2-adic absolute value 2026-10-14
The 2-adic absolute value is the p-adic absolute value for the prime number . It is defined on the rational numbers by for and , and extends to their P-adic number completion . For a nonzero integer, count factors of two until the remaining factor is odd; for a rational number, subtract the denominator's count from the numerator's count.
The associated metric reverses a familiar comparison:
Although is eight units from on the ordinary number line, it agrees with modulo , whereas already disagrees modulo . The 2-adic absolute value measures that agreement. The value also shows why this Non-Archimedean absolute value must be distinguished from the ordinary absolute value .
Figure 1.
Ordinary absolute value and 2-adic absolute value give different distance patterns for the same sixteen integers
. Details.
In the left panel, differences farther from the diagonal grow in ordinary absolute value. In the right panel, nonzero even differences are closer than odd differences, and each further factor of two halves the 2-adic absolute value. The highlighted pairs have opposite distance rankings. The repeated pattern is the nested congruence class structure of an ultrametric space, visible without adding any new points.
Let be a finite Galois extension of a field complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value. Suppose is uniquely closest to among the roots of a polynomial over lying in . Every element of preserves absolute values on a field and permutes these roots. It sends to an equally close root, hence fixes . The Fundamental theorem of Galois theory gives . The converse inclusion need not hold: for roots , the element is uniquely closest to zero but does not belong to .
Coprime factor lifting from valuation-extension uniqueness Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppose a Non-Archimedean absolute value on has a unique extension of an absolute value to every finite extension. Factor a monic into monic irreducible factors over . All factors have integral coefficients because their roots have absolute value at most one. By pure-power reduction of a monic irreducible polynomial, each factor reduces to a power of a single irreducible polynomial. If is a coprime monic factorization, assign each whole irreducible factor of , with its multiplicity, to the unique side containing its residue factor. The resulting monic satisfy and reduce to the prescribed factors. Completeness of is not required for this proof.
For a locally compact field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value, scaling a compact neighborhood makes its valuation ring compact. Its open maximal ideal gives a finite discrete residue field, so that ideal is also closed and compact. A nonzero element of maximal absolute value in the ideal generates it. Successive division by this uniformizer makes the value group discrete.
Suppose a Non-Archimedean absolute value on has a unique extension to every finite field extension. Any K-isomorphism between conjugate roots pulls the absolute value back to an extension on the source field, which must be the given one. Thus for every . This argument includes inseparable irreducible polynomials: no transitive Galois action or completeness assumption is needed.
Let be complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value and let be a finite-dimensional vector space with a norm satisfying and the ultrametric inequality. All such norms are equivalent to the maximum of coordinates in any basis. The upper bound is immediate. For the lower bound, induct on dimension. The span of all but the last basis vector is complete by induction, hence closed for the given norm. Thus . For , ; also . The induction bound on coordinates of now bounds all coordinates by a constant times . This proof needs no local compactness.
Local compactness criterion for a complete non-Archimedean field Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-14
A complete field with a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value is locally compact exactly when its valuation is discrete and its residue field is finite. In that case its valuation ring is the inverse limit of the finite rings and is compact. The nontrivial valuation in the local compactness criterion is essential.
For a field with a Non-Archimedean absolute value, define the coefficient norm for . Then . For nonzero polynomials, scale each by one of its coefficients of maximum absolute value; the resulting polynomials have integral coefficients and at least one unit coefficient. Their reductions in the residue field are nonzero, so their product is nonzero. The product therefore also has coefficient norm , proving the formula after reversing the scaling. This compares binary-polynomial coefficient heights with the heights of their roots.
For a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value on , every integer has absolute value at most one. Some prime must have value less than one, or the value would be trivial on every rational number. Two distinct such primes are impossible by a Bezout identity. Prime factorization then gives the displayed formula. Distinct primes give inequivalent topologies, since powers of tend to zero only for the -adic absolute value among these values.
p-adic absolute value Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Fix a prime number . Write a nonzero rational number as , where and the nonzero integers are not divisible by . The exponent is uniquely determined. Its P-adic valuation is this signed exponent : equivalently, for any nonzero integer numerator and denominator ,
Factors of in the numerator decrease the p-adic absolute value; factors in the denominator increase it. For the computations are:
Rational number FactorizationP-adic valuation 2-adic absolute value
Not applicable by convention
This is an absolute value on a field measuring divisibility, rather than the magnitude on a real number number line. It satisfies
The proof comes directly from P-adic valuations: exponents add in a product of numbers, and extracting a common power of from a sum gives . If the two P-adic valuations differ, the remaining term with smaller exponent cannot cancel modulo , so equality holds. Thus the p-adic absolute value is a Non-Archimedean absolute value. [ref]
The metric makes two rational numbers close when their difference contains a high power of . This packages successive modular congruences into a numerical error estimate, allowing convergence in a metric space and convergent series to encode exact arithmetic information.
For a finite extension of fields complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value, use the unique extended field absolute value. The extension is unramified when its residue extension is a separable field extension and
Equivalently, it has ramification index one, a separable field extension of residue fields, and no defect. For general nondiscrete valued fields, merely saying that the ramification index is one is insufficient; the displayed degree equality is part of the unramified condition.
Put . Since generates the residue extension, are linearly independent over . Their lifts are linearly independent over : a nonzero relation could be divided by a coefficient of largest field absolute value, giving an integral relation whose reduction has at least one nonzero coefficient, contrary to residue independence. They therefore form a -basis of .
For any , choose of largest field absolute value. All coefficients of belong to , and at least one is a unit. Its reduction is a nonzero linear combination of the residue basis, so is a unit of . This proves the residue-basis norm formula for an unramified extension
Hence exactly when every . We conclude
The last equality also uses the fact that every polynomial in the integral element is integral. The proof requires neither a uniformizer nor discrete valuation, and applies to every residue generator specified in the question.
Krasner's lemma states: let be complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value, let be a separable algebraic element over , and let be algebraic over , all in a fixed algebraic closure with the extended field absolute value. If
then . If , the conclusion is automatic and there is no conjugate-distance condition to check.
To prove it, put and take a finite splitting field for the minimal polynomial of over . That is a separable polynomial, so is Galois. The finite extension is complete, and uniqueness of extensions of an field absolute value from a complete non-Archimedean field makes every an isometry. It fixes , so
If , it is another -conjugate and this inequality contradicts the strict hypothesis. Every such automorphism therefore fixes . The Fundamental theorem of Galois theory gives , proving
Only needs to be a separable algebraic element: the proof works even when is inseparable, because the splitting field is taken over .
For a nonzero Laurent series let be its least exponent. Choose and . This is a multiplicative Non-Archimedean absolute value, and its valuation ring is .
Take
If is an -basis of , the elements , , , form a -basis of . To see this, group the exponents of each Laurent series modulo and then expand its coefficients in the constant-field basis. Uniqueness of those two expansions proves linear independence. Thus .
Its valuation ring is , with maximal ideal and residue field . Moreover , so the ramification index is and the residue degree is . The unique extending absolute value is explicitly
This restricts to the chosen absolute value because on . The prescribed ramification and residue degree for a Laurent series field construction works even when ; separability is not required in the question.
A Non-Archimedean absolute value on a field is a function with exactly for , , and the ultrametric inequality . It is nontrivial if some nonzero element has value different from one. Equivalent absolute values induce the same topology; for nontrivial absolute values this is equivalent to for some .
Here is also a proof of the latter equivalence in the case needed. A positive power plainly preserves the open neighborhoods of zero. Conversely, if the topologies coincide, then if and only if in the first topology, hence if and only if . Choose with . For every , and , whether agrees for the two values. Comparison with all rational numbers therefore identifies the two ratios . Thus with .
Now let be nontrivial and non-Archimedean on . Since and every positive integer is a sum of ones, for every integer. If all nonzero integers had value one, multiplicativity would make the absolute value trivial on all rationals. Hence some integer has value less than one; its prime factorization shows that some prime has .
There cannot be two distinct such primes . A Bezout identity with would give
Thus every other prime has value one. Prime factorization of the numerator and denominator of now gives
Conversely is multiplicative and satisfies the ultrametric inequality, since . Distinct primes give inequivalent values: for the -adic absolute value but for . We have proved the non-Archimedean part of Ostrowski theorem:
There is exactly one equivalence class for each prime.
Two absolute values on a field are equivalent absolute values when they induce the same topology. For nontrivial absolute values on a field this is equivalent to
for a fixed real number . The trivial absolute value is equivalent only to itself.
Restriction of a Non-Archimedean absolute value plainly preserves the ultrametric inequality. Conversely, if the restriction is non-Archimedean, every integer, interpreted in either field, has absolute value on a field at most one. In particular every binomial coefficient has absolute value on a field at most one. The triangle inequality applied to the binomial expansion gives, for and every positive integer ,
Raise both sides to the power and let . Since , this yields
This is the bounded-integer criterion for a non-Archimedean absolute value. The proof works for arbitrary field extensions, not just algebraic ones, and in positive characteristic as well.
First include the trivial absolute value if that convention is allowed. For a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value on , every integer has absolute value on a field at most one, and some nonzero integer has absolute value on a field less than one: otherwise every nonzero rational number, being a quotient of two integers, would have absolute value on a field one. Factoring that integer shows that some prime number has .
There cannot be two such prime numbers. If and for distinct prime numbers, choose integers with . Then the ultrametric inequality gives
Every other prime number therefore has absolute value on a field one. Factoring numerator and denominator of a rational number gives
Thus the nontrivial equivalence classes are precisely the p-adic absolute values, one for each prime number.
Now let be a number field, with ring of integers of a number field . If the restriction of an absolute value on a field to is trivial, a monic polynomial over satisfied by forces : if , its leading term would strictly dominate the other terms. Applying the same argument to forces for . Thus a nontrivial absolute value on a field defined on has a nontrivial restriction, associated with some prime number .
Every has , by applying the same leading-term argument to its monic integral equation. Consequently
is a proper prime ideal: it is an ideal by the ultrametric inequality, and with implies that at least one factor has absolute value on a field less than one. It is nonzero because it contains .
The localization lies in the valuation ring of the absolute value on a field: a denominator outside has absolute value on a field one. Since is a Dedekind domain, is a discrete valuation ring. Choose its uniformizer . Each has a unique expression
Both and lie in the valuation ring, so . Also belongs to its maximal ideal, hence . Therefore .
Conversely each nonzero prime ideal of gives the Non-Archimedean absolute value for any , using the discrete valuation of . All choices of are equivalent, and different prime ideals are distinguished by the elements of having absolute value on a field less than one. We have proved Non-Archimedean absolute values on a number field:
The trivial class is additional when trivial absolute values on a field are admitted.
The intended statement uses a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value. Under that convention choose with . A compact neighborhood of zero contains an open ball of some radius . For sufficiently large , is contained in that ball. The valuation ring is closed, so is a closed subset of and is compact. Scaling shows that itself is compact.
Its maximal ideal is open. The residue field is therefore discrete and compact, hence finite: the open cover by its singleton sets has a finite subcover. Since has finite index, its complement is a finite union of open cosets. Thus is also closed and compact.
The continuous absolute value on a field attains its maximum on . Nontriviality supplies a nonzero element there, so this maximum is for some , with . If , then , so .
For arbitrary , choose the integer for which . Then . This element cannot lie in , by maximality of , so its absolute value on a field is one. Therefore . This proves discrete valuation from nontrivial local compactness:
The nontrivial valuation in the local compactness criterion is essential. If the trivial absolute value is admitted, the displayed source claim is false: take with that absolute value on a field. It is complete and discrete, hence locally compact, but its valuation ring and residue field are both , which is infinite. The intended nontrivial case has been proved above.
Every Non-Archimedean absolute value on is either the trivial absolute value, or for a unique prime and some . Here .
To prove this classification, the ultrametric inequality gives for all integers . If every nonzero integer has absolute value one, multiplicativity makes the absolute value on a field trivial on all rational numbers. Otherwise some positive integer has absolute value less than one, and its prime factorization gives a prime with . There cannot be two such primes: if and with integers , then , a contradiction. Every other prime consequently has absolute value one. Unique prime factorization now gives
Conversely these are Non-Archimedean absolute values, by the valuation inequality . Thus . This is the non-Archimedean part of Ostrowski theorem, including the trivial case.