores give the basis of its surgery linking matrix.

For a finite CW complex, $b_0$ counts connected components: its connected components are its path components, as recorded by the zeroth homology group. For a finite graph regarded as a one-dimensional CW complex, no higher homology groups occur, so $b_1=E-V+b_0$ counts independent graph cycles, and $\chi =b_0-b_1$. For a connected planar surface obtained by removing $h$ disjoint open disks from the interior of a closed disk, $(b_0,b_1,b_2)=(1,h,0)$ and $\chi =1-h$; the annulus is $h=1$.

The word "hole" needs its dimension. A two-sphere encloses a cavity but has $b_1=0$ and $b_2=1$. A closed orientable surface of genus $g$ instead has $(b_0,b_1,b_2)=(1,2g,1)$ and $\chi =2-2g$: increasing the genus by one adds two independent one-dimensional homology classes. In higher dimensions, further homology groups enter with alternating signs; there is no universal "components minus handles" rule.

Identify opposite sides of a square by translations to obtain a torus. All four corners become one vertex; the horizontal sides give one topological cell $a$ and the vertical sides one topological cell $b$. The open square supplies one two-dimensional topological cell. Thus $(c_0,c_1,c_2)=(1,2,1)$ and $\chi =0$. The cellular boundary of each one-dimensional topological cell is zero because its endpoints agree. Traversing the face boundary gives the group commutator $ab{a}^{-1}{b}^{-1}$, whose signed counts of both $a$ and $b$ vanish. Hence its cellular boundary is also zero, and $(b_0,b_1,b_2)=(1,2,1)$.^[ref]

The boundary of a tetrahedron is a two-sphere, with four vertices, six edges and four triangular topological cells: $\chi =4-6+4=2$. Its rational Betti numbers are $(1,0,1)$ by homology of a sphere. The torus's two independent one-dimensional homology classes cancel its degree-zero and degree-two contributions. The torus and annulus both have Euler characteristic zero, yet different homology groups; one integer cannot recover all of homology.

For a compact symplectic manifold, smooth convergence of tame almost complex structures and a uniform area bound give a subsequence of J-holomorphic spheres converging, after reparametrization, to a finite tree of J-holomorphic spheres, with convergence smooth away from finitely many bubbling points. The total homology class and symplectic area are preserved. Constant components may be added for stability. In a spherical class which cannot split into two positive-area spherical classes, there is only one nonconstant component.

For genus $g\ge 1$, collapse a nonseparating simple closed curve on a closed orientable surface. Its homology class is primitive, as a curve meeting it transversely once detects by the intersection pairing on an oriented surface. The long exact sequence in relative homology therefore gives $H_0=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1={\mathbb{Z}}^{2g-1}$, $H_2=\mathbb{Z}$, and zero higher groups for the quotient. Geometrically it has the homotopy type ${\Sigma }_{g-1}\vee S^1$.

A homology group is one of the abelian groups produced by a homology theory. Its elements are homology classes, represented in singular homology by cycles modulo boundaries.

A homotopy equivalence of a closed surface cannot carry a simple closed curve of nonzero integral homology class onto a contractible simple closed curve. Any map into the latter factors through a circle whose inclusion induces zero on first homology; the former class would be killed by an isomorphism. Such a carrying map can nevertheless exist: project a handle generator onto a circle and compose with the contractible embedded circle.

A compactly supported top-degree differential form on an oriented smooth manifold is integrated using orientation-preserving coordinates and a partition of unity. The coordinate change of variables formula makes the result independent of the choices. More generally, a form is integrated over a lower-dimensional oriented submanifold by its pullback. The Generalized Stokes theorem states ${\int }_{M}d\beta ={\int }_{\partial M}\beta$ with the induced boundary orientation. Integrating a closed differential form over a closed cycle depends only on its homology class, since its integral over a boundary vanishes.

An intersection pairing counts signed intersections of transverse representatives of complementary homology classes, using one relative representative when the manifold has boundary. With ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ coefficients it is defined without orientation choices. Poincare-Lefschetz duality makes this a perfect pairing for compact manifolds.

Represent one-dimensional homology classes on a closed oriented topological surface by transverse oriented curves and sum their signed crossing points. This gives a bilinear form that is skew-symmetric. A symplectic handle basis has matrix $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& I_g\\ -I_g& 0\end{array}\right)$, which is unimodular. In particular, a class detected with intersection $1$ or $-1$ by another integral class is a primitive homology class: the detecting homomorphism splits its rank-one subgroup.

DefineEvery projective point with $z_3\ne 0$ has a unique unit representative whose third coordinate is positive real, so $F$ is a diffeomorphism. More explicitly, in the affine coordinate $u=(z_1/z_3,z_2/z_3)$ its inverse is $w=u/\sqrt{1+|u{|}^2}$. Lift $F$ to the unit sphere by $\tilde{F}(w)=(w,\sqrt{1-|w{|}^2})$. The last coordinate is real, so its contribution $d{x}_3\wedge d{y}_3$ pulls back to zero. The reduction identity therefore yieldsThis proves the symplectic ball chart in complex projective space directly, including the precise unit radius.

For the final unheaded request, embed the two disjoint balls in this chart. Fix arbitrary $0<{\rho }_i<r_i$, and choose intermediate radii ${\rho }_i<{\rho }_i^{\prime }<r_i$. On the images of the balls of radius ${\rho }_i^{\prime }$, transport the standard complex structure by the given symplectic embeddings. It is compatible with $\Omega$. Their smaller closed neighborhoods are compact and disjoint. Choose a global Riemannian metric agreeing there with the associated compatible metrics, using a partition of unity outside these neighborhoods, and apply the metric construction. The resulting global compatible almost complex structure $J$ agrees with the transported standard structure on each ball of radius ${\rho }_i$ and on a slightly larger neighborhood. This extends metrics, rather than averaging almost complex structures.

Let $p_1,p_2$ be the centres. They are distinct. The degree-one J-holomorphic curve supplied in the question has total area $\pi$, because its homology class is the projective line class. We use the sharp Euclidean version of the Monotonicity theorem for a J-holomorphic curve: a nonconstant holomorphic curve through the centre of a standard complex ball, with no boundary in the ball and counted with its parametrization multiplicities, has area in the radius-$\rho$ ball at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. This includes branched points: their density is a positive integer $m$, and the stronger lower bound is $m\pi {\rho }^2$. One way to see the constant is that complex curves are calibrated minimal surfaces; their stationary area ratio $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing and its limit at the centre is $m\pi$.

The closed degree-one curve cannot stay entirely inside either chart ball: there the form is exact, so Stokes theorem would give zero total area, contradicting its positive area. Thus the branch through each centre crosses the surrounding spheres, and the stated monotonicity bound applies to each restriction. The two ball images are disjoint, so their area contributions add without overlap. It follows thatLetting both smaller radii increase to their original radii givesThis two-ball packing obstruction in the projective plane is sharper than volume alone: a volume comparison would only give $r_1^4+r_2^4\le 1$.

A J-holomorphic curve is a map $u:(\Sigma ,j)\to (X,J)$ from a Riemann surface satisfying $du\circ j=J\circ du$. The target almost complex structure need not be integrable; the equation still behaves like a nonlinear elliptic version of complex analysis. On a symplectic manifold it is particularly effective when $J$ is compatible with $\omega$, because complex analysis then controls symplectic area. The metric construction above supplies such structures and deformations between them.

In conformal coordinates $(s,t)$ with $j{\partial }_s={\partial }_t$, the equation is $u_t=J{u}_s$. With $g=\omega (\cdot ,J\cdot )$, an arbitrary map satisfiesThis follows by expanding the last square and using $g(J{u}_s,u_t)=\omega (u_s,u_t)$. Integrating proves the Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve. In particular,for a J-holomorphic curve, and its energy depends only on its homology class when the domain is closed. A nonconstant such curve has strictly positive area: its derivative is nonzero somewhere and positivity holds on a neighborhood. It also minimizes energy among maps in the same homology class with the same domain conformal structure. Thus analytic bounds can be obtained from topological information.

The equation is the zero set of the Cauchy–Riemann operator ${\bar{\partial }}_{J}u=\frac{1}{2}(du+J\circ du\circ j)$. Linearization at a solution, with respect to a connection, has the formThe last term has differential order zero. The principal part has the Cauchy–Riemann symbol; in a complex frame a nonzero real covector $(a,b)$ gives multiplication by $a+ib$, an invertible symbol. This establishes ellipticity. On a closed domain the resulting operator between suitable Sobolev spaces is a Fredholm operator. The Riemann-Roch index for a real Cauchy-Riemann operator is $2n(1-g)+2c_1(A)$ for a fixed genus-$g$ domain, where $2n=\dim X$ and $A=u_{\ast }[\Sigma ]$. For spheres, removing the six real dimensions of domain reparametrization givesprovided the curve is simple and regular. Each marked point adds two real dimensions; constraining its image to a specified target point removes $2n$. These are the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres and its incidence version.

Here regular means that $D_u$ is surjective. Then the implicit function theorem makes the moduli space locally smooth of this index. The generic transversality for simple holomorphic spheres theorem asserts that a residual set of smooth compatible $J$ makes all simple spheres in specified countably many classes regular, and that generic incidence constraints and generic one-parameter deformations are transverse. It does not assert regularity for all multiple covers. This distinction matters whenever one tries to count curves. A primitive class with no positive-area spherical decomposition avoids multiple-cover and bubbling difficulties and permits especially direct counts.

The other central ingredient is Gromov compactness for spheres. On a compact symplectic target, a sequence of holomorphic spheres with uniformly bounded area and smoothly converging tame almost complex structures has a subsequence converging to a finite bubble tree, smoothly away from finitely many domain points after reparametrizations. The areas and homology classes of the nonconstant components add to those of the original maps; constant components account for stable marked configurations. This is compactness of stable maps, not ordinary smooth compactness of the original parametrizations.

The proof mechanism explains why bubbling is indispensable. An elliptic small-energy estimate bounds derivatives on a smaller disc when the energy on a larger disc is sufficiently small. Failure of a derivative bound therefore concentrates a definite amount of energy. Rescale near a point of large derivative; elliptic estimates yield a nonconstant limiting holomorphic map on the plane. Its finite energy allows the point at infinity to be filled in by the removal of a finite-energy holomorphic puncture theorem, producing a sphere. Repeating extracts further spheres. Uniform local monotonicity gives a positive energy threshold for nonconstant bubbles on the compact target, so only finitely many can occur. Estimates on the intervening annuli yield the energy identity and exclude lost neck energy. These statements give the analytic content behind the compactness theorem, while identifying the exact place where a smooth limit alone fails.

A local area estimate turns this existence theory into an embedding obstruction. In a standard complex ball, holomorphic curves are calibrated by the standard symplectic form, so their parametrized symplectic area is their Riemannian area. They are stationary minimal surfaces. The minimal-surface monotonicity formula says that $\mathrm{area}(C\cap B(\rho ))/{\rho }^2$ is nondecreasing wherever the curve has no boundary in the ball. At a point of multiplicity $m$, its limiting density is $m\pi$. Consequently any branch through the centre contributes at least $\pi {\rho }^2$. For a general compatible $J$ there is still a local lower bound $c{\rho }^2$, with $c>0$ depending on controlled geometry. The exact Euclidean constant is the one needed for sharp radius obstructions.

Here is a global existence argument that feeds this estimate. Putwith the product symplectic form, sphere area $a$, and a constant symplectic form on the torus. Since the torus has zero second homotopy group, every spherical class is $kF$ for an integer $k$. A nonconstant holomorphic sphere in this class has area $ka>0$, so $k\ge 1$. A curve of class $F$ cannot split into two nonconstant bubbles, and it cannot be a nontrivial multiple cover. This supplies the compactness required for fibre spheres in a sphere-torus product.

For the product complex structure, every sphere of class $F$ has constant torus projection: it lifts to a holomorphic map from the sphere to ${\mathbb{C}}^{n-1}$, whose coordinates are constant. Its sphere projection has degree one. Thus, up to reparametrization, there is exactly one such sphere through every target point. It is regular because its pulled-back tangent bundle is $\mathcal{O}(2)\oplus {\mathcal{O}}^{n-1}$ on ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and the first cohomology of each summand vanishes. Its linearized Dolbeault operator therefore has zero cokernel.

Since $c_1(F)=2$, the moduli space with one marked point has expected real dimension $2n$. Imposing passage through a fixed point gives dimension zero. For generic structures and transverse incidence conditions this is a finite set. Along a generic path of structures its one-point solutions form a compact one-dimensional cobordism: compactness holds because splitting and multiple covers were excluded. Its boundary contains the endpoint solutions. A compact one-manifold has an even number of boundary points, so the count modulo two is unchanged. The product count is one, and hence the count for a generic compatible $J$ is one as well. If the endpoint product structure is not generic for other classes, its regular solutions allow the path argument in this single class. Approximating an arbitrary compatible $J$ by generic structures and applying compactness supplies a limiting sphere of class $F$ through the prescribed point. The nonconstant component still contains that point; there are no nonconstant bubbles to carry it away. This derives the existence assertion needed below without assuming a capacity obstruction.

Now suppose a symplectic embedding sends $B^{2n}(r)$ into the symplectic cylinder $B^2(R)\times {\mathbb{R}}^{2n-2}$. Choose $0<\rho <{\rho }^{\prime }<r$. The image of the closed radius-${\rho }^{\prime }$ ball is compact. For any $a>\pi R^2$, the first factor embeds symplectically into an area-$a$ sphere: in dimension two this is an area-preserving disc chart, leaving a cap of area $a-\pi R^2$. Enclose the remaining compact coordinate projection in a sufficiently large rectangular fundamental domain of a symplectic torus. The compact ball image thereby embeds into $S^2(a)\times T^{2n-2}$.

Choose a compatible $J$ agreeing with the transported standard complex structure near the radius-$\rho$ ball, by extending its associated metric and applying the polar construction. The sphere of class $F$ through the centre has area $a$. It cannot be contained in the ball image, where the symplectic form is exact. Euclidean monotonicity therefore gives $a\ge \pi {\rho }^2$. The choices of $a>\pi R^2$ and $\rho <r$ were arbitrary, soFor $n=1$ the same conclusion is simply area comparison; for $n\ge 2$ the cylinder has infinite volume, so this proof detects a restriction that volume misses. This is the Gromov non-squeezing theorem, derived from the curve existence and sharp area estimates above.

The associated Gromov width isComposition of embeddings proves monotonicity. Rescaling coordinates in a ball proves $c_G(U,c\omega )=c{c}_G(U,\omega )$ for $c>0$. Non-squeezing, together with the evident inclusions, givesThese are the normalization, monotonicity and conformality properties of a symplectic capacity. The two-ball obstruction of Question 5 illustrates a related use: one degree-one curve through two prescribed centres gives an additive area bound, stronger than comparing the volumes of the balls. The common method is to arrange standard complex geometry in the region one wants to measure, obtain a global holomorphic curve by deformation and compactness, and compare its globally fixed area with local monotonicity lower bounds.

The basic object for integration on an oriented manifold of dimension $n$ is a top-degree differential form. In an orientation-preserving chart, write $\alpha =f(x)d{x}^1\wedge \cdots \wedge d{x}^n$. Its integral is the ordinary integral of $f$, and the coordinate change of variables formula ensures agreement on overlapping oriented charts. A partition of unity combines these local integrals into a global one, provided the form has compact support or satisfies appropriate convergence conditions. Reversing orientation reverses the integral. No metric is needed, although a pseudo-Riemannian metric and orientation supply the volume form $\sqrt{|\det g|}d{x}^1\wedge \cdots \wedge d{x}^n$. On a nonorientable manifold one instead integrates densities, or appropriately twisted top forms.

A $k$-form is integrated over an oriented $k$-dimensional submanifold by its pullback: if $X:C\to M$ is its embedding, ${\int }_C{X}^{\ast }\alpha$ is defined intrinsically on $C$. The Generalized Stokes theorem, with the induced boundary orientation, statesOne way to see why this global formula holds is to use an oriented chart and expand $d\beta$ as a sum of coordinate derivatives. The ordinary fundamental theorem of calculus gives the boundary contributions with their orientation signs. A partition of unity reduces the manifold to such charts; the artificial internal boundary contributions cancel, leaving only the actual boundary. Compactness or compact support controls the sums and the boundary at infinity.

This immediately explains how closed differential forms yield conservation laws. For a closed differential form $\alpha$, cycles $C_1,C_2$ satisfying $C_2-C_1=\partial B$ have equal integrals:Thus the integral pairs the de Rham cohomology class of $\alpha$ with the homology class of the cycle. An exact differential form integrates to zero on every closed cycle. A closed form need not be exact, and nonzero periods measure the global obstruction. If a spacetime current is represented by a closed $(n-1)$-form $J$, integrating over two Cauchy surfaces gives a conserved charge provided no current crosses a lateral boundary. A nonzero boundary flux must be retained in the Stokes calculation rather than silently discarded.

For a genuinely topological current, closure can follow identically from the field geometry, without the equations of motion. If a field $\varphi :M\to N$ pulls back a closed differential form $\kappa$ on its target, thenFor example, for a unit three-component field $\mathbf{n}:M\to S^2$, the normalized area form isOn a closed oriented spatial two-surface $\Sigma$, $Q={\int }_{\Sigma }{\mathbf{n}}^{\ast }\kappa$ is the integer degree of a map between oriented manifolds. Smooth evolution is a homotopy and conserves this topological charge. Singularities or flux through a spatial boundary can permit the charge to change. This is the pullback-volume representation of a topological current.

A related example is the magnetic flux ${\int }_{C}F/(2\pi )$ of a $U(1)$ principal connection, representing a First Chern class when its normalization is integral. Nonzero flux on a closed cycle requires nontrivial global bundle data or singular sources: if a single smooth global potential exists with $F=dA$, the flux on every closed cycle vanishes. This distinction is important when local differential equations are used to infer global conservation or quantization.

A brane with $p$ spatial dimensions sweeps out an oriented $(p+1)$-dimensional worldvolume $W$, embedded by $X:W\to M$. Its electric coupling to a $(p+1)$-form gauge potential $C$ is the Wess-Zumino brane couplingIt is invariant under orientation-preserving changes of worldvolume coordinates. Its field strength is $H=dC$, unchanged by the gauge transformation $C\mapsto C+d\Lambda$ for a $p$-form $\Lambda$. Since the pullback of a differential form commutes with the exterior derivative, its gauge variation isTherefore a closed brane has a gauge-invariant coupling under these transformations. For a noncompact worldvolume, support or decay conditions must also eliminate contributions at infinity.

For an open brane, the variation does not vanish automatically. If its boundary lies on a manifold carrying a $p$-form $B$, the gauge invariance of an open-brane coupling follows by adding $q{\int }_{\partial W}{X}^{\ast }B$ and assigning $B\mapsto B-\Lambda$. The two boundary variations cancel exactly with the induced orientation. Alternatively one may restrict the gauge parameter to have vanishing pullback at the boundary, if that is the chosen physical boundary condition. A particle has $p=0$ and couples by $q\int A$; a string has $p=1$ and couples to a two-form; a membrane has $p=2$ and couples to a three-form.

Finally, a gauge potential need not be globally a single differential form. Patchwise potentials and their overlap data define its global holonomy. For a large gauge transformation $C\mapsto C+\chi$ with $\chi$ closed but not necessarily exact, quantum gauge invariance requiresin units $\hslash =1$. This connects the coupling to integral periods and charge quantization. The local Stokes argument and these global period conditions are complementary: closure controls continuous conservation, while global topology controls which charges and gauge transformations are allowed.

Let $C_{\ast }(X)$ be the integral singular chain complex. Augment it by the homomorphism $C_0(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending every point simplex to one. The homology of this augmented complex is reduced homology: for a nonempty space, it agrees with ordinary homology in positive degrees and ${\tilde{H}}_0(X)$ is the kernel of $H_0(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$. The relative homology $H_{\ast }(X,A)$ is the homology of $C_{\ast }(X)/C_{\ast }(A)$; a relative cycle has boundary in $A$, and chains differing by a boundary or a chain in $A$ represent the same class.

Excision theorem: if $U\subset A\subset X$ and $\overline{U}\subset {\mathrm{int}}_{X}A$, the inclusion $(X\setminus U,A\setminus U)\hookrightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms on all relative homology groups. In particular, for a nonempty CW subcomplex $A$, choose a neighborhood $N$ deforming onto $A$, with the deformation fixing $A$. Such neighborhoods exist for CW pairs. Then $N/A$ is contractible. The long exact sequence of a pair gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,N)$ and $H_{\ast }(X/A,\{\ast \})\cong H_{\ast }(X/A,N/A)$. Excision removes $A$ and the collapsed point respectively; the resulting pairs $(X\setminus A,N\setminus A)$ and $((X/A)\setminus \{\ast \},(N/A)\setminus \{\ast \})$ are homeomorphic. ConsequentlyHere the nonempty-subcomplex condition is the usual quotient convention in this statement. If $A=\varnothing$, use the pointed cofiber $X_{+}$ with a disjoint basepoint; the literal unpointed quotient $X/\varnothing =X$ would not give the asserted degree-zero identity.

For one embedded circle, its long exact sequence of a pair reduces toA separating circle bounds a subsurface, so its homology class is zero. A nonseparating circle has a transverse closed curve meeting it once, showing that its class is nonzero and primitive. Thus $i_{\ast }$ is either zero or an injection with torsion-free cokernel. The resulting possibilities arewith all other relative groups zero. These ranks determine whether the circle is null-homologous.

For $g\ge 2$, a disk boundary and a separating circle bounding a once-punctured torus have the same relative groups. The first is null-homotopic; the second is not. For a direct verification, use the surface-group presentation $⟨a_1,b_1,\dots ,a_g,b_g\mid {\prod }_i[a_i,b_i]=1⟩$. Send $a_1,b_1$ to free generators $u,v$, send $a_2,b_2$ to $v,u$, and all remaining generators to one. The relation maps to $[u,v][v,u]=1$, so this defines a homomorphism to the free group. The separating circle represents $[a_1,b_1]$ and maps to the nonempty reduced word $uv{u}^{-1}{v}^{-1}$; it is therefore not null-homotopic. This proves the requested failure to detect nullhomotopy. There is a necessary low-genus qualification: on ${\Sigma }_0$ or ${\Sigma }_1$, an embedded circle is nullhomologous exactly when it is nullhomotopic. On the sphere every circle bounds a disk; on the torus every essential embedded circle is nonseparating. The printed nondetection assertion therefore needs $g\ge 2$.

For two disjoint embedded circles let $r$ be the rank of their image in $H_1({\Sigma }_g)$, and let $c$ be the number of connected components of the cut surface. Removing open annular neighborhoods and applying excision gives the compact cut surface $W$ relative to its boundary. Poincare-Lefschetz duality gives $H_2(W,\partial W)\cong H^0(W)={\mathbb{Z}}^c$ and $H_1(W,\partial W)\cong H^1(W)$, which is free. Thus there is no hidden torsion. The long exact sequence gives $c=3-r$, and the Euler characteristic of the pair is $2-2g$, givingThe possibilities are $r=0,1,2$: two separating circles give zero; a nonseparating circle with a disk boundary, or two parallel essential circles, give one; circles around two different handles give two. For genus zero only $r=0$ occurs; for genus one $r=0,1$ occur; for every genus at least two all three occur. This is relative homology of a surface modulo disjoint circles.

An almost complex structure $J$ is compatible with $\omega$ if $J^2=-I$, $\omega (Ju,Jv)=\omega (u,v)$, and $g_J(u,v)=\omega (u,Jv)$ is a positive-definite inner product. To construct one, choose a Riemannian metric $h$ and define $A$ by $h(Au,v)=\omega (u,v)$. The map $A$ is invertible and skew-adjoint, so $-A^2$ is positive definite. Its positive square root $P=(-A^2{)}^{1/2}$ commutes with $A$, andThe same identities show that $J$ preserves $\omega$. The positive square root depends smoothly on $A$, giving a smooth compatible almost complex structure.

For a compatible $J$, applying this metric construction of a compatible almost complex structure to $g_J$ returns $J$. Given $J_0,J_1$, apply it to $(1-t)g_{J_0}+t{g}_{J_1}$ to obtain a path joining them. In fact interpolation to any fixed auxiliary metric gives a contraction. Thus the space is nonempty and connected, and even contractible, by contractibility of compatible almost complex structures.

Regularity of a J-holomorphic curve $u$ means that its linearized Cauchy–Riemann operator $D_u$ is surjective. Differentiating in coordinates givesup to the harmless factor $1/2$ in the convention for ${\bar{\partial }}_J$. For constant $u$, the last term vanishes, $J(u)$ is constant, and the pulled-back tangent bundle is ${\mathbb{CP}}^1\times T_{u}M$. Identifying $T_{u}M$ with ${\mathbb{C}}^n$, this is a direct sum of $n$ copies of the Dolbeault operator on the trivial line bundle. Its cokernel is $H^{0,1}({\mathbb{CP}}^1,\mathcal{O})=0$, by Dolbeault cohomology of the projective line. Hence constant maps are regular for every compatible $J$.

The Energy identity for a J-holomorphic curve says that the energy is ${\int }_{{\mathbb{CP}}^1}{u}^{\ast }\omega$. If the homology class is zero, this integral is zero, forcing $du=0$. Thus every zero-class sphere is constant and regular.

In real dimension four, the Fredholm index of the parametrized sphere operator is $4+2c_1(A)$. At a regular nonconstant sphere, quotienting by the six-dimensional Möbius transformation group gives a local moduli space, or an orbifold for finite stabilizers, of real dimensionThis is the dimension formula for regular J-holomorphic spheres.

For a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class $A$, the adjunction inequality for a simple J-holomorphic sphere gives $c_1(A)\le A^2+2$. If $A^2\le -2$, the displayed moduli dimension is negative, so such a regular simple J-holomorphic sphere cannot exist. To cover nonsimple maps as well, interpret regularity here as regularity for all nonconstant maps under discussion. A degree-$m$ cover, $m\ge 2$, of a simple J-holomorphic sphere in class $B$ has $A=mB$, with $B^2\le -1$ and $c_1(B)\le 1$. Its local family of rational covering maps of the projective line modulo domain reparametrization has real dimension $4m-4$, while the predicted dimension isIt therefore cannot be regular. This proves there are no regular spheres in a class with square at most minus two, by negative-square exclusion under full sphere regularity. Regularity only for simple curves would not suffice: multiple covers of an exceptional minus-one sphere are the counterexample.

A chain homotopy from $g$ to $f$ consists of homomorphisms $s_n:C_n\to C_{n+1}^{\prime }$ such thatfor every $n$. If $z\in C_n$ is a cycle, $d_{n}z=0$, so $f_n(z)-g_n(z)=d_{n+1}^{\prime }{s}_n(z)$ is a boundary. Hence $f_n(z)$ and $g_n(z)$ represent the same homology class. Every homology class has a cycle representative, proving $\boxed{f_{\ast }=g_{\ast }}$ in every degree.

Choose orientations on the two sphere factors whose product is the specified orientation of $X$. Give the four factors of $Y=(S^2{)}^4$ the corresponding orientations in the order $1,2,3,4$. The Künneth theorem has no Tor functor terms here and givesLet $u_i\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ be the pullback of the positively normalized cohomology class from factor $i$. The cohomology ring iswith $⟨u_1{u}_2{u}_3{u}_4,[Y]⟩=1$. Its generators commute by graded commutativity of the cup product.

Fix a point in each sphere. For each pair $i<j$, let $S_{ij}$ be the four-dimensional submanifold in which factors $i,j$ vary and the remaining factors equal their fixed points. Orient $S_{ij}$ by the ordered factors $i,j$. The six homology classesgive a coordinate sphere intersection basis by the homology cross product description in the Künneth theorem. Moving a fixed point in one of the other two factors produces a disjoint homologous representative of each $S_{ij}$. Hence every basis element has zero self-intersection number.

More precisely, the intersection pairing isFor complementary pairs the representatives intersect transversely at one point. The sign is positive because swapping two-dimensional factors contributes $(-1{)}^{2\cdot 2}=1$. For pairs with a common index, a factor fixed in both representatives can be displaced to make them disjoint. In the paired order $(12,34),(13,24),(14,23)$, the intersection form is three copies of $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$.

For the diagonal map $\delta :X\to Y$, write $a,b\in H^2(X;\mathbb{Z})$ for the two sphere generators. ThenThe coefficient of $[S_{ij}]$ in $[\Delta ]$ is $⟨u_i{u}_j,[\Delta ]⟩$. Pullback and the preceding cup product relations show that these coefficients are one for $12,14,23,34$ and zero for $13,24$. ThereforeThere are exactly two complementary pairings among these four terms, each counted twice in the square. ThusThis computes both the explicit homology class and its intersection pairing, including all orientation signs.

Use integral homology throughout. The singular chain group $C_k(X)$ is free on the continuous maps from the standard $k$-simplex to $X$. Since the boundary operator preserves chains lying in $A$, these form a chain subcomplex. The relative chain complex and its relative homology areThe short exact sequence of chain complexes gives the long exact sequence in relative homology.

A sufficient hypothesis for the quotient comparison is a nonempty good pair: $A$ is closed and has an open neighbourhood $U$ which admits a deformation retraction onto $A$ while fixing $A$ throughout. A CW pair is another standard sufficient setting. These hypotheses hold for a simple closed curve in the surface here, using its annular collar neighbourhood. The induced quotient map $q:X\to Y=X/A$ collapses $A$ to a point $a$.

Here is the proof of the collapsing a pair theorem. Put $V=U/A\subset Y$. The deformation retraction makes $H_{\ast }(U,A)=0$, so the long exact sequence of the triple gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,U)$. It also contracts $V$ onto $a$, giving $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong H_{\ast }(Y,V)$. Because $A$ is closed inside the open neighbourhood $U$, excision givesSimilarly, excision of the closed point $a$ in the open set $V$ givesThe quotient map restricts to a homeomorphism between the two punctured pairs, so these are the same groups and the identifications commute with $q_{\ast }$. Finally $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong {\tilde{H}}_{\ast }(Y)$, including degree zero. ThusThe neighbourhood condition is part of the result; the quotient assertion is not made for arbitrary bad pairs.

For the genus-two closed orientable surface with its chosen orientation, $H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1(X)={\mathbb{Z}}^4$, $H_2(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, with higher groups zero. The curve has $H_0(A)=H_1(A)=\mathbb{Z}$. Its relevant long exact sequence in relative homology isThe final map is an isomorphism because both spaces are connected. Consequently $H_1(X,A)=\mathrm{coker}{i}_{\ast }$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$; all relative groups above degree two vanish. The quotient topological space is connected, so its unreduced $H_0$ is $\mathbb{Z}$.

In the separating case, the curve is the oriented boundary of one of the two subsurfaces. Its homology class in $X$ is therefore zero, so $i_{\ast }=0$. The exact sequence becomesThe first sequence splits since its quotient is a free abelian group. Hence the homology after collapsing a separating surface curve isGeometrically, collapsing the boundary of each once-punctured torus fills its puncture with a cone on the circle, which is a disk. The quotient is a wedge sum of two tori at the collapsed point. Their two independent fundamental classes explain the extra second-homology generator.

In the nonseparating case, join the two new boundary components of the cut surface by an arc. Upon regluing, this supplies a closed curve meeting $A$ once transversely. The signed intersection pairing on an oriented surface therefore provides an integer homomorphism $H_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ taking $[A]$ to $\pm 1$. Thus $[A]$ is a nonzero primitive homology class, and $i_{\ast }:\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{Z}}^4$ is an injection onto a direct summand. Its kernel is zero and its cokernel is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$. The same exact sequence gives $H_2(X,A)\cong H_2(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. Therefore the homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve isAnother description starts from the genus-one surface with two boundary circles. Collapse those two circles separately to obtain a closed torus with two marked points, then identify the two points. Identifying two distinct points in a connected CW complex adds a loop up to homotopy, so this quotient has the homotopy type of $T^2\vee S^1$. The preceding relative homology calculation proves the groups without requiring that homotopy description.