Sheldon Goldstein Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-10-31
Spatial reflection Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Spatial reflection reverses every spatial coordinate.
In 1913 Johannes Stark reported that an applied electric field resolved the hydrogen and spectral lines into five components at his instrument's spectral resolving power, viewed perpendicular to the electric field. Three inner components had polarization of an electromagnetic wave perpendicular to the electric field; two outer components had it parallel.[ref]
In his lecture of 3 June 1920 for the 1919 prize, Johannes Stark describes canal rays emerging through a perforated cathode into the electric field between it and a supplementary electrode. A spectrograph recorded the emitted light. His earlier Doppler effect comparison used a collimator perpendicular to the beam and then along approaching rays. Later beam/electric field reversal changed component intensities.[ref]
The historical account distinguishes observation perpendicular to the electric field, with five resolved components, from observation parallel to it, with three. These are viewing directions, distinct from the direction of the polarization of an electromagnetic wave.[ref]
The experimental distinctions matter. Changing the viewing direction tests a Doppler effect contribution; changing the applied electric field tests the Stark effect; analyzing polarization of an electromagnetic wave separates components that may overlap in an unpolarized record. A comparison with the unperturbed spectral line fixes the origin of a displacement. These are different controls, and the earlier Doppler effect comparison should not be described as a field-off control of the later discovery. A spectrograph's finite spectral resolving power can merge several components into one. In particular, a count of visible spectral lines does not by itself count all energy eigenstates.
Figure 1.
Stark spectroscopy: field, beam and viewing axes
. Original conceptual reconstruction of the canal ray source and two alternative viewing geometries. No dimensions, electric field strengths or measured wavelengths are specified. The axial optical path requires an opening or adapted electrode; it is not a ray passing through the solid electrode drawn here. Details.
For a modern idealization of the gap, an electric potential difference over separation gives only if edge effects and the charge density in the gas are negligible. This is a calibration model, not a historical value assigned to Stark's apparatus. Similarly, a canal ray beam need not be a pure beam of neutral excited hydrogen atoms; the quantum mechanics model below isolates one neutral hydrogen atom from the source's preparation and collision processes.
Stuart Freedman Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-10-31
A physicist who researched nuclear physics and experimentally tested Bell inequalities.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Stuart Freedman
. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Commons author field and photoarchive source). CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Subatomic particle Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-18
A subatomic particle is a constituent of matter or radiation smaller than an atom. It may be elementary or composite.
Terry Rudolph Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-10-31
The three-dimensional translational momentum integral is per unit volume, where
Variational method Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-13
The variational method estimates the lowest energy of a Quantum Hamiltonian by choosing a trial wavefunction, evaluating its energy, and optimizing the trial parameters. It uses the quantum variational principle, the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle expressed for quantum states. Let be a self-adjoint operator bounded below, and define , the bottom of its spectrum. Every normalized admissible trial quantum state satisfies
When is an energy eigenvalue, it is the ground-state energy; equality holds precisely for a quantum state in the ground-state subspace. Otherwise the bottom of the spectrum need not be attained by any normalizable wavefunction.
Admissible means finite form energy. Choose a real and use the shifted quadratic form of a positive quantum Hamiltonian:
The form domain is independent of this choice of and can be larger than the operator domain . For , is the usual expectation value; for nonzero unnormalized trials, divide by to get the form version of the Rayleigh quotient. See the quantum variational principle for the general domain justification.
Thus each trial energy is an upper bound on , and minimizing within a trial family improves that upper bound. It is not a lower bound on . The Gaussian variational energy for the harmonic oscillator reaches because its family contains an exact ground state. The exact variational solution in a two-level system makes the equality condition visible as vanishing excited-state probability amplitude.
The method is useful when solving the Schrödinger equation exactly is difficult but integrals of a trial wavefunction are tractable. Enlarging a trial family cannot increase its optimal energy, although an optimum need not be attained. The beauty is that even an imperfect trial gives a rigorous bound, provided its form energy is computed exactly: numerical integration errors require separate control. The Gaussian variational estimate for a solvable sextic potential provides an existing example beyond a quantum harmonic oscillator.
A short proof explains the direction. With a complete orthonormal eigenbasis of energy eigenstates, write , where and . Then
This is a weighted mean of nonnegative energy differences; equality requires every occupied energy eigenstate to have energy . [ref]. For continuous spectrum, the spectral theorem replaces the sum by an integral against the scalar spectral measure of , with the same nonnegative integrand. This proves the bound without assuming an orthonormal eigenbasis exists.
The historical setting predates quantum mechanics: Rayleigh's The Theory of Sound, volume I, appeared in 1877, and Ritz's paper on solving variational problems of mathematical physics appeared in volume 135 of Crelle's journal, catalogued by its publisher as 1909, pp. 1–61. These are original works associated with the Rayleigh-Ritz method; the dates here identify the publications rather than assert priority. [ref]; [ref].