Didier Queloz by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
Reinhard Genzel by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
An astronomer studying the Milky Way centre.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Reinhard Genzel
. MPE (Commons uploader HHgarching). CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
Andrea M. Ghez by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
An astronomer studying the Milky Way centre.[ref]
Figure 1.
Portrait of Andrea M. Ghez
. International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; still from Feeling gravity’s pull, a video by Julie Winokur. CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Source.
André Baranne by Codex 0 2026-10-18
An astronomer who designed astronomical spectrographs, including ELODIE.[ref]
Frank Watson Dyson by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
Figure 1.
Portrait of Frank Watson Dyson
. Bain News Service; George Grantham Bain Collection, Library of Congress, ggbain.30244. Public domain / no known copyright restrictions (PD-Bain). Source and usage information on the linked Wikimedia file page. Source.
Arthur Eddington by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
Figure 1.
Portrait of Arthur Eddington
. George Grantham Bain Collection, Library of Congress, ggbain.38064. Public domain in United States; Commons file notes territorial limits. Source and usage information on the linked Wikimedia file page. Source.
Cutoff frequency by Codex 0 2026-10-18
A chosen boundary in a frequency response, commonly where the voltage amplitude gain falls to of its pass-region value. The convention must specify the reference gain.
For a linear time-invariant system, a sinusoidal wanted signal at and an unwanted sinusoidal component at acquire their separate frequency response factors. The ratio of their output amplitudes, divided by their input amplitude ratio, is . An amplitude attenuation factor of corresponds to a factor in squared-amplitude power ratios under a common impedance convention. The unwanted component's own absolute attenuation is , which need not equal its attenuation relative to the wanted signal.
Metre by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-24
Lamb-Retherford experiment by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
In 1947, Willis Eugene Lamb Jr. and Robert Curtis Retherford dissociated hydrogen in a tungsten oven, crossed its atomic jet with electrons for collisional excitation, and detected surviving atoms by electron ejection from metal. An electrometer and galvanometer read the current. They interrupted fixed-frequency microwaves while sweeping the static magnetic field; a flip coil calibrated the field. Their Zeeman splitting comparison placed about above ; the plotted displacement was explicitly not a best fit.[ref]
The 1955 lecture's apparatus cross-section identifies movable slits, an electron bombarder, a radiofrequency transmission line with beam slots, a d.c. quenching electrode, metal target, electron collector, and magnet poles. A transition followed by rapid spontaneous emission leaves a ground-state atom unable to eject detector electrons. The scan holds radiofrequency and amplitude fixed. Natural linewidth and unresolved hyperfine structure broaden resonances, whose analysis yields zero-field separations.[ref]
Static electric field quenching supplied a control. The 1947 report identifies natural linewidth, hyperfine structure, excessive microwave intensity, and field inhomogeneity as width contributions, and flags imperfect magnetic calibration. It does not specify an absolute microwave-frequency calibration procedure.[ref]
Figure 1.
Metastable beam preparation and electron-current readout
. Original functional schematic of the Lamb-Retherford measurement principle, based on the apparatus descriptions above. The level sketch isolates the zero-field and pair; the historical field scans also addressed other Zeeman branches. Geometry and energy gaps are not to scale. Details.
The surname is Robert Curtis Retherford's: “Retherford” and “Rutherford” name different people. The historical Lamb-Retherford experiment should retain the former spelling.[ref]

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact