Past exam of the short options paper of the physics Prelims of the University of Oxford / 2022 / S02 (Astrophysics: from planets to the cosmos)

Assume spherical stars, central eclipses, uniform disc surface brightness, and negligible third light. Let $s$ denote the smaller star and $\ell$ the larger one, with $r=R_s/R_{\ell }\le 1$ and ${\ell }_s=L_s/L_{\ell }$. Normalize the out-of-eclipse flux to one, and denote the deep and shallow fractional losses by $D$ and $d$. The graph gives approximately $F_{\mathrm{out}}\simeq 0.98$, $F_{\mathrm{deep}}\simeq 0.57$, $F_{\mathrm{shallow}}\simeq 0.90$, so $D\simeq 0.42$, $d\simeq 0.08$; the last digits are graphical estimates.

At total occultation of the smaller star, the lost flux is $L_s/(L_s+L_{\ell })$. At its central transit across the larger star, the lost flux is $r^2{L}_{\ell }/(L_s+L_{\ell })$. There are two identifications:

These are ratios of luminosities in the observed band. Treating them as bolometric luminosities requires similar band corrections or an explicitly bolometric light curve. Limb darkening and finite exposure times limit the precision of these elementary estimates.

The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives $L=4\pi R^2\sigma T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4$ for bolometric luminosity. HenceWith the central values above, this is approximately $1.51$ for the first geometry and $0.67$ for the second. If only one-band luminosities are measured, bolometric corrections are needed before using this formula for effective temperatures.

Two direct methods are fitting the continuum stellar spectrum or several photometric colors to a stellar atmosphere model, and measuring temperature-sensitive absorption lines or line ratios in a stellar spectrum. The former includes the approximate black-body radiation estimate ${\lambda }_{\max }T=b$ from Wien's displacement law; the latter uses ionization and excitation populations. Observations during total eclipse or spectral disentangling help separate the two stellar spectra.

For comparable composition and accessible fuel fractions, the main-sequence lifetime is proportional to available nuclear fuel divided by luminosity, $t_{\mathrm{MS}}\propto M/L$. Estimate the masses from a calibrated mass-luminosity relation $L\propto M^{\alpha }$ in the appropriate mass range. ThenFor illustration $\alpha =3.5$ gives about $1.27$ and $5.6$ for the two graphical luminosity ratios. The common main sequence approximation is additional physics; eclipse depths alone do not determine masses or ages. A main sequence consistency check would also favor the second geometry because ordinary main-sequence stars have radius and effective temperature increasing with mass.

Let $r$ be radial position, $\mathcal{F}=L/(4\pi r^2)$ the outward radiative energy flux, and $P_r=a{T}^4/3$ the radiation pressure. A thin layer absorbs a fraction $\kappa \rho dr$ of an incident directed beam. Since a photon carries momentum $E/c$, the outward force per unit volume deposited by the radiation is $\kappa \rho \mathcal{F}/c$. Balance it against the radiation pressure gradient:Substituting $d{P}_r/dr=(4a/3)T^{3}dT/dr$ yields the radiative diffusion equationThe sign expresses outward energy flux down the temperature gradient. The approximation assumes optically thick material and near local thermodynamic equilibrium, with an appropriate mean opacity.

The printed attenuation law describes the loss from an incident beam; it is not generally the radial derivative of the net luminosity, since absorption is accompanied by emission. For a concrete counterexample, in a steady envelope without local energy generation the net luminosity is constant even though $\kappa \rho >0$ and $dT/dr<0$. Applying $dL/dr=-\kappa \rho L$ to that net luminosity would contradict energy conservation. The local momentum deposition argument supplies the physically correct derivation.

Write $m(r)$ for enclosed mass. The stellar hydrostatic equation is $dP/dr=-Gm\rho /r^2$. If radiation pressure dominates, compare it directly with the radiative diffusion result for $d{P}_r/dr$:This is the limiting Eddington luminosity scaling, assuming fixed composition and electron-scattering opacity.

If gas pressure dominates, use stellar homology: characteristic density $\rho \sim M/R_{\ast }^3$ and pressure $P\sim G{M}^2/R_{\ast }^4$. The ideal gas law then givesEstimating $|dT/dr|\sim T/R_{\ast }$ in radiative diffusion givesThus at fixed $\mu$ and constant electron-scattering opacity, $\boxed{L\propto M^3}$. These are stellar homology estimates for radiative stars, not exact relations valid for arbitrary composition and internal transport.

The same gas-pressure stellar homology estimates give $T\propto \mu M/R_{\ast }$ and $\rho \propto M/R_{\ast }^3$. With Kramers' opacity law $\kappa \propto \rho T^{-7/2}$, radiative diffusion givesConsequently the claimed exponent five additionally requires the approximate low-mass main-sequence mass-radius relation $R_{\ast }\propto M$ and fixed composition:The supplied opacity and pressure assumptions alone do not establish that mass-radius relation. For example, a homologous fixed-radius family obeys those scaling assumptions but gives $L\propto M^{11/2}$, not $M^5$. More generally $R_{\ast }\propto M^q$ gives $L\propto M^{(11-q)/2}$. Very low-mass stars can be convective, where this radiative model ceases to apply.

Use ${\rho }_r,{\rho }_m$ as energy per volume, as specified in the prose, and let $R$ have dimensions of length so that the positive curvature magnitude $k$ is dimensionless. The Friedmann equation for spatial curvature $-k$ isFor an energy density the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation is $\dot{\rho }+3H(\rho +P)=0$. Nonrelativistic matter has negligible pressure and radiation has $P_r={\rho }_r/3$. Thus the four contributions to $H^2$ scale respectively asFor nonzero positive densities and $\Lambda >0$, the usual possible sequence is radiation domination, matter domination, curvature domination, then cosmological-constant domination. A distinct era for each is not guaranteed: coefficients may cause curvature to be overtaken by the cosmological constant before it ever dominates. If $\Lambda =0$, curvature dominates asymptotically; negative $\Lambda$ does not give a late positive vacuum-dominated expansion.

The printed auxiliary relation $P_r={\rho }_r{c}^2/3$ uses mass-density notation, in conflict with the stated energy-density definition. It is consistent if ${\rho }_r$ there is understood as energy density divided by $c^2$; in that convention the density term in the Friedmann equation is $8\pi G\rho /3$. The two conventions must not be mixed.

In the prescribed matter-dominated approximation, neglect curvature, radiation, and the cosmological constant throughout the calculation. The Friedmann equation and ${\rho }_m\propto R^{-3}$ give $\dot{R}\propto R^{-1/2}$, hence $R\propto t^{2/3}$ and $H=2/(3t)$. For $H_0=70\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}=2.269\times 10^{-18}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$,The particle horizon is a proper distance on a constant-time slice, not simply $ct$:ThereforeThese are estimates within a spatially flat, matter-only model, rather than the measured age and particle horizon of the actual late-time universe.

Normalize the scale factor to $a(t_0)=1$ and set $a_d=10^{-3}$. In the same matter-only model $a=(t/t_0{)}^{2/3}$, soIts present proper size after expansion with the scale factor isThe present comoving distance to decoupling isThe angular diameter distance is $D_A=a_d{\chi }_d$, so the angular size of a transverse length equal to one particle horizon radius isIf “the horizon” denotes the diameter of the whole causally connected ball, its angular diameter is twice this, approximately $3.74^{\circ }$. The degree-scale conclusion is the same. Neglecting early radiation is an explicit approximation inherited from the question.

The angle estimates the largest transverse region at decoupling that could have established causal contact after the big bang in the assumed decelerating model. The cosmic microwave background has nearly the same temperature in directions separated by much larger angles. This is the horizon problem: those regions have no shared causal history in that simple model, yet their thermodynamic conditions are strikingly alike. The particle horizon should be distinguished from the smaller sound horizon, which controls acoustic propagation in the primordial fluid.

An early epoch dominated by a sufficiently large positive effective cosmological constant gives $\ddot{R}>0$ and approximately $R\propto e^{Ht}$. During this cosmic inflation, the comoving Hubble length $c/(RH)$ shrinks. A patch that was initially in causal contact can expand to contain the whole presently observable cosmic microwave background surface, while expansion suppresses spatial curvature. A finite period of cosmic inflation followed by reheating and the usual hot expansion therefore explains the uniformity without superluminal local signals. An eternally large unchanged cosmological constant would prevent the later matter-dominated history; an exit from cosmic inflation and reheating are required. Sufficient duration and a suitable pre-inflationary causal patch are part of this explanation.