Assume the holonomic constraints have linearly independent gradients, so their common level set is locally a smooth constraint manifold parametrized by . The multiplier form of the Euler-Lagrange equations is
At fixed time . The chain rule for the reduced Lagrangian gives
Conversely, if these reduced equations hold, the Cartesian Euler-Lagrange residual annihilates every tangent direction. Linear independence of the constraint gradients implies that it is a linear combination of those gradients, giving the required Lagrange multipliers. This proves the local equivalence, including time-dependent constraints; singular constraints would need separate analysis.
For the bead, , so
The autonomous conservation of energy gives . If , the motion has a fixed sign and
The integral is the signed arc length divided by the constant speed, and is locally invertible. The special solution is a stationary bead, for which writing time as a function of its unchanging position is not meaningful.
This can fail in the same example as in part (i): is injective on the singleton , but .
For the final count, forces to be injective. There are
such functions . Once is chosen, is forced on the elements of and has independent choices at each of the other elements of . Hence the number of pairs is
The intermediate value theorem says that a continuous takes every value between and . For , the closed sets where and cannot separate the connected interval; equivalently, taking the supremum of and using continuity gives a point with value .
Set and for . Every interval contains a zero ; continuity on makes take every value between and , yet is discontinuous at .
A monotone function can be discontinuous only by a jump. If it had a jump at , any number strictly between the left and right limits would lie between and but would not be attained, contrary to the hypothesis. Thus it is continuous.
For the last assertion, pass to subsequences with both within of and near , near . For , the intermediate value theorem on the interval joining and gives with ; then . The endpoint cases use the original sequences.
The ordinary mean value theorem gives for some . More generally, applying it to the difference of two translated functions shows inductively that
for some . Taking proves the result.
The continuous approximation of a Riemann-integrable function follows here by choosing partitions with upper-minus-lower sum below . On each subinterval choose the midpoint of the infimum and supremum to form a step function . Then
Replace each of the finitely many jumps of by a linear transition on intervals of sufficiently small total length, obtaining a continuous with . Hence , and uniformly for every subinterval ,
No. Take
Both functions are nonconstant on every interval and nondifferentiable at zero, but is differentiable.
No. Take , , and . The function is not differentiable at , but is differentiable. Neither function is constant on an interval.
Differentiating the moment-generating function at zero gives
The probability generating function is
Termwise differentiation gives
The coefficients are nonnegative, and , so both derivatives are positive and nondecreasing on .
For a compactly supported test function ,
Thus this is the distributional derivative of the Heaviside step function: .
For every test function and nonzero , substitution with the orientation handled by gives
Hence the Dirac delta scaling identity is .
If are countable, choose enumerations and map each element of to the first pair at which it occurs. Since is countable, the union is countable.
A periodic function of period is determined by its values on a complete residue system. Thus all periodic functions form a countable union over of the countable sets , and are countable.
The set of bijections is uncountable. Indeed, each binary sequence determines a bijection that swaps and exactly when its th bit is one. This is an injection from the uncountable set of binary sequences.
A Cauchy sequence in a metric space satisfies: for every there is such that whenever . A complete metric space is one in which every Cauchy sequence converges to a point of the space.
Every Cauchy sequence is bounded. Choose such that for , and put
Then every term lies in the ball .
Now suppose is complete and is a decreasing sequence of nonempty closed sets with . Choose . Given , choose with . For , both points lie in , so . Completeness gives . For each fixed , the tail lies in the closed set , hence . Therefore
Conversely, assume the nested-set property and let be Cauchy. Define
These sets are nonempty, closed, and decreasing. The Cauchy property implies ; taking a closure does not change the diameter. Choose . Since ,
Thus every Cauchy sequence converges and is complete. This proves the Cantor intersection theorem characterization.
The contraction mapping theorem states that a contraction of a nonempty complete metric space has a unique fixed point.
For each , the map is a contraction with the common constant , so it has a unique fixed point . This defines the required unique function. Fix . The fixed-point identities and the triangle inequality give
Consequently
The numerator tends to zero as by the assumed continuity for the fixed point . Hence is continuous, an instance of continuous dependence of the fixed point of a uniform contraction.
The residue theorem states that if a meromorphic function has finitely many poles inside a positively oriented simple closed contour and none on it, then its contour integral is times the sum of the enclosed residues.
Apply it to
on a keyhole contour around the positive real axis. The outer and inner circles vanish as their radii tend to infinity and zero because and , respectively. On the upper bank the numerator tends to , while on the lower bank it tends to and the direction is reversed. Therefore the limiting contour integral is
The only enclosed pole is the double pole at . Since ,
The residue theorem now gives
For , division and
yield
At , the integral is one, agreeing with the continuous limit. This is the positive-axis keyhole beta integral.
For a differentiable wave function,
Thus . Substitution into part (a) yields
The function is not Lipschitz on . For ,
which is unbounded as .
The function
is continuous, satisfies the equation away from , and has unequal one-sided derivatives there.
It is unique in the stated class. While a solution is positive its derivative is , so continuity forces it to follow until it first reaches zero at . It cannot subsequently make a positive excursion: on any connected interval where and , integration of gives . A negative excursion similarly contradicts . Hence the solution remains zero. This is the sign-decay differential equation.
A sequence converges uniformly to if, for every , there is such that
for every and every . A map is uniformly continuous if, for every , there is such that
for all .
If , choose a ball outside which . On the closed ball, continuity gives boundedness, so is bounded everywhere.
Now let be Cauchy in the uniform metric. For each , is Cauchy in ; let its limit be . Passing to the pointwise limit in the uniform Cauchy estimate shows that uniformly. Hence is continuous. Given , choose with , and then choose so that for . It follows that also vanishes at infinity. Thus is complete, as in completeness of continuous functions vanishing at infinity.
Every is uniformly continuous. Given , choose so that outside the ball of radius . On the compact ball of radius , is uniformly continuous; choose the corresponding . If two points at distance below are not both in that ball, then both lie outside the ball of radius , and their function values differ by less than .
For the final sequence, continuity of at zero gives, for each fixed ,
Thus pointwise convergence is compulsory. Uniform convergence need not hold: with ,
which is unbounded as a function of for every fixed .
Under the additional bound , however,
for , and the difference is zero at . Hence convergence is uniform, by the uniform square-root perturbation under linear growth estimate. The pointwise answer remains yes.