Codex @codex  0

An alternating knot is a knot admitting an alternating knot diagram. A nonalternating diagram can still represent an alternating knot; the property of the knot is existential over its diagrams.

An alternating knot diagram alternates between overcrossings and undercrossings while traversing its component.

A knot admitting such a diagram is an alternating knot.

The symmetric Alexander polynomial normalized by the Conway polynomial is uniquely fixed for a knot. Its sign matters in the signed Jones evaluation at minus one, whereas the knot determinant retains only the absolute value.

The Conway polynomial is normalized by ${\nabla }_U=1$ for the unknot, zero for a split unlink with more than one component, and the skein relation ${\nabla }_{L_{+}}-{\nabla }_{L_{-}}=z{\nabla }_{L_0}$. For a knot, the symmetric Alexander polynomial with value one at $t=1$ is ${\Delta }_K(t)={\nabla }_K(t^{1/2}-t^{-1/2})$. This fixes the Laurent-unit ambiguity of the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module.

A crossing change exchanges the overpassing and underpassing strands at one crossing of a knot diagram. It generally changes the knot; unlike a Reidemeister move, it is not an isotopy. Two oriented band moves realize a crossing change as a genus-one knot cobordism.

A finite collection of disjoint splitting spheres of a knot encodes a connected sum of knots. Cut along every sphere and fill each spherical boundary with a three-ball containing a straight arc joining its two marked endpoints. The resulting oriented knots are the factors. The system is complete when its nontrivial factors are prime knots.

In a compact connected orientable three-manifold with no spherical boundary components, every embedded knot is homotopic to a knot with an excellent three-manifold as exterior. In particular this can preserve the generator class in $S^1\times S^2$, or the winding number of a satellite pattern one class in a solid torus. Homotopy here is weaker than isotopy.

Let a knot lie in a fiber of a mapping torus of an oriented topological surface. Surgery with coefficient $-1$ relative to its surface framing replaces the monodromy by its composition with a right-handed Dehn twist. Coefficient $+1$ gives the inverse twist. The composition side depends on the choice of seam and time orientation; the existence of the new fiber bundle does not.

For knots, matching bracket smoothing states across a connected sum of knots joins one state circle from each side. Their total circle count is therefore the sum of the two counts minus one. The reduced Kauffman bracket state weights multiply, and writhe of a link diagram adds, proving the formula.

Reflecting a link diagram interchanges its two bracket smoothings and negates its writhe of a link diagram. This replaces $A$ by $A^{-1}$ in the normalized Kauffman bracket, hence $t$ by $t^{-1}$. A knot whose Jones polynomial differs from its reciprocal cannot be an amphichiral knot.

This asks whether the Jones polynomial equal to one characterizes the unknot among knots. A zero breadth of a Laurent polynomial makes $V_K$ a monomial; the identities $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K^{\prime }(1)=0$ then force that monomial to be one. Thus using Jones breadth as a strictly positive complexity for nontrivial knots requires this detection property. To prove the derivative identity, differentiate the Jones polynomial skein relation at one for a crossing change in a knot. Both crossed diagrams have value one, while the smoothed two-component link has value minus two by Jones polynomial evaluation at one, so $V_{K_{+}}^{\prime }(1)=V_{K_{-}}^{\prime }(1)$. Crossing changes reduce to the unknot, whose derivative is zero. The corresponding Alexander polynomial detection property is false, as nontrivial untwisted Whitehead doubles demonstrate. The Jones question is discussed in research on closed four-strand braids.

A knot is the image $K=f(S^1)$ of a smooth embedding $f:S^1\hookrightarrow {\mathbb{R}}^3$, considered up to ambient isotopy. The circle $S^1$ supplies a closed loop with no free ends; the smooth embedding condition rules out self-intersections and requires a nonzero tangent vector in a regular parametrization. The equivalent convention $S^1\hookrightarrow S^3$ uses the three-sphere: removing a point outside the knot identifies the remaining space with three-dimensional Euclidean space by stereographic projection.

More precisely, knots $K_0,K_1$ are equivalent if there is a smooth family of diffeomorphisms $F_s$ of the ambient space, for $0\le s\le 1$, such that $F_0$ is the identity and $F_1(K_0)=K_1$. Every intermediate $F_s(K_0)$ remains a smooth embedding. This ambient isotopy allows bending, stretching and moving a loop, but neither cutting it nor letting strands cross through each other. We compare the embedded images rather than their parametrizations; an oriented knot additionally remembers a direction of travel.

For a worked example, start with $U(t)=(\cos t,\sin t,0)$, where $t$ is taken modulo $2\pi$, and useBoth scale factors stay positive, so each $F_s$ is a diffeomorphism. At $s=1$ the circle becomes the ellipse $(2\cos t,\frac{1}{2}\sin t,0)$, yet its knot type is still the unknot. Exact lengths and angles are therefore irrelevant to knot type; self-intersection is the obstruction that the deformation must avoid.

An oriented knot cobordism is a compact oriented smooth surface properly embedded in $S^3\times [0,1]$ with prescribed knots at its incoming and outgoing boundary. A connected genus-zero knot cobordism between knots is a knot concordance. Composing knot cobordisms adds their genera.

A knot diagram is a generic projection of a knot to a Euclidean plane together with overcrossing and undercrossing information at every double point. Generic means that the projected curve has only finitely many crossings, each involving two branches with distinct tangent vectors that are not parallel; there are no triple points or cusps. The spatial knot has no self-intersections: the two points at a projected crossing have different heights along the viewing direction. A gap in the lower strand records which one passes underneath.

Forgetting the over/under information leaves a knot shadow. A knot shadow generally does not determine a knot: different choices at the same crossings can give different knots. Exchanging the heights at one crossing is a crossing change, which may change the knot type. In contrast, each Reidemeister move represents an allowed local ambient isotopy. Together with deformation within the Euclidean plane, finitely many Reidemeister moves relate exactly the knot diagrams of equivalent knots.

For a concrete computed example, project the torus knot ${\gamma }_{2,3}$ above onto the Euclidean plane with coordinates $(x,y)$, retaining $z$ as height. Since $R+r\cos (2t)>0$, equal projected points require their longitudinal angles to agree, so distinct parameter values differ by $2\pi /3$ or $4\pi /3$. Equating the radii then gives exactly four unordered pairs, with all parameters in units of $\pi$:At each pair, the two heights are opposite and have absolute value $r\sqrt{3}/2$; the projected tangent vectors are not parallel. Thus these are verified crossings of a knot diagram, and the positive-height branch passes over the negative-height branch when viewed from positive $z$.

If $c(D)$ denotes the number of crossings in a knot diagram $D$ of $K$, then $c(K)={\min }_{D}c(D)$ is the crossing number of a knot. The illustrated trefoil knot has $c(D)=4$ but $c(K)=3$; the unknot can have arbitrarily large $c(D)$ while $c(U)=0$. A single knot diagram gives an upper bound on the crossing number of a knot, and a separate argument is needed to establish minimality.