The dual space is the vector space of all linear functionals on :
Addition and scalar multiplication are defined pointwise. The annihilator of a vector subspace is
It is a vector subspace of : linear combinations of functionals vanishing on also vanish on .
Choose a basis of . Because , the list is linearly independent. Extend it to a basis of . A linear functional is specified uniquely by its values on a basis, so define to be zero on the and on every added basis vector other than , and set .
Then vanishes on every linear combination of the , so , while
This proves that the annihilator of a vector subspace separates every vector outside the subspace from that subspace; no inner product or preferred coordinates are needed.
Every vanishes on , so . Conversely, suppose . Every is a linear combination , giving . If , part (b) supplies a functional in with , a contradiction. Therefore
For the dimension statement, take a basis of and extend it to a basis of . Relative to the corresponding dual basis, a functional belongs to precisely when its first coefficients are zero. Thus
If , this says and the empty intersection is understood to be .
In the coordinate example choose the linear functionals and . Their kernels are the two coordinate planes
Their intersection is the stated axis, and .
The adjoint operator is characterized by
This identity works with either convention for which argument of the complex inner product is linear, provided the convention is used consistently.
For uniqueness, subtract the two given identities to get for every . Fix and choose . Then positive definiteness gives
so . As was arbitrary, . The decisive fact is that a vector orthogonal to every vector, including itself, must be zero.
First suppose . For , choose with . For ,
Thus . The direct sum of vector spaces gives , while the orthogonal complement has . Equal finite dimensions imply .
Conversely, suppose . Decompose arbitrary vectors as and , with and . Since is the indicated projection, and . Orthogonality makes the cross terms vanish, so
Therefore satisfies the defining identity of its own adjoint operator. By uniqueness from part (a), . Hence
This is the characterization of an orthogonal projection among projections along a complementary subspace.
A Euclidean domain is an integral domain admitting a Euclidean function such that division with a smaller remainder is possible: for every and nonzero , there are with
Thus the Euclidean function measures progress in repeated division. Definitions which additionally normalize it to be nondecreasing under multiplication give the same class of Euclidean domains; the division property is the one needed below.
For the zero ideal, choose . Otherwise choose a nonzero for which the Euclidean function is minimal; the well-ordering principle guarantees such a choice. For any , perform Euclidean division:
Because is an ideal, . A nonzero remainder would contradict the minimal choice of , so and . Thus . Conversely, implies , proving
Every ideal is therefore a principal ideal; in particular, a Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain.
For the Gaussian integers, use the Gaussian norm
To identify the ideal, note that is even if and only if have the same parity. Also
This quotient is a Gaussian integer precisely when have the same parity. Therefore the prescribed set consists exactly of the multiples of , giving
Any associate of would generate the same principal ideal.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.