Codex @codex  0

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Orient $S^3$ as the boundary of $B^4$. Push the interior of an oriented Seifert surface $F$ slightly into $B^4$, and let $X_F$ be the double branched covering of $B^4$ over this pushed-in surface. Its boundary is the two-fold branched cover of a knot. Define the knot signature byThe signature of a possibly degenerate intersection form means the number of positive eigenvalues minus the number of negative eigenvalues; its radical contributes zero.

Here is why the definition is independent of $F$. Given two choices $F_0,F_1$, glue their branched covers along the common boundary to obtainThis is the double branched covering of $S^4$ over the closed oriented surface obtained by gluing the pushed-in $F_0$ to $-F_1$. Every closed oriented surface in $S^4$ admits a Seifert hypersurface: its complement has an integral meridional class, represent it by a map to the circle, and take a regular value. Near the surface choose the angular map in its trivial normal disk bundle. The closure of a suitable regular fiber is a compact oriented three-manifold bounding the surface. Its trivial normal framing can be chosen to match this construction.

Push the interior of this Seifert hypersurface into $B^5$. The double branched covering of $B^5$ over the resulting properly embedded three-manifold has boundary $X$. The existence of the cover follows from the meridian homomorphism to $\mathbb{Z}/2$; smoothness near the branch set is the local map $(z,u)\mapsto (z^2,u)$. By the hypothesis about boundaries of five-manifolds, $\mathrm{sign}X=0$. Novikov additivity for gluing along an entire closed three-dimensional boundary givesThus the knot signature is independent of the Seifert surface. An isotopy of the knot carries the construction to an equivalent one, so it is also a knot invariant.

To calculate its intersection form, express $F$ as a disk with $2g$ bands. The double branched covering of $B^4$ over the pushed-in disk is again $B^4$. Each band lifts to a two-handle. The capped lifted cores give a basis of $H_2(X_F;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponding to the band-core basis of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. The framing of the $i$th lifted attaching circle is $2\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{+},a_i)=2V_{ii}$. For distinct bands, the two sheets contribute the two push-off linkings $V_{ij}$ and $V_{ji}$, so the mutual linking number is $V_{ij}+V_{ji}$. HenceA different integral basis changes this matrix by matrix congruence and leaves its signature unchanged.

In Figure 7 the upper knot is a connected sum of knots $T\#T$, while the lower one is $T\#\overline{T}$, where $T$ is the positive trefoil knot. Both knot groups have the same presentationTo see this, the Seifert-van Kampen theorem expresses the knot group of a connected sum of knots as the amalgamated free product of the two summand knot groups, amalgamating their meridians of a knot. A trefoil knot has presentation $⟨a,b\mid aba=bab⟩$ with $a$ a meridian. Reflection gives the same abstract group for the mirror. If it reverses the chosen meridian, send both generators to their inverses; the inverse braid relation is again the same relation. Thus the meridian amalgamation yields the displayed group presentation in both cases.

A band basis for the positive trefoil knot giveswhose symmetrization is negative definite. Therefore $\sigma (T)=-2$ and $\sigma (\overline{T})=2$. Boundary-connected-summing Seifert surfaces makes the Seifert matrix block diagonal, so the knot signature is additive under connected sum of knots. ConsequentlyThe upper knot and lower knot are therefore not isotopic, even though their knot groups are isomorphic. With the opposite global knot signature convention the first value is $+4$, and the distinction is unchanged.

A Heegaard splitting of a closed oriented three-manifold is a decomposition $Y=H_0{\cup }_{\Sigma }{H}_1$ into two handlebodies, with their common boundary the Heegaard surface $\Sigma$. With boundary present, the corresponding pieces are compression bodies, whose negative boundaries account for $\partial Y$.

For the given triangulation, take the barycentric subdivision. A regular neighbourhood $H_0$ of the original one-skeleton is a handlebody: thicken vertices to balls and edges to one-handles, then contract a spanning tree. The complementary region is a regular neighbourhood $H_1$ of the dual one-skeleton, whose vertices are tetrahedron centres and whose edges cross triangular faces. It too is a handlebody. Both graphs are connected, and their common boundary supplies the Heegaard splitting. If the original triangulation has $v$ vertices and $e$ edges, its Heegaard surface has genus $e-v+1$; the dual count gives the same number by $v-e+f-t=0$.

Choose an oriented meridian of a knot $\mu$ and the Seifert longitude $\lambda$ supplied by a Seifert surface for the null-homologous knot. For relatively prime integers $p,q$, rational Dehn surgery removes the interior of a tubular neighborhood and attaches a solid torus with its meridian of a solid torus on the unoriented slope $p\mu +q\lambda$. The choices $(p,q)$ and $(-p,-q)$ describe the same slope; $q=0$ is the original meridional filling. The boundary gluing reverses boundary orientation so that the oriented three-manifold extends across the filling.

For integral coefficients $n_i$, attach two-handles to $B^4$ along the components of the framed link, with their indicated Seifert framing shifts. The boundary operation removes $S^1\times D^2$ and inserts $D^2\times S^1$, with meridian $n_i{\mu }_i+{\lambda }_i$. Thus the compact oriented surgery trace satisfiesFor a finite rational coefficient, use a negative continued fractionReplace that component by an integrally framed chain of successive meridians with coefficients $a_0,\dots ,a_k$. Repeated slam-dunk moves give back $p/q$. Perform this replacement for every rationally framed component, leaving meridional fillings out. The resulting integral framed link has the same filled boundary, so its surgery trace proves that every such rational filling bounds a compact oriented four-manifold.

For a properly embedded oriented topological surface $F=\coprod F_j$, putThis defines the Thurston norm on integral relative homology classes in $H_2(Y,\partial Y;\mathbb{Z})$. Homogeneity extends it to rational classes, and continuity extends it to real classes. It is a seminorm: nonzero classes carried by spheres, disks, annuli or tori can have zero value.

Not every integral class has a connected embedded representative. In $Y=S^1\times S^2$, the class $2[\{\ast \}\times S^2]$ is a counterexample. A connected embedded oriented surface either separates, in which case it is null-homologous, or has connected complement. In the latter case join its two local sides through its complement to obtain a loop intersecting it exactly once. Its homology class is consequently a primitive lattice element. The proposed double has all intersection numbers even, so cannot have such a representative. Two disjoint parallel spheres do represent it.

For the knot exterior in an integral homology sphere, $H_2(Y,\partial Y;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$ is generated by a Seifert surface. Its Thurston norm iswhere $g(K)$ is the Seifert genus in the ambient integral homology sphere. To justify using a one-boundary-component Seifert surface, simplify a minimizing representative's boundary to parallel essential longitudes. The algebraic sum of these longitudes is one. Join oppositely oriented pairs by boundary annuli and push inward; this preserves Euler characteristic and does not increase ${\chi }_{-}$. Discard closed components, which represent zero because the ambient integral homology sphere has $H_2=0$. The component retaining the single boundary is a Seifert surface. This proves the formula, including the disk case.

When $\Vert y{\Vert }_T>0$, $g(K)\ge 1$. In zero Dehn surgery the longitude bounds a meridional disk in the filling solid torus. Cap a minimizing Seifert surface with that disk. The resulting closed surface $\hat{F}$ has the same genus and represents a generator of $H_2(Z;\mathbb{Z})$: its intersection with the filling core is one. ThereforeThe case $g(K)=1$ gives a zero-cost torus, rather than a negative value.

Here is a rigorous family of strict examples with $Z=S^1\times S^2$. Use the excellent knot representative theorem to choose a knot $J$ representing the generator of ${\pi }_1(Z)$ with an excellent three-manifold as exterior $E_0$. Inside $V=\nu J$, choose a winding number of a satellite pattern one pattern $P$ whose two-boundary-component exterior $E_1=V\setminus \mathrm{int}\nu P$ is also an excellent three-manifold. Both choices are available because neither ambient manifold has a spherical boundary component. Put $\Gamma =P(J)$ and $E=Z\setminus \mathrm{int}\nu \Gamma =E_0{\cup }_{\partial V}{E}_1$.

The interface is an incompressible surface. On a Thurston norm minimizing surface in $E$ with boundary the meridian ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$, arrange all interface intersections to be essential. The winding number of a satellite pattern one condition forces the oriented boundary on that interface to have net class ${\mu }_J$. The piece in $E_0$ has odd meridional boundary sum and costs at least one: a zero-cost representative would require an essential disk or annulus, forbidden by excellence. The piece in $E_1$ has opposite net meridians on its two boundary tori. It costs at least two: zero-cost components are boundary-parallel annuli or tori and carry no such boundary class, and its total meridional boundary count is even, so its nonzero negative Euler characteristic has even magnitude. Cutting along the interface adds the costs, since the essential pieces have no disk or sphere components. ThusHere the notation denotes the relative class whose boundary is ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$, not the meridian curve itself. This is the usual Thurston norm gluing along an incompressible torus argument.

Because $\Gamma$ represents the generator of $H_1(Z)$, $H_1(E)=\mathbb{Z}$, its meridian is null-homologous in $E$, and a longitudinal curve ${\lambda }_{\Gamma }$ generates $H_1(E)$. Fill $E$ along ${\lambda }_{\Gamma }$ to obtain $X$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence gives $H_1(X)=0$, so $X$ is an integral homology sphere. Let $K$ be the filling core. Its preferred longitude is ${\mu }_{\Gamma }$; zero Dehn surgery on $K$ consequently recovers $Z$. For this example $\Vert y{\Vert }_T\ge 3$, whereas the product sphere generates $H_2(Z)$ with zero cost. HenceThe construction needs a nontrivial winding-one pattern; merely tying a local knot into the product core would not provide this lower bound.

Consider the symmetric Laurent polynomialIt satisfies $f(1)=1$, so the Alexander polynomial realization theorem gives a knot $K_3$ with ${\Delta }_{K_3}(t)\doteq f(t)$. The polynomial is not a unit of $\mathbb{Z}[t^{\pm 1}]$, whereas

Let $V=S^1\times D^2$ contain the pattern of a satellite knot $P$. Its class in $H_1(V;\mathbb{Z})\cong \mathbb{Z}$ is the winding number of a satellite pattern. Winding number zero therefore makes $P$ null-homologous in $V$, so $P$ bounds an oriented embedded surface $F_P\subset V$. LetFor any companion knot $K$, an embedding $V\hookrightarrow S^3$ as a tubular neighborhood of $K$ carries $F_P$ to a Seifert surface for the satellite knot $P(K)$. Henceand the bound depends only on the pattern.

Every nontrivial oriented knot is a finite connected sum of knots of prime knots, uniquely up to permutation and oriented link isotopy. Existence follows by induction from additivity of Seifert genus. For uniqueness, compare complete decomposing sphere systems for a knot and remove their intersection circles by the prime-ball exchange lemma. Once a prime ball is disjoint from both systems, its factor can be removed from both; induction then matches all factors.

For a null-homologous knot, choose a meridian of a knot $\mu$ and Seifert longitude $\lambda$. Rational surgery with relatively prime numerator $p$ and denominator $q$ fills the knot exterior along $p\mu +q\lambda$. A negative continued fraction for $p/q$ replaces this operation by integer surgery on a chain of meridians, using slam-dunk moves.

Apply the oriented smoothing to every crossing of an oriented knot diagram, fill the resulting Seifert circles by disjoint disks at suitable heights, and reconnect them by twisted bands at the original crossings. The boundary is the original knot. If the connected surface has $s$ disks and $c$ bands, its Euler characteristic is $s-c$ and its genus is $(1-s+c)/2$.

Use the Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial. Choosing $t^{1/2}=i$ in the Jones polynomial skein relation gives $V_{L_{+}}(-1)-V_{L_{-}}(-1)=-2i{V}_{L_0}(-1)$. The quantities $(-1{)}^{\ell -1}{\nabla }_L(2i)$ obey the same relation, because smoothing changes the component count by one. Their unlink values agree, so crossing-change induction proves equality for every link. For a knot, the sign is one and ${\nabla }_K(2i)={\Delta }_K(-1)$. This proves the signed identity, not only equality of knot determinants.

For nonzero coprime integers $p,q$, the torus knot $T_{p,q}$ lies on a standard unknotted torus in the three-sphere and winds $p$ times meridionally and $q$ times longitudinally. Here a meridian of a solid torus goes around the small cross-section of the doughnut, while the longitudinal direction goes around its central hole. The integers count signed turns, so changing one sign gives the mirror of a link of the torus knot. In this article $p$ is always the meridional count and $q$ the longitudinal count.

An explicit parametric curve in three-dimensional Euclidean space iswhere $R>r>0$. Its cylindrical radius $\rho =\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ satisfies $(\rho -R{)}^2+z^2=r^2$, the equation of the supporting torus. Its meridional angle is $pt$ and its longitudinal angle is $qt$: this checks the convention directly rather than relying on the picture. Its squared speed isIf two parameter values give the same point, their difference $\delta$ satisfies $p\delta ,q\delta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$. Bézout's identity for the coprime integers $p,q$ then gives $\delta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$. Thus the loop closes and is an injective function on the parameter circle, with nonzero derivative; it is a smooth embedding.

For example, $R=2$, $r=0.7$, $p=2$, $q=3$ produces a trefoil knot. During one circuit the meridional angle changes by $4\pi$ and the longitudinal angle by $6\pi$. The supporting torus is a guide for construction, not a constraint on later ambient isotopies: the knot may move off it. This family makes arithmetic visible as geometry: the coprime integers determine whether a single traversal visits the whole loop without repetition.

The coprime integers hypothesis matters. If the greatest common divisor is $d=\gcd (|p|,|q|)>1$, the same parametric curve retraces a single component $d$ times; it does not automatically draw $d$ different components. The corresponding torus link is instead the full set of points on the torus whose angles satisfy $q\varphi -p\theta \in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$, with meridional angle $\varphi$ and longitudinal angle $\theta$. It has $d$ disjoint components, each with winding counts $(p/d,q/d)$. For instance, the torus link $T_{2,2}$ consists of two parallel $(1,1)$ loops and is a Hopf link, whereas substituting $(2,2)$ into ${\gamma }_{p,q}$ simply traces one of those loops twice.

For coprime p,q with absolute values at least two, the knot group is $⟨a,b\mid a^p=b^q⟩$. Its nontrivial central element $z=a^p=b^q$ maps nontrivially to the abelianization. A meridian $a^u{b}^v$, where $qu+pv=1$, has infinite order in the quotient $C_{|p|}\ast C_{|q|}$. A composite knot group would be an amalgamated free product of proper factors over its meridian subgroup, whose center lies in that subgroup. Then z would be a meridian power, contradicting the infinite order of the meridian modulo z.

// Target: geometric-group-theory.bigb

The trefoil is the torus knot $T_{2,3}$. It is the simplest nontrivial knot by crossing number of a knot: $c(T_{2,3})=3$. A standard three-crossing alternating knot diagram is reduced, so the Tait crossing-number theorem establishes minimality. The four-crossing knot diagram shown below also represents the trefoil knot, illustrating that a particular projection need not achieve that minimum. Its Seifert genus is one.

Here is a small algebraic certificate that a trefoil knot cannot be deformed into an unknot. One Seifert matrix for a trefoil knot isTaking the determinant gives the Alexander polynomial of a knotwhere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by a Laurent unit $\pm t^n$ in the Laurent polynomial ring. No such multiplication turns this three-term Alexander polynomial of a knot into the unknot's value $1$. Since the Alexander polynomial of a knot is a knot invariant, this computation rules out every possible ambient isotopy between the two knots; it does not merely rule out the deformations we happened to try.

The knot group supplies another certificate. The presentation $⟨a,b\mid a^2=b^3⟩$ maps onto the symmetric group $S_3$ by $a\mapsto (12)$ and $b\mapsto (123)$, since both sides of the relation map to the identity. These images generate a non-abelian group, so the knot group cannot be the unknot's infinite cyclic group. However, a trefoil knot and its mirror of a link have isomorphic knot groups: the abstract knot group alone does not distinguish all knots.

The unknot $U$ is the knot type represented by the planar circleEquivalently, an unknot is a knot that bounds a smoothly embedded disk in the three-sphere. The disk must itself be embedded; merely filling a loop with a map that is allowed to intersect itself does not establish that the knot is an unknot. Flattening a neighborhood of an embedded spanning disk explains why this criterion recovers the planar circle.

A complicated drawing can still represent an unknot. Starting with a crossing-free knot diagram of $U$, insert a small kink by a type I Reidemeister move. The resulting knot diagram has one crossing, but removing the kink exhibits the same unknot. Repeating in separate small regions gives knot diagrams of the unknot with arbitrarily many crossings, although the crossing number of a knot is $c(U)=0$. A drawing's apparent complexity is therefore not a certificate of knotting.

The normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot and Jones polynomial of the unknot are both $1$, and its knot group is the infinite cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}$, because the knot exterior is a solid torus. These are useful comparison values. In particular, a nonconstant Alexander polynomial of a knot certifies that a knot is not an unknot, but the converse fails: nontrivial untwisted Whitehead doubles also have Alexander polynomial of a knot $1$.