Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 2 14G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For unit , put . Then and , so is an orthogonal matrix. The affine reflection in a hyperplane is . Hence preserves the Euclidean norm and distance, and whenever . Thus it is an Euclidean isometry fixing the hyperplane pointwise.
For , any reflection exchanging them must have normal parallel to , and its fixed hyperplane must contain their midpoint. These requirements determine the perpendicular bisector uniquely:Changing both signs of leaves the same reflection. It belongs to the orthogonal group exactly when its translation term vanishes, that is, . Since ,To prove the finite reflection decomposition of a Euclidean isometry, first note that a distance-preserving map fixing zero preserves inner products by the polarization identity. Its values on an orthonormal basis form an orthonormal basis, and shows . Thus is orthogonal.
Every orthogonal transformation is a product of at most linear reflections: if , reflect to using the hyperplane normal , which passes through zero. The resulting orthogonal transformation fixes , and its restriction to is handled inductively in dimension . If , no initial reflection is necessary. Reflections on the complement extend by fixing ; the induction starts in dimension zero.
For an arbitrary isometry , if , first reflect to zero across its perpendicular bisector with zero. Composing this one affine reflection with gives an orthogonal transformation. If , skip the initial reflection. ThereforeThe glide reflection cannot use fewer than three: its determinant sign is negative, excluding zero or two reflections, while absence of fixed points excludes a single reflection. Three suffice by reflecting successively in , , and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 3 10F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Associate to the symmetric bilinear form . If is identically zero, every basis is diagonal. Otherwise choose with . Every has the decompositionwhose second term lies in . Thus , with no cross term in . Induction on dimension gives a diagonal basis. Rescaling its nonzero entries reduces the form towith additional zero coordinates. Define the rank of a quadratic form and its signature . Rank is intrinsic, since it is the rank of , equivalently . Also is the greatest dimension of a subspace on which the restriction of is a positive-definite quadratic form: any such subspace intersects the negative-plus-zero coordinate space only at zero, so its dimension is at most , while the positive coordinate space attains . The corresponding negative statement identifies . This proves the basis independence of and , the Sylvester's law of inertia conclusion.
For a totally isotropic subspace on which vanishes, polarization identity also makes vanish on . Quotient by the radical of a bilinear form. In the resulting nondegenerate form, projection of an isotropic subspace to either the positive or negative coordinate space is injective, so its dimension is at most . Consequently . The radical of a bilinear form together with the vectors , , attains this bound. The maximum dimension of a totally isotropic subspace is thereforeThe criterion for membership in a diagonal basis follows similarly: a nonzero vector can belong to a diagonal basis if it has nonzero quadratic value, by the same orthogonal splitting, or if it lies in the radical of a bilinear form, by choosing a radical basis containing it. An isotropic vector in a diagonal basis must be orthogonal to every basis vector, and hence must lie in that radical. For the specified form, its radical is the -axis, giving exactlyThe zero vector never belongs to a basis.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use polarization identity of the quadratic variations:This is continuous and adapted, starts at zero, and has finite variation on every compact interval because it is a difference of two nondecreasing processes. The defining quadratic variation property gives that and are continuous local martingales; their difference divided by four is . This proves existence without assuming a product formula involving an as yet undefined quadratic covariation.
If and both satisfy the requirements, is a continuous finite-variation process and a local martingale. By continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant, it is constant; its initial value is zero, so up to indistinguishability of stochastic processes.
There is a minor initial-value convention in this characterization. The displayed uncentred local martingale identity is directly valid when , or when the initial terms have the requisite integrability. With arbitrary finite initial values, centre the quadratic variation construction and use , which starts at zero. Adding back requires it to be integrable under the usual definition of a local martingale; the quadratic covariation itself is unaffected by centring.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 202 2 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
By the Itô formula,To compute the Stratonovich integral correction, apply the Itô formula also to , which is twice continuously differentiable because is . The continuous local martingale part of is , where is the continuous local martingale part of . A finite-variation process has zero quadratic covariation with , and the quadratic variation of a stochastic integral together with polarization identity givesAll these statements can be localized to compact ranges of , so unbounded derivatives create no global integrability requirement. Substitute this identity into the Stratonovich integral to obtain the Stratonovich chain rule:This is the integrated meaning of the requested differential identity; there is no extra second-order term after the Stratonovich integral correction has been included.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ib Paper 3 10F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The symmetric bilinear form associated with a quadratic form is obtained by polarization:To diagonalize it, argue by induction on . If for every , polarization gives , so every basis works. Otherwise choose with . Thenand diagonalize the restriction to inductively. Thus some basis gives a diagonal matrix with positive, negative, and zero entries. By Sylvester's law of inertia, their counts are basis-independent. In the convention relevant here, the signature of a quadratic form is
Suppose lies in the radical of a bilinear form, so for all . Then andHence is a well-defined quadratic form on the quotient vector space . In an adapted diagonal basis, quotienting by merely removes zero diagonal directions, so and , and therefore the signature, are unchanged.
Now let . Its Gram matrix iswhich has determinant . Thus is nondegenerate and has one positive and one negative square: it is a hyperbolic plane (quadratic form) and has signature zero. Nondegeneracy gives the orthogonal direct sumSignature is additive under orthogonal direct sums, so
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 8F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Let satisfy for every vector . If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise choose with . For every and every real number ,so the hypothesis gives . Taking two values of shows that . Sincewe obtain . Thus one of the two linear functionals is zero.
Sylvester's law of inertia says that, in a suitable basis, every real quadratic form isThe rank is , and the signature is ; both are independent of the chosen basis.
If , its polar form has image contained in , so . If , the two functionals must be independent and, after taking their sum and difference, is a difference of two squares. Hence . If , then . In every case,Conversely, this inequality leaves onlyup to a linear change of coordinates. These factor respectively as , , and . Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 4 1F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A Hermitian form is conjugate-linear in its first argument, linear in its second, and satisfies . For , the hypothesis says . The complex polarization identitytherefore gives for all .
The displayed matrix is Hermitian. By Sylvester's criterion, its leading principal minors areHence the form is
Choose any tangent vector and let the affinely parametrized geodesic with initial tangent start at . If is totally geodesic, then remains zero. Its initial derivative is therefore zero. Part iii, with at , givesThis holds for every tangent . Since is symmetric, the polarization identity implies
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 358 2 b Solution 2026-09-28
Let and be the projection-valued measures of and . Using the projection , defineThe scalar spectral measures converge weakly whenfor every bounded continuous function and every . By the spectral theorem for normal operators on a separable Hilbert space, this is equivalent to
The assumed moment identities say precisely that this convergence holds for every monomial . It follows by linearity for every polynomial. For , the identity givesso Markov inequality makes the positive measures tight. Higher even moments similarly control the tails of any fixed polynomial.
Given a bounded continuous and , choose so that the measure tails are uniformly small. The Weierstrass approximation theorem supplies a polynomial withMoment convergence handles ; tightness and a sufficiently high even moment handle the two tails. Hence . The polarization identity then gives the same conclusion for . This proves weak convergence of scalar spectral measures.
The assertion fails if only is assumed. Let , let , take , and letThe reversal matrices are self-adjoint unitaries. For fixed ,because the finite head of one vector is paired with the vanishing tail of the other. Thus the condition holds. However, , soin general. Taking shows that the spectral measures do not converge weakly.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ib Paper 4 8F Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
The symmetric bilinear form associated with a real quadratic form is obtained by polarization identity:In coordinates , replacing by its symmetric part does not change , and the formula gives ; this proves existence. A symmetric form is positive semidefinite when for every , and positive definite when the inequality is strict for every .
The diagonalization theorem for real quadratic forms says that some basis puts any symmetric form intowith further zero coordinates. Sylvester's law of inertia says that is independent of the diagonalizing basis. To prove this, let be the span of the positive coordinate vectors and let be the span of the negative and zero vectors. If is positive definite for another diagonalization and , thenso the two spaces intersect nontrivially. A vector in the intersection would have both positive and nonpositive square, a contradiction. Thus ; symmetry gives . Applying the same argument to gives , and then .
For the nondegenerate form on , write its inertia as , so . The restriction vanishes identically on : polarization gives for . Projection of to the positive coordinate space is injective, since a vector with zero positive projection cannot be isotropic unless it is zero. Hence ; projection to the negative space likewise gives . Therefore .
The matrix of is . If , it has rank one and inertia , hence signature one; if , its rank and signature are zero. The coefficientwise product has matrix , where , so it has the same rank-one conclusion when and is zero otherwise.
Finally, diagonalization writes every positive semidefinite form as a sum of squares, say and . Bilinearity of coefficientwise multiplication givesa sum of positive semidefinite rank-at-most-one forms. Thus is positive semidefinite.
Quadratic covariation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
The quadratic covariation of two continuous semimartingales is the limit in probabilityThe polarization identity gives .