Inside the infinite square well, , and the time-independent Schrödinger equation isFor , write and . The first Dirichlet boundary condition gives , and the second requires for a nonzero state. The case is identically zero; negative only changes an overall quantum phase. For a linear solution satisfying both walls is zero, and for the hyperbolic solutions likewise cannot satisfy both walls nontrivially.
Wavefunction normalization, , fixes . The orthonormal energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues are thereforeEach state vanishes outside the well. Its stationary time-dependent form is . General states are normalized superpositions of these modes, rather than additional single energy eigenstates.
Assume the given wavefunction is zero outside . Wavefunction normalization requiresAn arbitrary overall quantum phase is unobservable, so choose the positive real representative .
The linear ramp state in an infinite square well has a boundary subtlety: the limiting value at is , rather than zero. The function is still a normalized element of the well's Hilbert space , so position measurement and energy-projection probabilities are meaningful. It is not in the domain of the Dirichlet Hamiltonian, nor is it a finite-energy box state. Altering the value at the single endpoint does not cure its nonzero boundary trace; a physical finite-energy preparation must smooth the function to zero near the wall. The following probabilities refer to the supplied idealized state.
Apply the position version of the Born rule to the normalized wavefunction:The result is independent of because the state and the measurement interval scale together. Most position probability lies towards the right wall, since the probability density grows as .
An energy measurement selects the ground state with probability equal to the squared inner product with . Using and integration by parts,ThusThe full Fourier sine series has , so , an independent wavefunction normalization check. However for every , hence diverges. This explicitly verifies the infinite-energy expectation qualification in part (b), without invalidating the individual projection probabilities.
The two probabilities concern different quantum measurements, so there is no requirement that they match or that one bound the other. The spatial interval contains little of the state: its probability density is smallest near zero and increases towards . By contrast, the positive ground state extends across the whole well. It has substantial same-sign overlap with the positive linear wavefunction, with no cancellation between lobes in the overlap integral. The right panel of the figure in solution illustrates these two amplitudes and marks the small position interval.
Consequently a large global ground-state probability can coexist with a small probability of finding the particle in the left third. This is not because the ground state is spatially confined to that third; a ground-state particle can be found throughout the well. In operator language the two events are projections onto a spatial subspace and onto one energy eigenstate, respectively.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.