Beam splitter Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
A beam splitter is an optical instrument that routes an incident beam of light into transmitted and reflected beams. It also combines incident complex amplitudes: two inputs can contribute to the same output. A common geometry has four optical ports, with two chosen as inputs and two as outputs. A beam splitter changes the field; a photodetector supplies a measurement.[ref]
For one illuminated input of a passive beam splitter, at specified wavelength, angle of incidence and electromagnetic polarization, define power transmittance , reflectance and radiometric absorptance . In steady operation, with no gain or other source, no net stored energy change, and all escaping light included in the transmitted or reflected collection,
This is conservation of energy divided by incident power. If and count only the intended output beams, include a separate scattered or otherwise uncollected fraction : then . Missing output power need not be wave absorption. For an original specified example, , , and give transmitted, reflected and absorbed; these are assumed values, not measurements.
A 50:50 beam splitter specifies equal output powers for one input, not equal complex amplitudes without a relative wave phase. Recombination needs the beam splitter scattering matrix, including its wave phases. A nonpolarizing beam splitter approximately divides both orthogonal linear polarizations in the same power ratio over its specified operating range; a polarizing beam splitter deliberately routes the two differently.
Figure 1. . Original schematic. Left: the transmitted paths are and ; the reflected paths exchange direction. This ordering defines the beam splitter scattering matrix below. Right: one source is split into two mirror arms and the returning fields meet the same beam splitter again; the photodetector supplies the readout. Separate arrows show outward and returning paths, not separate physical beams. The schematic omits alignment steering mirrors and is not to scale. Details.
The useful surprise is that the same component divides power with one input and steers power by wave interference with two inputs. In a Michelson interferometer or Mach-Zehnder interferometer, mirror motion changes relative wave phase, turning a small change in optical path length into a measurable change in output power.
Suppose the two input beams share frequency, electromagnetic polarization and overlapping transverse profiles at each output, with stable relative wave phase during the photodetector's averaging interval. For the ideal beam splitter scattering matrix above, expanding the squared complex amplitudes gives
The imaginary part terms describe wave interference. Applying the single-input power split to each input separately and adding the results would discard these terms. Their opposite signs ensure : conservation of energy survives even when one output is dark.
For an original example, let , and . Then and :
Relative input wave phase Output power Output power
At , makes and ; at the dark output swaps. Thus the two inputs can feed all their combined power into one output without gain. At zero relative input wave phase, the splitter's own relative wave phase leaves the contributions in quadrature, so neither output is dark.
Figure 1.
Relative input wave phase redirects the combined power of two coherent beams
. Original ideal-model curves for , and . Output powers are normalized by one input's power ; their sum is always . Markers show the three worked cases. These are calculated curves, not measured data. Details.
For fluctuating fields, average the cross term as . It vanishes for mutually uncorrelated inputs, making the independent power-splitting rule valid for the averaged output. Partial first-order optical coherence reduces it. Orthogonal linear polarizations eliminate the cross term in a polarization-insensitive power readout, and spatial mismatch reduces the overlap. Detector averaging can also erase rapid relative wave phase changes. A fixed relation between two inputs can be prepared by splitting one laser beam and recombining the two arms.
An actual teaching protocol in Michelson Interferometer & Precision Wavelength Measurement — Week 1, University of Colorado Boulder, §§4–6, starts with an ideal-model prediction, then builds a Michelson interferometer using a helium-neon laser, a nonpolarizing beam splitter, adjustable mirrors, a micrometer translation stage and a photodetector. Steering mirrors align beam overlap at near and far planes; far-plane interference fringes refine alignment. Moving the arm mirror changes the returning relative wave phase; detector voltage is watched with a live acquisition display or oscilloscope. The guide compares measured arm powers with 50:50 splitting and asks for a revised field model. It tests electromagnetic polarization dependence, optionally changing one arm with a quarter-wave plate, and estimates noise from repeated readings at fixed mirror position. These controls test whether fringe changes reflect coherent recombination rather than splitter imbalance or misalignment. The guide supplies a protocol, not a numerical dataset. Its detector noise, imperfect overlap and electromagnetic polarization mismatch limit displacement inference.[ref]
Additional background subtraction controls follow from the field model: block both arms to record the detector offset and ambient light, then unblock each arm separately to establish its detected power at fixed gain. With both open, scan the mirror and compare extrema after subtracting that background. Keep the detector below saturation and repeat the scan to check drift. A changing signal alone cannot distinguish source optical coherence from motion or changing overlap. For a vacuum round trip, a mirror displacement changes relative wave phase by ; the useful signal is its modulation after detection, not an optical-frequency oscillation that the detector must resolve.
A nonpolarizing beam splitter is designed for approximately equal power splitting ratios for the two orthogonal linear polarizations, at specified wavelengths and angle of incidence. It need not be 50:50, lossless, or have equal transmission and reflection wave phases for both linear polarizations. A scalar beam splitter scattering matrix therefore still requires a specified electromagnetic polarization and operating range. Polarizing beam splitters instead aim to separate those linear polarizations into different paths.