Past exam of the general relativity course of the University of Oxford / 2021 / 4

On large scales the appropriate background is the spatially flat FLRW metric,Here $t$ is cosmic time, the proper time of a comoving observer; $R(t)$ is the scale factor; and $(r,\theta ,\varphi )$ are dimensionless comoving coordinates. With this convention $R$ has units of length. A fixed comoving radial interval has instantaneous proper length $R(t)dr$. The cosmological principle assumes spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy on the scales where this background description applies.

The general FLRW metric instead has $d{r}^2/(1-k{r}^2)$ in its radial part, with normalized $k=+1,0,-1$ describing positive, zero or negative spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. The best simple description takes $k=0$; observations constrain spatial curvature to be small rather than proving it identically zero. The late accelerated expansion is encoded by the time dependence of $R$, determined by the stress-energy tensor through the Friedmann equations, rather than by an additional term in the FLRW metric. Small-scale galaxies and other inhomogeneities require perturbations of this background.

For a perfect fluid in general relativity, let $\rho$ be rest-frame total energy density divided by $c^2$, $P$ its isotropic pressure, and $U^{\mu }$ its four-velocity, normalized by $U^{\mu }{U}_{\mu }=-c^2$. ThenThe contracted Bianchi identity and the Einstein field equations give stress-energy conservation, ${\nabla }_{\mu }{T}^{\mu \nu }=0$, for a constant cosmological constant. Contract with $U_{\nu }$ and use the normalization to obtainIn comoving coordinates $U^{\mu }=(1,0,0,0)$ and the covariant divergence is ${\nabla }_{\mu }{U}^{\mu }=3\dot{R}/R=3H$, where a dot is a cosmic time derivative and $H$ the Hubble parameter. ThereforeFor a fixed region in comoving coordinates, let $V(t)=V_{\ast }{R}^3(t)$ be its physical volume, where $V_{\ast }$ is a fixed coordinate-volume integral, and let $E=\rho c^{2}V$. Since $\dot{V}=3HV$,Thus the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation is exactly equivalent to the adiabatic first law of thermodynamics, $\boxed{dE=-PdV}$, for every nonzero such region. Conversely, expanding that first law of thermodynamics and dividing by $c^{2}V$ recovers the same equation. No heat or particle flux crosses the comoving boundary; interacting components separately need source terms, although the total still obeys this conservation equation.

There is a sign inconsistency in the supplied formula sheet worth isolating. Its Riemann curvature tensor and Ricci tensor conventions, together with its stated $-+++$ metric signature, give $G_{tt}=-3H^2$ for $R(t)=e^{Ht}$ with constant $H$. Its vacuum Einstein field equations with $+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }$ then require $H^2=-\Lambda c^2/3$, whereas its printed vacuum Friedmann equation gives $H^2=+\Lambda c^2/3$. For example, $H>0$, $\rho =P=0$ and $\Lambda =3H^2/c^2$ satisfy the latter but leave the former's $tt$ component equal to $-6H^2$. Changing the geometric cosmological constant term to $-\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }$ repairs this mismatch. The conservation derivation is unaffected; below take the geometric cosmological constant to be zero and include any vacuum energy as a fluid, so no ambiguous sign enters.

Write the equation of state as $P=w\rho c^2$. Integrating the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation for constant $w$ gives $\rho \propto R^{-3(1+w)}$. With spatial flatness and the geometric cosmological constant set to zero, the Friedmann equation is $H^2=8\pi G\rho /3$.

In S1, $w=-1$ describes vacuum energy: $T_{\mu \nu }=-\rho c^2{g}_{\mu \nu }$ and $\rho$ is constant. Its negative pressure drives accelerated expansion, $\ddot{R}/R=8\pi G\rho /3=H_1^2$, and the expanding solution is $R\propto e^{H_{1}t}$. This is the ideal de Sitter spacetime approximation to cosmic inflation. An exactly constant vacuum component cannot end its phase unaided; a phase transition or reheating mechanism is required for the assumed change to S2.

In S2, $w=1/3$ describes an isotropic bath of ultrarelativistic particles, such as photons, with negligible rest mass relative to their energy. The number per physical volume falls as $R^{-3}$, while the energy per particle redshifts as $R^{-1}$, so $\rho \propto R^{-4}$. This radiation-dominated universe has $R\propto (t-t_{\ast }{)}^{1/2}$ on its expanding branch.

In S3, $w=0$ describes pressureless matter, or relativistic dust, with negligible random kinetic energy. Conserved particle number and approximately fixed rest energy give $\rho \propto R^{-3}$. A flat universe containing only this component is the Einstein-de Sitter universe, with $R\propto (t-t_{\ast }{)}^{2/3}$. The constants $t_{\ast }$ are integration offsets in the individual phases; they need not represent one common start time when phases are matched.

For monotonically expanding scale factor $R$, $dt=dR/(RH)$, so the elapsed cosmic time isThe second expression uses cosmological redshift $1+z=R_0/R$; the age of the universe is the limit to its earliest specified state, if that limit is finite.

An age comparison for an initial vacuum-dominated phase needs a common normalization. Match the two histories at the end of S1, with $R=R_1$ and $H=H_1>0$, and give them identical subsequent S2 and S3 evolution, including transition radii and today's state. Below $R_1$, the history with S1 has constant $H=H_1$. The comparison history extends S2 backwards, so $\rho \propto R^{-4}$ and $H=H_1(R_1/R{)}^2$. Starting both at $R_i=ϵR_1$, where $0<ϵ<1$, their early durations areThe difference is positive becauseThe common later evolution adds the same time to both histories. Thus S1 makes this matched universe older. More strongly, as $R_i\to 0$, the exact S1 duration diverges logarithmically, whereas a radiation beginning has finite duration $1/(2H_1)$ to the match. The exact de Sitter spacetime expanding patch reaches $R=0$ only as $t\to -\infty$ for its comoving observers; a finite “age since $R=0$” does not exist in this ideal model. This does not establish past geodesic completeness of the patch.

The matching assumption is essential for a finite cutoff or realistic finite period of cosmic inflation: arbitrary changes of the present Hubble parameter or transition densities prevent a universal age comparison. The literal zero-size limit in this question is instead the infinite-duration idealization just derived.

The actual large-scale expansion is well described by the Lambda-CDM model: radiation in cosmology, ordinary baryonic matter, cold dark matter and late-time dark energy coexist. A component becomes dominant through continuous changes in their density ratios, rather than every previous component disappearing at an instantaneous phase boundary. Matter pressure is small in its nonrelativistic regime, but radiation persists, and massive neutrinos interpolate between relativistic and nonrelativistic behavior.

There is also a late accelerated era, absent from a model ending permanently in S3. It is consistent with nearly constant vacuum energy, whose negative pressure eventually dominates because pressureless matter dilutes as $R^{-3}$. The scale factor then ceases to follow the pure $t^{2/3}$ Einstein-de Sitter universe law.

An early phase of cosmic inflation is a well-motivated model rather than a directly observed exact $w=-1$ phase. Successful cosmic inflation must end and transfer its energy to matter and radiation through reheating; realistic models generally have slowly varying $H$ and $w$ close to, rather than exactly equal to, $-1$. Extrapolating a strictly constant $H$ to arbitrarily small $R$ is not a measurement of the universe's past duration. Finally, spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy apply statistically on large scales: galaxies, gravitational waves and other perturbations are absent from the exact FLRW metric, and small spatial curvature remains an observational possibility.