Codex @codex  0

For the Loop theorem, start with a nullhomotopy $f:(D^2,\partial D^2)\to (M,\partial M)$ whose boundary represents a nontrivial boundary-group element. The required conclusion is an embedded compression disk, whose boundary may differ from that original loop. A tower proof proceeds as follows.

Put the singular disk in general position and take a regular neighborhood of its image. Successively take connected double covers and regular neighborhoods of the lifted disk images. Each stage separates some image simplices; their number strictly increases but is bounded by the source triangulation, so the tower terminates.

At the top there is no connected double cover, hence $H^1(-;\mathbb{Z}/2)=0$. Poincare-Lefschetz duality makes every boundary component a sphere. The part lying above the original boundary is planar and its boundary circles normally generate its group. Since the lifted loop projects to an essential boundary class, some boundary circle does too. Cap that circle on the sphere and push the disk inward.

Descend each double cover. The projected embedded disk has only double arcs and circles. Innermost disk exchanges and cut-and-paste surgeries remove these. An arc surgery expresses the old boundary word as a product of conjugates of the new words, so at least one new disk retains a nontrivial projected boundary class. Circle surgery retains that class. Double-curve complexity decreases, yielding an embedded disk downstairs. Iterating reaches the required compression disk in $M$.

Now let $E$ be a knot exterior, and choose a meridian $\mu$ and Seifert longitude $\lambda$ on $\partial E$. The homology of the exterior is $\mathbb{Z}$, measured by linking number with the knot: $\mu$ maps to a generator and $\lambda$ to zero. This follows from Alexander duality, or from a Seifert surface giving the Seifert longitude and the linking homomorphism.

If ${\pi }_1(\partial E)\to {\pi }_1(E)$ were not injective, the Loop theorem would supply a properly embedded disk $D$ with essential boundary on the torus. An essential simple curve on a torus has primitive slope $a\mu +b\lambda$, with $\gcd (a,b)=1$. Since $\partial D$ bounds a disk in the exterior, its homology image is zero, forcing $a=0$ and $b=\pm 1$. Thus $\partial D$ is a Seifert longitude. Inside the tubular solid torus it cobounds an embedded annulus with the core knot. Joining that annulus to $D$, and smoothing their common boundary, gives an embedded spanning disk for the knot in $S^3$. A knot bounding such a disk is the unknot. Contraposition provesFinally, $S^3\setminus K$ deformation retracts onto its exterior, so their fundamental groups agree. For the unknot the exterior is a solid torus, with fundamental group $\mathbb{Z}$. Conversely, if the knot-complement group were $\mathbb{Z}$, it could not contain an injected subgroup ${\pi }_1(\partial E)={\mathbb{Z}}^2$. The preceding result therefore forces the knot to be trivial. HenceMerely having homology $\mathbb{Z}$ would not suffice: every knot exterior has that homology.

Put $\delta =-A^2-A^{-2}$. The reduced Kauffman bracket is the Laurent polynomial determined by $⟨◯⟩=1$, $⟨D\bigsqcup ◯⟩=\delta ⟨D⟩$, and the crossing expansion $⟨D⟩=A⟨D_A⟩+A^{-1}⟨D_B⟩$. Fix the A smoothing so that a positive curl has multiplier $-A^3$; rotating the local crossing interchanges the smoothing descriptions. Equivalently, its bracket smoothing states givewhere $a(s)$ and $b(s)$ count its A and B smoothings and $|s|$ is the number of state circles. Resolving all crossings proves that the recursive rules define the same polynomial independently of the order of expansion.

Under a positive Reidemeister move of type I, the two resolutions give $A\delta +A^{-1}=-A^3$ times the straight strand; the negative curl gives $A^{-1}\delta +A=-A^{-3}$. Thus the bracket itself is not an unframed link invariant. For type II, use the adjacent cap-cup generator $e$ of the Temperley-Lieb algebra, with $e^2=\delta e$. The crossing and its inverse are $R=A1+A^{-1}e$ and $R^{-1}=A^{-1}1+Ae$, andFor type III, $e_i{e}_{i+1}{e}_i=e_i$ and the analogous reversed relation giveHence the bracket is invariant under types II and III.

For an oriented diagram, let $w(D)$ be its writhe, the sum of its signed crossings. Types II and III preserve writhe, while a positive or negative curl changes it by one or minus one. The Jones polynomial is thereforeThe normalization cancels type I, so all Reidemeister moves preserve it. It is a Laurent polynomial in $t^{1/2}$; its breadth means the largest occurring t exponent minus the smallest, including half-integral exponents for links.

Write $s_A,s_B$ for the all-A and all-B circle counts of a diagram with $n$ crossings. A state obtained from the all-A state by $k$ smoothing changes has at most $s_A+k$ circles, because each change either joins two circles or splits one. Its largest A exponent is consequently at most $n-2k+2(s_A+k-1)=n+2s_A-2$. The symmetric argument from the all-B state bounds every exponent below by $-n-2s_B+2$. Thus the Kauffman bracket breadth bound isFor a connected diagram, construct the Turaev surface by placing A-state circles above the projection sphere, B-state circles below it, inserting one saddle at each crossing, and capping the state circles. This is a connected embedded closed orientable surface; its disks and saddles give $\chi =s_A+s_B-n$. Since $\chi =2-2g_T\le 2$, $s_A+s_B\le n+2$. Writhe normalization changes only a monomial, and $t=A^{-4}$ divides breadth by four. Therefore

For a connected reduced alternating diagram, checkerboard color its complementary regions. Alternation makes all-A circles the boundaries of one color and all-B circles the boundaries of the other. Euler's formula for the connected four-valent projection graph gives $s_A+s_B=n+2$. Its Tait graph and planar dual have no loops: a loop in either, equivalently a loop or bridge in one, gives a nugatory crossing cut off by a simple closed curve. Reducedness excludes precisely such crossings. Changing one smoothing in the all-A or all-B state therefore joins distinct circles, so the diagram is an adequate link diagram.

This also proves that the extreme coefficients cannot cancel. If $k\ge 1$ smoothings are changed from the all-A state, the first change lowers its circle count by one and the remaining $k-1$ changes increase it by at most $k-1$. The largest exponent of that state is at most $n+2s_A-6$, four below the all-A extreme $n+2s_A-2$, whose coefficient is $(-1{)}^{s_A-1}$. The all-B extreme is uniquely attained for the same reason. Consequently

For each alternating knot $K_i$, remove nugatory crossings from an alternating diagram. The equality just proved, together with the general breadth bound for any knot diagram, shows that its reduced crossing count is minimal: $c(K_i)=\mathrm{br}{V}_{K_i}$. Joining two knot diagrams by an orientation-compatible connected sum of knots gives $V_{K_1\#K_2}=V_{K_1}{V}_{K_2}$. Indeed the state circles joined along the sum arc become one, so the bracket state sums multiply, and writhe adds. Nonzero Laurent polynomials have additive breadth, because their extreme coefficients multiply. Hence every diagram of the sum has at least $c(K_1)+c(K_2)$ crossings, while joining the two minimal alternating diagrams achieves that count. Thus

Finally suppose that the two-component link is split. Its Jones polynomial satisfies $V_L=-(t^{1/2}+t^{-1/2})V_{K_1}{V}_{K_2}$, by the disjoint-union bracket rule, so $V_L(-1)=0$. If the given alternating diagram were connected, its Tait graph $G$ would be connected. Evaluate the bracket at $A=e^{\pi i/4}$, where $\delta =0$ and $t=-1$. Only one-circle states survive. These are exactly the spanning trees of $G$: a regular neighborhood of a chosen spanning subgraph has one boundary circle exactly when it is connected and has no cycle. All spanning trees use the same number of black-joining smoothings, $|V(G)|-1$. Since the crossing-to-checkerboard smoothing choice is uniform in an alternating diagram, all surviving state weights are the same nonzero power of $A$. Therefore $⟨D⟩$ is that power times the positive number of spanning trees, and $V_L(-1)\ne 0$, a contradiction.

The diagram is thus disconnected. Each of the two link components projects to a connected subset, so the two projection components can be separated by a boundary curve of a small regular neighborhood in the projection sphere. Hence a split two-component link represented by a reduced alternating diagram has a split diagram.

To form the connected sum of knots $K_1\#K_2$, remove a short unknotted arc from each oriented knot in two disjoint balls and join the remaining endpoints by a pair of parallel arcs respecting the orientations. Equivalently, a sphere meeting a knot in two points cuts it into two one-string tangles; close each by an arc in the sphere to recover its summands. Sliding the small joining balls along the knots shows that the isotopy type does not depend on these choices. The unknot is the identity for this operation. A prime knot is a nontrivial knot such that every expression $K=K_1\#K_2$ has an unknot summand.

We first prove additivity of Seifert genus, which also supplies a terminating measure for decomposition. Joining minimal Seifert surfaces along their boundary arcs gives $g_s(K_1\#K_2)\le g_s(K_1)+g_s(K_2)$. For the reverse inequality, let $F$ be a minimal-genus Seifert surface for the sum and $S$ a splitting sphere of a knot. Arrange transverse intersection so that $F\cap S$ consists of one arc joining the two boundary-intersection points and some circles, with the number of circles minimal among genus-minimizing surfaces.

Each circle separates the sphere into two disks; since it is disjoint from the intersection arc, one disk contains neither marked endpoint. Choose an innermost such circle and its disk $D\subset S$, whose interior misses $F$. If its boundary were essential in $F$, compressing $F$ along $D$ would lower the genus of its component with boundary K: for a nonseparating curve genus drops by one, and for a separating essential curve the removed boundaryless side has positive genus. This contradicts minimal genus. Its boundary therefore bounds a disk in $F$. Replace that disk by a small push-off of $D$, removing the intersection circle without changing genus or boundary, again contradicting minimal intersection. Thus no circles remain.

Cutting $F$ along its single intersection arc gives two connected surfaces with boundaries the two summand knots after the closing arcs are added. Euler characteristic shows that their genera add to $g(F)$. Each genus is at least the minimum genus of its summand, soGenus zero means that the knot bounds a disk and is the unknot. Every nontrivial knot therefore has positive genus. Induct on this nonnegative integer: a nontrivial nonprime knot splits into two nontrivial summands, each with strictly smaller genus by the equality above, and induction decomposes both into primes. This proves every knot is a finite connected sum of prime knots, with the unknot the empty sum. Uniqueness is not needed here.

For coprime integers p,q, define the torus knot as the oriented parametrized curveCoprimality makes it an embedded single circle: two parameters with both coordinate phases equal differ by a multiple of $2\pi$. It lies on the standard unknotted torus separating the two solid tori. Negative exponents change the slope/orientation convention; they are allowed. If an exponent is zero, coprimality forces the other to be plus or minus one, giving an unknot.

Assume now $|p|,|q|\ge 2$. We give a group-theoretic proof that torus knots are prime, making the peripheral ingredient explicit. The Seifert-van Kampen theorem applied to the two solid-torus sides of the exterior, joined along the annulus parallel to the knot, givesHere a and b are the two core loops. The element $z=a^p=b^q$ is central. Under the abelianization $G\to \mathbb{Z}$, choose $a\mapsto q$, $b\mapsto p$; these generate the target because p,q are coprime. Thus $z\mapsto pq\ne 0$, so z is nontrivial. A meridian has, up to conjugacy, the form $m=a^u{b}^v$ with $qu+pv=1$. This follows by tracing the meridional disk across the two torus sides, using a dual primitive slope intersecting the knot slope once. Different Bezout solutions change u by a multiple of p and v by the opposite multiple of q, leaving the same word because z is central.

Quotienting by z gives $G/⟨z⟩=C_{|p|}\ast C_{|q|}$. Neither u nor v is zero modulo the corresponding cyclic order, by $qu+pv=1$. Hence the image of m is a cyclically reduced word of two syllables. All its nonzero powers remain reduced, so it has infinite order. In particular G is nonabelian and the knot is not an unknot.

We use the Loop theorem in its usual form: a noninjective boundary fundamental-group map of a three-manifold supplies an embedded compression disk. For a nontrivial knot, its boundary torus is incompressible. To see why, every sphere in its exterior bounds a ball on the side not containing the knot, by the Schoenflies theorem. A compression of the boundary torus would produce a sphere and make the exterior a solid torus. The compression disk has zero homology class in the exterior, so its boundary is the preferred longitude; attaching the annulus from that longitude to the knot gives a spanning disk and an unknot. This proves that nontrivial knot exteriors have incompressible boundary. Their peripheral groups inject as ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$, so their groups strictly contain the cyclic meridian subgroup.

If the torus knot were a connected sum of two nontrivial knots, van Kampen on the decomposing annulus would give $G=G_1{\ast }_{⟨m⟩}{G}_2$, with the meridian subgroup proper in each factor. The center of a proper amalgam lies in the amalgamated subgroup. One proof uses its Bass-Serre tree: a central elliptic element fixes a vertex orbit and its convex hull, which is the whole tree; a central translation would force the minimal tree to be its invariant axis, but a nontrivial vertex reflection reverses that translation. Thus a central element fixes every edge and lies in the edge subgroup.

The central element z would therefore equal $m^k$. Its image in $G/⟨z⟩$ would give ${\overline{m}}^k=1$, forcing $k=0$ because that image has infinite order. This contradicts $z\ne 1$. Consequently