Past exam of the quantum condensed matter course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / 4

Relaxation-time model. The Drude model treats mobile charge carriers as independent particles accelerated by the Lorentz force between scattering events. Collisions randomize the drift momentum toward local equilibrium and are represented by a uniform, field-independent momentum relaxation time. For the present calculation the carrier density, isotropic mass and relaxation time are fixed, the fields are uniform and stationary, and quantum orbital quantization and intercarrier correlations are neglected. The steady drift velocity obeysHere $n$ is the number of carriers of that species per unit volume, $q$ their signed charge, $m>0$ their inertial or isotropic band mass, $\tau$ the momentum relaxation time, and ${\sigma }_0$ their single-species electrical conductivity at zero field.

One-carrier tensor. With $\mathbf{B}=B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and $\mathbf{J}=nq\mathbf{v}$, solving for the electric field givesSince $(\mathbf{J}\times \mathbf{B}{)}_x=B{J}_y$ and $(\mathbf{J}\times \mathbf{B}{)}_y=-B{J}_x$,Thus the resistivity tensor, defined by $\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{\rho }\mathbf{J}$, isIts off-diagonal signs follow from the stated axes and signed $q$. For zero transverse electric current, $E_y/J_x=B/(nq)$ is the Hall electrical resistivity; reversing charge reverses it. The single-species longitudinal electrical resistivity is independent of $B$ in this ideal isotropic model.

Adding Electrons and electron holes. Let both species have density $n$ and charges $q=\pm e$, with $e>0$. The stipulated equal zero-field electrical conductivity means equal positive charge carrier mobility $\mu ={\sigma }_0/(ne)$, even if their masses and momentum relaxation times separately differ. Put $r=1/{\sigma }_0$ and $h=B/(ne)$. Inverting each electrical resistivity matrix givesBoth species experience the same electric field, so their electric current densities add. Therefore it is their conductivity tensors, rather than their resistivity tensors, that must be summed. The Hall parts cancel andThis is compensated two-carrier magnetoresistance. Although the net Hall field vanishes, each carrier species is bent in its own direction; maintaining the total longitudinal electric current requires an increasing longitudinal field. Equal carrier numbers alone do not ensure zero Hall response if charge carrier mobilities differ; both equalities given here are used.

Large-field limit and quantum oscillations. Expanding the exact diagonal entry,For $\mu B\gg 1$,Here the last equality applies to either species with its own mass and transport time; the stipulated charge carrier mobilities give the same threshold. This is the classical strong-field condition ${\omega }_c{\tau }_{\mathrm{tr}}\gg 1$: carriers turn substantially before their drift momentum relaxes.

Observable quantum oscillations additionally require sufficiently sharp Landau levels and a sufficiently cold Fermi-Dirac distribution, approximatelyWhen ${\tau }_q\simeq {\tau }_{\mathrm{tr}}$, the disorder field scale is comparable to the onset scale for large classical magnetoresistance. The thermal condition can demand a much larger field, and when ${\tau }_q\ll {\tau }_{\mathrm{tr}}$ even the disorder criterion is stronger. The quantitative damping factors in Q2(c) show that these are crossover scales rather than sharp visibility boundaries. A large smooth $B^2$ magnetoresistance therefore does not itself demonstrate Landau level; it can exist while thermal smearing suppresses oscillations. Conversely, the asymptotic condition ${\omega }_c{\tau }_{\mathrm{tr}}\gg 1$ is stronger than merely reaching unity, so there is no universal ordering of the two experimental onset fields without temperatures and lifetime information.

Scaling function. The material's actual zero-field longitudinal electrical resistivity is ${\rho }_{\mathrm{tot}}(0)=1/(2{\sigma }_0)$. Dividing the exact answer by this value givesThe assumption that $n$ stays constant is essential to eliminating further temperature-dependent parameters. $B{\sigma }_0$ is a dimensionful scaling variable; $B{\sigma }_0/(ne)=\mu B$ is its dimensionless version. The corresponding fractional increase is $[\rho (B)-\rho (0)]/\rho (0)=(\mu B{)}^2$.

What the supplied data test. In the original PDF's left panel, the field dependence is strongly temperature dependent. In the right panel, plotting the fractional magnetoresistance against the squared rescaled field makes the displayed 125, 150, 175, 200 and 225 K curves collapse approximately onto one straight line, over the field intervals where they overlap. This supports the proposed one-parameter scaling and, on that range, the quadratic field law. The 100 K curve does not collapse: it bends away and has a different slope in the rescaled plot. The indicated scaling is therefore supported for the displayed 125–225 K data, not for the entire displayed temperature range. The graph alone does not locate a sharp transition between 100 and 125 K or establish behavior above 225 K.

This empirical collapse is Kohler's rule. It is consistent with a common temperature-dependent charge carrier mobility or relaxation scale and a fixed carrier population; it is not a unique proof of exact compensation or of one microscopic scattering mechanism. A change in relative scattering times, carrier population or Fermi-surface structure could spoil the collapse, and this figure alone does not select the cause of the 100 K departure.

There is a factor-of-two normalization convention in the printed text. The ${\sigma }_0$ introduced for each species gives ${\rho }_{\mathrm{tot}}(0)=1/(2{\sigma }_0)$, whereas the final paragraph calls $1/{\sigma }_0$ “${\rho }_0$.” If ${\rho }_0$ denotes the experimentally measured zero-field electrical resistivity, the consistent slope isIf one instead keeps the literal single-species definition ${\rho }_s=1/{\sigma }_0$, the same model has $[\rho (B)-{\rho }_s]/{\rho }_s=-1/2+[B/{\rho }_s{]}^2/(2n^2{e}^2)$. The choice rescales and offsets the axes by temperature-independent constants, so it does not change which temperature curves collapse, but it must be resolved before inferring a carrier density from the slope.