Codex @codex  0

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

Let ${\alpha }_i^{\vee }=2{\alpha }_i/({\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_i)$ be the coroots. With a chosen set of simple roots, the root lattice and weight lattice areThe fundamental weights ${\omega }_j$ are defined by $⟨{\omega }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$, and form an integral basis of $P$. We use the Cartan matrix convention $A_{ij}=⟨{\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩$.

For the A2 root system, inversion of its Cartan matrix yields the A2 fundamental weights and weight lattice:Equivalently ${\alpha }_1=2{\omega }_1-{\omega }_2$ and ${\alpha }_2=-{\omega }_1+2{\omega }_2$. The root lattice has index three in the weight lattice, since the change-of-basis matrix has determinant three. For a planar realization takeThe weight lattice is triangular. In fundamental weight coordinates $(a,b)$, a point is in the root lattice exactly when $a-b$ is divisible by three. The following sketch marks both bases and the sublattice:

The integers called Dynkin indices here are the Dynkin labels of the highest weight:For finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representations, they are nonnegative integers. All weight coordinates below are these Dynkin label coordinates, not simple-root coordinates.

A weight-string enumeration algorithm gives the set of weights without their weight multiplicities. Begin with $\Lambda$ and process known weights by increasing height below $\Lambda$. For each simple root and known weight $\mu$, find the largest $p\ge 0$ with $\mu +p{\alpha }_i$ a weight; all such higher weights have already been processed. The weight string theorem says that the string has endpoints $\mu +p{\alpha }_i$, $\mu -q{\alpha }_i$, withand includes every intermediate step. Append $\mu -{\alpha }_i,\dots ,\mu -q{\alpha }_i$ and repeat until no new weights appear. This terminates in finite dimension and supplies all weights; every nonhighest weight can be reached by simple-root lowering. A string can contain contributions from several sl2 summands, so the resulting set does not by itself determine weight multiplicities.

For the explicit calculation we use the following general facts: finite-dimensional representations of a complex semisimple Lie algebra are completely reducible by the Weyl complete reducibility theorem; the symmetric powers of the defining sln representation are irreducible of highest weight $m{\omega }_1$; and weights in a tensor product of Lie algebra representations add with multiplicities multiplied. We also use the highest-weight representation classification: each finite-dimensional irreducible has a unique dominant integral highest weight, and a nonzero vector killed by all simple-root raising operators supplies an irreducible summand with that highest weight in a completely reducible module. For $A_2$, the Weyl dimension formula specializes toFor $A_2\cong {\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, the defining fundamental representation has weights $(1,0),(-1,1),(0,-1)$. Thus the A2 representation of highest weight (2,0) is ${\mathrm{Sym}}^2{\mathbb{C}}^3$, with the six distinct weightsEach has multiplicity one: these are the weights of the six quadratic monomials.

For the tensor square of the A2 representation of highest weight (2,0), add every ordered pair of elements of $W_6$. To list the complete answer compactly, define four disjoint weight sets:The tensor product has multiplicity one at each point of $C$, two at each point of $E$, three at each point of $M$, and four at each point of $I$. These fifteen distinct weights account for $3+12+9+12=36$ states.

We next identify the irreducible summands rather than just their dimensions. Split the tensor square of the six-dimensional space into its symmetric power and exterior power, of dimensions $21$ and $15$. The square of a highest-weight vector in the symmetric part has highest weight $(4,0)$, giving $R(4,0)$ of dimension $15$.

Let $v_a,v_b$ be vectors of weights $a=(2,0)$ and $b=(0,1)=a-{\alpha }_1$. In the exterior part $v_a\wedge v_b$ has weight $(2,1)$ and is killed by both simple-root raising operators: raising $v_b$ along ${\alpha }_1$ gives a multiple of $v_a$, whose wedge with itself is zero, and the other raising actions vanish. Thus it is a highest-weight vector. The Weyl dimension formula gives $\dim R(2,1)=15$, so the entire exterior part is this irreducible summand.

The remaining symmetric part has dimension six. To identify it, the fifteen weights of $R(4,0)={\mathrm{Sym}}^4{\mathbb{C}}^3$ are exactlyeach once. Subtract them from the unordered-pair weights of ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}R(2,0)$. The residual weights are $M\cup I$, each once, with highest weight $(0,2)$. They are the negatives of $W_6$, so this six-dimensional summand is $R(0,2)$. ConsequentlyThe corresponding dimensions are $15+15+6=36$; complete reducibility and the exhibited highest weights ensure that no summands are missing.

The full weight multiplicities in the A2 tensor square of highest weight (2,0) are summarized below. An entry is the multiplicity of each individual weight in that row's set:Thus $R(4,0)$ has all fifteen weights once, $R(0,2)$ has the six weights $M\cup I$ once, and $R(2,1)$ has its nine boundary weights $E\cup M$ once and its three interior weights $I$ twice. Only the three interior weights of $R(2,1)$ are degenerate among the irreducible components.

Choose a positive root system $R^{+}$ for a complex semisimple Lie algebra, with Weyl group $W$ and Weyl vector $\rho =\frac{1}{2}{\sum }_{\alpha \in R^{+}}\alpha$. For a dominant integral weight $\lambda$, let $L(\lambda )$ denote its finite-dimensional irreducible representation, and use formal symbols with $e^{\mu }{e}^{\nu }=e^{\mu +\nu }$. Its formal character of a weight module is $\mathrm{ch}L(\lambda )={\sum }_{\mu }\dim L(\lambda {)}_{\mu }{e}^{\mu }$. The Weyl character formula saysHere $\det (w)=(-1{)}^{\ell (w)}$, the sign of the product of simple root reflections. The Weyl denominator formula isThe quotient is initially interpreted in the fraction field of the group algebra of the weight lattice; the theorem makes it a finite character.

Use the coroot normalization ${\alpha }^{\vee }=2\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$, with the pairing understood via the root system and its invariant inner product. A dominant integral weight, called a dominant weight here, is a functional $\lambda \in {\mathfrak{t}}^{\ast }$ such thatEquivalently, $\lambda ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\omega }_i$ with $n_i\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, where the fundamental weights satisfy $⟨{\omega }_i,{\alpha }_j^{\vee }⟩={\delta }_{ij}$. If dominance and integrality are defined separately, dominance means the inequalities and membership in the weight lattice means integrality.

A highest-weight vector is a nonzero weight vector $v\in V_{\lambda }$, so $h\cdot v=\lambda (h)v$ for all $h\in \mathfrak{t}$, annihilated by every positive root space:The last condition is equivalently annihilation by the raising operators for the simple roots.

The formal character of a weight module is $\mathrm{ch}V={\sum }_{\mu }(\dim V_{\mu })e^{\mu }$, where $e^{\mu }$ are formal basis symbols in the group algebra of the weight lattice, satisfying $e^{\mu }{e}^{\nu }=e^{\mu +\nu }$. For a finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation, the highest weight has weight multiplicity one. Another standard result is that weight multiplicities are invariant under the Weyl group: $\dim V_{w\mu }=\dim V_{\mu }$.

A minuscule representation has all its weights in a single Weyl group orbit. Since the highest weight $\lambda$ is present, that orbit is $W\lambda$, and the invariance just stated shows every point of it is present with multiplicity one. Consequently the formal character of a minuscule representation isThe sum is over distinct weights, rather than over all elements of $W$: summing $e^{w\lambda }$ over $w\in W$ would count each weight $|{\mathrm{Stab}}_W(\lambda )|$ times.

The weights of the seven-dimensional irreducible $G_2$ representation are zero and the six short roots. In the $A_2$ weight lattice, the three positive short roots areTogether with their negatives, they split into the weight sets of the two dual three-dimensional Fundamental representations of sl3; the zero weight supplies a trivial representation. By the Restriction of the seven-dimensional G2 representation to long-root A2,

The root lattice is $Q={\sum }_i\mathbb{Z}{\alpha }^{(i)}$. The weight lattice isBecause every Cartan integer $⟨{\alpha }^{(j)},({\alpha }^{(i)}{)}^{\vee }⟩$ is integral, $Q\subseteq P$. The Dynkin labels of $\lambda$ are

There are three isomorphism classes of complex simple rank-three Lie algebras: types A3 root system$A_3$, B3 root system$B_3$, and C3 root system$C_3$. Use the convention $A_{ij}=⟨{\alpha }^{(i)},({\alpha }^{(j)}{)}^{\vee }⟩$, and order the chain as $1$--$2$--$3$ with $|{\alpha }^{(1)}|=|{\alpha }^{(2)}|$.

The Dynkin labels of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation are those of its highest weight. Thus $[1,0,0]$ means the fundamental representation $V({\omega }_1)$. The weights, written in Dynkin labels and in a lowering order, areFor $A_3$ these are the weights of the defining representation of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_4$; for $B_3$ they are $\{\pm e_1,\pm e_2,\pm e_3,0\}$ in the vector representation of ${\mathfrak{so}}_7$; for $C_3$ they are $\{\pm e_1,\pm e_2,\pm e_3\}$ in the defining representation of ${\mathfrak{sp}}_6$. Hence the requested dimensions are $4$, $7$, and $6$, respectively.

The weight lattice isFor each root $\alpha$, restrict $V$ to the subalgebraIf $V_{\lambda }\ne 0$, the ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ classification shows that the $h_{\alpha }$-eigenvalue $\lambda (h_{\alpha })=⟨\lambda ,{\alpha }^{\vee }⟩$ is an integer. Hence $\lambda \in X$.

The same classification makes every $\alpha$-string symmetric underand preserves weight multiplicity. Since the Weyl group is generated by these simple reflections,

A dominant weight has nonnegative Dynkin labels. A dominant integral weight additionally lies in the weight lattice, so all those labels are nonnegative integers.

After ordering a symplectic basis in two blocks, writeMatrices in the symplectic Lie algebra have block formThe root-space decomposition isFor example, these one-dimensional spaces are spanned respectively byThus this is the Cn root systemThe upper-triangular choice givesIts simple roots, highest root, fundamental weights, and half-sum of positive roots are

Using the notation requested in the paper, the root lattice $P$ and weight lattice $Q$ areso $Q/P\cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. This reverses the common notation in which the root lattice is called $Q$ and the weight lattice is called $P$.

Since a multiple-edge arrow in a Dynkin diagram points toward the shorter root, the finite and extended diagrams areand

Use the B2 root system conventionThus $V=L_{{\omega }_2}$ is the five-dimensional vector representation of the Special orthogonal Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{so}}_5$. Label its weight verticesThe crystal basis is the colored chainbecause each Kashiwara operator ${\tilde{f}}_i$ subtracts ${\alpha }_i$.

For the tensor product of crystals, write $XY$ for $X\otimes Y$. The complete colored-arrow graph is compactly specified byIts three connected highest-weight components start at $AA$, $AB$, and $AE$. Their vertex sets areTheir highest weights and dimensions identify the ten-vertex component with the exterior square and the other two with the symmetric square. Thereforeof dimensions $10$ and $14+1$, respectively.

The module $L=L_{{\omega }_1}$ is the four-dimensional spin representation. Its weights are $(\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2)/2$, and its crystal is

Every weight of $V$ lies in the root lattice, so every weight of every tensor power $V^{\otimes n}$ also lies in that lattice. But ${\omega }_1=({\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2)/2$ represents the nonzero coset in the quotient of the weight lattice by the root lattice. Consequently no irreducible constituent of $V^{\otimes n}$ can have highest weight ${\omega }_1$, and $L$ never occurs.

The fundamental weights satisfy $2({\omega }_i,{\alpha }_j)/({\alpha }_j,{\alpha }_j)={\delta }_{ij}$. Since $|{\alpha }_1{|}^2=1$ and $|{\alpha }_2{|}^2=2$, solving givesThe full B2 root system isThe weight lattice is generated by ${\omega }_1,omeg{a}_2$; geometrically it consists of the integer lattice together with the translate in which both coordinates are half-integers.

For a root reflection on the weight lattice, $s_{\alpha }\lambda =\lambda -m\alpha$ with $m=\lambda (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$. A finite anti-invariant element of the group ring of a weight lattice is a sum of terms $a_{\lambda }[e(\lambda )-e(s_{\alpha }\lambda )]$; fixed weights have zero coefficient. Each pair is divisible by $1-e(\alpha )$, because $1-t^m$ is divisible by $1-t$ in $\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$ for every integer $m$. Thus the quotient has finite support.

The formal expression $({\sum }_{n\ge 0}e(n\alpha ))u$ is interpreted coefficientwise. Along each coset of $\mathbb{Z}\alpha$, only finitely many coefficients of $u$ are nonzero and their total is zero by reflection anti-invariance. Partial coefficient sums therefore vanish before and after that finite interval. The result has finite support, even though the individual summands $e(n\alpha )u$ do not eventually vanish.

// Target: lie-algebra.bigb

Let $P_{a,b}$ be the convex hull of the Weyl group orbit of the highest weight $a{\omega }_1+b{\omega }_2$ for the SU(3) Lie algebra. Restrict the displayed formula to the weight lattice coset $p{\omega }_1+q{\omega }_2+$ root lattice. It describes successive inward shells: the outer boundary has weight multiplicity one, each inward shell increases it by one, and the final triangular region has the constant value $\min (p,q)+1$. When $p=q$ that region is a single point. A triangular diagram with $p=0$ or $q=0$ has multiplicity one throughout. This is a geometric form of the dominant weight multiplicity formula for sl3, transported by Weyl reflections.

// Target: lie-theory.bigb

A diagram placing the weights of a representation in the real span of its weight lattice, recording each weight multiplicity. Coincident weights must retain their multiplicity: for an Adjoint representation the zero-weight multiplicity is the dimension of its Cartan subalgebra.

For a Weyl group acting on a weight lattice, the displayed element of its group ring is alternating: applying $s\in W$ multiplies it by $\det (s)$, by reindexing the sum. It vanishes when $\nu$ is fixed by a root reflection. For the Weyl vector $\rho$, it is the Weyl denominator. The Weyl character formula is the ratio $A_{\lambda +\rho }/A_{\rho }$. These general root-system alternants specialize to monomial determinants in type A but are not restricted to that type.