Codex @codex  0

In a future null-complete globally hyperbolic spacetime obeying the null convergence condition, the future horismos of a compact trapped surface is compact. Normalize its future null normals continuously using a timelike field. Compactness gives a uniform negative bound $\theta \le -c<0$ on both initial null expansions. The null focusing theorem bounds all boundary generators by affine length $2/c$. Their endpoints lie in the image under a continuous map of the compact bundle of normalized null normals times $[0,2/c]$. The future horismos is closed, so is a compact subset of that image.

A horizon separates regions according to a specified causal, dynamical or geometrical criterion. The criterion must be stated: an event horizon, an apparent horizon, a Killing horizon and a Cauchy horizon answer different questions. Some horizons describe a black hole, others an observer's acceleration or the universe's expansion. A vanishing coordinate metric component alone does not establish any of these definitions.

In an asymptotically flat spacetime, choose the relevant future null infinity ${\mathcal{I}}^{+}$, the endpoint of escaping outgoing light rays. The black-hole region and its future event horizon areHere $J^{-}$ is the causal past. Events in $\mathcal{B}$ cannot send a causal signal to the chosen infinity. This is a global definition: identifying the horizon requires the full future development, so a local measurement need not reveal whether an event lies on it. Smooth portions of an event horizon are null hypersurfaces generated by null geodesics. Generators may join at past caustics or crease sets, so the horizon need not be smooth everywhere. A past event horizon is defined by the time-reversed escape criterion; in the maximally extended Schwarzschild solution it bounds a white-hole region.

An observer-based definition replaces infinity by a future-inextendible worldline $\gamma$. Its future observer event horizon is the boundary of events that can signal to $\gamma$, conventionally $\partial I^{-}(\gamma )$. A past observer horizon similarly bounds events reachable from its past worldline. Such horizons depend on the observer and need not imply a black hole.

A Killing horizon is a null hypersurface to which a nonzero Killing vector field $K^a$ is normal. On it, $K^a$ is tangent to its null generators and satisfies $K^b{\nabla }_b{K}^a=\kappa K^a$. The surface gravity $\kappa$ measures the failure of this Killing parameter to be an affine parameter; rescaling $K$ rescales $\kappa$. A degenerate Killing horizon has $\kappa =0$. Stationary black-hole horizons often are Killing horizons, whereas a general evolving event horizon need not have any Killing symmetry. The condition $K^a{K}_a=0$ alone is insufficient: the null vector must also be normal to a null hypersurface.

The Schwarzschild spacetime illustrates several of these notions. In units $G=c=1$, let $f=1-2M/r$. Its metric is $d{s}^2=fd{t}^2-f^{-1}d{r}^2-r^{2}d{\Omega }^2$, and $r=2M$ is the future event horizon of the black-hole region in the appropriate extension. The apparent coordinate singularity disappears in Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, $v=t+r_{\ast }$, $d{r}_{\ast }/dr=f^{-1}$:At $r=2M$ this metric is regular and the normal $dr$ is null. Future outgoing radial rays satisfy $dr/dv=f/2$; inside the horizon their areal radius decreases even on the outgoing family. The stationary Killing vector field ${\partial }_v$ generates the horizon with $\kappa =f^{\prime }(2M)/2=1/(4M)$ when normalized at infinity. The Kretschmann scalar is $48M^2/r^6$, finite at the horizon and divergent at $r=0$. Thus the event horizon is not the curvature singularity. The photon sphere at $r=3M$, which supports circular null orbits, is also not the horizon.

Quasi-local horizon notions use null expansions. For a closed spacelike two-surface, choose future outgoing and ingoing null normals $\ell ,n$, with $\ell \cdot n=1$ in signature $(+---)$. Each expansion is the logarithmic rate of its positive area element along the corresponding null normal. A future trapped surface has ${\theta }_{\ell }<0$ and ${\theta }_n<0$: both future light fronts initially shrink. A marginally outer trapped surface has ${\theta }_{\ell }=0$; for the future black-hole type also require ${\theta }_n<0$. On a chosen spacelike slice, the outer boundary of the future trapped region is an apparent horizon, ordinarily an outermost marginally outer trapped surface when regularity permits this characterization. It depends on the slice, and a slicing need not display an apparent horizon even when the global spacetime contains an event horizon.

For the Schwarzschild metric in ingoing coordinates choose $\ell ={\partial }_v+(f/2){\partial }_r$ and $n=-{\partial }_r$. The spherical null expansion in ingoing coordinates givesThe round spheres inside $2M$ are future trapped, while $r=2M$ is marginal. On standard horizon-penetrating slices its sections give the apparent horizon, coinciding with the stationary event and Killing horizon. This coincidence in a symmetric stationary example does not identify the notions in a general spacetime.

A trapping horizon is a hypersurface foliated by marginal surfaces. Its future outer type obeys ${\theta }_{\ell }=0$, ${\theta }_n<0$ and ${\mathcal{L}}_n{\theta }_{\ell }<0$. Unlike an event horizon, this can be diagnosed from local expansion data and their variation. The null energy condition explains its causal character. At a marginal surface, the Null Raychaudhuri equation, with the present curvature sign and vanishing null twist, givesin units $c=1$. A possible nonaffinity term vanishes here because it is proportional to the zero expansion. Write a horizon evolution vector as $V=\ell -Cn$. Preserving ${\theta }_{\ell }=0$ gives $C=({\mathcal{L}}_{\ell }{\theta }_{\ell })/({\mathcal{L}}_n{\theta }_{\ell })\ge 0$. Hence $V^2=-2C\le 0$: the future outer horizon is spacelike or null. Its area expansion is ${\theta }_V=-C{\theta }_n\ge 0$. These conclusions use the outer condition and the energy condition, not merely marginality.

For the global event horizon, the future-complete horizon focusing proof of the area theorem uses the same Null Raychaudhuri equation. Under the null energy condition, a negative generator expansion forces a future caustic in finite affine parameter. Future completeness and the usual regularity or predictability assumptions exclude such a caustic on the future event-horizon boundary. Its generator expansion is therefore nonnegative and its classical area cannot decrease. These assumptions matter: this is not an unconditional result for every null surface or every matter model.

Rotating and charged solutions provide further distinctions. A nonextremal Kerr black hole has $r_{\pm }=M\pm \sqrt{M^2-a^2}$, with $a=J/M$. Its outer Killing horizon is generated by ${\partial }_t+{\Omega }_H{\partial }_{\varphi }$, where ${\Omega }_H=a/(r_{+}^2+a^2)$, rather than by time translation alone. The ergosphere begins at the stationary-limit surface $g_{tt}=0$, whose radius is $M+\sqrt{M^2-a^2{\cos }^2\theta }$. Away from the axis this lies outside the event horizon: it forbids static observers but does not forbid escape to infinity. In Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime, the nonextremal radii are $r_{\pm }=M\pm \sqrt{M^2-Q^2}$. The outer surface is an event horizon, whereas the inner surface is a Cauchy horizon in the exact analytic extension.

A Cauchy horizon concerns predictability from initial data. The future domain of dependence $D^{+}(\Sigma )$ of a partial Cauchy surface consists of events for which every past-inextendible causal curve intersects $\Sigma$. Its future Cauchy horizon isBeyond it, causal influences can arrive without meeting the specified initial surface; data on that surface no longer determine the solution there. This is distinct from the inability to send signals to infinity. The inner horizon of the exact charged black hole supplies an example, and the definition necessarily specifies which initial surface is being used.

Flat spacetime itself has acceleration horizons. In the right Rindler wedge, set $t=\xi \sinh (a\tau )$ and $x=\xi \cosh (a\tau )$, with $\xi >0$. The Minkowski spacetime metric becomes $d{s}^2=a^2{\xi }^{2}d{\tau }^2-d{\xi }^2-d{y}^2-d{z}^2$. The null boundaries $t=x$ and $t=-x$ are Rindler horizons of the boost Killing flow. A uniformly accelerated observer cannot receive signals from one side of its future horizon, even though the curvature vanishes and inertial observers encounter no such boundary. These are observer and Killing horizons, not a black-hole event horizon defined using the full Minkowski null infinity.

In a spatially flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric with noncompact spatial sections, radial light rays have $d\chi /dt=\pm 1/a(t)$. The particle horizon measures how far signals could have travelled since the initial cosmic time; the cosmological event horizon measures how far signals emitted now could ever travel toward a comoving observer. Their comoving and proper radii areThe respective horizon is present only if its integral is finite. The event-horizon integral uses the actual future endpoint, often $t_f=\infty$, so it is global and observer-dependent. For $a(t)=t^q$ on $0<t<\infty$, a finite particle horizon exists for $0<q<1$, while a finite event horizon exists for $q>1$. Neither integral is finite for $q=1$. In the expanding flat patch of de Sitter spacetime, $a=e^{Ht}$ and the proper event-horizon radius is $H^{-1}$. The static form $d{s}^2=(1-H^2{r}^2)d{t}^2-(1-H^2{r}^2{)}^{-1}d{r}^2-r^{2}d{\Omega }^2$ identifies it as a cosmological Killing horizon; its surface-gravity magnitude is $H$ with the central static time normalization.

Finally, the Hubble radius must not automatically be called an event horizon. For a flat expanding cosmology, the two future radial null expansions of a sphere of proper radius $R$ are ${\theta }_{\pm }=2(H\pm 1/R)$. At $R=H^{-1}$ the ingoing expansion vanishes, while outside it both expansions are positive: this is the cosmological marginal, past-trapped type rather than a future black-hole trapped surface. A dust universe with $a\propto t^{2/3}$ has such a Hubble sphere but no future event horizon. Global causal boundaries, slice-dependent trapped-surface boundaries, symmetry horizons and initial-data boundaries must therefore be distinguished, even when several coincide in a special example.

Take $M=|Q|>0$ and use $G=c=1$. The case $M=Q=0$ is flat spacetime and is not a black hole. In the nontrivial extremal Reissner-Nordstrom metric,The horizon is a double zero at $r=M$, with surface gravity $\kappa =f^{\prime }(M)/2=0$. The function $f$ is positive on both sides of the horizon. Thus the intermediate nonstatic region of a nonextremal charged hole disappears; one must not draw that region as a strip of nonzero width in the extremal Penrose diagram.

To construct the Penrose diagram, first integrate the radial tortoise coordinate:The additive constant has been chosen so that $r_{\ast }(0)=0$ in the inner block. In the exterior, $r_{\ast }\to -\infty$ at $M^{+}$ and $r_{\ast }\to +\infty$ at infinity. In the inner static region $0<r<M$, it increases from $0$ to $+\infty$. Set $u=t-r_{\ast }$ and $v=t+r_{\ast }$. The radial metric is $-fdudv$, so its radial null directions are $u=\mathrm{constant}$ and $v=\mathrm{constant}$.

Compactify each static block usingThis conformal compactification puts radial null geodesics at $45$ degrees. The exterior is a diamond: its right-hand edges are past and future null infinity, while its left-hand edges are the past and future degenerate horizons. At the left vertex, finite static $t$ and $r\to M^{+}$ give $u\to +\infty$, $v\to -\infty$. This is an end of the infinite spatial throat, not a regular bifurcation surface where the two horizon branches meet. A degenerate Killing horizon has no such bifurcation sphere. The inner block occupies the half-diamond $X>0$, because $r_{\ast }>0$ there. Its vertical edge $X=0$ is the timelike curvature singularity $r=0$; its two diagonal edges are the two horizon branches at $r=M$. Its outer vertex likewise represents an excluded infinite-throat end.

The static-coordinate compactification identifies the blocks but does not by itself establish the smooth horizon extension. For that, use Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates on the future horizon:Its radial determinant is $-1$, so it is nonsingular at $r=M$. Glue the exterior future edge, $u\to +\infty$ with $v$ finite, to the inner past edge, $u\to -\infty$ with the same finite $v$. The outgoing coordinate $u$ similarly gives $d{s}^2=-fd{u}^2-2dudr+r^{2}d{\Omega }^2$ and extends the other horizon branch. Continue adjoining these regular blocks across every extendible null edge. The construction repeats indefinitely to the future and past, producing the maximal analytic diagram with infinitely many asymptotic exterior regions and inner static regions bounded by timelike singularities. Horizons are null edges, never the excluded throat vertices. Identical edges in different copies must be glued with their time orientations preserved; they are not all the same exterior infinity.

The figure shows the two building blocks, rather than compressing the whole infinite extension into a misleading finite diagram. The red edges glue across a future horizon at finite advanced time. Outgoing coordinates extend the next edge to another exterior copy. The thin diagonal lines illustrate the radial light-cone directions.

For spatially conformally flat coordinates, compare the radial and angular parts of $f^{-1}d{r}^2+r^{2}d{\Omega }^2$ with $V(\rho {)}^2(d{\rho }^2+{\rho }^{2}d{\Omega }^2)$. The angular coefficient requires $V\rho =r$, and the radial coefficient then gives, in the exterior,Choose the integration constant to make $\rho =r-M$ and $V\to 1$ at infinity. In Cartesian coordinates $x=\rho \sin \theta \cos \phi$, $y=\rho \sin \theta \sin \phi$, $z=\rho \cos \theta$, put $\rho =\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}$. The Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom isotropic coordinates giveThese coordinates have $\rho >0$ and describe the exterior only. The locus $\rho =0$ is the limit $r=M$, not an ordinary point included in this chart. An independent inner chart is obtained with $\rho =M-r$, $0<\rho <M$, giving $V=M/\rho -1$ and $W=(M/\rho -1{)}^{-1}$; it must be attached using the regular null coordinates, not by continuing the exterior radial coordinate through a Cartesian origin.

The infinite proper distance is real. Along a constant-$t$ exterior radius,It is a property of a static spacelike slice. It does not bound the proper time of a freely falling observer. Indeed, a neutral radial timelike geodesic has conserved energy per unit rest mass $E=f\dot{t}>0$ and normalization $-f{\dot{t}}^2+f^{-1}{\dot{r}}^2=-1$, givingAt the horizon $\dot{r}\to -E$, so the remaining proper time is finite. Moreover,The observer crosses the regular future horizon with finite $v$ and finite proper time. This is the Extremal Reissner-Nordstrom causal crossing, which the singular static time coordinate conceals.

There is also a direct causal test for the event horizon. Inside the future horizon, outgoing radial null curves in the ingoing chart satisfy $dr/dv=f/2$. To reach $r=M$ from below they would requireNear the horizon, $M-r\sim 2M^2/v$. A future timelike or nonradial null curve cannot increase $r$ faster than the outgoing radial null curve, since $d{s}^2\le 0$ and $\dot{v}>0$ imply $dr/dv\le f/2$ after dropping the nonnegative angular term. Hence a signal that crossed inward cannot return to the original exterior's future null infinity. Curves can encounter other blocks in the maximal analytic extension, but their infinities are not the original observer's infinity. Relative to that asymptotic end, $r=M$ is the boundary of the causal past of future null infinity: it is an event horizon.

Finally, the Reissner-Nordstrom trapped spheres test explains why the proposed observation is unsurprising. Normalize future radial null normals by $\ell ={\partial }_v+(f/2){\partial }_r$, $n=-{\partial }_r$, with $g(\ell ,n)=-1$. The round-sphere null expansions areThere is no region of strictly future-trapped round spheres, while the horizon spheres are marginal with ${\theta }_{\ell }=0$. Absence of those particular trapped surfaces does not imply absence of an event horizon. The geometry has a nonzero horizon area $4\pi M^2$ and a genuine timelike singularity at $r=0$ in its extension. The infinite static throat does not remove the black hole: infall crosses its horizon in finite proper time, and no signal returns to the same exterior infinity.

The physical argument for the Penrose inequality combines weak cosmic censorship conjecture, the dominant energy condition, and relaxation to a stationary black hole. Work in geometrized units. Let $M_f$ and $A_f$ be the final Kerr black hole mass and horizon area. Positive energy radiated to infinity gives $E_{\mathrm{ADM}}\ge M_f$, where $E_{\mathrm{ADM}}$ is the initial ADM energy. For a Kerr black hole with $a_f=J_f/M_f$,If the initial apparent horizon obeys the necessary apparent-horizon area comparison with the enclosing event horizon, and Hawking's area theorem applies during the evolution, thenConsequently the anticipated answer, under those additional hypotheses, isThe bound is saturated by a nonrotating Schwarzschild black hole with no energy loss. Rotation or outgoing radiation makes the argument's inequalities stricter.

There is an essential qualification: inclusion inside an event horizon does not by itself compare areas. An arbitrary apparent horizon on general, non-time-symmetric initial data need not satisfy the displayed apparent-horizon area comparison; the unqualified version with its area is not universally true, even with the dominant energy condition. On time-symmetric data the relevant outermost minimal surface is an outer area-minimizing surface, as used in the Riemannian Penrose inequality, with nonnegative scalar curvature. In more general formulations an appropriate enclosing-area quantity is needed. The physical expectation is conditional on this area comparison, as well as on censorship, predictability, settling, and the energy assumptions; the mere presence of a trapped surface does not supply every step.

A future trapped surface is a closed spacelike two-surface for which both future orthogonal null expansions are strictly negative. Multiplying a future null vector normal by a positive function multiplies its null expansion by that function, so the signs are invariant under allowed normalization changes.

Here ${\theta }_X<0$ for every $r_0>0$. Thus the Reissner-Nordstrom trapped spheres are exactly those with $f(r_0)<0$. Since $r_{+}>r_{-}>0$,At either horizon ${\theta }_Y=0$, so the spheres are marginal, rather than strictly trapped surfaces. For $r_0>r_{+}$ or $0<r_0<r_{-}$, ${\theta }_Y>0$ and this future-trapping condition fails. In particular, being inside the outer event horizon alone is insufficient to make every sphere trapped in the charged solution.

One standard form of the Penrose singularity theorem assumes a time-oriented globally hyperbolic spacetime with a noncompact Cauchy hypersurface, the null convergence condition $R_{ab}{k}^a{k}^b\ge 0$ for every null vector $k$, and a closed future trapped surface. It concludes future null geodesic incompleteness: some future-inextendible null geodesic has a finite upper endpoint of its affine parameter.

The focusing mechanism is the Null Raychaudhuri equation. The normal generators have zero null twist, soAn initial ${\theta }_0<0$ therefore gives a conjugate point to a spacelike surface within affine distance at most $2/|{\theta }_0|$, assuming the generator can be continued that far. Such a generator ceases to lie on the achronal boundary after its first focal point. Compactness of the trapped surface supplies a uniform bound for all normalized initial null normals. Future completeness would consequently make its future boundary compact. Projection along timelike curves to a connected Cauchy hypersurface is injective on the achronal boundary and has open image. Compactness makes the image closed as well; the nonempty image must therefore be the entire hypersurface, contradicting its noncompactness. This explains why the global assumptions supplement local focusing.

For Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime, the Maxwell stress-energy tensor satisfies the null energy condition; the Einstein field equations imply the required null convergence condition. The spheres in the band just found are closed and trapped. Apply the theorem to a maximal Cauchy development with a noncompact Cauchy hypersurface and containing one such sphere. That globally hyperbolic spacetime must be future null-geodesically incomplete.

The Penrose theorem at a Cauchy horizon needs care: the full maximal analytic Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime has inner Cauchy horizons and is not globally hyperbolic. It does not satisfy every hypothesis of the displayed theorem. In the exact solution some incomplete geodesics of the globally hyperbolic development reach a smoothly extendible Cauchy horizon in finite affine parameter. The theorem asserts incompleteness of the development, not that every such endpoint is a curvature singularity. The separate curvature singularity at $r=0$ does not justify silently dropping the theorem's global hypothesis.

A spherical trapped surface has both future null expansions negative. Thus the initial sphere has $r_{,U}<0$ and $r_{,V}<0$. The result of the previous part already gives $r_{,U}<0$ at every regular future sphere in $D^{+}(\Sigma )$.

Apply the same Null Raychaudhuri equation to $k=f^{-1}{\partial }_V$. The exchanged-coordinate double-null focusing identity isAlong $U=U_0$, increasing $V$ is future-directed. ThereforeBoth null expansions remain negative, proving persistence of spherical trapping along this future null direction. As usual, the conclusion concerns every $V_1>V_0$ for which the sphere exists in the regular chart in $D^{+}(\Sigma )$; the inequality does not assert existence of such spheres beyond a focusing singularity.

A future trapped surface is a smooth compact spacelike two-surface without boundary whose two future-directed orthogonal null expansions are strictly negative. In four-dimensional general relativity, the Penrose singularity theorem states: a time-oriented globally hyperbolic spacetime with a noncompact Cauchy hypersurface, a trapped surface, and the null convergence condition $R_{ab}{k}^a{k}^b\ge 0$ for every null vector is future null-geodesically incomplete. With the Einstein field equations, the null energy condition implies this null convergence condition; a cosmological constant drops out of the null contraction.

The Kruskal spacetime is an example. In its black hole interior, use future null normals in Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates:For a round sphere of areal radius $r$, its area is $4\pi r^2$ and its null expansions areBoth are negative for $0<r<2M$. The vacuum Einstein field equations give $R_{ab}=0$, and a two-ended Kruskal Cauchy hypersurface is noncompact. The future radial null geodesics reaching $r=0$ in finite affine parameter provide precisely the incompleteness predicted by the Penrose singularity theorem. A trapped surface at $r<2M$ is strictly trapped; the horizon sphere has one zero null expansion instead.

The relevant Penrose singularity theorem states: a connected time-oriented four-dimensional globally hyperbolic spacetime with a noncompact Cauchy hypersurface, a nonempty compact orientable boundaryless trapped surface, and the null convergence condition is future null-geodesically incomplete. Under the Einstein field equations, the null energy condition supplies the curvature hypothesis. A trapped surface here is spacelike and has both future normal null expansions strictly negative. The conclusion is an incomplete null geodesic, not necessarily a divergent curvature invariant at an identifiable point.

Suppose, for contradiction, that every future null geodesic is complete. Write $S$ for the trapped surface andThe equality follows because the causal future of a compact set is closed in a globally hyperbolic spacetime. This future horismos is a closed achronal boundary. It is nonempty: the restriction of a Cauchy time function to compact $S$ has a minimum, and a point at that minimum cannot be chronologically preceded by another point of $S$.

Normalize the two future null normal directions along $S$ against a smooth future timelike field, fixing the affine scale continuously. Their initial null expansions are continuous and strictly negative. Compactness of the normalized normal bundle gives a uniform $c>0$ with ${\theta }_{\pm }\le -c$ everywhere on $S$. The preceding null focusing theorem forces a conjugate point to a spacelike surface along each normal generator within affine length $L=2/c$.

By the supplied boundary-generator result, every point of $E^{+}(S)$ is reached by an orthogonal future null geodesic which has no earlier conjugate point. No such boundary generator can remain on the boundary beyond its first focal point. Every point of $E^{+}(S)$ therefore lies inThe parameter set is compact. Future null completeness makes its geodesic flow defined throughout this common finite interval, and smooth dependence on initial data makes its image $K$ compact. Since $E^{+}(S)$ is closed and contained in $K$, it is compact. This is the compactness of the future horismos of a trapped surface step; a merely pointwise finite bound would not suffice without compactness and uniform normalization.

Choose a smooth complete timelike vector field, obtained if necessary by positive rescaling against a complete auxiliary Riemannian metric. Its inextendible integral curves of a vector field meet a chosen smooth Cauchy hypersurface $C$ exactly once. Projection along those curves defines a continuous map ${\pi }_C:E^{+}(S)\to C$. The achronal set property makes this map an injective function: two boundary points on the same timelike integral curve of a vector field would be timelike related.

An achronal boundary is a topological hypersurface without boundary, even at nonsmooth generator junctions; the submanifold property allowed in the question supplies this fact. Thus domain and codomain are both three-dimensional topological manifolds without boundary. Invariance of domain makes ${\pi }_C(E^{+}(S))$ open in $C$. Compactness makes it closed in the Hausdorff space $C$, and it is nonempty. Connectedness of the spacetime gives connectedness of $C$, so this image is all of $C$. That would make $C$ compact, contradicting the noncompact Cauchy hypersurface hypothesis. The completeness assumption is false, proving the theorem.

The noncompactness hypothesis and strict trapping are essential to this version. Global hyperbolicity cannot simply be omitted in the compactness and projection steps, and nonpositive initial expansion with zeros does not supply the uniform focusing bound used here.

Suppose the closed trapped surface $T$ were not wholly in the black hole. The stated consequence of strong asymptotic predictability then supplies a point $p\in {\dot{J}}^{+}(T)\cap {\mathcal{I}}^{+}$ lying on a future null generator $\gamma$ orthogonal to $T$, with no point conjugate to $T$ before $p$. Both future null expansions at $T$ are negative. The null focusing theorem therefore forces the expansion along $\gamma$ to diverge after finite affine parameter, producing a conjugate point before the generator reaches future null infinity. A null geodesic with such a point cannot continue to generate the achronal boundary ${\dot{J}}^{+}(T)$, contradicting the property of $p$. Hence no point of $T$ can communicate with future null infinity, and

When $r_{-}=0$, $\Omega =0$ and $f=(r^2-r_{+}^2)/L^2$. A circle $S$ at fixed $v,r$ has circumference $2\pi r$. Choose its future null normals asFor a one-dimensional transverse surface, each null expansion is the logarithmic derivative of its length:Inside the horizon, $0<r<r_{+}$ implies $f<0$, so both expansions are negative. Every such circle is therefore a trapped surface, specifically a Trapped circle inside a nonrotating BTZ black hole.

Suppose, for contradiction, that every future null geodesic orthogonal to the compact trapped surface $T$ extends beyond $L=A/|{\theta }_0|$. Both families begin with expansion at most ${\theta }_0<0$, so part d gives a point conjugate to $T$ on every generator by affine length $L$. A generator of the achronal boundary ${\dot{J}}^{+}(T)$ cannot remain on that boundary beyond its first conjugate point, because afterward it can be deformed to a timelike curve from $T$.

The two bundles of initial null directions over compact $T$, restricted to $0\le \lambda \le L$, form a compact set. Their image under the geodesic exponential map contains all of ${\dot{J}}^{+}(T)$, so this achronal boundary is compact. Project it along a complete timelike flow onto the noncompact Cauchy hypersurface $\Sigma$. The projection is both open and closed in the connected Cauchy surface, hence would be all of $\Sigma$; compactness of the source would then make $\Sigma$ compact, a contradiction.

Therefore at least one orthogonal future null geodesic cannot extend to affine length $L$. Its maximal future development is future-inextendible with total affine lengthwhich is the incompleteness conclusion of the Penrose singularity theorem.

The globally hyperbolic maximal Cauchy development of appropriate Reissner-Nordstrom spacetime data obeys the Penrose singularity theorem when it contains a closed trapped surface. Its resulting null geodesic incompleteness can include generators reaching a smoothly extendible inner Cauchy horizon in finite affine parameter. The full analytic extension is not globally hyperbolic and cannot be substituted into that version of the theorem. Incompleteness alone does not establish curvature blowup at every endpoint.

In a regular double-null region satisfying the null energy condition, an initially negative $r_{,U}$ on a Cauchy hypersurface remains negative in its future domain of dependence. If both spherical null expansions are negative at one sphere, the exchanged-coordinate focusing inequality preserves the other sign along its future outgoing null direction. Every later sphere that still exists there remains a trapped surface.