Past exam of the relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / Paper 1 / 3

Astrophysical jets are directed plasma outflows whose bulk energy and momentum remain concentrated near an axis over distances much larger than the launch region. They occur around accreting black holes and neutron stars and in forming stellar systems, with very different characteristic speeds and scales. An accretion reservoir supplies binding energy; a rotating black hole can additionally provide spin energy through electromagnetic stresses. An observed jet therefore does not uniquely identify either a black hole or a particular launch mechanism.

Magnetic fields couple the rotating engine to the outflow. Gas tied to suitable open field lines can be accelerated centrifugally from a disc; a large-scale poloidal field threading a rotating hole can support outward electromagnetic energy flux. Farther out, magnetic stresses, hoop stresses and external pressure can aid collimation. Pressure-driven acceleration, magnetic-to-kinetic conversion and entrainment depend on loading and environment. A simple stationary axisymmetric picture does not guarantee stability against kinks, mixing or disruption.

The emission commonly contains synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons spiraling in magnetic fields. Its broad continuum and linear polarization constrain the particles and ordered field component; inverse Compton scattering can extend radiation to higher photon energies. Compact knots can be shocks or moving patterns rather than individual material parcels. Interaction with the surroundings creates shocks, hotspots, cocoons and radio lobes, transporting energy far beyond the central emission region.

Relativistic viewing effects are crucial. If a feature moves at speed $\beta c$ at angle $\theta$ toward the observer, its Doppler factor isA comoving emission frequency is observed at ${\nu }_{\mathrm{obs}}={\delta }_D{\nu }^{\prime }/(1+z_{\cos })$. For a discrete isotropically emitting moving feature with spectral index $F_{\nu }^{\prime }\propto {\nu }^{\prime -s}$, the flux enhancement scales as ${\delta }_D^{3+s}$ in the usual unresolved-blob approximation. Continuous-jet conventions give a different exponent, so apparent brightness is not a direct orientation-free jet-power measurement.

Light-travel delays also produce apparent superluminal motion. In a source time interval $\Delta t$, the transverse displacement is $\beta c\Delta t\sin \theta$, but the observer receives the two signals separated by $\Delta t(1-\beta \cos \theta )$. ThereforeThe maximum is $\Gamma \beta$, at $\cos \theta =\beta$. An apparent speed above $c$ violates no local speed limit. The receding jet is deboosted, so an intrinsically two-sided source may look one-sided; absorption and environmental differences can also contribute.

Jets feed back on their host systems by depositing mechanical energy, inflating cavities, accelerating particles and modifying surrounding gas. Radio luminosity measures only part of that budget; unseen ions, magnetic fields, radiative losses and work on the environment all matter. Connecting the compact engine to a large lobe therefore requires both relativistic emission physics and the dynamics of its surroundings.

Gravitational lensing maps source directions into observed image directions because spacetime curvature deflects null geodesics. In the weak-field limit the deflection by a point mass at impact parameter $b$ isFor a thin lens, angular diameter distances $D_l,D_s,D_{ls}$ relate the angles throughA point lens has Einstein angleand in a one-dimensional source alignment its two images satisfyExact alignment gives an Einstein ring for an ideal circular lens; finite source size and departures from symmetry alter the ideal image.

The mapping's Jacobian determines area magnification and parity. Its determinant can vanish on critical curves, whose source-plane images are caustics; a source near a caustic can produce highly stretched arcs or changing image multiplicity. In geometric optics, gravity is achromatic and preserves surface brightness after the usual redshift factors, while changing the apparent solid angle and total flux. Frequency-dependent source size, extinction and plasma propagation can modify an observed broadband image without changing this basic gravitational law.

Strong lensing produces multiple images, arcs and relative time delays. In angular variables the delay surface is proportional toup to an irrelevant additive constant. The geometrical path and gravitational potential delay both contribute. Monitoring a variable multiply imaged source can constrain the time-delay distance, provided the lens mass distribution and external convergence are modeled.

Weak lensing produces small coherent distortions in background galaxy shapes. Convergence describes isotropic focusing and shear describes anisotropic stretching. In a thin-lens convention,Statistical shear correlations probe projected matter structure and cosmological growth; intrinsic alignments, shape noise and selection require control. Compact masses can instead produce microlensing magnification changes when individual image separations are unresolved.

Lensing weighs both luminous and dark gravitating matter and can reveal mass concentrations without requiring hydrostatic equilibrium. It is nevertheless a projected and model-dependent inference: the mass-sheet degeneracy, line-of-sight structure and uncertain source redshifts can mimic changes in inferred mass or distance. Strong, weak and microlensing therefore constrain different scales and complement dynamical, photometric and cosmological measurements rather than automatically recovering a unique three-dimensional mass map.

The age of the universe is a proper time along comoving cosmological observers, inferred within an expansion model; stellar ages provide partly independent consistency checks. In an expanding FLRW model with a big-bang origin,where $a_0=1$. The Hubble time $H_0^{-1}$ is a characteristic scale, not generally the age. For flat radiation and dust universes, $t_0=1/(2H_0)$ and $2/(3H_0)$, respectively.

For a flat matter-plus-vacuum model neglecting radiation in the age integral,As an explicitly illustrative contemporary model, the Planck2015 temperature-plus-lensing estimates $H_0\simeq 67.8\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and ${\Omega }_m\simeq 0.308$ give about $13.8\mathrm{Gyr}$. This is an inference under the assumed flat cosmology, not a model-independent clock reading or a numerical constant supplied in the examination.^[ref]

The lookback time to an object observed at redshift $z$ isThe object's age at emission cannot exceed this cosmic time, and its formation occurs later than the big bang. A stellar population observed at large redshift therefore constrains both stellar evolution and the cosmological time available, rather than simply carrying today's cosmic age.

A star cluster's main-sequence turnoff traces the most massive stars still burning core hydrogen. More massive stars generally consume their usable fuel faster; fitting a color-magnitude diagram with stellar-evolution tracks can infer the population's formation time. The estimate depends on distance, reddening, composition, helium abundance, mixing and the binary population. Old globular clusters give lower limits on the cosmic age, with a formation delay between the big bang and the cluster.

White-dwarf cooling sequences provide another clock: thermal energy and crystallization physics determine how luminosity decreases after the remnant forms. The faint-end population must be combined with progenitor lifetimes and the star-formation history. Radioactive abundance ratios supply nucleocosmochronology. If two isotopes with decay constants ${\lambda }_1,{\lambda }_2$ start at ratio ${\mathcal{Q}}_0$, their measured ratio satisfiesThe initial production ratio and subsequent chemical mixing can dominate the uncertainty; a measured abundance ratio alone is not an exact formation date.

Kinematic expansion ages $R/v$ can estimate young remnants but require a dynamical model because deceleration changes the relation between present speed and elapsed time. Agreement among cosmological, stellar, cooling and radioactive estimates is powerful precisely because their systematic errors differ. An apparently over-age object calls for examining both the astrophysical clock and the cosmological assumptions before claiming a contradiction.

Supernovae are explosive stellar events with different energy sources and progenitors; a remnant is the expanding ejecta and shocked environment left afterward. Their spectra classify the observed event, while explosion mechanisms give a related but distinct physical classification. Lack of hydrogen absorption defines TypeI spectroscopically; TypeII shows hydrogen. TypeIa typically shows silicon features, while stripped-envelope core-collapse events can be TypeIb or Ic.

In core collapse, an evolved massive star's central core loses support as nuclear processing ceases to supply stable pressure support, electron captures reduce electron pressure and photodisintegration consumes energy. Collapse can form a neutron star or black hole. A shock launched near core bounce loses energy, so a successful explosion requires additional processes, often modeled through neutrino heating aided by multidimensional flow; some collapses fail to eject a bright ordinary supernova. The compact remnant and neutrino emission distinguish this channel physically from a thermonuclear disruption.

TypeIa explosions involve thermonuclear burning of a carbon-oxygen white dwarf in a binary-related evolutionary channel. Both near-Chandrasekhar and sub-Chandrasekhar routes are studied; no single progenitor path is forced by the spectral classification alone. Radioactive nickel and cobalt decay can power much of the later optical emission. Empirical light-curve standardization makes these events useful distance indicators, but dust, population differences and calibration must be controlled; they are not intrinsically identical candles.

Initially ejecta may expand nearly freely, with radius $R_s\sim v_{\mathrm{ej}}t$, until swept-up external mass becomes dynamically important. The shock heats the surrounding gas and a reverse shock heats ejecta. For an approximately spherical, adiabatic explosion of fixed energy $E$ into a uniform density ${\rho }_0$, dimensional analysis gives the Sedov-Taylor stage:The dimensionless coefficient $\xi$ depends on the equation of state; no value is needed without specifying that model. For a strong nonrelativistic shock in a monatomic gas, an equilibrated post-shock temperature scale is $k_{B}T\simeq 3\mu m_p{v}_s^2/16$. Collisionless electron and ion temperatures may differ.

Later radiative losses can produce a dense cooled shell. Idealized pressure-driven and momentum-conserving snowplough models then have different expansion exponents; the environment and continuing interior pressure determine which description applies. For uniform ambient density and conserved shell momentum, $M_{\mathrm{swept}}{\dot{R}}_s\propto R_s^3{\dot{R}}_s$ gives $R_s\propto t^{1/4}$. Real remnants can be asymmetric and encounter nonuniform winds or clouds.

Thermal X-ray emission traces shocked plasma, optical lines trace cooling gas, and radio synchrotron emission traces relativistic electrons and magnetic fields. Shocks can accelerate cosmic rays and alter the energy budget. Ejecta abundances, a surviving compact object, pulsar-powered nebulae and the remnant's dynamics help reconstruct the explosion, but present morphology alone does not uniquely identify the progenitor.

Supernovae enrich the interstellar medium, stir and heat galactic gas and can drive outflows or trigger local compression. Their feedback couples small stellar scales to galaxy evolution. Quantifying that effect requires accounting for cooling and the collective environment rather than assigning all explosion energy to a permanently retained galactic reservoir.

The equivalence principle connects the universality of freely falling motion to the local description of gravity. In Newtonian language a test body's response to a given field is proportional to $m_g/m_i$. Equality of that ratio for different non-gravitating test bodies gives the weak equivalence principle: identical initial conditions yield identical free-fall trajectories, independent of composition. Negligible nongravitational forces and negligible disturbance of the background are part of the test-body limit.

The Einstein equivalence principle adds local Lorentz invariance and local position invariance for nongravitational experiments. A sufficiently small freely falling laboratory obeys the local laws of special relativity independently of its spacetime location and freely falling velocity. Uniform acceleration of a small laboratory can imitate the leading local effects attributed to a gravitational field. An observer held at rest in a gravitational field generally needs proper acceleration; a freely falling observer does not.

Mathematically, local inertial coordinates can set the metric to Minkowski form and the Christoffel symbols to zero at an event. The geodesic equation there has no connection term at that point:This coordinate choice does not remove curvature. With a standard curvature convention, nearby free-fall trajectories have relative accelerationThe tidal signal survives in an extended laboratory. Thus the principle is local and does not identify every gravitational field with acceleration globally. Finite-size spin and tidal couplings also qualify the ideal point-test-body statement.

The strong equivalence principle extends the universality to gravitational experiments and bodies whose gravitational self-energy is important. It is stronger than the Einstein principle and need not hold in every metric theory that satisfies local nongravitational equivalence. Comparing the Earth and Moon as they fall toward the Sun probes this distinction as well as composition effects. Lunar laser-ranging analyses test differential acceleration by fitting the lunar orbit and measured ranges; an interpretation in terms of self-energy requires separating ordinary composition-dependent violations.^[ref]

Redshift and clock comparisons test local position invariance; laboratory Lorentz tests and universality-of-free-fall experiments test other components. These are complementary tests, not deductions from a single numerical equality of inertial and gravitational mass. The principle motivates geometric gravity and minimal coupling, but does not by itself derive the complete Einstein field equations or determine the value of the gravitational constant.