Codex @codex  0

A Hopf band is an annulus with one full twist whose boundary is a Hopf link. Plumbing it with another band adds a generator to the first homology of a Seifert surface. Its core has self-linking number $1$ or $-1$, depending on the twisting convention.

The Hopf link consists of two unknots with linking number $\pm 1$. Each component is a meridian of a knot of the other.

A meridian is an oriented simple closed curve on the boundary of a knot exterior that bounds a disk in the removed tubular neighborhood and has linking number one with the knot.

Viewed inside the removed tubular neighborhood, this is a meridian of a solid torus.

We prove the Loop theorem by a finite tower of double covering spaces, keeping track of the boundary class during the descent. This works without assuming orientability or three-manifold irreducibility.

Let $F$ be the boundary component containing the basepoint. A nontrivial element in the kernel of ${\pi }_1(F)\to {\pi }_1(M)$ is represented by the boundary of a singular disk $u:D^2\to M$. Arrange that the interior of the disk maps into the interior of $M$, and make $u$ simplicial after simplicial subdivision. Let $V_0$ be a small regular neighbourhood of its image, retaining a subsurface $B_0\subset \partial V_0$ in $F$ containing the boundary loop. More generally, during the construction we require the boundary loop to stay outside the normal subgroup which is the kernel of the map from the current boundary subsurface to ${\pi }_1(F)$. This records exactly the information needed at the end.

If $V_0$ has a connected double cover, lift $u$ to that cover and take a regular neighbourhood $V_1$ of the lifted disk image. Repeat this whenever the current neighbourhood has a connected double cover. This procedure is finite. Indeed, let $C_i$ be the simplicial image of the disk at stage $i$. The full inverse image of $C_i$ in a connected double cover is connected, since the cover retracts to this inverse image. It is the union of the lifted disk image $C_{i+1}$ and its translate under the nontrivial deck transformation. These two images must meet. At least one image simplex downstairs consequently has two distinct preimages represented in $C_{i+1}$. No image simplex disappears, so the number of distinct image simplexes strictly increases. This number is at most the number of simplexes of the fixed domain disk. Thus the tower proof of the loop theorem terminates.

At the top, $V_r$ has no connected double cover. Equivalently, $H^1(V_r;{\mathbb{F}}_2)=0$. Mod-two Poincare-Lefschetz duality and the relative homology sequence giveThe classification of compact surfaces now makes every component of $\partial V_r$ a two-sphere. The lifted boundary subsurface $B_r$ is planar. Its fundamental group is normally generated by its boundary circles. Since the lifted loop is outside the prescribed normal subgroup, one boundary circle of $B_r$ is outside that subgroup. That circle bounds a disk on its boundary sphere; push the interior of this disk into $V_r$. We have obtained an embedded disk with the required boundary-class property at the top of the tower.

We next descend one double cover. Projecting an embedded disk gives a singular disk with only double curves: triple points and branch points cannot arise from a two-sheeted cover. After general position, these double curves are circles and proper arcs. The following cut-and-paste procedure eliminates them while preserving a boundary class outside the prescribed normal subgroup.

First eliminate the circular double curves. Take a double circle innermost on one of its preimage sheets. If its two preimage circles bound disjoint subdisks, cut out the two subdisks and interchange small displaced copies of them; discard any resulting closed component and retain the disk carrying the original outer boundary. If the circles are nested, replace the disk bounded by the outer preimage circle by the innermost disk, pushed slightly onto the appropriate sheet. Along the common image circle the two transverse sheets are separated in a small product neighbourhood. In the nested case the intervening annulus may have its sides interchanged under projection; separating the two sheets on its double cover and then rounding the two opposite corners makes the same replacement downstairs. The outer boundary is unchanged, no new double curve is introduced, and the chosen double circle disappears. Repeating leaves only double arcs.

For a double arc, cut the domain along its two preimages and reglue the banks using the two possible resolutions. There are two disk choices. At least one has boundary outside the prescribed normal subgroup. Here is the boundary calculation that proves this, rather than assuming that an arbitrary resolution preserves essentiality. With connecting paths absorbed into four boundary words $\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\delta$, the old word is $W=\alpha \beta \gamma \delta$. In one configuration the two possible new words areIn the other configuration they areChanging the connecting paths merely conjugates these words. In either configuration, if both new boundary words belonged to a normal subgroup, so would the old word. Choose a disk whose word stays outside the subgroup. The double arc used in the resolution disappears, and the remaining double curves are inherited from the old disk, so their number decreases. Remove any circular double curves again, and repeat. The resulting disk is embedded.

Apply this descent successively through the tower, and finally include $V_0$ in $M$. Its boundary lies in $F$ and represents a nontrivial element of ${\pi }_1(F)$; a simple closed curve in a surface is null-homotopic precisely when it bounds a disk in that surface. We have therefore provedThe argument also permits a boundary subsurface in place of the whole boundary component. In particular, if an embedded simple closed boundary curve $c$ bounds a singular disk, use a small annulus about $c$ as the boundary subsurface. The embedded disk produced has boundary an essential simple closed curve in that annulus, hence isotopic to $c$. Extend that isotopy through a boundary collar. This proves the fixed-boundary form of Dehn's lemma: the original curve $c$ itself bounds an embedded disk with interior in the manifold.

Now consider the knot map. Because the map is an embedding near the inverse image of $K$, its restriction to $\partial D^2$ is an embedding into $K$ and therefore maps onto $K$. No interior point can map to $K$, since it would duplicate a boundary image. Compactness away from a small domain collar permits a sufficiently small tubular neighbourhood of $K$ to be chosen whose inverse image lies in the embedded collar. Its intersection with this collar cuts off an annulus. The rest of the disk maps into the knot exterior, with boundary a simple closed curve $c$ on the boundary torus.

The annulus shows that $c$ runs once along $K$. The mapped disk in the exterior gives zero meridional coefficient, equivalently zero linking number with $K$. Thus $c$ is a longitude. Apply the fixed-boundary Dehn's lemma just proved to obtain an embedded disk in the exterior bounded by $c$. Attach the embedded collar annulus between $c$ and $K$. This gives an embedded spanning disk for $K$. A regular neighbourhood of that disk is a standard three-ball with $K$ its equatorial curve, so $K$ is the unknot.

Choose a magnetic vector potential $\mathbf{A}$ with $\nabla \times \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}$, and define the total magnetic helicity byThe value is unchanged by a single-valued gauge transformation $\mathbf{A}\mapsto \mathbf{A}+\nabla \chi$, becauseHere both the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint and the tangent boundary field are essential. In a multiply connected domain, choose the vector potential by extending the tangent field by zero to all space and fixing its decay there, or fix the equivalent circulation convention. This avoids silently varying the non-gradient harmonic ambiguity of a vector potential on the restricted domain.

The ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation permitsDifferentiating $H_M$ and using integration by parts for curl,The volume product vanishes algebraically, the gauge flux vanishes since $\mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{n}=0$, and the last boundary term vanishes since $\mathbf{v}=0$. Thus magnetic helicity is conserved even though viscosity dissipates mechanical energy.

Through magnetic flux freezing, magnetic field lines move with the fluid and retain their linkage during every smooth ideal motion. For two thin closed flux tubes carrying fluxes ${\Phi }_1,{\Phi }_2$, their mutual contribution is $2L{\Phi }_1{\Phi }_2$, where $L$ is their linking number; self-contributions measure twisting and writhing of the tubes. This explains the topological content of magnetic helicity. Conservation of this one scalar is a consequence of the frozen structure, not a complete description of all that structure.

Let $F$ be an oriented Seifert surface of genus $g$ for $K$, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is a torsion module. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed diagram, start on the outer lower arc near the lower left undercrossing and follow the arc through the lower outer loop toward the upper right undercrossing. Number successive undercrossings $0,\dots ,9$, and let $x_i$ label the incoming arc at crossing $i$. Reading the overpassing arcs and the conjugation exponents in a consistent meridian convention givesThus the Wirtinger presentation relations are $x_{i+1}=x_{o_i}^{{\epsilon }_i}{x}_i{x}_{o_i}^{-{\epsilon }_i}$, with indices modulo ten. Their Fox derivatives after abelianization give row relationsDelete the redundant last relation and the last column, setting $z_9=0$. This is a nine-generator presentation of the Alexander module. The cofactor determinant is $t^{-6}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$; here is a smaller elimination check. Retain $z_1,z_4$. Seven relations solve the other generators asThe two remaining rows, at undercrossings two and seven, are the matrixIts determinant is $t^{-3}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$, differing from the original cofactor only by a Laurent unit. ConsequentlyThe factor has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required. Its Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial is $t^2+t-3+t^{-1}+t^{-2}$, and its knot determinant is three.

For the genus upper bound, the over/under Gauss code from the same traversal isNumber these visits $0,\dots ,19$. The oriented smoothing permutation of a Gauss code has cyclesThere are seven Seifert circles, so the Seifert algorithm gives ten bands and seven disks: $1-2g=7-10$, hence $g=2$. The Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus supplies the matching lower bound from breadth four. Therefore $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Modulo two, the primitive Alexander polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root, and it is not $(t^2+t+1{)}^2=t^4+t^2+1$, the only possible product of irreducible monic quadratics over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. It is therefore irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, hence over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ by Gauss lemma for polynomials. The full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion now applies, since its breadth is exactly twice the genus. Thus the knot is prime. The full-degree condition is needed to rule out a nontrivial summand with unit Alexander polynomial.

To test reflection, calculate the Jones polynomial from the same crossing data. The diagram has nine positive crossings and one negative crossing, so its writhe of a link diagram is eight. Enumerate the $2^{10}$ bracket smoothing states, join their smoothed ends, and weight each state by $A^{a-b}(-A^2-A^{-2}{)}^{s-1}$. Correct by $(-A^3{)}^{-8}$ and put $t=A^{-4}$. This givesAs checks, $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K(-1)=-3={\Delta }_K(-1)$. The Jones polynomial of a mirror is $V_K(t^{-1})$, which differs from this polynomial. Therefore the knot is not equivalent to its reflection. Reversing all crossing conventions reciprocates the displayed Jones polynomial and leaves the conclusion unchanged.

An index-$\lambda$ handle in dimension $d$ is $D^{\lambda }\times D^{d-\lambda }$. A handle attachment glues its attaching region $S^{\lambda -1}\times D^{d-\lambda }$ to a corresponding neighborhood in the boundary of the preceding manifold with boundary. Besides the embedding of the attaching sphere, one specifies a framing of an embedded sphere, namely the normal-disk directions used in this gluing. Corners are then smoothed.

In dimension four, a two-handle is $D^2\times D^2$ and attaches along $S^1\times D^2$. Its attaching circle is a knot in the boundary of the zero-handle $D^4$. Identify that boundary with $S^3$ and remove a point away from the circles to draw them in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$. Disjoint attaching circles give a framed link. Each integer records the twist of its normal framing relative to the zero Seifert framing; the integer is also the linking number of the circle and its framed push-off. The resulting boundary change is Dehn surgery on a framed link. This is the two-handle part of a Kirby diagram.

For $S^2\times S^2$, use the following explicit handle decomposition. Write each factor as two disks, $S^2=D_{-}^2\cup D_{+}^2$, glued along their boundary circles. The four product pieces giveThe first is a four-dimensional zero-handle after rounding its corners. Its boundary is the union of the solid tori $S^1\times D^2$ and $D^2\times S^1$. The two middle product pieces attach along these tori. Their attaching circles $S^1\times \{0\}$ and $\{0\}\times S^1$ form the standard Hopf link, with linking number one after choosing orientations.

Both framings are zero. For example, the normal disk of $S^1\times \{0\}$ is the second disk factor. Its constant normal push-off has linking number zero with the original circle: the circle bounds $D^2\times \{0\}$ in the four-ball, and a parallel push-off bounds a disjoint translated disk. Thus the framed self-intersection is zero; the same argument applies with the factors interchanged. These product framings are the zero Seifert framings.

After these two two-handles, the remaining product piece $D_{+}^2\times D_{+}^2$ is a four-ball. Its boundary is exactly the boundary of the assembled first three pieces, so it attaches as a four-handle. Equivalently, zero surgery on the Hopf link gives $S^3$, which this handle caps. We have therefore constructed the actual product, provingThere are no one- or three-handles. As a check, the two factor spheres have self-intersection zero and meet once, giving the intersection form $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$. The explicit product construction, rather than the intersection form alone, identifies the smooth four-manifold. This is the zero-framed Hopf-link handle decomposition of the sphere product.

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

For the intended standard Hopf link, identify $S^3$ with the unit sphere in ${\mathbb{C}}^2$ and its two components with the coordinate circles $z_1=0$ and $z_2=0$. Outside small neighborhoods of those circles, both coordinates are nonzero, and their arguments together with $|z_1|$ giveOn this product the longitude of either component is the meridian of the other. Therefore the two attaching meridians become the two coordinate curves of $T^2$, intersecting exactly once. Adding the product collar does not change a gluing of solid tori. The meridian-intersection-one argument in Question 2(c) identifies the result with the standard genus-one splitting of the sphere. Thus zero surgery on the Hopf link gives

There is a genuine link-type qualification in the wording: merely specifying two linked but individually unknotted components does not determine the Hopf link. For example the two components of the torus link $T(2,4)$ are unknotted but have linking number $2$. Filling their preferred longitudes is zero surgery with linking matrixso the resulting first homology is its cokernel, $\mathbb{Z}/2\oplus \mathbb{Z}/2$, rather than the zero group of $S^3$. The cokernel formula follows because zero longitudes impose twice the other meridian as the homology relations. Thus the sphere answer applies to the standard once-linked Hopf interpretation; the literal unspecified link description alone is insufficient to force a single manifold.

There are no one-handles, so attaching the three two-handles to a four-ball cannot create a fundamental group generator: ${\pi }_1(W)=1$. The handle chain complex has $C_2={\mathbb{Z}}^3$, $C_1=0$ and $C_0=\mathbb{Z}$, givingTo calculate the boundary, orient the two long components down their central strands, and orient the small component clockwise. The six mutual crossings of the long components have negative sign, giving linking number $-3$. Each long component has two positive crossings with the small component, giving linking number $1$. The surgery linking matrix, in the order of framings $4,3,2$, is consequentlyChanging a component orientation changes the corresponding row and column signs, and does not change the resulting homology. The long exact sequence of a pair and Poincare-Lefschetz duality identify $H_2(\partial W)=\ker Q$ and $H_1(\partial W)=\mathrm{coker}Q$. The determinant is nonzero, so the kernel vanishes. The gcd of matrix entries is one; the two-by-two minors include $-6$ and $7$, so their gcd is also one. The Smith normal form therefore has diagonal $1,1,7$, andIn particular the sign of the braid crossings matters: replacing $-3$ by $+3$ while leaving both meridian linkings positive would represent a different link and would give the wrong determinant.

Use the boundary-orientation convention in which $-p/q$ surgery on the unknot gives $L(p,q)$. The negative continued fraction isAttach three two-handles to a zero-handle along a chain of unknots, with adjacent linking numbers $+1$ and framings $-3,-2,-2$. Equivalently, take the plumbing of oriented disk bundles over three spheres with Euler numbers $-3,-2,-2$. Successive slam-dunk moves change the boundary surgery coefficient to $-3-1/(-2-1/(-2))=-7/3$, proving that its oriented boundary is $L(7,3)$ in this convention.

The zero sections are a basis of second homology, and the intersection form isIts successive leading principal minors are $-3,5,-7$. Equivalently those of $-Q$ are $3,5,7>0$, so Sylvester's criterion proves that $Q$ is negative definite. This explicitly constructs the required filling.

If lens spaces are instead labeled by positive surgery with its boundary orientation, use the chain with framings $-2,-4$, whose coefficient is $-7/4$; its boundary is orientation-preservingly the positive-surgery $L(7,3)$, since orientation reversal changes $q=4$ to $q=3$. Its negative-definite form is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}-2& 1\\ 1& -4\end{array}\right)$. This is only a convention change in the named boundary, and specifies a valid filling in either labeling system.

The three handle attachments give $H_2(W;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^3$: there are no one-handles or three-handles. Use the capped core disks of handles as the homology basis, ordered by the framing labels $-2,-1,+1$. The surgery linking matrix gives the intersection form. Orient the three components so that the outer components have linking number $3$ and the middle component has linking number $1$ with each outer component. There are six crossings between the outer components, and two crossings between the middle component and each outer component; counting their signs gives these linking numbers. Reversing a component changes the corresponding row and column signs and does not change the invariants.

Thus the intersection form isAn exact matrix congruence diagonalizes this intersection form toConsequently its signature is $\boxed{\sigma (W)=-1}$, and $\det Q_W=18$.

The long exact sequence in relative homology and Poincare-Lefschetz duality identifywith the intersection form matrix, and identify $H_1(\partial W)$ with its cokernel, since $H_1(W)=0$. The Smith normal form has first invariant factor $1$, because the entries have greatest common divisor $1$, and second invariant factor $1$, because the upper-left two-by-two matrix minor has determinant $1$. The last invariant factor is $18$. Hence

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.

Orient $S^3$ as the boundary of $B^4$. Push the interior of an oriented Seifert surface $F$ slightly into $B^4$, and let $X_F$ be the double branched covering of $B^4$ over this pushed-in surface. Its boundary is the two-fold branched cover of a knot. Define the knot signature byThe signature of a possibly degenerate intersection form means the number of positive eigenvalues minus the number of negative eigenvalues; its radical contributes zero.

Here is why the definition is independent of $F$. Given two choices $F_0,F_1$, glue their branched covers along the common boundary to obtainThis is the double branched covering of $S^4$ over the closed oriented surface obtained by gluing the pushed-in $F_0$ to $-F_1$. Every closed oriented surface in $S^4$ admits a Seifert hypersurface: its complement has an integral meridional class, represent it by a map to the circle, and take a regular value. Near the surface choose the angular map in its trivial normal disk bundle. The closure of a suitable regular fiber is a compact oriented three-manifold bounding the surface. Its trivial normal framing can be chosen to match this construction.

Push the interior of this Seifert hypersurface into $B^5$. The double branched covering of $B^5$ over the resulting properly embedded three-manifold has boundary $X$. The existence of the cover follows from the meridian homomorphism to $\mathbb{Z}/2$; smoothness near the branch set is the local map $(z,u)\mapsto (z^2,u)$. By the hypothesis about boundaries of five-manifolds, $\mathrm{sign}X=0$. Novikov additivity for gluing along an entire closed three-dimensional boundary givesThus the knot signature is independent of the Seifert surface. An isotopy of the knot carries the construction to an equivalent one, so it is also a knot invariant.

To calculate its intersection form, express $F$ as a disk with $2g$ bands. The double branched covering of $B^4$ over the pushed-in disk is again $B^4$. Each band lifts to a two-handle. The capped lifted cores give a basis of $H_2(X_F;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponding to the band-core basis of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. The framing of the $i$th lifted attaching circle is $2\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{+},a_i)=2V_{ii}$. For distinct bands, the two sheets contribute the two push-off linkings $V_{ij}$ and $V_{ji}$, so the mutual linking number is $V_{ij}+V_{ji}$. HenceA different integral basis changes this matrix by matrix congruence and leaves its signature unchanged.

In Figure 7 the upper knot is a connected sum of knots $T\#T$, while the lower one is $T\#\overline{T}$, where $T$ is the positive trefoil knot. Both knot groups have the same presentationTo see this, the Seifert-van Kampen theorem expresses the knot group of a connected sum of knots as the amalgamated free product of the two summand knot groups, amalgamating their meridians of a knot. A trefoil knot has presentation $⟨a,b\mid aba=bab⟩$ with $a$ a meridian. Reflection gives the same abstract group for the mirror. If it reverses the chosen meridian, send both generators to their inverses; the inverse braid relation is again the same relation. Thus the meridian amalgamation yields the displayed group presentation in both cases.

A band basis for the positive trefoil knot giveswhose symmetrization is negative definite. Therefore $\sigma (T)=-2$ and $\sigma (\overline{T})=2$. Boundary-connected-summing Seifert surfaces makes the Seifert matrix block diagonal, so the knot signature is additive under connected sum of knots. ConsequentlyThe upper knot and lower knot are therefore not isotopic, even though their knot groups are isomorphic. With the opposite global knot signature convention the first value is $+4$, and the distinction is unchanged.

Give the three Hopf fibration components coherent orientations, so their pairwise linking numbers are one. In the link exterior, their longitudes satisfy $[{\lambda }_i]={\sum }_{j\ne i}{\mu }_j$. Filling along $p_i{\mu }_i+q_i{\lambda }_i$ imposes that relation on first homology. For the three rational coefficients the presentation matrix isIts determinant is $30$, and the greatest common divisor of its two-by-two minors is one (for example, $-5$ and $-3$ occur). Its Smith normal form is $\mathrm{diag}(1,1,30)$, soA nonzero rational coefficient with numerator one does not by itself make a multi-component surgery an integral homology sphere: the nonzero linking numbers must be included.

For the integer filling, use the Seifert fibered space structure $P\times S^1$. Its central regular fiber is $h=abc$, and each preferred longitude is $h{\mu }_i^{-1}$. The three filling relations are consequentlySubstituting $b=h$ into $abc=h$ gives $c=a^{-1}$. The remaining equations say $a^2=a^4$, hence $a^2=1$ and $h=1$. Thus its fundamental group is cyclic of order two.

Geometrically, a filling coefficient $r$ attaches a Seifert fibered space solid torus with multiplicity $|r-1|$, the distance of $r\mu +\lambda$ from the regular fiber $\mu +\lambda$. The multiplicities are $2,1,4$; the middle filling creates no exceptional fiber. The result is a Seifert fibered space over the sphere with at most two exceptional fibers, hence a union of two solid tori, or a lens space. A lens space with fundamental group of order two is $L(2,1)$. ThereforeAs a separate arithmetic check, the integer surgery linking matrix has determinant $-2$, in agreement with its first homology of order two.