Sequential absorption imaging recorded both trapped clouds on a camera. Fits to axial profiles used the boson cloud as a thermometer. At common temperature, the nearly equal magnetic trapping potentials provided a comparison: the clouds had similar sizes near , but the fermion cloud remained broader as cooling reached . Figure 3 compared its radius with ideal Fermi gas and classical predictions.[ref]
Varying the wait before imaging tested thermal equilibrium. Finite imaging resolution restricted the analysis to the axial direction; fits neglected interaction-induced density shifts. Cooling eventually suffered from the dwindling boson heat capacity. The result supports quantum occupation effects, without directly resolving individual occupied states or reaching zero temperature.[ref]
These were neutral alkali atoms in a spatially varying trap. The Fermi energy of a model electron gas instead uses uniform Electrons, two equally populated spin states, and the Electron mass. The measured trapped-atom radii are not measurements of that electron model's or ; comparing their numerical Fermi energies requires the appropriate particle mass, internal-state populations, and confining potential.
A Zeeman slower prepares a slow beam for capture; a narrow longitudinal velocity group is not by itself a cold three-dimensional cloud. The historical apparatus measured slowed-beam velocities with a separate fluorescence probe scanned in frequency, just after switching off the slowing beam. This avoided simultaneous-beam complications.[ref]
For an original resonance-tracking calculation, let atoms travel along with and the slowing beam along , so its atom-frame angular frequency is . Approximate the selected cycling transition by on one field branch; is its signed angular frequency shift per unit magnetic field. A multilevel atom may require a nonlinear outside that branch. Maintaining a chosen effective laser detuning requires
For chosen constant deceleration magnitude , gives and length . Substitution supplies a square-root magnetic field profile, plus a constant offset. The signs follow from the specified directions; reversing the selected transition's magnetic slope reverses the required field variation.
As a hypothetical design, take , and . The required length is and flight time . For chosen and , photon recoil velocity implies roughly directed absorption events. The mean required scattering rate is about . This budget must lie below the available scattering rate, with margin for capture and intensity variation. Optical pumping into unwanted hyperfine structure or magnetic sublevels can interrupt the cycle. Longitudinal slowing, transverse recoil heating and final cloud temperature are separate quantities.
Zeeman splitting Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-18
Zeeman splitting is the separation of energy levels or mode frequencies by a background magnetic field. In atomic physics, the magnetic field couples to a magnetic dipole moment, lifting quantum degeneracy. Transitions between the shifted quantum states can turn one spectral line into several. A split level and a split spectral line are different objects: the emitted photon measures the difference between two level energies, and the electric-dipole selection rule determines which differences appear.
The Stern-Gerlach experiment also probes magnetic dipole moments, through beam deflection in a magnetic field gradient. Here the readout is a spectral line.
The pattern makes an invisible magnetic field visible through spectroscopy. It also reveals angular momentum and magnetic dipole moments inside chemical atoms. Zeeman slowers exploit a changing resonance frequency to keep moving chemical atoms absorbing laser photons; a magneto-optical trap combines position-dependent shifts with electromagnetic polarization and laser cooling. Related mode shifts occur in Zeeman splitting of an antiferromagnetic spin wave.