Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 52 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A highest-weight vector is a nonzero vector satisfying and ; its eigenvalue is the highest weight. Existence does not require the Lie algebra representation to be antihermitian. Since is a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space, has an eigenvector with some eigenvalue . The commutator with shows that each nonzero has eigenvalue . Infinitely many such vectors would have distinct eigenvalues and be linearly independent, which is impossible. The last nonzero vector in this raising chain is therefore a highest-weight vector .
Put . The ladder operator relations give . The raising coefficient follows by expanding the commutator of with a power of :The factor is essential: these ladder operators have , rather than the convention with . The same finite-dimensionality argument gives a last nonzero lowered vector , with . Applying to yieldsso . All are nonzero and have distinct eigenvalues. Their span is invariant under and therefore under the original three generators. Irreducibility of the Lie algebra representation makes this span equal to . HenceIn particular, the initial construction produces the largest eigenvalue of , since its full spectrum is now . This establishes the highest weight without assuming beforehand that all eigenvalues are real or that is diagonalizable.
For the additional antihermitian Lie algebra representation, the given definitions imply and . Thus distinct eigenvalues give orthogonal weight vectors. With , write . The adjoint relation and the raising coefficient giveMultiplying this recursion proves the normalized highest-weight lowering formula in the present normalization:Every factorial argument is an integer, even for half-integral . The displayed states have unit norm, mutually distinct eigenvalues, and span , so they form an orthonormal basis. Their phase convention also fixes the positive ladder amplitudeswith the endpoint actions interpreted as zero. These amplitudes will determine the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 43 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A Lie algebra representation is a linear map preserving brackets: . Differentiating a smooth unitary representation of a Lie group gives , an anti-Hermitian operator for each real algebra element . In the physics convention one uses Hermitian generators and writes . Conversely, integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a representation of the connected simply connected group. A representation of another group with the same algebra additionally has to be trivial on the kernel of its covering map.
For the angular momentum commutation relations, take Hermitian and on a positive-definite inner-product space. A highest-weight vector has and . Set . Commuting through each lowering operator gives . Furthermore,so acting on the highest-weight state and summing the coefficients givesTaking the inner product with produces the unitary highest-weight termination recursionThe first factor requires . If is not an integer, the first integer would make the norm negative, while every preceding norm is positive. ThusFor these values, have strictly positive norms and distinct eigenvalues, while has zero norm and hence is zero. They therefore span a space of dimension , invariant under all three generators. Its weights are . This proves integer or half-integer spin and finite dimension . The positive-definite unitary assumption matters: an unrestricted algebraic highest-weight module need not terminate. Normalizing the ladder states yieldsThis is the normalized highest-weight lowering formula with the usual positive ladder phases and units .
Choose the active-rotation convention. The SU(2) lift of an axis-angle rotation isThe Pauli matrix multiplication law shows that conjugating by this matrix produces , withThis is the ordinary three-dimensional rotation. In any spin- representation the corresponding unitary operator and its matrix elements areFor half-integer spin, in this notation includes a choice of lift to SU(2); it does not define a single-valued representation of SO(3).
For the specified Euler-angle order, the rightmost rotation acts first:Here the Wigner D-matrix middle factor is . It can be calculated explicitly by realizing spin as the symmetric product of spin-one-half factors. Write and . The fundamental rotation sends to and to . Expanding a normalized symmetric state with plus signs giveswhere . The exponent counts initially positive spinors that become negative, while counts initially negative ones that become positive; their minus signs and binomial coefficients give the displayed expression. Every factorial argument is an integer even for half-integer spin.
For spin one-half this reduces to the explicit matrixReplacing by reverses both sine and cosine, so every entry changes sign. In particular, a pure rotation gives , while a rotation gives .
Finally, the Adjoint double cover from SU(2) to SO(3) is surjective by the axis-angle construction. Its kernel consists of matrices commuting with all Pauli matrices, hence scalar matrices; within SU(2) these are . ThusTheir Lie algebras are isomorphic, but their global topology and representations differ. In spin , the central element acts as , so exactly the integer-spin representations descend to ordinary SO(3) representations. This is the descent of an SU(2) representation to SO(3) criterion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 48 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Set and let . A concrete irreducible spin representation is the symmetric powerStart with copies of the defining SU(2) doublet and restrict their tensor product representation to the completely symmetric subspace. Its orthonormal basis consists of symmetric states with up components and down components, where . There are such states. The total generators are , acting on this subspace, where are the Pauli matrices. This also constructs the trivial representation when .
The spin ladder operators satisfyThe Casimir operator commutes with every generator. On the highest-weight vector , the identity gives its eigenvalue . With phases chosen to make the lowering coefficients positive,The squared norm of the lowered state follows from . The ladder stops exactly at . Every weight is connected to every other by these operators, and has distinct eigenvalues. Hence any invariant subspace contains a weight vector and then the whole ladder: the representation is irreducible.
For , successive lowering has squared normThus the normalized highest-weight lowering formula isAll factorial arguments are nonnegative integers, including for half-integral .
The unitary representation of an isospin rotation isIts matrix in the weight basis is . Insert the completeness relation between two operators to obtainThese verify the group representation and unitarity properties, and the ladder argument gives irreducibility. Here rotations carry their SU(2) lifts: . Integer descends to the ordinary SO(3) group; half-integral is a representation of its double cover, not a single-valued representation of .
For , order the basis as . The lowering and raising coefficients give the spin-one half-turn matrixMultiplication shows . Reduce the matrix exponential using this identity:At it becomesThus its matrix elements are . In the pion phases , , this isospin rotation exchanges the two charged states with positive coefficients and negates the neutral state.
Charge conjugation is linear and unitary here. Similarity preserves commutators, soConsequently the conjugated generators obey the same Lie algebra. The specified signs also give . Since and the neutral state has positive charge conjugation eigenvalue,The signs depend on the chosen charged-state phases, which have been fixed by the ladder convention.
Conjugation by changes to , exactly as charge conjugation does. Their product, the G parity operator, therefore satisfiesThe Schur lemma makes scalar on each irreducible isospin multiplet, hence independent of . On the neutral pion, . Therefore the pion G-parity is