Past exam of the formation of Structure in the Universe course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / Paper 1 / 3

A protostar forms when a self-gravitating cloud fragment can contract faster than pressure support and energy loss can arrest it. A useful local scale is the Jeans length, ${\lambda }_J\sim c_s/\sqrt{G\rho }$, with characteristic Jeans mass $M_J\sim c_s^3/(G^{3/2}{\rho }^{1/2})$ and free-fall timefor an initially uniform sphere. Geometry, turbulence and magnetic support change the detailed threshold; none of these estimates asserts that every cloud contracts as a uniform sphere.

While cooling is efficient, compression is nearly isothermal. Then $M_J$ decreases as the density rises, allowing fragmentation. Rotation becomes increasingly important during contraction because a parcel conserving specific angular momentum $j$ encounters a centrifugal scale $r_c\sim j^2/(GM)$. The resulting accretion disc must transport angular momentum before matter can reach the central object. Infall, a dense accreting interior and an outer envelope can therefore coexist; a protostar is not initially an isolated fixed-mass star.

Increasing optical depth eventually slows radiative cooling. The central gas then becomes less compressible and can form a pressure-supported first core. Molecular hydrogen dissociation absorbs compressional energy and can trigger a second collapse before a compact stellar core is established. Subsequent accretion supplies a luminosity of orderThe retained fraction depends on shock and disc radiation, so this expression is an energy scale rather than a guaranteed luminosity all emerging from the stellar surface.

A central accreting core can be nearly hydrostatic on its short sound-crossing time while its mass, entropy and radius evolve on longer times. A low-mass object is often largely convective because of its opacity and steep radiative temperature gradient; deuterium burning can temporarily contribute to support and moderate contraction. Neither convection nor the timing of deuterium ignition is universal across all masses and accretion histories.

When the main accretion phase ends, gravitational contraction remains an energy source. The virial theorem explains how contraction both heats the interior and supplies radiation: for an ideal-gas-supported object with negligible surface-pressure correction, $2U+W\simeq 0$, so only part of the released binding energy appears as increased thermal energy. The corresponding Kelvin-Helmholtz time isFully convective pre-main-sequence evolution approximately follows a Hayashi track, with decreasing radius and luminosity at comparatively weakly changing effective temperature. Objects developing radiative interiors can follow Henyey tracks. Eventually sustained core hydrogen burning balances the luminosity and the star reaches the main sequence. Massive objects can ignite hydrogen while substantial accretion continues, so “accretion ends, then hydrogen ignites” is not a universal ordering.

A useful structural distinction is therefore between an accretion-powered protostar and a largely fixed-mass pre-main-sequence contraction model. An infrared-bright envelope or disc traces obscured formation and reprocessing of radiation; a schematic evolutionary track should not replace the actual mass- and entropy-dependent stellar-structure problem.

An encounter between galaxies or clusters mainly couples their collective gravitational fields; it need not involve physical impacts between individual stars. Direct stellar collision rates depend on number density, relative speed and gravitational focusing. For two stars the collision cross-section is approximatelyIn an ordinary galaxy, the small geometrical stellar filling factor makes such impacts rare even while the galaxy undergoes a major encounter. Dense stellar cores are an important exception, not a reason to treat all galaxies as collisional fluids.

Tidal forces depend on the gradient of the perturber's field. For a distant fast encounter of mass $M_p$, impact parameter $b$ and speed $V$, the impulse scale for a star at displacement $r$ isA more specific result illustrates the geometry. Put the straight-line perturber trajectory in the $(x,y)$ plane along $y$, with closest approach at $x=b$. In the tidal and impulse limits,for an initially spherical, nonstreaming target with randomly sampled internal phases. The cross term averages to zero, and $⟨x^2+z^2⟩=2⟨r^2⟩/3$. Heating, expansion and tidal stripping preferentially affect weakly bound outer stars. A slow encounter can be adiabatically shielded rather than impulsive; a penetrating or strongly resonant encounter needs more than this distant straight-line approximation.

Disc rotation and orbital orientation matter. Prograde passages can drive stronger coherent distortions than corresponding retrograde passages. Tidal bridges, long tails, asymmetric arms and shells can record the encounter. Restricted gravitational calculations already reproduced prominent bridge and tail structures without requiring individual stellar collisions; full self-consistent models additionally follow the gravity of the responding discs and haloes.^[ref]

A first high-speed passage need not bind the pair. Capture or merging requires orbital energy and angular momentum to be redistributed into internal motions, escaping material, gas radiation or the surrounding halo. Dynamical friction transfers orbital energy to a gravitational wake and can bring a bound satellite inward. In a major merger, the potential changes on orbital times and violent relaxation redistributes stellar energies; phase mixing then smooths fine orbital structure. These are collective collisionless processes, distinct from slow two-body relaxation.

Gas behaves differently from stars: gas streams can shock, dissipate energy, lose angular momentum and fuel a central starburst or active nucleus. Gas-poor mergers are correspondingly more nearly dissipationless. Outcomes depend on mass ratio, orbital angular momentum, relative velocity, halo structure and gas fraction: they range from a modest flyby and tidal debris to disruption of a satellite or a merged remnant. Slow encounters in a group are generally more favorable to merging than otherwise comparable very fast unbound passages, but no single speed or mass-ratio threshold follows without an explicit structural model.

Galaxy formation combines gravitational assembly of dark-matter haloes with dissipative baryonic physics. Primordial density fluctuations supply a statistical seed distribution. In linear theory, each Fourier mode evolves through a growth factor and a scale-dependent transfer function; the power spectrum describes the variance by scale. Radiation pressure, free streaming and the time of horizon entry influence the small-scale transfer, so one should not replace the spectrum by a single universal growing power of time.

When fluctuations become nonlinear, overdense regions collapse, virialize and build larger structures through accretion and mergers. Cold dark matter permits a broad hierarchy of bound haloes. A spherical-collapse threshold and a mass-variance prescription, such as the Press-Schechter formalism, organize an approximate halo abundance; departures from spherical collapse and correlated environments limit its literal interpretation.

Gas falling into a halo is compressed and may be shock-heated toward a virial scaleUnlike collisionless dark matter, it can radiate away thermal energy. A rough cooling time iswhere the denominator specifies a chosen optically thin astrophysical cooling function convention. Cooling is effective for condensation when this time is short compared with the relevant dynamical or supply time. Atomic transitions, molecular processes, ionization state, density and metal abundance matter. A stable virial shock is not obligatory for all accretion: cold dense inflows can supply gas in regimes where shock-heated gas would cool rapidly.

The distinction between a gravitationally assembled massive halo and a radiatively condensing luminous component is fundamental. In the classic two-stage picture, non-dissipative clustering builds potential wells while cooling allows gas to concentrate much further than the halo component.^[ref]

Angular momentum inherited from tidal torques and later accretion helps gas settle into a rotationally supported disc after cooling; disc size depends on angular-momentum retention and transport. Locally self-gravitating gas fragments and forms stars. Stellar radiation, winds and supernovae then heat gas, drive turbulence, enrich it with heavy elements and can expel it from shallow potential wells. Metal enrichment can also accelerate later cooling, so feedback is more than a single positive or negative energy term.

Galaxy growth is usefully expressed as a gas-budget competition:Here $\mathcal{R}$ is the promptly returned stellar mass fraction; unlike the simplification in Question1, a general evolutionary model need not set it to zero. The equation separates newly supplied, converted, expelled and recycled gas rather than assuming that halo mass uniquely fixes stellar mass.

Accreting central black holes can provide radiative and mechanical feedback. Heating a halo, ejecting gas or maintaining a hot atmosphere can reduce fresh fuel; removal of a satellite's gas supply and ram pressure in a surrounding medium provide additional environmental routes. Quiescent galaxy assembly can still add stellar mass through dry mergers, so cessation of star formation is not identical to cessation of all mass assembly.

Mergers and disc instabilities can rearrange morphology and trigger bursts, while smooth accretion can rebuild discs. Cosmological expansion changes the supply and merger environment; accelerated late-time expansion also slows linear growth. A predictive model must connect these mechanisms to the stellar mass function, gas fractions, star-formation histories, sizes, chemical abundances and clustering. Those observables test different pieces of the assembly-and-feedback picture; none alone implies a one-to-one instantaneous relation between galaxy luminosity and total halo mass.