For a hyperelastic material . Material frame indifference of this first Piola-Kirchhoff law meansThe spatial force components rotate under a superposed rigid rotation, whereas the reference normal does not.
If , differentiate with respect to in direction to obtain , hence the displayed stress transformation. Conversely, assume that stress transformation. For fixed , the derivative of with respect to vanishes. The positive-determinant matrix domain is connected, as follows from polar decomposition and the connectedness of and of the positive-definite cone. Thus , independent of . Iterating givesThe assumed lower bound on forces : either nonzero sign would tend to minus infinity for one direction of integer . This proves the required equivalence and explains the use of the lower-bound hypothesis.
In the frame-indifferent setting, isotropy means invariance under reference rotations as well: for . The distinction matters: left rotations encode changes of observer, and right rotations encode material symmetry.
An orientation-preserving singular value decomposition is , with and . Material frame indifference and isotropy remove , leaving a function of the stretches. Permuting the stretches using signed permutation rotations does not change the value, so is symmetric. Conversely a symmetric stretch function is unchanged by both left and right rotations, in particular is isotropic.
The eigenvalues of are . Its three principal invariants areThey determine the unordered positive eigenvalues as the roots of . Therefore a symmetric stretch function defines a well-defined on the admissible invariant triples. Conversely a function of these invariants is a symmetric stretch function, proving the equivalence of all three descriptions.
The printed domain of must be , since it takes three arguments. Also isotropy alone as right invariance would not imply the spectral representation without material frame indifference: for a fixed nonscalar symmetric positive-definite is right invariant but not generally objective. The equivalence here uses the frame-indifferent constitutive setting.
For the specific energy, Newton identities for the three eigenvalues gives , while . ThusTo differentiate it, useThese follow from , the displayed trace formula for , and . The three partial derivatives of are , and . The chain rule therefore givesFinally , and . This is precisely the requested expression, with the coefficient of separated from the and cofactor terms. The positive sign of the term comes from the contribution in the energy.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.