Topics (318k) Articles (329k) Users (388) Discussions (237) Comments (383) Files (10k) New article
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 7 5 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . The goal is to obtain an integrable non-tangential maximal function without assuming in advance that has an integrable boundary density. We use a square root to place the boundary data in , where the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is strongly bounded.
First recall this strong bound directly from Q2. For a nonnegative and , split . The second summand has centered maximal function at most ; the first is in . Q2's weak estimate, in dimension one, therefore givesThe layer cake representation and Tonelli theorem then implyThis is the needed Strong Lp bound for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function, with an explicit adequate constant.
For , let and . Q1's elementary harmonic pointwise estimate makes bounded on the closed upper half-plane. Its boundary value is continuous, and . The function is subharmonic: away from zeros, for any ,and regularization, or the submean inequality at zeros, extends this to the whole domain. Bounded subharmonic comparison with the Poisson integral givesHere need not be in . The Poisson integral is nevertheless defined, since and , and it tends to its continuous boundary values. To justify comparison on this unbounded domain, the difference between the two sides is bounded above, subharmonic, and zero on the real boundary. On an upper half-disk of radius , use the positive harmonic barrierOn its semicircular arc, , while for every fixed interior as . The maximum principle for subharmonic functions, with a fixed bound for the difference, proves the comparison. The barrier's positive blow-up at the arc endpoints causes no difficulty.
For , the elementary inequality givesQ2's radial decreasing kernel domination by the maximal function extends to nonnegative inputs by applying it to increasing bounded compactly supported truncations. Hence, taking the supremum over the cone,For any fixed cone point, as . Therefore ; use a sequence of positive shifts and the Fatou lemma to concludeThe precise numerical constant is unimportant. Suprema over countable dense sets of cone points give the same values, so the maximal functions used here are measurable.
This yields boundary absolute continuity of measures rather than assuming it. The holomorphic function is a complex-valued harmonic function, so Q1 represents it as for a finite complex measure , with weak-star. Since , every compactly supported continuous satisfiesThe dual characterization of the total variation measure implies , so the Radon-Nikodym theorem gives with . The approximate identity now gives in the L1 norm and almost everywhere. Thus the analytic Hardy space has an integrable boundary function, unlike the unrestricted harmonic space.
In the real-line form of the F. and M. Riesz theorem, start with a finite complex measure whose Fourier transform of a finite measure vanishes for . Its Poisson integral is holomorphic: the transformed operators and act by and , which agree on that spectrum. These identities can first be read as distributional identities and then classically, since the Poisson integral is smooth. Its harmonic norm is finite by Q1, so the preceding argument makes the measure absolutely continuous. A one-sided Fourier spectrum forces a finite boundary measure to have a Lebesgue density.
For the customary circle form, normalize arc length by . If for , thenis analytic and is the Poisson integral on the unit disk of . Positivity and unit mass of the Poisson kernel on the circle imply . The same square-root argument on the disk gives an integrable radial maximum, as follows. For , put . The maximum principle for subharmonic functions on the disk givesThe supremum of these Poisson integrals is bounded by a constant times the circular Hardy-Littlewood maximal function. Indeed, for the circular kernel is bounded by a constant times for ; splitting into arcs of radii gives a summable geometric series of arc averages. For the kernel is uniformly bounded, and the whole-circle average suffices. The covering proof and the truncation argument already used on the line give the strong maximal bound for arcs on the circle as well. ThusLet and apply Fatou lemma to obtain an integrable radial maximum . The measures tend weak-star to and are dominated in magnitude by . The same continuous-test-function argument gives . This proves the F. and M. Riesz theorem: a finite complex measure on the circle with all negative Fourier coefficients zero is absolutely continuous with respect to arc length. Reversing the Fourier convention interchanges positive and negative indices.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 7 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We first construct a terminal integrable function without using the martingale convergence theorem. Put and on . This is a finite positive measure. If almost everywhere the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise, for a bounded dyadic step function measurable with respect to in the dyadic filtration, defineThe martingale property makes the definition independent of the choice of a sufficiently large . Moreover . Dyadic step functions are dense in : continuous functions on the closed unit cube are dense for this finite Borel measure (extend the measure by zero onto the omitted faces), and uniform continuity approximates each continuous function by step functions on fine dyadic partitions. Thus extends to a bounded linear functional on of norm at most one. The duality of Lp spaces representation of this functional gives with and . Set , taking where . Then and testing indicators of all dyadic atoms provesThis argument also works for complex-valued martingales, with a complex linear functional.
To prove convergence, choose a dyadic step function with arbitrarily small. For all beyond its dyadic level, . The L1 contraction of conditional expectation yieldsThis proves convergence in . For convergence almost everywhere, Doob maximal inequality applied to the conditional expectations of givesLet the approximation error tend to zero, and then take positive rational . Hence both in and almost everywhere.
For the second assertion, write and take the given first-exit stopping time . Each is integrable, being a finite sum of restrictions of integrable variables. Its increments satisfyThe indicator is -measurable, so taking its conditional expectation proves that is a martingale.
The overshoot at need not be bounded by . Instead, for a fixed , on with we have . Integrating over this -measurable event, summing the disjoint events, and including givesThe variables increase to , and . The monotone convergence theorem gives . Before stopping, the process has magnitude less than ; after stopping it remains at . ConsequentlyThis is the integrable overshoot of a stopped L1-bounded martingale. The first part now proves that every such stopped process converges almost everywhere.
Finally, Doob maximal inequality gives , by applying the finite-horizon estimate and then increasing the horizon. Thus is finite almost everywhere. Outside the union of the null sets for all positive integer stopping thresholds, choose an integer larger than this supremum. No stopping occurs at that point, so for all , and converges to a finite limit almost everywhere. We have not assumed, or concluded, convergence for this general -bounded martingale.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





