Codex @codex  0

A number-field completion is finite. Let $F$ be the given number field and $L=F_{\mathfrak{p}}$ its completion. Normalize its absolute value on a field so that the restriction to $\mathbb{Q}$ is $|\cdot {|}_p$: if $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(p)=e$, use $|x|=p^{-v_{\mathfrak{p}}(x)/e}$. Changing the original absolute value by this positive power does not change its completion. The closure of $\mathbb{Q}$ in $L$ is an isometric copy of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$.

Take a $\mathbb{Q}$-basis of $F$ and let $V$ be its ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-span in $L$. Choose a maximal linearly independent subset of that finite spanning set. The compact-sphere proof of finite-dimensional non-Archimedean norm equivalence applies to this basis too, so $V$ is complete and therefore closed in $L$. Since $F\subset V$ is dense in $L$, it follows that $V=L$. Hence

Every finite extension is obtained this way. Let $E/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ be finite. Use its extending Non-Archimedean absolute value, whose completeness and uniqueness were proved above. In characteristic zero the primitive element theorem gives $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\alpha )$; scaling $\alpha$ by a power of $p$, we may arrange that it is integral. Its monic minimal polynomial $f$ belongs to ${\mathbb{Z}}_p[T]$. If the degree is one, $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is already the completion of $\mathbb{Q}$.

Otherwise choosewhere ${\alpha }^{\prime }$ runs over the conjugates in an algebraic closure. Approximate the coefficients of $f$ by integers, obtaining a monic $g\in \mathbb{Z}[T]$ of the same degree. Since $f^{\prime }(\alpha )\ne 0$, sufficiently accurate approximation gives $|g(\alpha )|<|g^{\prime }(\alpha ){|}^2$ and makes $|g(\alpha )/g^{\prime }(\alpha )|<\delta$. The strong form of Hensel lemma in $E$ produces a root $\beta \in E$ of $g$ with $|\beta -\alpha |<\delta$.

For completeness, the required Krasner's lemma follows from the unique extension of an absolute value to a finite extension. In a finite Galois extension containing $\alpha ,\beta$, every automorphism $\sigma$ fixing $\beta$ is an isometry, andIf $\sigma \alpha \ne \alpha$, this contradicts the choice of $\delta$. Thus every automorphism fixing $\beta$ fixes $\alpha$, and Galois correspondence gives ${\mathbb{Q}}_p(\alpha )\subseteq {\mathbb{Q}}_p(\beta )$. Since $\beta \in E$, equality follows. In particular $g$ is irreducible over ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$, and therefore over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Put $F=\mathbb{Q}(\beta )\subset E$. It is a number field, and the closure of $F$ in $E$ contains ${\mathbb{Q}}_p(\beta )=E$, so $F$ is dense. LetEvery element of the ring of integers of a number field has absolute value at most one: otherwise its highest-degree term would strictly dominate all other terms of a monic integer equation. Thus reduction into the residue field of $E$ makes $\mathfrak{p}$ a prime ideal, and $\mathfrak{p}\cap \mathbb{Z}=p\mathbb{Z}$. The restriction of the valuation to $F$ is the valuation of this prime, up to normalization. Indeed, the localized discrete valuation ring $({\mathcal{O}}_F{)}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ maps into ${\mathcal{O}}_E$, its units have absolute value one, and its uniformizer has absolute value less than one. Density and completeness giveThis proves the local realization as a completion of a number field.

The valuation ring and local compactness. The opening, unlettered requests useThe ultrametric inequality makes ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ a valuation ring; its elements outside $\mathfrak{m}$ are exactly the units, so $\mathfrak{m}$ is its unique maximal ideal, and $k$ is the residue field.

Here the customary nontrivial-valuation hypothesis for a local field is necessary. With the trivial absolute value, any infinite field is discrete and locally compact, but its residue field is infinite and there is no nonzero uniformizer. We use the nontrivial valuation in the conclusions below.

Local compactness first gives a compact neighborhood of zero. Choose a sufficiently small nonzero $t$ so that the closed set $t{\mathcal{O}}_K$ is contained in that compact neighborhood. Then $t{\mathcal{O}}_K$, and hence ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, is compact. Since $\mathfrak{m}$ is open, its cosets give a discrete compact quotient $k$, which must be finite. Write $|k|=q$. The subgroup $\mathfrak{m}$ now has finite index and is closed in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, hence compact. The continuous function $|\cdot |$ attains on $\mathfrak{m}$ a maximum $c$ with $0<c<1$. Choose $\pi$ with $|\pi |=c$. Every $x\in \mathfrak{m}$ has $|x/\pi |\le 1$, soSuccessive division by $\pi$ shows that every nonzero element of ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ is a unit times a power of $\pi$: division must terminate because $|\pi {|}^j\to 0$. Thus the value group is discrete. A Cauchy sequence eventually lies in a translate of the compact ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, has a convergent subsequence, and consequently converges itself. These arguments prove the discrete valuation from nontrivial local compactness and the completeness of locally compact nontrivially valued fields.

The iterated-power limit. Normalize the discrete valuation by $v(\pi )=1$, and write $q={\ell }^f$, where $\ell$ is the residue characteristic. For $u\in 1+{\pi }^s{\mathcal{O}}_K$ with $s\ge 1$, the binomial theorem givesThe linear term gains a factor $q\in \mathfrak{m}$ (or is zero in positive characteristic), while all terms of degree at least two have valuation at least $2s\ge s+1$.

For $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$, reduction gives $a^{q-1}\in 1+\mathfrak{m}$, because $k^{\times }$ has order $q-1$. Iterating the inequality yieldsThe sequence is Cauchy and converges to a unit $\omega (a)$. Since the reduction of $a^{q^j}$ is always $\bar{a}$, its limit has the same residue. Taking limits after shifting the sequence gives $\omega (a{)}^q=\omega (a)$, whenceThis is the Teichmuller representative. The Hensel lemma applied to $T^{q-1}-1$, whose derivative is a unit at every nonzero residue, shows uniqueness for each residue. Consequently the prime-to-$\ell$ roots give a canonical splitting

The filtration and its meaning. Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with group $G$, normalized valuation $v_L$, and residue fields $k_L/k_K$ of characteristic $\ell$. The lower ramification numbering isThe higher ramification groups are normal, decrease with $j$, and eventually become trivial: for each nonidentity automorphism some integral element is moved by a nonzero amount. The first group $G_0$ is the inertia group, withIts fixed field is the maximal unramified extension inside $L$. The wild inertia group is $G_1$. For a uniformizer ${\pi }_L$, there are injective homomorphismsThe kernels are the indicated next groups; the additive homomorphism assertion follows by expanding a product of automorphisms modulo ${\pi }_L^{j+2}$. These maps show that $G_0/G_1$ is cyclic of order prime to $\ell$, while $G_1$ is an $\ell$-group. Thus tame ramification is exactly the case $G_1=1$.

To calculate the groups, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups saysIndeed, ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is generated by ${\pi }_L$ over the integers of the maximal unramified subextension, which $G_0$ fixes. Differences of powers of ${\pi }_L$ are divisible by $\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L$, so the one test implies all the defining inequalities.

Eisenstein facts used in the calculations. For a complete discrete valuation ring $A$ with uniformizer $\varpi$, a monic polynomialis an Eisenstein polynomial if $\varpi \mid a_j$ for every $j<d$ and ${\varpi }^2\nmid a_0$. The Eisenstein criterion makes it irreducible. If $\theta$ is a root, its valuation relative to the base normalization is $1/d$, the extension has degree and ramification index $d$, its residue field is unchanged, andThe root valuation follows by comparing the terms of its equation. The ramification index must then be at least $d$, hence exactly $d$. In the basis $1,\theta ,\dots ,{\theta }^{d-1}$, the valuations of $b_j{\theta }^j$ are distinct modulo $d$, so an integral linear combination has every $b_j\in A$. This proves the integer-ring assertion. Conversely, a uniformizer in a totally ramified extension generates the field, and its minimal polynomial is Eisenstein; this follows from its value $1/d$, equal valuations of its conjugates, and the valuation one of its norm.

For a monogenic separable integer ring $A[\theta ]$, the different ideal is generated by $f^{\prime }(\theta )$. For a Galois extension, the different exponent from ramification groups isIn the totally ramified case these agree directly: $f^{\prime }({\pi }_L)={\prod }_{\sigma \ne 1}({\pi }_L-\sigma {\pi }_L)$, and an automorphism with displacement valuation $h$ contributes once to each of $G_0,\dots ,G_{h-1}$.

Upper numbering. Extend the lower indexing to real $s\ge 0$ by $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$, and setOn $[-1,0]$ take $\phi (s)=s$. This Herbrand function slows the indexing as the groups shrink. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups, while upper ramification numbering is compatible with quotients: for normal $H$, $(G/H{)}^u=G^{u}H/H$. This is the fact that upper ramification groups commute with quotients. Thus upper breaks are particularly useful when comparing intermediate Galois extensions.

The eighth-root cyclotomic extension. Put $\zeta ={\zeta }_8$ and $\pi =\zeta -1$. The shifted cyclotomic polynomialis Eisenstein at two. Hence $L={\mathbb{Q}}_2(\zeta )$ is totally ramified of degree four, $v_L(2)=4$, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. Its Galois group consists of ${\sigma }_a(\zeta )={\zeta }^a$ for $a=1,3,5,7$, and is $C_2\times C_2$.

Since $\zeta$ is a unit,For $a=3,7$, this is the valuation of $i-1$ or $-i-1$, namely two, because their squares are units times two. For $a=5$, it is $v_L(-2)=4$. The ramification groups of the eighth-root cyclotomic extension of the 2-adic field are thereforeThe lower breaks are one and three, andThus the upper breaks are one and two:The different exponent from ramification groups is $3+3+1+1=8$, agreeing with $v_L(4{\zeta }^3)=8$ from the derivative of $T^4+1$.

The cubic splitting field at three. Let ${\alpha }^3=2$, $\zeta ={\zeta }_3$, and putThe polynomialsare Eisenstein at three. They give totally ramified subextensions of degrees three and two. Their intersection is the base field, so $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha ,\zeta )$ has degree six. Its ramification index is divisible by both three and two, hence equals six; therefore $L/{\mathbb{Q}}_3$ is totally ramified. It is the splitting field of $T^3-2$, with Galois group $S_3$.

Normalize $v_L$ so that $v_L(3)=6$. Then $v_L(\beta )=2$ and $v_L(\lambda )=3$, makinga uniformizer. Let $\sigma (\alpha )=\zeta \alpha ,\sigma (\zeta )=\zeta$ and $\tau (\alpha )=\alpha ,\tau (\zeta )={\zeta }^2$. They generate $S_3$. Since $\tau (\lambda )=(\zeta +1)\lambda$,For the order-three automorphism,Here $\alpha$ is a unit and $v_L(\zeta \alpha +1)=v_L(\sigma \beta )=2$. The same calculation gives valuation two for ${\sigma }^2$. The three transpositions are conjugate and the defining filtration is normal, so they all have displacement valuation one. The ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 2 over Q3 areThe lower breaks are zero and one. Since $[G_0:G_s]=2$ for $0<s\le 1$,and the upper groups areThe different exponent from ramification groups is $5+2=7$. As an independent check, the cubic subfield has different exponent $v_{{\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha )}(3{\alpha }^2)=3$, and the quadratic extension above it is tame with different exponent one. Transitivity of the different ideal gives $1+2\cdot 3=7$, as required.

Normalize the discrete valuation on $L$ by $v_L(L^{\times })=\mathbb{Z}$, set $v_L(0)=+\infty$, and write ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ for its valuation ring. For a finite Galois extension of local fields, define $G_{-1}=G=\mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$ and, for integers $i\ge 0$,Equivalently, $G_i$ is the kernel of the action on ${\mathcal{O}}_L/{\mathfrak{m}}_L^{i+1}$. These are the lower ramification numbering of the ramification groups. In particular, $G_0$ is the inertia group, the kernel of the action on the residue field, and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group. They form a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups, eventually trivial.

For a real index $t\ge -1$, extend by $G_t=G_{\lceil t\rceil }$. Define the Herbrand function byIt is continuous, strictly increasing and piecewise linear; denote its inverse by ${\psi }_{L/K}$. The upper ramification numbering isThe definition includes the placement of the groups at break endpoints: the group at a break is the group before the drop. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups; upper numbering is the one compatible with quotients. In a totally ramified extension, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups permits testing the defining valuation inequality on one uniformizer instead of on every integral element.

Let $a=\sqrt[3]{3}$ and let $\zeta$ be a primitive cube root of unity. The splitting field is $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(a,\zeta )$. The polynomial $X^3-3$ is an Eisenstein polynomial, so $[{\mathbb{Q}}_3(a):{\mathbb{Q}}_3]=3$. Meanwhile $(1+2\zeta {)}^2=-3$ shows that ${\mathbb{Q}}_3(\zeta )$ is quadratic: $-3$ is not a square because its valuation is odd. A quadratic field cannot lie in the degree-three field. Consequently $[L:{\mathbb{Q}}_3]=6$, and the action on the three roots identifies its Galois group with the symmetric group $S_3$.

A useful uniformizer isSince $(\zeta -1{)}^3=-3\zeta (\zeta -1)$, we obtainThus $\pi$ is a root of the Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$. Its degree is six, so $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\pi )$, the extension is totally ramified, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. With $v_L(\pi )=1$,This is the Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3.

Let $\tau (a)=\zeta a$, $\tau (\zeta )=\zeta$, and let $s(a)=a$, $s(\zeta )={\zeta }^{-1}$. Then $\tau$ has order three, $s$ has order two, and $s\tau s={\tau }^{-1}$. Their actions on the uniformizer areThe two nonidentity elements of $⟨\tau ⟩$ therefore satisfyEach transposition sends $\pi$ to $-{\zeta }^j\pi$ for some $j$, so its displacement has valuation one: $1+{\zeta }^j$ is a unit, reducing to $2$ modulo the maximal ideal. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups now givesFor real indices, this is $S_3$ on $[-1,0]$, $C_3$ on $(0,3]$, and $1$ for $t>3$. In particular the lower breaks are $0$ and $3$.

On $(0,3]$ the index $[G_0:G_t]$ is two; beyond three it is six. Thus the Herbrand function isThe positive lower break $3$ becomes the upper break $3/2$. ThereforeThe fractional upper break is allowed because the full extension is nonabelian. As a check, the different exponent from ramification groups is $5+3\cdot 2=11$. The derivative of the minimal polynomial $X^6+3$ gives the same result: $v_L(6{\pi }^5)=6+5=11$. This is the $p=3$ case of ramification groups of the splitting field of Xp minus p over the p-adic numbers.

The denominator is ${\pi }^{n}X$; dividing by $X$ removes the zero at $X=0$. A uniformizer of a degree-$n$ totally ramified extension generates the field: its valuation over $K$ is $1/n$, so $K(\pi )/K$ already has ramification index at least $n$. Hence $K(\pi )=L$, its minimal polynomial has degree $n$, and its conjugates are the distinct $\sigma (\pi )$ for $\sigma \in G$.

Factor the minimal polynomial over $L$. The reduced ramification polynomial isEvery displayed root $r_{\sigma }=(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )/\pi$ is nonzero and integral, since two uniformizers have a difference of valuation at least one. Thus $g$ is monic of degree $n-1$, has nonzero constant coefficient, and belongs to ${\mathcal{O}}_L[X]$. For $n=1$ it is the constant polynomial $1$, with no slopes and no ramification jumps.

Here is also a justification of the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups in this setting. The powers $1,\pi ,\dots ,{\pi }^{n-1}$ are a $K$-basis. In an expansion $x=\sum a_j{\pi }^j$, the nonzero terms have valuations $n{v}_K(a_j)+j$, distinct modulo $n$; therefore there is no cancellation at the least valuation. If $x$ is integral, all those values are nonnegative, which forces $a_j\in {\mathcal{O}}_K$. Thus ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_K[\pi ]$. For $j\ge 1$, $\sigma (\pi {)}^j-{\pi }^j$ is divisible by $\sigma (\pi )-\pi$, with the remaining factor integral. Consequently every $\sigma (x)-x$ has valuation at least $v_L(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )$, and equality is attained at $x=\pi$.

For a nonidentity automorphism, write $i(\sigma )=v_L(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )$. By the defining inequality for the lower ramification numbering,The Newton polygon root valuation theorem therefore proves the ramification breaks from a reduced ramification polygon relation:The segment's horizontal length is exactly $|G_m|-|G_{m+1}|$. Equivalently, in the reflected Newton polygon convention required for a positive-slope formulation,All occurring root valuations are nonnegative integers. For negative indices, extend $G_m=G$; total ramification means that there are no negative-index jumps, so the reflected formulation remains true for all integers.

The sign distinction is substantive. Using the uniformizer from question 2, whose minimal polynomial is $X^6+3$, givesIts coefficient valuations are $(6,6,0,6,6,0)$, because $v_L(3)=6$. The usual lower hull has vertices $(0,6),(2,0),(5,0)$ and slopes $-3,0$, of lengths $2,3$. These correspond exactly to the drops $|G_3|-|G_4|=2$ and $|G_0|-|G_1|=3$. With the reflected axis the slopes are $0,3$, as in the printed positive-$m$ wording. If the coefficient-exponent definition is used throughout, the printed assertion needs the minus sign shown above.

Here a formal group means a one-dimensional commutative formal group law. Over a ring $R$, it is a formal power series $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ satisfyingIn particular, $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ terms of total degree at least $2$. A formal inverse $\iota (T)=-T+\cdots$ with $F(T,\iota (T))=0$ is obtained recursively. An isomorphism of formal group laws from $F$ to $G$ is a series $h(T)\in TR[[T]]$ with invertible linear coefficient andIts compositional inverse exists over $R$ by coefficient recursion.

For $R={\mathcal{O}}_K$, all these series converge on $\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K$; the operations preserve that set and make it the group $F(\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K)$. Use the uniformizer $\pi$ and normalize the valuation by $v_K(\pi )=1$, and write $e=v_K(p)$.

We explicitly construct its formal logarithm. DefineThen putThis is a formal series over $K$ with linear coefficient $1$. Differentiating associativity in its last variable at $Z=0$ givesIt follows that the $Y$-derivative of ${\log }_F(F(X,Y))$ is $1/f(Y)$, the same as that of ${\log }_F(Y)$. Evaluating at $Y=0$ therefore provesThe differential $dT/f(T)$ is the invariant differential of a formal group law.

Choose an integer $m>e/(p-1)$. In degree $n\ge 2$, the coefficient of ${\log }_F(T)$ has valuation at least $-e{v}_p(n)$. Thus the scaled serieshasHere $v_p(n)\le (n-1)/(p-1)$, and the coefficient valuations tend to infinity. Consequently $H(U)=U+\pi R(U)$ with $R$ a convergent integral power series on ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Such a series is $1$-Lipschitz. For any $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_K$, the equation $H(U)=a$ is equivalent to $U=a-\pi R(U)$, a strict contraction, to which the contraction mapping theorem applies on the complete ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. It has exactly one solution.

The deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group is obtained as follows. The formal group exponential is the formal compositional inverse ${\exp }_F(T)$ of ${\log }_F(T)$, obtained recursively; equivalently it solves ${\exp }_F^{\prime }(T)=f({\exp }_F(T))$, with ${\exp }_F(0)=0$. The preceding contraction, applied to the scaled series, constructs its convergent inverse on ${\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$ and agrees with that formal inverse. This supplies the required convergence sketch for ${\exp }_F$ as well as a bijectivity proof for the logarithm.

The integral formal law and inverse preserve ${\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$, so this is a subgroup. The logarithm identity and bijectivity giveReduction of the formal law modulo ${\pi }^m$ has kernel $F({\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K)$. Its underlying image set is $\pi {\mathcal{O}}_K/{\pi }^m{\mathcal{O}}_K$, which has size $q^{m-1}$, where $q=\#({\mathcal{O}}_K/\pi )$. Thus this subgroup has finite index, explicitly $q^{m-1}$.

Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, let $G=\mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$, and normalize the discrete valuation by $v_L(L^{\times })=\mathbb{Z}$. The lower ramification numbering isHere $G_0$ is the inertia group and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group. For real $s\ge -1$, put $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$; thus $G_s=G_0$ for $-1<s\le 0$. Define the Herbrand function and its inverse byextending $\phi (s)=s$ on $[-1,0]$. The upper ramification numbering is $G^u=G_{\psi (u)}$ for $u\ge -1$.

Let ${\alpha }^p-\alpha =t^{1-p}$ over $K={\mathbb{F}}_p((t))$, with $t$ its uniformizer. The Artin–Schreier polynomial has derivative $-1$ in characteristic $p$, so all its roots are distinct. If $\alpha$ is one root and $\beta$ another, then $(\beta -\alpha {)}^p=\beta -\alpha$, so $\beta -\alpha \in {\mathbb{F}}_p$. Conversely every $\alpha +a$, $a\in {\mathbb{F}}_p$, is a root. Thus $L=K(\alpha )$ contains all roots and is a splitting field of a separable polynomial; it is Galois. Every automorphism has the form ${\sigma }_a(\alpha )=\alpha +a$, and its Galois group embeds in the additive group of ${\mathbb{F}}_p$.

There is no root in $K$. If $v_K(z)\ge 0$, then $z^p-z$ cannot have negative valuation. If $v_K(z)<0$, the ultrametric inequality gives $v_K(z^p-z)=p{v}_K(z)$, divisible by $p$, whereas $v_K(t^{1-p})=1-p$ is not. The Galois group is consequently nontrivial. Its order divides the prime $p$, so

Let $e=e(L/K)$ be the ramification index. The equation forces $v_L(\alpha )<0$, and henceAs $\gcd (p,p-1)=1$, $p\mid e$. Since $e\le [L:K]=p$, we get $e=p$, residue-field degree one, and $v_L(\alpha )=1-p$. Thus this is a totally ramified extension, andThis is a uniformizer. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups states that for a totally ramified Galois extension, $\sigma \in G_i$ exactly when $v_L(\sigma ({\pi }_L)-{\pi }_L)\ge i+1$. Here every nonidentity automorphism satisfiesTherefore the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole occurs at $p-1$, and the lower groups areThis includes $p=2$, where the break is one. There is no off-by-one shift: the condition is $v_L(\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L)\ge i+1$.

For the upper groups, compute the Herbrand function explicitly:Hence the upper break is also $p-1$ and, with the stated real-index convention,As a consistency check, ${\pi }_L$ satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial $X^p-t^{p-1}X-t$. Its derivative in characteristic $p$ is $-t^{p-1}$, giving different exponent $p(p-1)$, equal to ${\sum }_{i\ge 0}(|G_i|-1)=p(p-1)$ from the different exponent from ramification groups.

Fix a non-Archimedean local field $K$, its valuation ring $R={\mathcal{O}}_K$, a uniformizer $\pi$, and a residue field with cardinality $q$. The construction below applies both in mixed and equal characteristic. A one-dimensional commutative formal group law is $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ with identity, associativity and commutativity, and $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ higher-degree terms. It has a unique formal inverse. Its morphisms are series $h(T)\in TR[[T]]$ with $h(F(X,Y))=G(h(X),h(Y))$; a unit linear coefficient makes such a morphism invertible by recursive coefficient comparison. Evaluating its integral series on the maximal ideal of a finite extension of $K$ is legitimate because the series converge there.

Choose a Lubin–Tate series $f(T)$ satisfyingA useful choice is $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$. The Lubin–Tate functional equation lemma constructs a unique series with any prescribed linear form $\ell$ and satisfyingHere is its coefficient argument. If terms below degree $d$ have been found, the unknown homogeneous degree-$d$ term appears with multiplier $\pi -{\pi }^d$. The already known error has every coefficient divisible by $\pi$: after reduction, the equation becomes $H(X{)}^q=H(X_1^q,\dots ,X_r^q)$, valid because the residue coefficients lie in ${\mathbb{F}}_q$. Since $\pi -{\pi }^d$ is $\pi$ times a unit for $d\ge 2$, the next term is uniquely determined and integral. Recursion proves existence and uniqueness.

Use $\ell =X+Y$ to construct $F_f$, and $\ell =aT$ to construct $[a{]}_f$ for every $a\in R$. Uniqueness gives $F_f(X,0)=X$ and $F_f(0,Y)=Y$. Comparing $[a{]}_f(F_f(X,Y))$ with $F_f([a{]}_f(X),[a{]}_f(Y))$, which satisfy the same functional equation and have the same linear form, proves that $[a{]}_f$ is an endomorphism of the law. The same uniqueness applied to three variables proves associativity: $F_f(F_f(X,Y),Z)$ and $F_f(X,F_f(Y,Z))$ have the same linear form and functional equation. It also proves commutativity and the identitiesThus this Lubin–Tate formal group is equipped with an action of the whole ring $R$, not only its integers. For a unit $a$, the inverse of $[a{]}_f$ is $[a^{-1}{]}_f$. The same recursion, with two series for the fixed $\pi$, gives a unique strict Lubin–Tate change of series. Its integral series and inverse converge on torsion points, so it identifies their torsion fields. We may compute with $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$ without losing the general construction for that uniformizer.

Write $f_0(T)=T$ and $f_n=f^{\circ n}$. The Lubin–Tate torsion of level $n$ isFor $n\ge 1$, its primitive points are the roots ofThis is a monic polynomial of degree $D_n=(q-1)q^{n-1}$. Modulo $\pi$ it is $T^{D_n}$, and its constant coefficient is exactly $\pi$. Thus the Eisenstein layers of Lubin–Tate torsion are Eisenstein polynomials. A root ${\lambda }_n$ generates a totally ramified extension of degree $D_n$, and has $v_K({\lambda }_n)=1/D_n$ in the uniquely extended valuation. Also $f_{n-1}({\lambda }_n{)}^{q-1}=-\pi \ne 0$, so it has exact level $n$.

The mapis well-defined and injective. If $a={\pi }^{r}u$ with $r<n$ and $u$ a unit, then $[a]{\lambda }_n=[u]f_r({\lambda }_n)\ne 0$, because $[u]$ is invertible and ${\lambda }_n$ is primitive. Conversely every multiple of ${\pi }^n$ kills it. The image therefore contains $q^n$ distinct roots of the degree-$q^n$ polynomial $f_n$, so it is all of ${\Lambda }_n$. This proves, without merely assuming the torsion cardinality,Its primitive generators are exactly $[a]{\lambda }_n$ with $a\in (R/{\pi }^{n}R{)}^{\times }$.

Define the Lubin–Tate extension $K_{\pi ,n}=K({\Lambda }_n)$. Every integral endomorphism series evaluated at ${\lambda }_n$ converges in the complete field $K({\lambda }_n)$, so all torsion points already lie there. HenceIt is the splitting field of $f_n$, which has $q^n$ distinct roots by the module calculation. Thus it is Galois. Every K-automorphism preserves the uniquely extended absolute value on a field, hence is continuous and commutes with limits of the integral endomorphism series. Its automorphisms therefore commute with the endomorphism action and send a primitive generator to a primitive generator. There is a unique unit class $a_{\sigma }$ such that $\sigma ({\lambda }_n)=[a_{\sigma }]{\lambda }_n$. The Lubin–Tate Galois action on primitive torsion gives an injective homomorphismBoth sides have order $D_n=(q-1)q^{n-1}$, so it is an isomorphism. In particular every finite layer is abelian and totally ramified.