For a momentum eigenstate with eigenvalue $p$, the equation $-i\hslash {\psi }^{\prime }=p\psi$ has solution $\psi (x)=C{e}^{ipx/\hslash }$. The periodic boundary condition imposes $e^{2\pi ip/\hslash }=1$, so $p/\hslash \in \mathbb{Z}$. The wavefunction normalization gives $1=2\pi |C{|}^2$. Choosing a convenient global phase yieldsThese momentum eigenstates form an orthonormal basis, the Fourier basis for the particle on a circle:Here ${\delta }_{nk}$ is the Kronecker delta.

For a free particle, the Hamiltonian operator is $H=P^2/(2m)$, where $P=-i\hslash d/dx$ is the momentum operator. The time-independent Schrödinger equation is thereforeThe full stationary state is $\Psi (x,t)=e^{-iEt/\hslash }\psi (x)$. The periodic boundary condition identifies $x$ and $x+2\pi$, giving a particle on a circle with wavefunction normalization over one period.

For nonzero Rabi detuning,The sketch starts at zero and oscillates between zero and ${\gamma }^2/({\gamma }^2+{\Omega }^2)<1$, with period $\pi /\sqrt{{\gamma }^2+{\Omega }^2}$ when the coupling is nonzero. Relative to resonance, the oscillations have a smaller maximum and a shorter period at fixed coupling. The sign of the Rabi detuning changes the amplitudes' phases but leaves this transition probability unchanged. For $|\Omega |\gg |\gamma |$, its maximum is approximately ${\gamma }^2/{\Omega }^2$, so population transfer is strongly suppressed. The plotted detuned example has $|\Omega |=|\gamma |$, giving maximum $1/2$.

On Rabi resonance, $\omega ={\omega }_0$ and $\Omega =0$, soFor nonzero drive the probability starts at zero, reaches unity at $t=\pi /(2|\gamma |)$, and repeats with period $\pi /|\gamma |$. The population oscillation therefore has angular frequency $2|\gamma |$. This is complete resonant Rabi transfer; a drive of zero strength gives no transition.

With the conventional particle labels, the allowed cubic decay channels areEach has one tree-level Feynman diagram, consisting of one cubic Feynman vertex. The final identical-leg contractions supply $2!$ and cancel the $1/2!$ in the Lagrangian density.

Taken literally with these labels, the printed $\Phi \to \varphi \varphi$ channel is forbidden: its initial Noether charge is $-2$ and its final Noether charge is $+2$. Its decay amplitude is zero, at every order preserving the global phase symmetry. If the source uses “$\Phi$” to name the heavy antiparticle instead, its intended answer is the nonzero decay amplitude $-h$ for $\bar{\Phi }\to \varphi \varphi$. The following decay width calculation concerns either allowed channel, whose widths are equal by charge conjugation.

Keep the particle labels specified under 2. There are two connected tree-level Feynman diagrams: the quartic contact interaction vertex and an $s$-channel light antiparticle exchange. The initial Noether charge is $1-2=-1$, exactly the charge of $\bar{\varphi }$. At the first cubic Feynman vertex, the incoming $\varphi$ and $\Phi$ leave the second $\varphi$ leg internal; the conjugate Feynman vertex supplies both outgoing particles.

ThusHere $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$ for incoming $\varphi (p_1),\Phi (p_2)$. Both terms have the same sign in the chosen S-matrix convention.

The distinction from antiparticles matters. If the paper's heavy “$\Phi$ particle” is instead intended to mean the charge-$+2$ state $\bar{\Phi }$, so that its printed decay into $\varphi \varphi$ is allowed, the exchange diagram is crossed. For that alternative physical process,This is a consistent alternative naming convention only if it is also applied to the decay in iii; one cannot use the same heavy particle label for both charge assignments.

Let $p_1,p_2$ be the incoming and $p_3,p_4$ the outgoing four-momenta, and set $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$, $t=(p_1-p_3{)}^2$, $u=(p_1-p_4{)}^2$, the Mandelstam variables. The only connected tree-level Feynman diagram is the $s$-channel exchange of $\bar{\Phi }$, with Noether charge $+2$. The two incoming light particles attach to ${\varphi }^2\Phi$, and the two outgoing light particles to its conjugate. There is no four-light contact Feynman vertex, nor a charge-allowed $t$ or $u$ exchange with these external labels.

Define the invariant scattering amplitude by $⟨f|S-1|i⟩=i(2\pi {)}^4{\delta }^{(4)}(P_f-P_i)\mathcal{M}$. ThenThe Feynman vertices already contain the identical-leg combinatorics. No extra factor of two multiplies this invariant scattering amplitude; the distinct identical final-state symmetry factor enters a cross section integral.

Cross the second incoming heavy particle and one outgoing heavy particle in i to obtain $\Phi \bar{\Phi }\to \Phi \bar{\Phi }$. Panel (e) of b's figure shows the resulting box diagram. Its four light-charge arrows again alternate source and sink corners; it is the only connected order-$g^4$ topology. There is no tree exchange because every cubic interaction vertex has only one heavy leg. With $|\mathbf{p}|\ll M\ll m$, crossing does not affect the zero-external-momentum loop integral, soAn independent check is to integrate out the complex scalar field $\varphi$ at constant $\Phi$. Its two real-component squared masses are $m^2\pm g|\Phi |$. The one-loop quantum effective potential is thereforeExpanding the logarithms to fourth order in $\Phi$ givesThus the effective Lagrangian has the positive local coefficient $g^4/(384{\pi }^2{m}^4)$. Its $2!2!$ external attachments give the common scattering amplitude $g^4/(96{\pi }^2{m}^4)$ in both channels. This also checks the box multiplicity and sign.

Four external $\Phi$ lines require four cubic interaction vertices, since each such interaction vertex contains only one heavy field. Their other eight endpoints must form four light internal lines. A connected Feynman diagram therefore has $V=I=4$ and $L=1$: the leading contribution is a one-loop box diagram, of order $g^4$, with four $\varphi$ scalar propagators. Charge-two incoming and outgoing heavy lines attach alternately around the box, as shown in panel (d) of b's figure. Each incoming heavy line supplies the two outgoing light-charge arrows at its corner, and each outgoing heavy line absorbs them. With external labels fixed there is one such box and its symmetry factor is one.

For $|\mathbf{p}|\ll M\ll m$, the external energies are also small compared with $m$, so expand the loop integrand in all external four-momenta. Its leading term isA Wick rotation and the Euclidean massive loop integral giveHence, more precisely than just its requested scaling,The mass dimension $[g]=1$ makes $g^4/m^4$ dimensionless, as a four-dimensional scattering amplitude should be. The leading amplitude has no extra identical-particle multiplicity.

Take $\varphi (p_1)+\bar{\varphi }(p_2)\to \varphi (p_3)+\bar{\varphi }(p_4)$ with the Mandelstam variables of i. The allowed tree-level Feynman diagram is the crossed $u$-channel $\Phi$ exchange in panel (c) of b's figure. At one end the incoming particle and outgoing antiparticle transfer charge $+2$; the other end absorbs that charge. The zero-charge $s$- and $t$-channel assignments are forbidden by the interaction vertices. ThusIn the center-of-mass frame with $|\mathbf{p}|\ll m$, $s=4m^2+O(|\mathbf{p}{|}^2)$ and $u=O(|\mathbf{p}{|}^2)$. For $M\gg m$, both scattering amplitudes approach $g^2/M^2$. The elastic two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space and incident flux agree for the two experiments. Usingfor distinguishable final particles, and an extra factor $1/2!$ when integrating the identical-particle final state over the whole sphere, givesThere is no additional division for identical incoming particles in the definition of a beam scattering cross-section. Before taking $M/m\to \infty$, the zero-momentum ratio is $\frac{1}{2}[M^2/(M^2-4m^2){]}^2$, provided the threshold is away from the heavy pole.

Near $s=M^2$, the bare $s$-channel scalar propagator makes fixed-order perturbation theory fail: repeated self-energy insertions contain powers of ${\Sigma }_{\Phi }(s)/(s-M^2)$. The $\Phi \to \varphi \varphi$ channel is open for $M>2m$, giving the leading decay widthResumming the self-energy gives a finite Breit-Wigner resonance cross section, with denominator $s-M_{\mathrm{pole}}^2+i{M}_{\mathrm{pole}}{\Gamma }_{\Phi }$ near the pole, rather than an infinite scattering cross-section. Also, $s\simeq M^2$ with $M\gg m$ lies outside the assumed nonrelativistic incoming kinematics; the ratio $1/2$ is not a resonance prediction.

Label the incoming four-momenta $p_1,p_2$ and the outgoing ones $p_3,p_4$. Define the Mandelstam variables $s=(p_1+p_2{)}^2$, $t=(p_1-p_3{)}^2$, $u=(p_1-p_4{)}^2$. Two incoming $\varphi$ particles have conserved charge $+2$, so the only tree-level Feynman diagram is an $s$-channel $\Phi$ exchange, shown in panel (b) of b's figure. Each end converts two charge-one lines into one charge-two line. There are no $t$- or $u$-channel exchanges: an incoming and an outgoing particle at such an end would transfer zero charge, for which this theory has no cubic interaction vertex.The single Feynman diagram is already symmetric under exchanging the two outgoing particles. This does not add another copy of the scattering amplitude; the identical final-state symmetry factor enters the integrated scattering cross-section instead.

Use incoming fermion $p_1$ and antiparticle $p_2$, outgoing fermion $p_3$ and antiparticle $p_4$. The two tree-level Feynman diagrams are the $t$ channel, with $q_t=p_1-p_3=p_4-p_2$, and the $s$ channel, with $q_s=p_1+p_2=p_3+p_4$. They occupy the lower row of the figure. In the $t$ channel the fermion flow follows $1\to 3$ and $4\to 2$; in the $s$ channel it follows $1\to 2$ at the incoming interaction vertex and $4\to 3$ at the outgoing interaction vertex.

The two contractions again have a relative fermionic sign. With the same harmless common-phase convention as i, their sum isThe auxiliary-field propagator is the same constant $-i$ in both channels. There is no $u$ channel preserving the external fermion number assignments.

Label the incoming fermion momenta $p_1,p_2$ and outgoing fermion momenta $p_3,p_4$, with $p_1+p_2=p_3+p_4$. There are two tree-level Feynman diagrams: the $t$ channel connects $1$ to $3$ and $2$ to $4$, with exchanged momentum $q_t=p_1-p_3=p_4-p_2$; the $u$ channel connects $1$ to $4$ and $2$ to $3$, with $q_u=p_1-p_4=p_3-p_2$. Both internal lines are auxiliary-field propagators. The upper row in the figure gives these labelled connections; the outgoing labels are exchanged in its second panel to avoid a visually unnecessary crossing.

Each tree-level Feynman diagram contains two factors $ig$ and one factor $-i$, giving $i{g}^2$. The exchange of the two identical outgoing fermions gives the relative fermionic sign. Up to a common external-state phase, the corresponding scattering amplitude isThere is no annihilation channel: both incoming particles carry the same fermion number, whereas a $\sigma \bar{\psi }\psi$ interaction vertex couples one fermion to one antiparticle when both are incoming.

To include all momentum-dependent contributions to the two-point function, put one external line at each interaction vertex. Let $r$ be the number of lines connecting the vertices, and $t_A,t_B$ their numbers of tadpole diagrams. For vertex valences $v_A,v_B\in \{4,6\}$,The integer $r$ is odd, and $r=1$ gives a one-particle-reducible Feynman diagram and is excluded. Thus the complete list is

The coefficient of the mixed graph includes the reflected external attachment as well as its reciprocal Feynman-diagram symmetry factor. If both external lines attach to the same interaction vertex, no external momentum enters the connecting internal lines, and that Feynman diagram cannot contribute to wave-function renormalization.

For incoming external momentum $p$, assign the connecting lines momenta $k_1,\dots ,k_{r-1},p-{\sum }_j{k}_j$. DefineThe momentum space Feynman rules give, in the order listed,Each $C$ is a reciprocal Feynman-diagram symmetry factor, including any equivalent external attachments. There are respectively $2,3,4,4$ independent loop momenta.

If “contribute to wavefunction renormalization” means requiring a divergent kinetic counterterm after subtraction of all subdivergences, only the last topology qualifies. The first three still have nontrivial external momentum dependence and give finite contributions to a normalization condition; their raw divergent factors arise from mass counterterms and interaction vertex counterterms. Keeping all four here makes this distinction explicit. The ultraviolet divergence analysis in d establishes it directly.

With a single quartic interaction vertex, the two unused line ends close into one tadpole diagram. With a single sextic interaction vertex, the four unused ends pair into two tadpole diagrams. These are the only one-vertex one-particle irreducible Feynman diagrams for the two-point function.

Define the Minkowski Feynman integralsThe amputated two-point function contributions arewhere $C_4,C_6$ are the reciprocals of the corresponding Feynman-diagram symmetry factors. Both are independent of external momentum, and hence affect the mass counterterm rather than wave-function renormalization. No numerical Feynman-diagram symmetry factors are needed here.

For $\Psi (p_1)\to \chi (p_2)+\varphi (k_1)+\varphi (k_2)$, the sole tree-level Feynman diagram has a Yukawa coupling interaction vertex producing an off-shell scalar field particle of four-momentum $q=p_1-p_2=k_1+k_2$, followed by its cubic scalar field interaction vertex. Its invariant decay amplitude isTwo successive Yukawa coupling interaction vertices would change the fermion species twice and leave a $\Psi$, so they cannot produce this final state. Interchanging the two identical outgoing bosons does not create another Feynman diagram; the cubic factorial is already included in the Feynman rule. The integrated decay width instead includes the identical final-state symmetry factor $1/2!$.

For $\Psi (p_1)\to \chi (p_2)+\varphi (p_3)$, the sole tree-level Feynman diagram is a single flavour-changing Yukawa coupling interaction vertex, with $p_1=p_2+p_3$. Its invariant decay amplitude isThe solid arrow passes from the incoming $\Psi$ to the outgoing $\chi$; the dashed outgoing line carries $p_3$.

For $\Psi (p_1)+\varphi (k_1)\to \Psi (p_2)+\varphi (k_2)$, there are two tree-level Feynman diagrams, both with an internal $\chi$ fermion. Their internal four-momenta are $p_1+k_1$ and $p_1-k_2$. The scattering amplitude isThese are the two possible absorption/emission orderings along the fermion flow. There is no third tree-level Feynman diagram using the cubic scalar field interaction vertex, since attaching its remaining scalar field line to the external $\Psi$ line would require a forbidden $\varphi \bar{\Psi }\Psi$ interaction vertex.

Label the external four-momenta by $\Psi (p_1)+\chi (p_2)\to \Psi (p_3)+\chi (p_4)$. The only tree-level Feynman diagram exchanges a scalar field particle between the transitions $\Psi (p_1)\to \chi (p_4)$ and $\chi (p_2)\to \Psi (p_3)$. Its internal four-momentum is $q=p_1-p_4=p_3-p_2$. Thus its scattering amplitude, with a consistent external-state ordering, isIt is the crossed, or $u$-channel, exchange with these labels. A direct $t$-channel scalar field exchange would need a flavour-preserving Yukawa coupling, which the Lagrangian density does not contain. There is no annihilation Feynman diagram for two incoming fermions.

Let $p_1,p_3$ label the incoming and outgoing fermion, and $p_2,p_4$ the incoming and outgoing antifermion. The bottom row of the figure gives the two tree-level Feynman diagrams:

Thus the Mandelstam variables in the two denominators areThe two scattering amplitude terms have a relative fermionic sign of minus when written with spinor products $({\bar{u}}_3{u}_1)({\bar{v}}_2{v}_4)$ and $({\bar{v}}_2{u}_1)({\bar{u}}_3{v}_4)$. The overall phase depends on the chosen ordering of the external states. No $u$ channel joins an incoming fermion to an outgoing antifermion through a species-preserving Yukawa interaction.