The valuation ring is , and is an ideal by the ultrametric inequality. Its complement inside consists exactly of elements of field absolute value one, whose inverses also lie in . Every proper ideal must avoid units and hence lie in . Therefore is the unique maximal ideal: is a local ring. Also its fraction field is , since every nonzero element outside the ring has its inverse inside it.
If is integral over , it satisfies a monic equation with . Were , the leading term would have strictly larger field absolute value than every other term, so the ultrametric inequality would prevent cancellation to zero. Thus , proving the valuation ring is integrally closed.
For the ideal criterion, assume the valuation is nontrivial and write . If its value group is discrete, normalize it to and choose a uniformizer of valuation one. In any nonzero ideal , the nonnegative integer valuations have a least value . Choose of that value. For every , , so . Hence and is a principal ideal domain.
Conversely, if is a principal ideal domain, its nonzero maximal ideal is . For every element of positive valuation, implies with , so . Thus is the least positive value. For any value , subtract . The remainder belongs to the value group and lies in , so is zero. The value group is therefore , and the valuation is discrete. We have proved the principal ideal criterion for a nontrivial rank-one valuation ring.
The nontriviality qualification matters under the standard definition of discrete valuation, which requires value group isomorphic to . With the trivial field absolute value, is still a principal ideal domain, but the value group is zero and there is no uniformizer. Thus the literal unrestricted equivalence has a field exception. If “discrete” instead includes the trivial value group as a discrete subgroup of , that exceptional case satisfies the equivalence too.
The discrete valuation identities and make closed under products and sums; it contains and additive inverses. As a subring of the field , it is an integral domain.
Its units are exactly the elements of valuation zero: if and only if . The remaining elements form the ideal , and every proper ideal is contained in it, since an ideal containing a unit is the whole ring. Hence is a local ring with this unique maximal ideal.
For a nonzero ideal , the set of valuations of its nonzero elements is a nonempty subset of and has a least value. Choose attaining it. Every satisfies , so and . The zero ideal is also principal. This proves that is a discrete valuation ring, in particular a principal ideal domain.
Choose a uniformizer , with . For , some makes , and is a quotient of elements of . Thus is the field of fractions of .
Put and . The polynomial is Eisenstein, so , while the preceding part gives degree for . Both numbers divide by the tower law, and the compositum degree is at most their product. Coprimality forces . Since contains all the roots of , it is the splitting field of a separable polynomial and is Galois.
Extend with . Then , , and
The value group therefore forces the ramification index to be at least ; it cannot exceed the extension degree. Thus is totally ramified and is a uniformizer for the normalized valuation .
Write its automorphisms as and , with , . The degree count makes all pairs occur, giving . Their action on the uniformizer is
If , the residue of this ratio is , so subtracting one gives a unit and . If and , the ratio is , giving displacement valuation . The identity has infinite displacement valuation.
By the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, precisely when that displacement valuation is at least . Hence the ramification groups of the splitting field of Xp minus p over the p-adic numbers have sizes
For the group itself is . The lower wild ramification break is .
Write . The Nottingham group is the set of formal series over , with ordinary composition as multiplication and the -adic topology. The identity is . A compositional inverse exists uniquely by solving its coefficients successively, since the linear coefficient is .
Equivalently is the group of continuous -automorphisms of whose action on is the identity. Such an automorphism is determined by the image of , which is . To identify this with ordinary series composition without reversing multiplication, send to the automorphism . Its composite with the automorphism for is the one for .
The depth filtration is
Each is open and normal, and the coefficient of identifies with . Thus , and is the inverse limit of its finite p-group truncations.
Here is a local-field proof that every finite p-group embeds in . We first establish the realization step rather than assume the Nottingham embedding itself. Put and , and let be the inertia subgroup, the group homomorphism kernel of the action on the algebraic closure of the residue field. We use the standard additive normal basis theorem consequence for . It follows by taking direct limits of the finite-Galois normal-basis modules, whose additive cohomology vanishes. The Artin-Schreier sequence
then gives
The classes for positive prime to are linearly independent: a nonzero finite linear combination has a most negative valuation prime to , whereas a negative valuation of is divisible by . Thus there are infinitely many independent continuous characters .
Induct on the order of a finite p-group . Choose a central subgroup and put . By induction there is an onto map with , corresponding to a totally ramified -extension. The central extension is specified by a two-cocycle. Its pullback along is a coboundary because . Correcting a set-theoretic section by that coboundary gives a continuous homomorphism lifting .
We must make the lift onto on inertia, not merely onto on the whole Galois group. Let . On , the lift takes values in . Characters vanishing on form a finite-dimensional space: has a finite subgroup and procyclic quotient , so a character is determined by finitely many values on generators of these two pieces. The infinite-dimensional character space therefore has infinitely many distinct restrictions to . Choose a character whose restriction to does not cancel , and set . Centrality of makes this another homomorphism lifting . Its image on is nontrivial and hence all of , while its image on maps onto . Therefore . The fixed field of is the required totally ramified finite Galois extension with group . This proves the realization step for every finite p-group.
Since the residue field of is still , choosing a uniformizer identifies with . Indeed successive subtraction of its residue coefficient and division by gives each element of its valuation ring a unique convergent expansion with , and fractions give the Laurent expansions. Each element of preserves the valuation and fixes , so sends to . The linear coefficient is a homomorphism . Since is a -group and , that homomorphism is trivial. Thus the faithful Galois action lies in , completing the embedding proof.
An infinite profinite group is hereditarily just infinite when every open subgroup is infinite and every nontrivial closed normal subgroup of each such open subgroup is open. We sketch the normal-subgroup argument, giving the depth calculation in odd characteristic explicitly. For series of depths ,
where . The coefficient follows by comparing and in degree : their cross terms are and .
Let be open and closed. Choose with and choose of depth . For every with , commutation with supplies an element of of depth , with any prescribed nonzero leading coefficient by varying . Thus every sufficiently high layer except possibly depths congruent to modulo occurs in .
When is odd, choose one available depth with . Such a residue exists even for . An element of that depth can be commuted with for every sufficiently large missing depth . The new leading coefficient contains , so those missing layers occur too. Hence contains an element with any chosen coefficient in every depth , for some .
Successive coefficient correction now proves : match the coefficient of an arbitrary target in depth by an element of , correct the error in depth , and continue. The partial products converge -adically to the target and remain in , which is closed. Thus is open. This proves hereditary just infiniteness for odd .
For characteristic two, the leading coefficient alone misses even depths. The standard characteristic-two normal-closure collection lemma supplies the needed extra input: for every and every nonidentity , the closed subgroup generated by the conjugates with contains for some . Its proof retains the next coefficients in pairs of group commutators to fill the parity gaps, then uses the same successive coefficient correction. Apply this lemma to and : every such conjugate lies in , so contains the tail and is open. This states the additional collection result used in the characteristic-two sketch; the odd-prime leading-term argument is not being applied there. Since every open subgroup contains a tail and is infinite, the Nottingham group is hereditarily just infinite for every prime .
The structural facts used about a non-Archimedean local field are that it is complete for a normalized discrete valuation , its valuation ring is a discrete valuation ring, its maximal ideal is for a uniformizer , and its residue field is a finite field . Polynomial operations are continuous for this valuation topology.
A simple-root version of Hensel lemma is: if , , , and , then there is a unique with and .
Construct with . Given , put . Taylor expansion over the valuation ring gives
The omitted terms contain , and for . The residue of remains the nonzero residue of , so choose with
This makes . The congruences make a Cauchy sequence; completeness gives its limit . Continuity and give , and the first congruence gives its specified residue class.
For uniqueness, if are two roots in that class, polynomial division of their difference gives
The second factor is a unit, since is a unit and . Thus . This proves both existence and uniqueness in the stated Hensel lemma.
Now suppose . The Teichmuller lifts constructed in (b) are additive as well as multiplicative: if and , then the characteristic- Frobenius identity gives . Uniqueness of the lift with prescribed residue yields . Their set is therefore a finite coefficient field in positive-characteristic local fields, and reduction identifies it with .
Choose a uniformizer . For , let be the lift of its residue and write with . Repeat with , then , and so on. This gives
The remainder tends to zero, and completeness gives . The expansion is unique: in a nonzero difference of two series the first different coefficient is a nonzero element of the coefficient field, hence a unit, and so gives exactly the valuation of that difference.
Consequently substitution defines a bijection . It is a ring homomorphism because the coefficient lift is a field homomorphism, polynomial operations agree before passage to limits, and multiplication is continuous. Every element of becomes integral after multiplication by a sufficiently large power of . Allowing finitely many negative powers therefore extends substitution to the field isomorphism
It preserves the normalized discrete valuation, since the first nonzero coefficient determines the valuation on each side. The results used are the structural facts stated in (a), its proved Hensel lemma, the proved multiplicative lifting in (b), and the characteristic- identity . No classification theorem for local fields is needed.
Put . This is a complete discretely valued field, with valuation ring and residue field ; its infinite residue field means it is not a locally compact local field. The finite-extension facts needed here are uniqueness of the extended valuation, completeness of the extension, and for complete discretely valued fields with perfect residue field. They apply in this characteristic-zero setting.
Let . The finite residue extension of must be itself, so and . Normalize integrally and choose a uniformizer . Since , write with .
The residue of has an th root . Apply Hensel lemma to : its derivative at is the unit because the residue characteristic is zero. Hence there is with . Setting gives
The elements are linearly independent over . In a nontrivial relation , the nonzero summands have valuations , distinct modulo , so exactly one has least valuation and cannot cancel. Since has dimension , this proves .
The constants already embed into with residue field . Subtracting the residue coefficient and dividing by repeatedly, exactly as in Question 1(c), expresses every integral element uniquely as with . Completeness and the first-nonzero-coefficient valuation show that allowing finite negative powers gives
This proof of finite extensions of the complex Laurent series field did not need a Galois hypothesis. All distinct th roots of unity lie in the constant field, and the substitutions preserve . They give all automorphisms, so every such finite extension is cyclic Galois:
Choose compatible roots in an algebraic closure, first choosing them successively along the factorial-degree tower and then taking powers to define the other roots, with whenever . The fields are nested under divisibility. Every finite extension inside the closure equals one of them: its constructed root of differs from by a constant root of unity. Therefore their union is the entire algebraic closure. Explicitly, every algebraic element generates a finite extension, so lies in the union; any polynomial over the union has its coefficients in one finite extension, and its roots are still algebraic over , hence also lie there.
For , restriction of automorphisms sends to . Using the compatible primitive roots , these are the reduction maps on exponent groups. Thus the absolute Galois group of the complex Laurent series field is
The inverse limit carries its profinite topology; choosing compatible roots gives the displayed identification with the profinite completion of the integers.
Let be the given algebraic morphism of algebraic varieties. Its value at the generic point supplies homogeneous coordinates with , not all zero. Thus it defines a rational map of projective varieties on .
Fix a missing point . The local ring of a smooth algebraic curve at is a discrete valuation ring , with uniformizer and valuation . Put
Zero coordinates remain zero. Every is in , and some is a unit because its valuation is zero. Choose a neighborhood of on which all are regular and remains nonvanishing; this is possible because membership in the local ring means regularity on a neighborhood. The affine target-chart coordinates
are regular on , so they define a morphism of algebraic varieties . At its homogeneous value is , well-defined because .
Multiplication of all homogeneous coordinates by the same nonzero rational function does not change their projective point. Thus this local morphism agrees with the original one on the common dense open where their coordinates were chosen. They agree throughout the overlap: the target's diagonal is closed, being defined in homogeneous coordinate pairs by for all . Thus the equalizer is closed and contains that dense open. Apply this construction at each point of the finite set and glue with the original morphism. The same closed-diagonal argument proves uniqueness. Therefore
This gives the extension of a rational map from a smooth projective curve by explicit local coordinates. The mechanism is the one-dimensional smooth local ring: it permits removal of the smallest common pole order while leaving at least one unit coordinate.
Use the simple-root form of Hensel lemma. Let be a complete discrete valuation ring, let be a uniformizer, and let . If is a root of with , then there is exactly one root reducing to .
Choose a lift of . Suppose . To construct a lift satisfying the next congruence, write . The polynomial expansion gives
Since is a unit, its residue is invertible in the residue field. There is a unique residue class of making this zero modulo . Thus and . This produces a Cauchy sequence in the complete discrete valuation ring. Its limit satisfies by continuity of polynomial evaluation, and .
For uniqueness, suppose are two such roots. Polynomial division of their difference gives
Because , the second factor is a unit. Hence . The simple-root hypothesis is used both for constructing successive lifts and for this uniqueness argument.
All the local fields here carry normalized discrete valuations. Write for the valuation ring, for its maximal ideal, and for its residue field. We use the basic degree identity for finite extensions of non-Archimedean local fields, with the ramification index and the residue degree.
First construct the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension inside an arbitrary finite extension . Choose a primitive element of a field extension for the finite residue field extension . Let be its monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, of degree , and lift its coefficients to obtain a monic of the same degree. Finite finite fields are perfect fields, so . By Hensel lemma applied in , there is reducing to with . For we have
Every inequality is therefore an equality. In particular is unramified, , and is the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element .
If is unramified, then , so this construction gives . Taking supplies the required generator, and is a unit. Conversely suppose with integral and its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element satisfying . Its coefficients lie in , since all conjugates of an integral element are integral and is complete. In the constructed unramified extension the element is a simple root of . Hensel lemma in produces a root with residue . In both and lift this same simple residue root, so Hensel uniqueness gives . Thus , proving
For lifting residue-field embeddings of unramified extensions, use the generator and polynomial just constructed when is unramified. Given a -field homomorphism , its value is a simple root of . Hensel lemma in produces the unique root with that residue. The assignment defines a -field homomorphism ; it induces because generates . Conversely any such field homomorphism preserves the unique extended valuation, hence induces a residue field homomorphism, and its image of is uniquely forced by Hensel uniqueness. This proves the asserted bijection. The same proof only requires that be a non-Archimedean local field containing with its compatible valuation; its finiteness over is not essential.
Now set . The finite residue field extension has exactly automorphisms, cyclically generated by . Their unique lifts give automorphisms of . Consequently is a Galois extension, and reduction identifies its Galois group with that cyclic residue Galois group. Its generator is the arithmetic Frobenius:
For the compositum, choose a uniformizer of the totally ramified extension . The Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension characterization, proved in the next solution, says that and its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is Eisenstein over . A uniformizer of remains a uniformizer in the unramified extension . All its Eisenstein coefficient conditions therefore remain true over . Thus the same Eisenstein polynomial is irreducible over and generates as a totally ramified extension. This proves is totally ramified, of degree .
Here is an explicit example showing that the converse decomposition of an arbitrary extension can fail. Take and with . Since is irreducible and separable modulo three, the degree and residue-degree argument above shows that is unramified quadratic. Put
The element is a unit in , so is Eisenstein over . Hence , , and . Moreover gives , with
We verify its Galois group, since that is what rules out a totally ramified complement. By Hensel lemma there is with : the residue root of is simple modulo three. Set . Then
The assignments and respect the defining relation, because . They therefore define a -automorphism of . Its square satisfies and , so has order four. There are thus four automorphisms of the degree-four extension, and
This is the cyclic quartic local extension without a totally ramified complement. Its unique quadratic subfield is , fixed by , and is unramified. If with unramified and totally ramified, then and . To obtain the full degree four both would have degree two, forcing to be a totally ramified quadratic subfield. There is no such subfield. Thus is the required counterexample.
Let , with normalized discrete valuations . Suppose first that is totally ramified, so . Choose a uniformizer of . The elements are linearly independent over : the nonzero terms in any proposed relation have valuations , distinct modulo , and a sum with a unique least valuation cannot vanish by the ultrametric inequality. Hence , proving .
Extend to an algebraic closure with values in . Every conjugate of has valuation , by uniqueness of the extended valuation on finite extensions of the complete field . In its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element , the coefficient is a sum of products of conjugates, counted with multiplicity. Thus for , so every nonleading coefficient is in . The constant coefficient is the product of all conjugates, so has valuation exactly one. This proves that is an Eisenstein polynomial. This argument also works for inseparable finite extensions, since the conjugates can be counted with their multiplicities.
Conversely let be an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , with root and . The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility. For completeness, monic factors would have integral coefficients; their reductions would be positive-degree powers of , so both constant coefficients would be divisible by the uniformizer of , contradicting . To determine the root valuation, put in the extended valuation. If , the leading term is the unique term of least valuation; if , the leading term again has uniquely least valuation zero. Both are impossible. If , every nonconstant lower term has valuation at least . Cancellation in therefore requires the leading term and constant term to have equal valuation:
Since and is a positive integer, . The opposite inequality follows from . Hence , , and . We have proved both the equivalence and the uniformizer assertion:
Now take with and . The translated cyclotomic polynomial is
In characteristic , putting reduces this to . Its constant coefficient over the integers is . It is therefore Eisenstein at , of degree . Consequently is totally ramified of degree , with uniformizer . If , the field is simply , a trivial totally ramified extension.
For a general positive integer with , the field generated by the prime-to- root of unity is unramified. Indeed has distinct roots modulo . In a finite unramified field whose residue field contains those roots, Hensel lemma lifts all of them uniquely. Reduction preserves their orders: a prime-to- root reducing to one must itself be one, by Hensel uniqueness at the root one of . The arithmetic Frobenius therefore acts as , and the extension degree is the multiplicative order of modulo , with degree one when .
The identity
follows by taking powers of a primitive nth root of unity and using the coprimality of in the opposite direction. The prime-to- field is unramified and the -power field is totally ramified; unramified base change preserves total ramification proves that their compositum has the same residue degree as the prime-to- field. Thus the total ramification criterion for local cyclotomic extensions gives the full classification:
This includes trivial extensions when . For only is possible.
For a finite totally ramified Galois extension with Galois group , define its lower ramification numbering by
Here is the inertia group, which equals , and is the wild inertia group. For a uniformizer the condition is equivalent to . To justify this uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, expand every as a convergent series with the coefficients chosen from representatives of in . Such an expansion is obtained by successive subtraction of a residue representative and division by , since total ramification gives . The automorphism fixes each , and is divisible by . Thus the required valuation bound for implies it for every , including the limit by completeness.
For , all primitive conjugates lie in and the Eisenstein degree is . Hence
If , put , so . The element is a primitive th root of unity. Applying the already proved uniformizer result to its field, and multiplying its valuation by the ramification index of over that field, gives
The identity automorphism has infinite valuation. Therefore the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension is explicitly
The order of the middle group is . At odd , has order ; at , the condition is automatic, so when . The case has trivial Galois group, and the displayed formula remains valid. For all groups are trivial. The valuation calculation also provides the upper ramification numbering, if desired, by integrating the reciprocal indices with the Herbrand function; no change of numbering is implicit in the displayed answer.
The multiplicative Hilbert theorem 90 states that, for a finite Galois extension with Galois group , every multiplicative cocycle satisfying has the form for some . In the cyclic case , it says
Here is the full existence argument. Distinct field homomorphisms are linearly independent as functions over . To see this Artin independence theorem directly, assume a nonzero identically vanishing relation with the fewest nonzero coefficients. There are at least two terms. Choose two participating embeddings and an element with . Evaluate the relation at and subtract times its value at . The th term disappears while the first remains nonzero, giving a shorter vanishing relation, a contradiction.
Apply this independence to
The coefficients are nonzero, so is not identically zero; choose with . The cocycle identity gives , and hence
This proves the general statement. In the cyclic case, given , set and for . The norm-one identity makes this definition compatible with , and the cocycle identity follows by concatenating the products. The argument above gives . Conversely that quotient has norm one because its conjugate product telescopes.
Finally let be unramified, and take its arithmetic Frobenius . For a unit of norm one, the cyclic theorem gives with . Write and choose the common uniformizer . Then has valuation zero, and implies . Thus the unit form of Hilbert theorem 90 is
The unramified hypothesis is what permits shifting an arbitrary integer valuation of by a power of a uniformizer belonging to .
Let be a uniformizer. Because is unramified, the same is a uniformizer of , and . The conjugates of all have the same valuation, so
This proves that every field norm has valuation divisible by . Conversely for every integer , so it remains to prove surjectivity of unit norms in unramified extensions.
Write , so . Reduction of the field norm on units is the finite-field norm
The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. The displayed power map on a group of order has image of order , and is therefore onto . Given a unit , first choose with .
We can correct the norm at each subsequent power of . For and , expanding the product over the cyclic Galois group gives
All products involving at least two correction terms are divisible by , hence by . The residue field trace is onto even if the residue characteristic divides . Indeed its polynomial is nonzero of degree ; it cannot vanish at every element of . Its values lie in , since raising to cyclically permutes the summands. Thus it is a nonzero -linear map to the one-dimensional space , and is surjective.
Suppose . Choose whose trace is the coefficient of in , and put . Then , and . By completeness the units converge to a unit . The field norm is continuous, being a polynomial in coordinates of multiplication, so . Multiplying such a unit by a power of proves
The proof uses no local class field theory, and works in either characteristic.
Fix a non-Archimedean local field , write , and use the arithmetic Frobenius normalization throughout: a uniformizer maps to the automorphism inducing on the maximal unramified extension. The Local Artin map, or local reciprocity map, is the canonical continuous group homomorphism
where is the maximal abelian extension inside a fixed algebraic closure with its separable part understood. Its finite projection to every finite abelian extension is onto and has kernel exactly the norm subgroup of a local field extension:
In particular, the quotient has order . This is how local class field theory turns abelian extension problems into computations inside a multiplicative group.
One precise definition of the finite reciprocity map uses the cup-product construction of local reciprocity. For a finite Galois extension with group , the local fundamental class is specified by local Brauer invariant . Cup product gives an isomorphism
The finite Local Artin map is its inverse, composed with the quotient map from . For abelian the target is itself. Taking the compatible inverse limit over finite abelian extensions defines .
The essential inputs to this cohomological construction have concrete arithmetic content. The local Brauer invariant identifies with ; restriction to multiplies the invariant by , so its kernel is cyclic of that order and has the distinguished generator . For every subgroup , Hilbert theorem 90 gives , while the same invariant calculation over the fixed field gives cyclic of order . These are the hypotheses of the algebraic cup-product isomorphism in Tate cohomology of a finite group. It is obtained by dimension shifting in group cohomology with a projective resolution of the trivial module and the extension representing the fundamental class. Thus the norm-kernel statement comes from the degree-zero definition of Tate cohomology of a finite group, rather than from an arbitrary assignment of an automorphism to each element. In an unramified extension of degree , the fundamental class is the cyclic algebra with arithmetic Frobenius generator and parameter a uniformizer; the isomorphism sends that Frobenius to the class of the uniformizer. This explains the chosen sign of reciprocity.
Several properties follow immediately from this construction. If are finite abelian extensions, restricting to gives . The Local Artin map is therefore compatible with the finite projections defining its infinite target. For any finite separable extension and , its norm compatibility is
Here is abelian, so the displayed restriction makes sense. An outline of the compatibility proof is to use the corestriction map in group cohomology: on multiplicative coefficients its degree-zero map is the norm. The cup-product projection formula, together with restriction and corestriction of the local fundamental class, gives exactly the commuting reciprocity diagram. The compatibility is an arithmetic instance of the functoriality of the cohomological definition.
The Local Artin map has dense image, because every finite abelian quotient receives a surjective map. Its kernel is trivial, and it extends to an isomorphism
where this profinite completion uses the open finite-index subgroups of the topological multiplicative group. The original map is generally not onto: on the unramified quotient it sends the integer valuation into , rather than producing every profinite integer. Its units map onto the abelian inertia group. For a finite abelian extension, the corresponding unit image is its inertia group, while the valuation accounts for its residue extension. Indeed , so the valuation quotient has order ; the full norm quotient has order , leaving unit image of order . Since unit images act trivially on the residue field, they give precisely the inertia group. More finely, the image of the higher principal-unit group in a finite abelian extension is its rth upper ramification group, for each integer . The use of upper ramification numbering is essential for compatibility with quotients.
The existence theorem of local class field theory states that every open finite-index subgroup is for a unique finite abelian extension . Inclusions are reversed: larger extensions have smaller norm subgroups. In the established reciprocity isomorphism, the proof is simply to take the fixed field of the open subgroup corresponding to . Conversely a finite extension gives an open kernel of a finite continuous projection. Uniqueness follows because that kernel specifies its fixed field. The substantive existence problem is therefore to prove that the reciprocity isomorphism realizes all open finite-index subgroups; it is not just this final fixed-field argument.
The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity provides an explicit route to that existence problem. Choose a uniformizer and a Lubin–Tate series , with its associated Lubin–Tate formal group . Solving successively by total degree constructs the law with linear part ; the analogous equations construct the endomorphisms with linear coefficient . The congruence supplies the divisibility needed at each step. These endomorphisms satisfy and make the torsion an -module.
If denotes the rfold iterate, the primitive level-r Lubin–Tate torsion points are roots of
Reduction modulo is , and the constant term is , so this is an Eisenstein polynomial. Its roots therefore generate a totally ramified extension of degree . A primitive point generates the entire torsion module, and all points are its images under the integral convergent endomorphisms . The torsion field is therefore a Galois extension of . The action map into is injective, and the computed degree equals the order of this unit group, proving it is an isomorphism. Passing to the inverse limit gives for the Lubin–Tate tower .
The unramified tower and are linearly disjoint field extensions: a finite common subextension would be both unramified and totally ramified, hence trivial. The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity on their compositum is
The inverse on the unit action goes with the arithmetic Frobenius convention; changing to geometric Frobenius inverts the whole reciprocity map. The reciprocity theorem identifies this explicit action with the finite cup-product maps, independently of the chosen uniformizer. Its proof compares the fundamental class with the norm relations between consecutive torsion fields. The construction makes the possible finite kernels concrete: on the compositum of the degree-d unramified field with the kernel is
These subgroups are cofinal among open finite-index subgroups. Indeed any such contains for sufficiently large , and contains for some positive , since the class of in has finite order. Taking the appropriate fixed subgroup in this explicit finite compositum realizes . This proves the open-subgroup part of existence once the norm compatibility of the explicit and cohomological constructions is established. Together with the finite reciprocity maps it also shows that .
As a direct check, on a finite unramified extension the construction reduces to
The earlier elementary unit-norm proof shows its kernel is exactly . At , the Lubin–Tate cyclotomic example takes and . Its torsion is , so a unit acts by . These examples exhibit both the valuation and unit parts of local reciprocity with consistent signs.