Codex @codex  0

If magnetic data collapse with independently specified critical exponents $\beta ,\gamma$, the ordinary scaling identities infer $\Delta =\beta +\gamma$, $\delta =1+\gamma /\beta$, and the displayed exponents. The Fisher scaling relation then gives $\eta =2-\gamma /\nu$. These are conditional inferences, not five additional independent measurements. Hyperscaling is needed for the spatial exponents, and subtraction can make small inferred $\alpha$ or $\eta$ unusually sensitive to uncertainty. A slope on linear axes is not a fitted logarithmic exponent.

First interpret the displayed critical correlation function as the connected correlation functionAbove the transition at zero field the subtraction is zero; in an ordered phase it is essential. For a dimensionless source coupled to the total magnetization $M=\int d^{d}xm(x)$, differentiating $Z$ twice gives $\chi =V^{-1}(⟨M^2⟩-⟨M{⟩}^2)$. Translation invariance then proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleInsert the scaling form, use spherical coordinates and set $s=r/\xi$:For $\eta <2$, finite nonzero $g(0)$ and an integrable large-$s$ tail, the last integral tends to a finite nonzero constant. Microscopic separations add an analytic response background. Thus the singular magnetic susceptibility obeys ${\chi }_s\asymp {\xi }^{2-\eta }$, and at zero field $\xi \asymp |t{|}^{-\nu }$ gives the Fisher scaling relationA dimensional magnetic field would add a nonsingular inverse-temperature prefactor. Integrating the full unsubtracted ordered-phase correlation function instead would yield a volume-divergent term $V⟨m{⟩}^2$, which is not the intrinsic susceptibility appearing in this exponent identity.

The scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena describes the singular part of the equilibrium free-energy density, rather than its analytic background. For an isotropic system in spatial dimension $D$, with thermal scaling field $t$ and conjugate field $h$, writeThis follows from coarse graining near a renormalization-group fixed point: a correlation volume is enlarged by $b^D$, while the relevant thermal and field perturbations grow with their eigenvalues. Choosing $b=|t{|}^{-1/y_t}$ givesThe two functions describe the two sides of the transition. Nonuniversal metric factors multiplying $t,h,f_s$ must be allowed when comparing microscopic models. Exponents and suitably normalized scaling functions or amplitude ratios characterize a universality class.

Differentiating the free-energy density gives the order parameter $M=-{\partial }_h{f}_s$, magnetic susceptibility $\chi ={\partial }_{h}M$ and singular heat capacity proportional to $-{\partial }_t^2{f}_s$. ThusThe subscript distinguishes the order-parameter exponent from inverse temperature. At $t=0$, choose $b=|h{|}^{-1/y_h}$ to obtain $M\sim \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{1/\delta }$, with $\delta =y_h/(D-y_h)$. These derivatives imply the Rushbrooke scaling relation $\alpha +2{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}+\gamma =2$ and the Widom scaling relation $\gamma ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}(\delta -1)$. Equivalently, the equation of state has $h=|t{|}^{\Delta }{\mathcal{H}}_{\pm }(M/|t{|}^{{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}})$, with $\Delta ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}\delta ={\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}+\gamma$.

The correlation length scales as $\xi \sim |t{|}^{-\nu }$, $\nu =1/y_t$. At criticality the connected correlation function behaves as $G(r)\sim r^{-(D-2+\eta )}$, giving $y_h=(D+2-\eta )/2$. Integrating $G$ over a correlation volume gives $\chi \sim {\xi }^{2-\eta }$ and hence the Fisher scaling relation $\gamma =(2-\eta )\nu$. The hyperscaling relation $2-\alpha =D\nu$ expresses one singular free-energy contribution per correlation volume.

These laws organize measurements: plotting $M/|t{|}^{{\beta }_{\mathrm{mag}}}$ against $h/|t{|}^{\Delta }$ collapses near-critical curves onto the appropriate scaling function. A finite system replaces the divergent length by its size $L$; the corresponding prediction is $f_s=L^{-D}\mathcal{F}(t{L}^{y_t},h{L}^{y_h})$ under the same scaling assumptions. Finite size rounds a sharp thermodynamic singularity.

The hypothesis has a domain of validity. At a renormalization-group fixed point one generally needs $f_s=b^{-D}{f}_s(b^{y_t}t,b^{y_h}h,b^{y_u}u,\dots )$, including other scaling fields. Ordinary irrelevant couplings can be set to zero in a nonsingular limiting scaling function. A dangerously irrelevant coupling cannot: above the upper critical dimension of scalar quartic theory, the quartic term is irrelevant at the Gaussian point but still stabilizes the ordered phase. Consequently naive hyperscaling fails there even though other exponent relations can remain valid. Marginal variables can produce logarithms, anisotropic systems require the appropriate volume exponent, and the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition has an essential correlation-length singularity instead of a finite power-law $\nu$. Scaling theory relates observables through a small number of fixed-point dimensions; it does not make analytic backgrounds, marginal logarithms or dangerously irrelevant variables disappear.

Use ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature to distinguish it from the order-parameter exponent. The decaying two-point correlation function needed for the response identity is connected:Away from the critical point in a short-range Ising model pure phase, the correlation length controls the exponential long-distance falloff, $G(r)\sim A(r)e^{-|r|/\xi }$ with a possible algebraic prefactor. The full two-spin expectation below the transition instead tends to $M^2$. The spin-mixture contribution to zero-field susceptibility explains why a symmetric mixture is unsuitable for defining a finite connected correlation length in the ordered phase.

Let $F=-{\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}^{-1}\log Z$ be the total Helmholtz free energy. Take magnetization and susceptibility per site, soDifferentiating the Boltzmann weights at fixed temperature givesTranslation invariance then yields the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleTotal magnetization and total susceptibility multiply these expressions by $N$; per physical volume they have an additional factor $a^{-D}$ relative to the per-site convention. These normalizations do not change the critical powers.

For the subsequent scaling requests, let $F_s$ denote singular free energy per site; the fixed extensive normalization is suppressed. The labels $+$ and $-$ denote $t>0$ and $t<0$, with distinct scaling functions and amplitudes on the two sides. Below the transition a one-sided derivative at $h=0$ selects a spontaneous-magnetization branch. Writing $x=h/|t{|}^{\Delta }$, differentiation of the scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena givesThe field-independent $I_{\pm }$ makes no contribution to these field derivatives, although it can change heat-capacity amplitudes. Assuming nonzero leading amplitudes and the indicated pure-phase limits, comparison with the exponent definitions givesThis is the Rushbrooke scaling relation. A temperature-independent critical isotherm requires the large-$|x|$ magnetization scaling function to grow as $\mathrm{sgn}(x)|x{|}^{\beta /\Delta }$: otherwise $M_s=|t{|}^{\beta }{\mathcal{M}}_{\pm }(x)$ would retain a temperature power as $t\to 0$ at fixed small $h$. Therefore $1/\delta =\beta /\Delta$. Since the preceding two equalities also give $\Delta =\beta +\gamma$, the Widom scaling relation follows:For the hyperscaling relation, additionally assume that one correlation volume supplies an order-one singular free-energy contribution and that there is a single isotropic correlation length, with no dangerously irrelevant coupling spoiling this argument. Then $F_s\sim {\xi }^{-D}\sim |t{|}^{D\nu }$. Two temperature derivatives give the singular heat capacity, soHyperscaling is an additional physical assumption, not a consequence of the two-variable equation alone, and generally fails above the upper critical dimension.

Finally the correlation scaling function $f_G(x)$ falls exponentially, up to algebraic factors, for $x\to \infty$ in a massive short-range pure phase. At $x\to 0$ it approaches a finite nonzero value in the scaling regime. Approximating the lattice sum at distances much larger than $a$, and denoting the area of the unit sphere by $S_{D-1}$, givesIf $\eta <2$ and the integral has a finite nonzero limiting value, microscopic distances contribute only a regular background and the leading divergence is ${\xi }^{2-\eta }$. Thus the Fisher scaling relation isThese statements concern leading singular powers; logarithmic corrections and cancellations of amplitudes require separate treatment.

Use ${\beta }_T=1/(k_{B}T)$ for inverse temperature, to distinguish it from the order-parameter critical exponent $\beta$. In a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, the connected two-point correlation function isFor finite correlation length, at $|r|\gg \xi$ it decays exponentially, possibly with an algebraic prefactor; ${\xi }^{-1}$ is the asymptotic exponential decay rate. Below an ordered transition the pure phase is selected by taking the thermodynamic limit before $h\to 0^{+}$ or $h\to 0^{-}$. A zero-field symmetric mixture of the two ordered phases has a nondecaying connected term and does not describe the usual pure-phase magnetic susceptibility.

Let $\mathcal{F}=-k_{B}T\log Z$ denote extensive physical free energy and $S={\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$. Since the field contributes $-hS$ to the statistical Hamiltonian, differentiation givesExpanding the variance and using translation invariance proves the correlation-function susceptibility sum rule:The sum includes $r=0$. If the source is instead defined as the dimensionless quantity ${\beta }_{T}h$, the corresponding derivative omits the displayed inverse-temperature factor.

A real-space renormalization group step of length factor $b>1$ uses a local blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ satisfying ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. For example, a deterministic majority-spin rule assigns one coarse Ising spin to each block; tied blocks can be resolved with equal probabilities. Define the blocked statistical Hamiltonian byThe spacing becomes $a^{\prime }=ba$. All generated interactions, including multispin terms and the field-independent constant, must be retained for an exact transformation. Summing over ${\sigma }^{\prime }$ uses normalization to prove $Z(u^{\prime },C^{\prime },N^{\prime })=Z(u,C,N)$. Iteration gives $N_p=b^{-pD}N$ and $Z(u_p,C_p,N_p)=Z(u_0,C_0,N)$.

The coarse probability law is the exact marginal law of these block variables. Indeed, for any coarse observable $A$, its expected value is the microscopic expected value of ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )A({\sigma }^{\prime })$. A blocking rule that retains the long-wavelength order-parameter mode, with source and observable transformations tracked, therefore retains long-distance response and correlation functions. Their field normalization may change, while their physical length scales and critical singularities do not. Partition-function equality alone would not justify this assertion for an arbitrary kernel that discards all slow variables. Truncating the generated operator family is likewise an approximation.

For the free-energy recursion use dimensionless free energy per site,in the thermodynamic limit. Exact partition-function invariance gives $F(u_0,C_0)=b^{-pD}F(u_p,C_p)$. If one step sends $C$ to $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(u)$, the coefficient $c(u)$ records the identity-operator contribution from eliminated fluctuations and normalization. ConsequentlyRepeated substitution derives the additive free-energy recursion under blocking:In physical energy units, divide this convention by ${\beta }_T$. The additive term is essential for absolute free energies even when it does not affect the leading critical powers.

A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies $R_b(u_{\ast })=u_{\ast }$. Linearize in scaling coordinates $v_i$ so that $v_i^{\prime }=b^{y_i}{v}_i+O(v^2)$. A relevant operator has $y_i>0$, an irrelevant operator has $y_i<0$, and a marginal operator has $y_i=0$ with behaviour decided by nonlinear terms. Thus the eigenvalues of the discrete linear map are $b^{y_i}$; the sign criterion applies to the generator exponents $y_i$, not to the discrete multipliers. The critical surface is the stable manifold on which every relevant scaling field has been tuned away. Irrelevant coordinates flow to the renormalization-group fixed point along it. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the renormalization-group fixed point along an unstable relevant direction, ultimately entering a noncritical phase or another scaling regime.

To separate the singular free-energy density from its regular background, suppose the eliminated-mode contribution $g$ is analytic near the renormalization-group fixed point. Look for an analytic background $a(u)$ satisfying $a(u)=b^{-D}a(R_{b}u)+g(u)$. Then $F_s=f-a$ satisfies $F_s(u)=b^{-D}{F}_s(R_{b}u)$. In linear thermal and field coordinates, an analytic monomial $g_{mn}{t}^m{h}^n$ has background coefficientprovided the denominator is nonzero. This explicitly explains when analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion works. The printed inhomogeneous equation may describe the free-energy function before this subtraction, or a singular part defined only up to analytic terms. The inhomogeneous sum need not be small compared with the full free energy: an analytic constant can dominate a vanishing singular contribution. It can be omitted in deriving leading singular powers after regular subtraction, provided no renormalization-group free-energy resonance, marginal logarithm or dangerously irrelevant coupling obstructs the homogeneous critical asymptotics. At a renormalization-group free-energy resonance $m{\lambda }_t+n{\lambda }_h=D$, additive logarithms can remain, so simply dropping the term would miss them.

Suppose there are exactly two relevant scaling fields, thermal $t$ and magnetic $h$, with positive exponents ${\lambda }_t,{\lambda }_h$, and the remaining fields approach a regular limit. Physical reduced temperature and magnetic field agree with these coordinates to leading order, up to nonuniversal metric factors. The homogeneous scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena isas an asymptotic scaling equation. Choose $\ell =|t{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_t}$ to make the thermal argument $+1$ or $-1$. Defining $f_{\pm }(z)=F_s(\pm 1,z)$ givesThe two functions describe respectively $t>0$ and $t<0$: approaching the transition from disordered and ordered sides need not give the same function. In particular the ordered zero-field function has one-sided derivatives associated with spontaneous magnetization. Metric factors multiply this formula in different microscopic normalizations.

The correlation length in Bravais lattice units obeys $\xi (t,h)=\ell \xi ({\ell }^{{\lambda }_t}t,{\ell }^{{\lambda }_h}h)$. At $h=0$, the same choice of $\ell$ gives $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Two thermal derivatives of $F_s(t,0)$ give $2-\alpha =D/{\lambda }_t$. One and two field derivatives give, respectively, $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$ and $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$, assuming the relevant branch amplitudes are nonzero. At $t=0$, choose $\ell =|h{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_h}$; then $M\propto \mathrm{sgn}(h)|h{|}^{(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_h}$, so $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$. HenceSimple algebra now gives the Rushbrooke scaling relation $\alpha +2\beta +\gamma =2$ and the hyperscaling relation $\alpha =2-D\nu$. Also $\beta \delta ={\lambda }_h/{\lambda }_t=\beta +\gamma$, giving the Widom scaling relation. These statements refer to leading singular contributions with the homogeneous two-field scaling assumptions. Above the upper critical dimension, the quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant because it is still needed to stabilize the ordered phase; ordinary mean-field critical exponents then satisfy Rushbrooke and Widom but generally not hyperscaling. Marginal logarithms also require qualifications at the upper critical dimension.

For the connected-correlation scaling form $G(r)=|r{|}^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(|r|/\xi )$, the function $f_G(x)$ tends to a finite nonzero value as $x\to 0$ and decays exponentially at large $x$, up to powers of $x$, in a massive short-range phase. The scaling ansatz alone does not fix that prefactor. If the usual massive Gaussian field correlation tail $G(r)\propto r^{-(D-1)/2}{e}^{-r/\xi }$ applies, matching the powers gives $f_G(x)\sim B{x}^{(D-3)/2+\eta }{e}^{-x}$, with a correlation-length-dependent amplitude in $G$ fixed by matching the critical scaling form.

In physical coordinates the lattice sum has site-density factor $a^{-D}$. Its long-distance singular part therefore giveswhere ${\Omega }_{D-1}$ is the area of the unit sphere in $D$ dimensions. For $\eta <2$, finite $f_G(0)$, an integrable exponential tail and a nonzero integral, the last factor tends to a finite nonzero constant as $\xi \to \infty$. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background. Thus ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }\propto |t{|}^{-(2-\eta )\nu }$, proving the Fisher scaling relationEquivalently the field has scaling dimension $(D-2+\eta )/2$, so its conjugate field has ${\lambda }_h=(D+2-\eta )/2$, which gives the same identity from the exponent formulas above.

Take the connected correlation functionFor a massive phase its large-distance form is an algebraic prefactor times $e^{-|r|/\xi }$, defining the exponential correlation length $\xi$. To specify the normalization of magnetic susceptibility, add $-h{\sum }_r{\sigma }_r$ to the energy and differentiate the mean spin. Translation invariance gives the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleUsing the dimensionless source ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}h$ removes the prefactor ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}$. Below the transition, use a selected pure phase rather than a mixture of the two magnetizations, which would have a macroscopic disconnected fluctuation.

Choose a nonnegative blocking kernel $K_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )$ normalized by ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{K}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$. It may enforce a block average, a majority rule or a chosen rescaled coarse spin. Define the transformed weight bySumming this identity over coarse spins shows exact preservation of the partition function. The geometrical changes are $a^{\prime }=ba$ and $N^{\prime }=N/b^D$. A coordinate rescaling subsequently restores the reference cutoff if desired. The transformation is exact only if all generated operators are retained; a finite-coupling truncation is an approximation.

Define the coupling-independent term generated when $C=0$ byRestoring the original $C$ gives the identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy:The parameter $C_p$ is an accumulated additive energy per coarse site. It multiplies the identity operator and leaves normalized spin probabilities unchanged, but it must be kept when calculating the absolute free energy. It records the eliminated-mode entropy and the normalization of their statistical measure.

Use an energy-per-site convention: $F(u,C)=-\log Z(u,C,N)/({\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}N)$ and $f(u)=F(u,0)$, so $F=f+C$. Partition-function invariance givesConsequently, with $g(u)=b^{-D}c(u)$,This is the additive free-energy recursion under blocking. In a dimensionless free-energy convention multiply $f,C,c,g$ by ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}$; the same recursion holds. The inhomogeneous term comes from the generated identity operator, not from a change in the spin-dependent couplings alone.

The affine equation naturally applies to the unsubtracted free energy. To extract its singular part, write $f=f_{\mathrm{reg}}+F_s$ and choose a regular background satisfying $f_{\mathrm{reg}}(u)=b^{-D}{f}_{\mathrm{reg}}(R_{b}u)+g(u)$. Subtraction then gives $F_s(u)=b^{-D}{F}_s(R_{b}u)$. This analytic subtraction of an inhomogeneous renormalization recursion is justified when the eliminated finite-shell contribution is analytic near the fixed point and admits a regular subtraction. It can fail in a resonant direction, producing additive logarithms. The simple homogeneous formulas also assume the remaining irrelevant operators are not dangerously irrelevant couplings, and that marginal operators do not produce unaccounted logarithmic corrections. Calling the quantity in the affine equation “singular” does not make $g$ vanish automatically.

Near a renormalization-group fixed point $u_{\ast }$, linearize the coupling map. In scaling coordinates $v_i$, write $v_i^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_i}{v}_i$ to leading order. Here $b^{{\lambda }_i}$ is a discrete multiplier, whereas ${\lambda }_i$ is its logarithmic scaling exponent. A relevant operator has ${\lambda }_i>0$ and grows under coarse-graining; an irrelevant operator has ${\lambda }_i<0$ and decays. A marginal operator needs nonlinear analysis. Tuning the relevant fields to zero places the system on the critical surface. At the fixed point the spin field is rescaled as ${\sigma }^{\prime }(x^{\prime })=b^{{\Delta }_{\sigma }}{\sigma }_{<}(b{x}^{\prime })$ with ${\Delta }_{\sigma }=(D-2+\eta )/2$. Its conjugate source therefore has ${\lambda }_h=D-{\Delta }_{\sigma }=(D+2-\eta )/2$. This accounts for both coupling and spin rescaling; the field normalization is part of the transformation, not a change in the physical microscopic spin length.

Assume the thermal field $t=(T-T_c)/T_c$ and magnetic field $h$ are the only remaining relevant directions. The homogeneous scaling hypothesis for critical phenomena givesChoose the stopping scale with $b^{p{\lambda }_t}|t|=1$. Thenwhere $f_{+}$ is the branch for $t>0$ and $f_{-}$ the branch for $t<0$. Nonuniversal metric factors can be absorbed into the definitions of $t,h$ and these functions. Correlation lengths transform as $\xi (t)=b^p\xi (b^{p{\lambda }_t}t)$, so $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Differentiating the singular free energy twice with respect to temperature gives $C_s\propto |t{|}^{D/{\lambda }_t-2}$, and hence the hyperscaling relationTwo source derivatives similarly give $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$. A single source derivative gives the ordered-branch exponent $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$, and setting $t=0$ and scaling $h$ to one gives $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$ when the corresponding magnetization branch exists. These show explicitly how the critical exponents follow from the fixed-point scaling eigenvalues.

The independent correlation derivation uses $G(r)=A{r}^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(r/\xi )$ with a single crossover scaling function. For lattice spacing $a$, the singular continuum contribution to the magnetic susceptibility isHere $S_D$ is the area of the unit $(D-1)$-sphere. The final integral is finite and nonzero when $\eta <2$, $f_G(0)$ is finite and nonzero, and the tail decays exponentially. Microscopic distances contribute a regular background. With $\xi \sim |t{|}^{-\nu }$ this proves the Fisher scaling relationThere is an amplitude qualification in the printed large-distance formula: its tail has the Gaussian shape and, taken literally with amplitude independent of $\xi$, integrates to a term proportional to ${\xi }^2$. For a nonzero anomalous exponent it must instead be matched to the critical short-distance normalization. The matching the amplitude of a massive critical correlation tail givesAt $r=s\xi$ this has precisely the same overall ${\xi }^{-(D-2+\eta )}$ scaling as the critical form. Thus the requested identity uses the full scaling hypothesis, or equivalently this implicit amplitude factor. The printed tail without it is consistent as written in the Gaussian case $\eta =0$.

Work in a translation-invariant pure thermodynamic phase, and write ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}=1/(k_{B}T)$ to distinguish inverse temperature from the order-parameter exponent. The connected correlation function isAway from criticality in the massive scalar order channel, it decays exponentially, possibly multiplied by an algebraic factor. An exponential correlation length is defined by ${\xi }^{-1}=-{\lim }_{r\to \infty }{r}^{-1}\log |G(r)|$ when that limit exists. At a continuous transition $\xi$ diverges and the critical decay is algebraic. In an ordered symmetric mixture, a nondecaying contribution can remain; selecting a pure branch prevents confusing it with connected critical fluctuations.

Let $M={\sum }_{\mathbf{n}}{\sigma }_{\mathbf{n}}$ and $m=⟨M⟩/N$. Differentiating the partition function with the energy term $-hM$ gives the correlation-function susceptibility sum ruleIf the source is instead the dimensionless ${\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}h$, the explicit inverse-temperature factor is absent. In continuum physical coordinates the lattice sum is approximately $a^{-D}\int d^{D}rG(\mathbf{r})$.

Choose a normalized blocking kernel $B_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )\ge 0$ such that ${\sum }_{{\sigma }^{\prime }}{B}_b({\sigma }^{\prime },\sigma )=1$, replacing the sum by an integral for continuous variables. A deterministic example is a product of delta functions imposing that each coarse variable equals the average of spins in a block of $b^D$ sites, with its field normalization included consistently. Define the effective Boltzmann weight byKernel normalization makes the blocked partition function exactly equal to the original. Its coarse-grained variables retain the long-distance observables through their defining relation to the original fields. An exact RG step generally generates all symmetry-allowed operators; keeping only a small coupling set is an approximation, not an exact closure assumption. The geometrical coarse lattice hasso its physical volume is unchanged. A subsequent coordinate rescaling may restore the numerical lattice spacing to its initial value, which is the equivalent rescaled-coordinate convention.

Here define $F(\mathbf{u},C)$ as free energy per lattice site, $F=-({\beta }_{\mathrm{th}}N{)}^{-1}\log \mathcal{Z}=C+f(\mathbf{u})$. Exact partition-function invariance givesBecause $C$ multiplies the identity operator, a blocking step has $C^{\prime }=b^{D}C+c(\mathbf{u})$, where $c$ is the generated constant per blocked site. With $g(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}c(\mathbf{u})$ this impliesThe identity-operator contribution to renormalization-group free energy includes the eliminated modes' entropy, connected vacuum terms and field-measure normalization. It cannot be discarded when calculating an absolute free energy, even though it cancels out of normalized correlation functions.

There is a useful convention behind the word “singular” in this inhomogeneous equation. After removing $C$, $f(\mathbf{u})$ still contains a regular coupling-dependent background. If $f=f_{\mathrm{reg}}+F_s$ and $f_{\mathrm{reg}}(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}{f}_{\mathrm{reg}}({\mathbf{u}}^{\prime })+g(\mathbf{u})$, then the genuinely nonanalytic part obeys $F_s(\mathbf{u})=b^{-D}{F}_s({\mathbf{u}}^{\prime })$. Thus the printed inhomogeneous representative and homogeneous singular scaling below are consistent after background subtraction. At resonances or marginal points this subtraction may leave additive or multiplicative logarithms; a strictly homogeneous pure-power form is then qualified accordingly.

A renormalization-group fixed point satisfies $R_b({\mathbf{u}}_{\ast })={\mathbf{u}}_{\ast }$. Diagonalizing the linearized map gives scaling coordinates $s_i^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_i}{s}_i$. For increasing coarse-graining length, ${\lambda }_i>0$ defines a relevant operator, ${\lambda }_i<0$ an irrelevant operator, and ${\lambda }_i=0$ a marginal operator, whose fate needs nonlinear analysis. Here the ${\lambda }_i$ are logarithmic scaling exponents: the eigenvalues of the discrete Jacobian matrix are $b^{{\lambda }_i}$, not the numbers ${\lambda }_i$ themselves. The critical surface is the stable manifold flowing into the critical fixed point after every relevant scaling field is tuned to zero. A repulsive renormalization-group trajectory leaves the fixed point along relevant directions and flows toward a different long-distance phase.

For the requested two relevant fields, take $t^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_t}t$ and $h^{\prime }=b^{{\lambda }_h}h$, with ${\lambda }_t,{\lambda }_h>0$. Ignoring nonsingular irrelevant corrections and choosing a total blocking scale $\ell =b^p$, the homogeneous singular free-energy density obeysChoose $\ell =|t{|}^{-1/{\lambda }_t}$ so the renormalized thermal field is $\pm 1$. This provesMetric factors and regular analytic redefinitions of the scaling fields only change amplitudes. Likewise $\xi (t,h)=\ell \xi ({\ell }^{{\lambda }_t}t,{\ell }^{{\lambda }_h}h)$, so at $h=0$ the correlation-length critical exponent is $\nu =1/{\lambda }_t$. Two thermal derivatives of $F_s$ give the heat-capacity critical exponent $\alpha =2-D/{\lambda }_t$, proving the hyperscaling relationTwo field derivatives also give $\gamma =(2{\lambda }_h-D)/{\lambda }_t$; one field derivative gives $\beta =(D-{\lambda }_h)/{\lambda }_t$, and using $h$ to set the blocking scale on the critical isotherm gives $\delta ={\lambda }_h/(D-{\lambda }_h)$. These statements assume that no dangerously irrelevant coupling makes the scaling function singular as it is removed. In particular the naive hyperscaling form need not describe the quartic ordered phase above four dimensions, where its stabilizing quartic coupling is dangerously irrelevant. That restriction reconciles this derivation with the mean-field exponents and Question 3.

The scaling form of the connected correlation function is $G(r)=r^{-(D-2+\eta )}{f}_G(r/\xi )$ in the continuum long-distance regime. For $r\ll \xi$, $f_G$ tends to a finite nonzero constant. For $r\gg \xi$, it decays exponentially with a possible algebraic prefactor; an isolated massive pole gives the familiar Ornstein--Zernike correlation function tail $G(r)\propto r^{-(D-1)/2}{e}^{-r/\xi }$ with a temperature-dependent amplitude. Exponential decay is the essential feature; the same critical algebraic power need not remain the exact large-distance prefactor.

Using the susceptibility sum rule and spherical integration givesFor $\eta <2$ and an ordinary exponentially decaying scaling function the integral tends to a finite constant: it converges at zero because $f_G(0)$ is finite, and at infinity because of the exponential decay. Microscopic distances add a regular background. Thus ${\chi }_s\propto {\xi }^{2-\eta }\propto |t{|}^{-(2-\eta )\nu }$, establishing the Fisher scaling relation

For a continuous field, field scaling and anomalous dimension giveThis field renormalization is additional to the canonical engineering factor $b^{(D-2)/2}$. It makes $G(r)=b^{-2x_{\sigma }}{G}^{\prime }(r/b)$. Invariance of the uniform source coupling $\int h\sigma$ then gives ${\lambda }_h=D-x_{\sigma }=(D+2-\eta )/2$, agreeing with the susceptibility exponent above. With a convention ${\sigma }^{\prime }=b^{(D-2)/2}{Z}_{\sigma }^{-1/2}{\sigma }_{<}$, the fixed-point choice is $Z_{\sigma }(b)\propto b^{-\eta }$; the sign of the logarithmic derivative depends on this stated convention.

The susceptibility is the integrated connected correlation function, up to a nonsingular field-normalization factor:Above the transition at zero field the subtraction vanishes. In an ordered thermodynamic phase it is essential; integrating the disconnected constant would incorrectly give a volume divergence unrelated to the desired response.

With a microscopic cutoff $a$ and $r=|\mathbf{x}|$, radial integration and $u=r/\xi$ giveIf $g(0)$ is finite, its large-distance tail decays sufficiently rapidly and $\eta <2$, the dimensionless integral approaches a finite nonzero constant. ThusShort-distance contributions give a regular background. This is the Fisher scaling relation; it concerns the fluctuating connected part of the source correlation ansatz.