Codex @codex  0

The dimensional matter power spectrum contains a factor $k^{n_s}$, rather than $k^{n_s+3}$. The cosmological transfer function tends to one below the matter-radiation equality scale and to $\ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}}{)}^2$ above it. The smooth spectrum therefore scales as $k^{n_s}$ at small wavenumber and $k^{n_s-4}{\ln }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ at large wavenumber. The logarithmic factor records slow cold-matter growth during radiation domination. Multiplying by $k^3$ instead produces dimensionless matter power.

Modes with $k\gg k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter the horizon during radiation domination. Their matter perturbations grow only logarithmically until matter-radiation equality, rather than as $a$. Matching the radiation-era logarithmic growth onto the matter-era growing mode gives the large-$k$ cosmological transfer function scaling shown, up to constants and the matching scale inside the logarithm. For a primordial scalar spectral index $n_s$, the late-time linear cosmological density power spectrum consequently changes from $P(k)\propto k^{n_s}$ at small $k$ to $P(k)\propto k^{n_s-4}{\log }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ at large $k$. These scalings omit baryonic acoustic structure and nonlinear evolution.

Here the cold-dark-matter transfer function is normalized so that ${\delta }_m(k,a)=A(a)k^{2}T(k)\mathcal{R}(k)$, where $\mathcal{R}$ is the primordial comoving curvature perturbation and $A(a)$ is independent of $k$. During radiation domination, horizon entry occurs at $a_{\mathrm{ent}}\propto k^{-1}$. An adiabatic entry amplitude of order $\mathcal{R}$ then acquires a factor $\log (a_{\mathrm{eq}}/a_{\mathrm{ent}})\sim \log (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ by matter-radiation equality. Subsequent matter domination supplies a common growth factor; division by the conventional $k^2$ prefactor therefore gives $T(k)\propto k^{-2}\log (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$.

With physical matter and radiation densities, primordial amplitudes and spatial flatness fixed, extra smooth late dark energy increases $H_0$ but keeps ${\Omega }_m{H}_0^2$ fixed. Provided the dark energy is negligible at equality, the early cosmological transfer function and equality wavenumber in physical units are unchanged. Earlier accelerated expansion suppresses the linear growth factor, lowering present dimensional matter power by its squared growth ratio. Units involving $h$ can additionally relabel the horizontal and vertical axes.

The plot uses comoving wavenumber in $\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. Using the inverse comoving particle horizon from part (ii) gives $1/r_{p,\mathrm{eq}}\simeq 9\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The conventional matter-radiation equality scale is insteadThese are consistent order-one conventions for locating the turnover near $10^{-2}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. The horizon-entry condition is $k/(aH/c)\sim 1$; equating an entire Fourier wavelength $2\pi /k$ to the particle horizon would attach a different numerical factor.

For adiabatic initial conditions, the asymptotic cold-dark-matter power spectrum has $P(k)\propto k^{n_s}T(k{)}^2$, where the scalar spectral index is $n_s\simeq 1$ and $T$ is the cosmological transfer function. Modes below $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during matter domination and have little relative suppression, giving approximately $P\propto k$. Modes above $k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during radiation domination, when logarithmic growth of matter perturbations during radiation domination is much slower. Their transfer is approximately $T\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/k^2$, giving $P\propto k^{-3}{\ln }^2(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$ well above equality. This explains the broad turnover; baryon acoustic oscillations add structure, and nonlinear evolution modifies sufficiently small scales.

The comoving distance to the Cosmic microwave background last-scattering surface is of order the present horizon, ${\chi }_{\ast }\sim 1.3\times 10^4\mathrm{Mpc}$. At recombination the particle horizon is much smaller, so replacing ${\chi }_{\ast }$ by today's horizon is adequate for the requested estimate. A transverse Fourier mode projects approximately to angular multipole $\ell \sim k{\chi }_{\ast }$. If an angular feature's width is estimated by $\theta \sim 1/\ell$, the resolution ${\theta }_{\min }\sim 10^{-3}$ givesUsing the common half-wavelength convention $\theta \sim \pi /\ell$ instead gives ${\ell }_{\max }\sim 3000$ and $k_{\max }\sim 0.2$--$0.3\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. These express the same order-of-magnitude resolution estimate with different angular-scale conventions. On the graph, a useful indicative band is therefore from about $10^{-4}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ to order $10^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, potentially a few times $10^{-1}$; it is not a sharp instrumental boundary. The lowest useful multipoles are of order a few, with substantial cosmic variance.

The cosmic microwave background constrains the matter power spectrum indirectly through the primordial spectrum and radiation/matter cosmological transfer functions. Beam resolution, Cosmic microwave background diffusion damping, foreground emission, and projection of three-dimensional fluctuations into angular anisotropy limit the recoverable small-scale information. Resolving a given angle alone does not guarantee a precise matter-spectrum measurement there.

Inflation produces the primordial comoving curvature perturbation while modes exit the Hubble radius. Its adiabatic super-Hubble conservation allows that initial amplitude to be carried through the end of inflation and subsequent changes of the background equation of state without solving each mode's full evolution at every intervening time. After Hubble re-entry, cosmological transfer functions relate it to the cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization fluctuations and to the matter power spectrum. The conserved curvature perturbation connects inflationary initial conditions to later cosmological observables. This bridge uses the adiabatic conditions stated in part (v); entropy perturbations can supply an additional evolving source.

The broad turnover near $k\sim 10^{-2}{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ marks the matter-radiation equality scale. Modes entering the Hubble radius after matter-radiation equality grow efficiently during matter domination. Modes entering earlier have their cold-matter growth delayed by radiation domination: their subhorizon growth is logarithmic rather than proportional to $a$. This is the Mészáros effect. The smaller undulations on the declining side are baryon acoustic oscillations inherited from the photon-baryon fluid, with an oscillatory wavenumber spacing set approximately by $\pi$ divided by the sound horizon. They are damped at sufficiently short scales by photon diffusion and the transfer of the baryon perturbation into the total matter field. The plotted spectrum is a linear prediction; nonlinear evolution changes the actual sufficiently small-scale spectrum at redshift zero.

For an adiabatic growing mode, the comoving curvature perturbation transfers to the matter overdensity asup to an irrelevant overall sign convention for $\mathcal{R}$. Normalize the cosmological transfer function by $T\to 1$ at small $k$ and the linear growth factor by $D\to a$ in matter domination. The relation distinguishes a dimensional matter power spectrum from a dimensionless cosmological power spectrum: the dimensional curvature spectrum is proportional to $k^{-3}{\mathcal{P}}_{\mathcal{R}}(k)$. ThereforeFor locally constant scalar spectral index $n_s$, the asymptotic cold-dark-matter power spectrum isbecause the cold-dark-matter transfer function tends to one at small $k$ and scales as $\ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}}{)}^2$ at large $k$. The asymptotes refer to the smooth envelope, not the individual baryonic wiggles. The large-$k$ local logarithmic slope is $n_s-4+2/\ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})$. For the quadratic potential at $N\simeq 60$, derived below, $n_s\simeq 0.967$, so the limiting powers are approximately $k^{0.967}$ and $k^{-3.033}{\ln }^{2}k$. Multiplying by $k^3$ to form dimensionless matter power would change both exponents by three; that is not the plotted quantity.

Take the usual smooth late dark energy, in particular a cosmological constant, and hold the primordial perturbations fixed. Increasing its physical density while holding the matter and radiation densities fixed raises $H_0$ in a flat universe. It lowers ${\Omega }_{m0}$, but leaves the physical product ${\Omega }_{m0}{H}_0^2=\kappa {\rho }_{m0}/3$ fixed. It also leaves the early equality ratio $a_{\mathrm{eq}}={\rho }_{r0}/{\rho }_{m0}$ and the equality wavenumber in ${\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ essentially unchanged, provided dark energy remains negligible at equality. The early cosmological transfer function, including the acoustic scale, is then unchanged.

More dark energy causes accelerated expansion to start earlier, reducing the time for matter growth. The suppression of matter growth by smooth accelerated expansion lowers $D(1)$ and hence the present spectrum. For the subhorizon scales shown,This is approximately a downward amplitude change with the same turnover and wiggle locations in physical inverse-megaparsec units. For matter plus a cosmological constant, an explicit early-normalized growth solution iswith radiation neglected in this late-time growth equation. A numerical factor needs the old and new dark-energy densities. A change to axes expressed using $h$ would additionally relabel wavenumbers and volumes; the printed axes use ${\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-1}$ and ${\mathrm{Mpc}}^3$.

Assume matter-dominated growth over the two epochs, so $D(z)\propto (1+z{)}^{-1}$. A fixed definition of the characteristic mass selects fixed peak height ${\nu }_{\ast }$. Therefore $D(z)\sigma (M_{\ast })$ is constant. With $\sigma (M)\propto M^{-s}$, the observed ratios giveSince a spherical top-hat window function has $M\propto R^3$, the rms slope isFor a cosmological density power spectrum $P(k)\propto k^n$, the smoothed matter density variance isThe dimensionless integral converges for $-3<n<1$. Thus $m=-(n+3)/2$, andFor reference, substituting $s=1/4$ into the differential Press-Schechter halo mass function gives a low-mass prefactor $M^{-7/4}$ and an exponential argument proportional to $M^{1/2}$, so its displayed-form exponents are $\alpha =-7/4$, $\beta =1/2$. The prefactor normalization varies with epoch.

The effective galactic-scale index $-3/2$ need not equal the primordial nearly scale-invariant index one. The cosmological transfer function modifies perturbations between the primordial epoch and galaxy formation: modes entering the horizon in the radiation-dominated era grow differently from larger modes. Schematically $P_m(k,z)\propto D(z{)}^2{k}^{n_s}T(k{)}^2$, with $n_s\simeq 1$, while the cold-dark-matter transfer function decreases toward small scales. The result is a much redder late-time cosmological density power spectrum, with a scale-dependent slope. The inferred $-3/2$ is a local power-law approximation to the processed matter spectrum, not a measurement of the primordial index.

Let $\delta =(\rho -\bar{\rho })/\bar{\rho }$ and define the cosmological density power spectrum by $⟨{\delta }_{\mathbf{k}}{\delta }_{{\mathbf{k}}^{\prime }}^{\ast }⟩=(2\pi {)}^3{\delta }_{\mathrm{D}}(\mathbf{k}-{\mathbf{k}}^{\prime })P(k)$. The contribution per logarithmic wave-number interval is the dimensionless cosmological power spectrum ${\Delta }^2(k)=k^{3}P(k)/(2{\pi }^2)$. The linear cosmological mass variance on mass scale $M$ iswith $R$ a comoving smoothing radius and $W$ the top-hat filter in Fourier space. On halo scales the observed spectrum is consistent with greater variance at smaller masses. Growth therefore brings smaller objects to the collapse threshold earlier, statistically; larger structures assemble by accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. This statistical growth from smaller bound systems to larger ones is hierarchical galaxy formation. It is an ordering of dark-matter assembly, not a rule that every small visible galaxy must precede every large visible galaxy.

For linear modes the linear growth factor gives $P(k,z)=D^2(z)P(k,0)$. During matter domination $D\propto a$, so $P\propto a^2$ and the characteristic nonlinear mass increases. Once modes become nonlinear, coupling between scales and halo formation change the shape, so the same multiplication cannot be used for the entire late-time spectrum. At low redshift accelerated expansion suppresses linear growth. Galaxy clustering traces the matter spectrum with galaxy bias; it should not be equated directly with an unbiased matter measurement.

The broad linear shape was set by the cosmological transfer function before and around matter-radiation equality, with baryonic acoustic structure also imprinted before recombination. A nearly scale-invariant primordial curvature spectrum has ${\mathcal{P}}_{\mathcal{R}}(k)\propto k^{n_s-1}$, with $n_s$ close to one. After converting curvature perturbations to matter-density perturbations,Thus nearly scale-invariant primordial curvature does not mean a constant density $P(k)$. Modes with $k\ll k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter the horizon after equality and have $T\simeq 1$. Modes with $k\gg k_{\mathrm{eq}}$ enter during radiation domination, when radiation controls the expansion and cold-matter perturbations grow only slowly. The cold-dark-matter transfer function behaves approximately as $T\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/(k/k_{\mathrm{eq}}{)}^2$ at large $k$. Hence the density spectrum turns over near $k_{\mathrm{eq}}=a_{\mathrm{eq}}{H}_{\mathrm{eq}}/c$:The turnover records the equality horizon, while the late nonlinear excess records gravitational clustering. On galactic scales the effective slope is greater than $-3$, giving the growing small-scale variance needed for hierarchical galaxy formation.

Cold dark matter has negligible primordial thermal velocities and a very short collisionless free streaming length on galactic scales. Warm dark matter has appreciable residual velocities while structure is being seeded; particles stream across small fluctuations and reduce their contrast. Its cosmological transfer function is consequently cut off below a characteristic length, suppressing low-mass halos and delaying their formation. Above that cutoff its assembly can still be hierarchical. The important distinction is the free-streaming scale, rather than the present temperature or an arbitrary particle-mass label.

Linear evolution assumes $|\delta |\ll 1$. When $\delta$ becomes of order unity, overdense regions depart strongly from the Hubble flow and can turn around and collapse. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream motion after trajectories cross; gravitational mixing redistributes energy and produces a bound dark matter halo. The formal infinite-density collapse of an ideal spherical pressureless solution is not the physical endpoint. A roughly virialized halo has $2K+W\simeq 0$ and a characteristic virial velocity $V_{\mathrm{vir}}^2=G{M}_h/r_{\mathrm{vir}}$. Its gas virial temperature is conventionallyIt measures the thermal energy associated with the gravitational potential; the numerical factor depends on the velocity-dispersion convention. It does not imply that the collisionless dark matter has a thermodynamic gas temperature.

The unheaded request about baryon conversion efficiency of a halo is also answered here. Define $f_{\ast }=M_{\mathrm{stars}}/(f_b{M}_h)$ using the cosmic baryon fraction $f_b$. In small halos, shallow potentials let stellar feedback drive outflows or repeatedly heat star-forming gas; supernova energy per stellar mass is roughly fixed while binding energy per gas mass scales as $V_{\mathrm{vir}}^2$. Photoheating during reionization also prevents very small halos from retaining or accreting cool gas. Molecular/atomic cooling thresholds further reduce star formation in the smallest systems. These effects make $f_{\ast }$ fall toward low mass.

Near $M_h\sim 10^{12}{M}_{\odot }$, gas can cool efficiently and the potential is deep enough to retain more of it, while a long-lived hot atmosphere and maintenance heating are less effective than in larger systems. At high mass, higher virial temperature and lower cooling efficiency let a substantial hot atmosphere persist. Active-galactic-nucleus feedback can prevent that atmosphere from supplying cold gas and can expel some gas; the cooling-time bottleneck alone is not an adequate explanation for the low stellar fractions of massive groups and clusters. The peak reflects a competition between gas supply/cooling and feedback, rather than complete conversion of all baryons at a sharply universal mass. Its exact location and height depend on epoch, metallicity, gas history and the stellar population included.

In the Lambda-CDM model, nearly Gaussian primordial density contrasts grow under gravity within an expanding universe containing cold dark matter, ordinary baryons and a cosmological constant. The cold dark matter is effectively collisionless and has negligible pressure on galactic scales. Before recombination, baryons are coupled to the photon fluid: radiation pressure and acoustic oscillations prevent their perturbations from behaving like pressureless matter. After recombination they can fall into the gravitational potentials already established by dark matter, subject to gas pressure and the Jeans mass.

For small density contrasts, evolution is linear. On pressure-free scales the growing mode is multiplied by the linear growth factor $D(t)$, with $D\propto a$ during matter domination. The cosmological density power spectrum can be writtenHere $T(k)$ is the cosmological transfer function. For nearly scale-invariant initial conditions, the large-scale matter spectrum behaves approximately as $P\propto k$, whereas well inside the matter-radiation equality scale it falls approximately as $k^{-3}{\log }^{2}k$, until the microscopic dark-matter cutoff matters. This fall of the dimensional $P(k)$ does not imply less fluctuation power on every smaller mass scale: the power per logarithmic wavenumber is ${\Delta }^2=k^{3}P/(2{\pi }^2)$, and the smoothed matter density variance is obtained by integrating it against a mass-dependent window. Over the relevant cold-dark-matter hierarchy, smaller mass windows generally have larger variance.

The hierarchical galaxy formation picture follows: fluctuations on small mass scales typically reach the nonlinear collapse threshold first, while larger objects assemble later through accretion and dark-matter halo mergers. It is a statistical ordering, not a claim that every small object precedes every large rare peak. When $|\delta |$ becomes order unity, the linear growth factor is no longer a solution for the local density. Collisionless dark matter develops multistream regions and bound dark matter halos; phase mixing and violent relaxation redistribute orbital energies, and virialized structures approximately obey the virial theorem.

Baryons have an additional nonlinear route. Infall and shocks convert bulk kinetic energy into thermal energy, with characteristic virial temperatureUnlike collisionless dark matter, the gas can lose this energy through radiative cooling. The optically thin gas cooling time is the thermal-energy density divided by the radiative loss rate, for exampleThe density convention in $\Lambda$ must agree with the denominator; the astrophysical cooling function can also be defined using $n_H^2$ instead. The cooling criterion for galaxy formation compares this time with the collapse or supply time. Rapidly cooling gas loses pressure support, contracts and can form stars. Slowly cooling gas remains in a hot atmosphere. Stable virial shocks are not obligatory in every low-mass system: gas can also arrive in cold streams and cool while being accreted.

Angular momentum prevents indefinite radial contraction. Tidal torque theory supplies an initial halo spin, and later mergers change it. If gas radiates energy while retaining much of its specific angular momentum, it settles into a rotationally supported galactic disk rather than reaching the centre. The relation $j\sim R{v}_c$ explains why modest halo spin can set a disk radius much smaller than its virial radius of a dark-matter halo. Torques, bars and gravitational encounters can transport angular momentum outwards and feed central concentrations; radiative cooling alone does not remove it.

Galaxy mergers alter stellar structure as well as assembling mass. A major galaxy merger can strongly disturb or destroy an existing galactic disk, randomizing stellar orbits and creating a spheroid through violent relaxation. A gas-rich galaxy merger also permits dissipation, inflow and a burst of star formation; gas left over or accreted afterwards can rebuild a galactic disk. Minor galaxy mergers add stars to outer components, thicken disks and grow bulges. Dry galaxy mergers add stellar mass and can increase size without much new star formation. Halo merging therefore does not imply instantaneous merging of its galaxies: satellite orbital decay requires Chandrasekhar dynamical friction and can take a substantial time.

The atomic and molecular cooling thresholds for galaxy formation supply a lower characteristic scale. Primordial atomic gas cools inefficiently below roughly $10^4\mathrm{K}$ because electronic excitation is suppressed. The corresponding halo mass is of order $10^8{M}_{\odot }$ at a redshift of order ten, with approximate dependence $M_{\mathrm{atomic}}\propto (1+z{)}^{-3/2}$ at fixed threshold temperature. Molecular hydrogen can cool gas at hundreds of kelvin and permit smaller early objects, provided it forms and survives dissociating radiation. Metal-line cooling changes these thresholds after enrichment. Thus the atomic threshold is not an absolute minimum mass for all stellar systems.

At the other end, sufficiently massive dark matter halos have high virial temperatures and low-density hot gas. Above the strong atomic-line-cooling interval, thermal bremsstrahlung has $\Lambda \propto T^{1/2}$. At comparable halo gas density, $t_{\mathrm{cool}}\propto T^{1/2}\propto M_h^{1/3}$, while $t_{\mathrm{dyn}}$ depends mainly on formation density. Cooling therefore becomes less able to condense all the gas within the available time. This upper galaxy mass from gas cooling argument selects galaxy-sized condensations, broadly halo masses around $10^{12}$–$10^{13}{M}_{\odot }$ in simple low-redshift estimates, rather than single luminous galaxies containing every baryon in a group or cluster. Its numerical scale depends on epoch, metallicity and gas profile. Subsequent galaxy mergers can build larger stellar systems; cooling is not an absolute upper bound on their final mass.

Finally, a Press-Schechter halo mass function has many low-mass objects and a steep high-mass cutoff, while the luminosity function of galaxies also has a faint component and a bright cutoff, often described by a Schechter function. The two shapes are related through the halo-to-galaxy luminosity mapping, not by identifying luminosity with total halo mass. In the idealized one-central-galaxy, no-scatter limit,If $d{n}_h/d{M}_h\propto M_h^{-a}$ and $L\propto M_h^p$, then $\Phi (L)\propto L^{-1-(a-1)/p}$. A constant conversion gives similar shapes. Actual stellar feedback, inefficient low-temperature cooling and reionization suppress faint galaxies relative to small haloes, while long cooling times and active-galactic-nucleus feedback suppress luminosity at large halo masses. Satellites, scatter, stellar populations and dust further affect the correspondence. The halo hierarchy supplies the gravitational framework; cooling, angular momentum and feedback determine which parts become luminous galaxies.

Let $P_m(k,z)$ be the dimensional cosmological density power spectrum and ${\Delta }_m^2=k^3{P}_m/(2{\pi }^2)$ its dimensionless power spectrum. In linear theory,where $D$ is the linear growth factor and $\mathcal{T}$ is the cosmological transfer function. An approximately scale-invariant primordial curvature spectrum corresponds, with the conventional matter-spectrum normalization, to $P_{\mathrm{prim}}\propto k^{n_s}$ with $n_s\simeq 1$. This does not say that the dimensional density spectrum is white noise or that the early curvature and density perturbations are the same variable.

The crucial scale dependence develops around horizon entry and matter-radiation equality. Modes entering during radiation domination undergo only logarithmic cold-matter growth, whereas modes entering later avoid that suppression. For cold dark matter, the large-scale transfer tends to a constant and the small-scale transfer behaves schematically as $\mathcal{T}(k)\propto \ln (k/k_{\mathrm{eq}})/k^2$. ThusFor $n_s\simeq 1$, the dimensional spectrum turns from an approximately $k$ rise to an approximately $k^{-3}{\ln }^{2}k$ decline. Multiplying by $k^3$ shows that the dimensionless small-scale power still increases slowly. The resulting variance of density fluctuations smoothed on mass $M$ generally increases as $M$ decreases, over the scales relevant to galaxy assembly.

After equality, and over scales where linear growth is scale-independent, the transfer shape is approximately preserved while the amplitude grows. During matter domination, $D\propto a$; late accelerated expansion slows that growth. A region collapses when its linearly evolved density contrast reaches the linear spherical-collapse threshold. Smaller mass scales, having larger variance, typically reach this threshold earlier. Small haloes form first, then accrete matter and merge into larger haloes; galaxies form from cooling baryons in those wells and themselves merge. This small-to-large assembly is hierarchical galaxy formation. It is a statistical trend: rare high peaks can produce unusually massive early objects, and gas cooling and feedback prevent a one-to-one identification of halo collapse with star formation.

For cold dark matter, random particle velocities are small enough that collisionless free streaming erases little power on galactic scales. Warm dark matter retains a larger early velocity dispersion and a larger free-streaming length, suppressing power below a finite scale. There are consequently fewer low-mass haloes, delayed formation of the smallest galaxies, and a lower limit to the hierarchy that can develop. Above the cutoff, warm-matter structure can still assemble hierarchically. The distinction concerns the particles' velocity history and transfer function, not the thermal temperature of gas in a galaxy today. The broad late-time shape was largely established by early horizon-entry physics, with subsequent nonlinear collapse and merging altering the spectrum at high wavenumber.

Match the cutoff exponent to get $2\beta =1/2$, so $\beta =1/4$. Independently, the low-mass exponent is then $\beta -2=-7/4$, as required. ConsequentlyMatching the coefficient of the power-law Press-Schechter stellar mass function givesThusAbout $5.1\%$ of the halo baryons form stars in this model, corresponding to $1.0\%$ of total halo mass. The independent stellar-density integral gives ${\rho }_{\ast }^{\mathrm{com}}/{\bar{\rho }}_{m,0}={ϵ}_{\ast }$, checking the mass-function normalization.

The index $-3/2$ is an effective slope of the processed matter spectrum on these mass scales, not the primordial index. The cosmological transfer function suppresses modes that enter the horizon during radiation domination, altering the approximately primordial $k$ law. Around and below galaxy scales the dimensional matter spectrum has a much more negative local slope, eventually tending toward the approximately $k^{-3}{\ln }^{2}k$ small-scale limit. A local power law with $n=-3/2$ is a useful idealization over a limited interval; there is no reason for it to equal the large-scale primordial value or to hold on every scale.

Write $K=k_1+k_2+k_3>0$ and $C=ϵ+1-c_s^2$. The inflationary scalar Fourier mode has real late-time value $A_k=H/\sqrt{4ϵM_{\mathrm{Pl}}^2{c}_s{k}^3}$ and $u_k^{\prime \ast }(\tau )=A_k{c}_s^2{k}^2\tau e^{ik{c}_s\tau }$. Thus the time integrand, before the factor $-2i$, isThe Bunch-Davies vacuum prescription supplies damping in the past. Equivalently, use a positive regulator $d$ and then take the limit:The real part of $-2i$ times this integral is $4/(c_s^3{K}^3)$. Including the six Wick contractions yields the cubic time-derivative curvature bispectrumThe resulting primordial bispectrum is a homogeneous function of degree $-6$ in the wavenumbers, as expected for scale-independent background parameters.

The printed limit $c_s\ll 0$ is not a physical sound-speed limit for these modes. The normalization and positive-frequency choice assume $c_s>0$; a negative value is outside the positive sound-speed convention used by these modes. The likely intended limit is $0<c_s\ll 1$, which is analyzed explicitly here rather than silently substituted for the PDF.

To compare primordial non-Gaussianity, normalize by the power spectrum, not only by the raw three-point amplitude. HereAt an equilateral bispectrum configuration, the exact normalized amplitude isThus $c_s\to 1$ gives an amplitude of order $ϵ$, consistent with weak non-Gaussianity in single-field slow-roll inflation. For $0<c_s\ll 1$, this vertex gives an amplitude of order one, enhanced relative to the slow-roll limit but not diverging as $c_s^{-2}$ after power-spectrum normalization. At fixed $H,ϵ,M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ the raw bispectrum does scale as $c_s^{-2}$, but $P_{\zeta }^2$ has the same scaling. The often-quoted larger small-sound-speed amplitudes of more general inflationary actions require their actual interaction coefficients and other vertices; they do not follow from the lone supplied vertex. These conclusions concern its tree contribution within the stated weak-perturbation approximation.

The bispectrum shape function isAt fixed perimeter, the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality bounds this by $1/27$, attained only at an equilateral bispectrum configuration. In a squeezed bispectrum configuration with $k_1=q\ll k_2\simeq k_3=k$, it behaves as $q/(8k)\to 0$. At a flattened bispectrum configuration $(k,k,2k)$ it is finite, $1/32$, with no boundary singularity. Thus the shape prefers equilateral triangles and suppresses squeezed triangles, with a broad finite flattened contribution. This is a shape preference, not a complete signal-to-noise calculation: actual observational weighting also depends on cosmological transfer functions, covariance and accessible triangles. If $C=0$, this vertex produces no bispectrum at any configuration; if $C<0$, the signed shape reverses while its absolute triangle preference is unchanged.

Let $R=\Delta \tau >0$, $L={\ell }_1+{\ell }_2+{\ell }_3$ and $D={\prod }_{r=1}^3(2{\ell }_r+1)$. Use exactly the given constant primordial bispectrum normalization, without an additional local-template convention factor. Combining it with the large-angle Sachs-Wolfe effect cosmological transfer function gives the reduced CMB bispectrumwhere $I_{\ell }(x,R)={\int }_0^{\infty }{j}_{\ell }(kR)j_{\ell }(kx)dk$. Each $1/5$ transfer factor has been retained; their product is $1/125$.

Apply the supplied spherical Bessel product integral after rescaling $q=kR$:The two branches agree at $x=R$. In the radial integral put $r=x/R$. The factor $R^3$ from $x^{2}dx$ cancels the $R^{-3}$ from the three kernels. The remaining integral isprovided $L>0$. This evaluation uses the momentum integrals at fixed radial parameter in the projection, then the radial integral; it does not require an unjustified global exchange of all oscillatory integrals.

The factors $(2/\pi {)}^3$ and ${\pi }^3/8$ cancel exactly. Hence the Sachs-Wolfe projection of a constant bispectrum isThe all-monopole case $L=0$ has a logarithmically divergent outer radial integral and is not covered by the printed finite formula. Observable CMB analyses remove the monopole and dipole, normally using ${\ell }_i\ge 2$, so this issue is absent there. Angular triangle and parity selection are carried by the triple-spherical harmonic geometric factor multiplying the reduced bispectrum.

There is no dependence on the last-scattering distance $R$, and no extra physical scale appears when ${\Delta }_{\zeta }^2$ is held constant. At fixed triangle shape and in the range $1\ll {\ell }_i\ll 200$, common rescaling of all multipoles givesThis is angular scale invariance in the usual weighted sense; a constant primordial shape does not make the unweighted reduced CMB bispectrum independent of angular scale. The exact finite-multipole expression retains the $+1$ and $+3$ terms shown above.