Let , which tends to zero as . Factor the denominator and use the cosecant expansion near zero:
Substitution gives the first two nonzero terms and the requested omitted order:
More precisely the next term is , followed by . The outside factor is essential when converting the remainder order from powers of to powers of .
Choose the upward orientation of the paraboloid cap. Its boundary is the circle at , oriented counterclockwise as viewed from above. By Stokes theorem,
On the boundary, and . Parametrize by , , . Then
The second term integrates to zero over a full period, while the first contributes . Equivalently, replace the cap by the upward disk at : there , whose integral is by symmetry.
An orientation is not stated in the original question. The displayed result uses the upward normal, also the outward normal on the curved top of the enclosed cap; the opposite orientation gives .
Take the sphere's outward normal. Since with constant , its divergence is . The divergence theorem gives
The translated centre does not enter the answer, because the divergence is constant. Equivalently the constant field produced by translating coordinates has zero net flux through a closed sphere. The inward orientation would negate the result.
Choose the plane normal to be . Only the second field component contributes, and on it is . Thus the surface integral factors into two Gaussian integrals:
The original question does not specify an orientation; choosing instead gives .
The printed first component is undefined on the entire integration plane. Its removable continuous extension there is , since . The stated flux uses this natural extension; in fact the normal component alone is already well-defined and integrable on the plane, so the first component does not affect either oriented value.
The divergence is
For any closed piecewise smooth surface bounding a volume, use the divergence theorem with the outward orientation:
Reversing the orientation still gives zero. The field is smooth everywhere, so there is no hidden singular source inside the surface.
View with and . Hold fixed and apply the multivariable chain rule:
Dividing the changes along the fixed- variation by gives exactly the two terms in the question. Thus the simpler expression is
The subscripts specify which coordinate is held fixed and must be retained.
Away from zeros of , an integrating factor for a differential one-form is . Multiplication converts the form to
Therefore the implicit solution family is . On each graph interval between consecutive multiples of , this becomes
No such open interval contains zero. At , the undivided graph equation would read , which is impossible for a finite derivative; hence no differentiable graph extends across one of these points.
If solutions are instead understood as arbitrary parametrized integral curves of the differential form, the vertical lines are additional solutions: along them and . They were lost on division by and are not graphs over an interval.
If the form is for a scalar function with continuous second partial derivatives, then and . Equality of the mixed partial derivatives therefore requires
This is necessary for an exact differential. For continuously differentiable coefficients on a simply connected open domain it is also sufficient; on a domain with holes, the equality alone need not give a single-valued global potential.
Set . Then gives or . Taking all three cube roots of each yields six distinct solutions.
Equivalently, multiply the original polynomial by to obtain . The original roots are exactly the ninth roots of unity that are not cube roots of unity: a cube root would give , not zero. Thus
All six have modulus one, and their distinct arguments show that no roots have been repeated or omitted from the degree-six polynomial.
The complementary function is . A particular solution is , since applying to either sine or cosine multiplies it by . Thus
At zero, , giving . At , the cosine term vanishes and the particular term is , so . Consequently
The two boundary conditions determine the two constants uniquely because their evaluation matrix on is the identity.
Construct the scalar potential . Its differential is
which proves exactness directly. Multiplying the differential equation by shows that a solution satisfies , so . The initial value at zero gives . Therefore
The factor is also an integrating factor for the associated first-order linear equation.
Set to reduce the second-order linear differential equation to . Equivalently, , so on any interval excluding zero. The derivative condition at gives .
Integrating on the positive interval containing the initial point yields . The value then fixes , giving
Its derivative is , and direct substitution verifies the equation. The selected solution diverges as and cannot extend through zero as a finite-valued function.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.