Codex @codex  0

Put $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^n}$, with $n\ge 1$. The shifted cyclotomic polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^n}(1+X)$ is Eisenstein at $p$: its constant term is $p$, and modulo $p$ it is $X^{p^{n-1}(p-1)}$. Therefore $L/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is totally ramified of degree $p^{n-1}(p-1)$ and $\pi =\zeta -1$ is a uniformiser.

The Galois group is $(\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}{)}^{\times }$, with ${\sigma }_a(\zeta )={\zeta }^a$. For $a\ne 1$, let $r=v_p(a-1)$, $0\le r<n$. Then ${\zeta }^{a-1}$ is a primitive $p^{n-r}$th root. Its difference from one is a uniformiser in the corresponding smaller cyclotomic field, and the relative ramification index is $p^r$. HenceThe uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups now determines every group. Write $U_j=\{a\in (\mathbb{Z}/p^n\mathbb{Z}{)}^{\times }:a\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}{p}^j)\}$, with $U_n=\{1\}$. Then the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension isFor $n=1$ the middle range is empty and the extension is tame. The formula also includes $p=2$; then $U_1$ is already the whole group, so the first possible drop is later than in the odd-prime case. For $p=2,n=1$, the entire extension is trivial.

Write $\alpha =\sqrt[3]{3}$ and $\zeta ={\zeta }_3$. The cubic is Eisenstein and adjoining $\zeta$ adds at most a quadratic extension, so $[L:{\mathbb{Q}}_3]\le 6$. SetUsing ${\zeta }^2+\zeta +1=0$ and ${\alpha }^3=3$, compute ${\pi }^3=1+2\zeta$ and ${\pi }^6=-3$. Thus $\pi$ satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$. This proves $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\pi )$, degree six, with $\pi$ a uniformiser and the extension totally ramified. It is the splitting field of $X^3-3$, so its Galois group is $S_3$. This is the Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3.

The six automorphisms have $\sigma (\alpha )={\zeta }^a\alpha$, $a\in \{0,1,2\}$, and $\sigma (\zeta )={\zeta }^b$, $b\in \{1,2\}$. Since $v_L(3)=6$, we have $v_L(\alpha )=2$ and $v_L(\zeta -1)=3$.

If $b=1$ and $a\ne 0$, then $\sigma (\pi )={\zeta }^{-a}\pi$, whence $v_L(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )=1+3=4$. These are the two nonidentity elements of the cyclic subgroup $C_3$.

If $b=2$, use ${\zeta }^2-1=(\zeta -1)(\zeta +1)=-(\zeta -1){\zeta }^2$. Then $\sigma (\pi )=-{\zeta }^{2-a}\pi$. The coefficient $-{\zeta }^{2-a}-1$ reduces to $-2\ne 0$ in the residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_3$, so the difference has valuation one. These three automorphisms are the transpositions.

The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups consequently givesAs a consistency check, the different exponent is $(6-1)+3(3-1)=11$. The derivative of the monogenic Eisenstein polynomial gives the same value, $v_L(6{\pi }^5)=6+5=11$. In particular, stopping the wild filtration at $G_1$ would give the wrong different.

A place of a number field is an equivalence class of nontrivial absolute values on a field. Its finite places correspond to nonzero prime ideals of the ring of integers of a number field; its infinite places come from real embeddings and conjugate pairs of complex embeddings.

For a embedding of a number field into a p-adic algebraic closure $\iota :K\hookrightarrow {\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p$, pull back the p-adic absolute value. This gives a place above $p$. Every element of $\mathrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p/{\mathbb{Q}}_p)$ preserves that absolute value, by uniqueness of its extension to each finite local extension, so equivalent embeddings give the same place.

Conversely, a place $v$ above $p$ gives a completion of a number field at a prime ideal $K_v$, a finite extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$. Embed it into ${\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p$ and restrict to $K$. If two embeddings give the same place, they extend to two ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-embeddings of this same completion. They are conjugate under the absolute Galois group: their finite separable images lie in a finite normal closure, and an isomorphism of such images extends to an automorphism of the algebraic closure. The completion really is the closure of the embedded $K$, since rational coefficients are dense in the ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-span of a primitive element. Thus we obtain the embedding orbit description of finite places:

For the product formula, use normalized local factorsThe squared modulus at a complex place counts its two embeddings. Equivalently one can use ordinary complex modulus and put exponent two in the product. These normalized local factors for the product formula must be specified; arbitrary representatives of place classes would not satisfy the unweighted printed formula.

The fractional principal ideal $(x)$ has only finitely many nonzero prime exponents. Its ideal norm is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x)|$: for integral $x$, multiplication by $x$ on an integral basis has this determinant in absolute value, equal to the index of $(x)$ in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; a quotient gives the fractional case. Hence the finite-place product is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x){|}^{-1}$. The infinite-place product is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x)|$, by the embedding expression for the field norm. Therefore all but finitely many local factors are one, and

Finally, let ${\Delta }_K\ne 0$ be the integer field discriminant, defined by the determinant of the trace pairing on an integral basis. If a rational prime $p$ ramifies, the algebra ${\mathcal{O}}_K/p{\mathcal{O}}_K$ has a nonzero nilpotent element: use prime ideal factorization and the Chinese remainder theorem to see a nonzero nilpotent in a factor ${\mathcal{O}}_K/{\mathfrak{p}}^e$ with $e>1$. If $y$ is nilpotent, multiplication by $yz$ is nilpotent for every $z$ in this commutative algebra, and therefore has trace zero. Thus $y$ is in the radical of its trace pairing, making the reduced discriminant zero. We have proved the discriminant obstruction to ramification:Only finitely many rational primes divide this nonzero integer, so only finitely many primes ramify.

Choose $\beta$ with ${\beta }^{p(p-1)}=-p$ and put $N=p(p-1)$. The Eisenstein polynomial $T^N+p$ shows that $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\beta )$ has degree $N$, is totally ramified, and has uniformizer $\beta$. Its subfield ${\mathbb{Q}}_p({\beta }^p)$ is the field $K$ from the previous part. Because $p$ is odd,Thus $L$ contains $a$ and ${\zeta }_p$, and contains all roots $a{\zeta }_p^j$ of $T^p-p$. Conversely $[{\mathbb{Q}}_p(a):{\mathbb{Q}}_p]=p$, while $[K:{\mathbb{Q}}_p]=p-1$. Their coprime degrees force their compositum to have degree $N$. It is contained in $L$ and hence equals it. Therefore $L$ is exactly the splitting field, not merely an extension containing it.

The Galois group has a normal subgroup $H=\mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$ of order $p$, acting by $\beta \mapsto {\zeta }_p^j\beta$. The $(p-1)$st roots of unity already lie in ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$ by the Hensel lemma. The maps $\beta \mapsto \omega \beta$, with ${\omega }^{p-1}=1$, supply a complement of order $p-1$. Its conjugation acts faithfully on $H$, so $G\cong C_p⋊{\mathbb{F}}_p^{\times }$.

Normalize $v_L(\beta )=1$. Total ramification and the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups reduce the calculation to $i_G(\sigma )=v_L(\sigma \beta -\beta )$. For nonidentity $\sigma \in H$,since $e(L/K)=p$ and $v_K({\zeta }_p^j-1)=1$. For $\sigma \notin H$, write $\sigma \beta =\omega {\zeta }_p^j\beta$ with $\omega \ne 1$. Its multiplier has residue $\overline{\omega }\ne 1$, so $i_G(\sigma )=1$. The lower ramification numbering is thereforeAll later groups are trivial. The wild lower break is $p$, not one. In the upper ramification numbering, the Herbrand function sends this break to $p/(p-1)$: $G^0=G$, $G^u=H$ for $0<u\le p/(p-1)$, and $G^u=1$ above it.

As an independent consistency check, the different exponent from ramification groups is $(N-1)+p(p-1)=2N-1$. The derivative of the Eisenstein polynomial gives the same answer, $v_L(N{\beta }^{N-1})=N+(N-1)$, since $v_L(p)=N$.

The filtration and its meaning. Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with group $G$, normalized valuation $v_L$, and residue fields $k_L/k_K$ of characteristic $\ell$. The lower ramification numbering isThe higher ramification groups are normal, decrease with $j$, and eventually become trivial: for each nonidentity automorphism some integral element is moved by a nonzero amount. The first group $G_0$ is the inertia group, withIts fixed field is the maximal unramified extension inside $L$. The wild inertia group is $G_1$. For a uniformizer ${\pi }_L$, there are injective homomorphismsThe kernels are the indicated next groups; the additive homomorphism assertion follows by expanding a product of automorphisms modulo ${\pi }_L^{j+2}$. These maps show that $G_0/G_1$ is cyclic of order prime to $\ell$, while $G_1$ is an $\ell$-group. Thus tame ramification is exactly the case $G_1=1$.

To calculate the groups, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups saysIndeed, ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is generated by ${\pi }_L$ over the integers of the maximal unramified subextension, which $G_0$ fixes. Differences of powers of ${\pi }_L$ are divisible by $\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L$, so the one test implies all the defining inequalities.

Eisenstein facts used in the calculations. For a complete discrete valuation ring $A$ with uniformizer $\varpi$, a monic polynomialis an Eisenstein polynomial if $\varpi \mid a_j$ for every $j<d$ and ${\varpi }^2\nmid a_0$. The Eisenstein criterion makes it irreducible. If $\theta$ is a root, its valuation relative to the base normalization is $1/d$, the extension has degree and ramification index $d$, its residue field is unchanged, andThe root valuation follows by comparing the terms of its equation. The ramification index must then be at least $d$, hence exactly $d$. In the basis $1,\theta ,\dots ,{\theta }^{d-1}$, the valuations of $b_j{\theta }^j$ are distinct modulo $d$, so an integral linear combination has every $b_j\in A$. This proves the integer-ring assertion. Conversely, a uniformizer in a totally ramified extension generates the field, and its minimal polynomial is Eisenstein; this follows from its value $1/d$, equal valuations of its conjugates, and the valuation one of its norm.

For a monogenic separable integer ring $A[\theta ]$, the different ideal is generated by $f^{\prime }(\theta )$. For a Galois extension, the different exponent from ramification groups isIn the totally ramified case these agree directly: $f^{\prime }({\pi }_L)={\prod }_{\sigma \ne 1}({\pi }_L-\sigma {\pi }_L)$, and an automorphism with displacement valuation $h$ contributes once to each of $G_0,\dots ,G_{h-1}$.

Upper numbering. Extend the lower indexing to real $s\ge 0$ by $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$, and setOn $[-1,0]$ take $\phi (s)=s$. This Herbrand function slows the indexing as the groups shrink. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups, while upper ramification numbering is compatible with quotients: for normal $H$, $(G/H{)}^u=G^{u}H/H$. This is the fact that upper ramification groups commute with quotients. Thus upper breaks are particularly useful when comparing intermediate Galois extensions.

The eighth-root cyclotomic extension. Put $\zeta ={\zeta }_8$ and $\pi =\zeta -1$. The shifted cyclotomic polynomialis Eisenstein at two. Hence $L={\mathbb{Q}}_2(\zeta )$ is totally ramified of degree four, $v_L(2)=4$, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. Its Galois group consists of ${\sigma }_a(\zeta )={\zeta }^a$ for $a=1,3,5,7$, and is $C_2\times C_2$.

Since $\zeta$ is a unit,For $a=3,7$, this is the valuation of $i-1$ or $-i-1$, namely two, because their squares are units times two. For $a=5$, it is $v_L(-2)=4$. The ramification groups of the eighth-root cyclotomic extension of the 2-adic field are thereforeThe lower breaks are one and three, andThus the upper breaks are one and two:The different exponent from ramification groups is $3+3+1+1=8$, agreeing with $v_L(4{\zeta }^3)=8$ from the derivative of $T^4+1$.

The cubic splitting field at three. Let ${\alpha }^3=2$, $\zeta ={\zeta }_3$, and putThe polynomialsare Eisenstein at three. They give totally ramified subextensions of degrees three and two. Their intersection is the base field, so $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha ,\zeta )$ has degree six. Its ramification index is divisible by both three and two, hence equals six; therefore $L/{\mathbb{Q}}_3$ is totally ramified. It is the splitting field of $T^3-2$, with Galois group $S_3$.

Normalize $v_L$ so that $v_L(3)=6$. Then $v_L(\beta )=2$ and $v_L(\lambda )=3$, makinga uniformizer. Let $\sigma (\alpha )=\zeta \alpha ,\sigma (\zeta )=\zeta$ and $\tau (\alpha )=\alpha ,\tau (\zeta )={\zeta }^2$. They generate $S_3$. Since $\tau (\lambda )=(\zeta +1)\lambda$,For the order-three automorphism,Here $\alpha$ is a unit and $v_L(\zeta \alpha +1)=v_L(\sigma \beta )=2$. The same calculation gives valuation two for ${\sigma }^2$. The three transpositions are conjugate and the defining filtration is normal, so they all have displacement valuation one. The ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 2 over Q3 areThe lower breaks are zero and one. Since $[G_0:G_s]=2$ for $0<s\le 1$,and the upper groups areThe different exponent from ramification groups is $5+2=7$. As an independent check, the cubic subfield has different exponent $v_{{\mathbb{Q}}_3(\alpha )}(3{\alpha }^2)=3$, and the quadratic extension above it is tame with different exponent one. Transitivity of the different ideal gives $1+2\cdot 3=7$, as required.

A set $S$ of prime numbers has Dirichlet density $\delta$ if the following limit exists:Equivalently, the denominator can be ${\sum }_p{p}^{-s}$, since that sum is $\log (1/(s-1))+O(1)$. Adding or removing finitely many prime numbers leaves the Dirichlet density unchanged.

Put $\alpha =\sqrt[4]{2}>0$ and $L=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ,i)$. This is the splitting field of $X^4-2$, whose four roots of a polynomial are $\alpha ,i\alpha ,-\alpha ,-i\alpha$. The polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at $2$, so $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha ):\mathbb{Q}]=4$. Since $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha )$ is contained in the real numbers, it does not contain $i$, giving $[L:\mathbb{Q}]=8$. Thus $L/\mathbb{Q}$ is a Galois extension of degree $8$. Its Galois group is the dihedral group of order $8$: the field automorphisms $r(\alpha )=i\alpha$, $r(i)=i$ and $s(\alpha )=\alpha$, $s(i)=-i$ satisfy $r^4=s^2=1$ and $srs=r^{-1}$.

For an odd prime number $p$, the condition $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$ means that the finite field ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ contains all fourth roots of unity. Under this condition, $2$ is a quartic residue exactly when $X^4-2$ has a root in ${\mathbb{F}}_p$; multiplying that root by $1,i,-1,-i$ gives all four distinct roots. Conversely, complete splitting of $X^4-2$ over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ gives both a fourth root of $2$ and a primitive fourth root of unity, so it also forces $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}4)$.

The polynomial discriminant of $X^4-2$ is $-2^{11}$. Hence every odd prime number is unramified in $L$, and the root-splitting criterion is equivalent to its Frobenius automorphism acting trivially on all the roots. Since the roots generate $L$, this is equivalent to the Frobenius automorphism being the identity, or to $p$ being a completely split prime of $L/\mathbb{Q}$. The Chebotarev density theorem says that the unramified prime numbers with Frobenius conjugacy class $C$ have Dirichlet density $|C|/|\mathrm{Gal}(L/\mathbb{Q})|$. Here $C=\{1\}$, so

If $f$ is an irreducible polynomial, any two roots $\alpha ,\beta$ have the same minimal polynomial. Thus the map $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha )\to \mathbb{Q}(\beta )$ carrying $\alpha$ to $\beta$ is a field embedding. The extension theorem for field embeddings extends it to an embedding of the splitting field $L$ into an algebraic closure. Since $L/\mathbb{Q}$ is normal, its image is $L$, so it is an element of the Galois group.

Conversely, factor $f$ into irreducible factors over $\mathbb{Q}$. An automorphism preserves the vanishing of each factor, so it cannot send a root of one factor to a root of another. Since there are no repeated roots, different factors have disjoint root sets. Transitivity on all roots therefore forces a single irreducible factor. This proves the equivalence.

Here one must distinguish two conventions for a radical extension. The solvability theorem says that a finite extension with solvable normal-closure Galois group is contained in a tower of radical adjunctions. Under the convention that this containment defines a radical extension, this is the requested assertion.

Let $N/K$ be the finite normal closure and let $m$ be divisible by the orders of its Galois group elements. Adjoin a primitive $m$th root of unity, obtaining $K^{\prime }=K({\zeta }_m)$, which itself is a radical adjunction since ${\zeta }_m^m=1$. The Galois group of $N{K}^{\prime }/K^{\prime }$ embeds in the solvable group of $N/K$, so it is solvable. A composition series with cyclic prime-order quotients gives a tower of cyclic prime-degree extensions above $K^{\prime }$. Each is a radical adjunction, as the following argument shows.

For a cyclic extension $E/F$ of prime degree $p$ containing ${\zeta }_p$, let $\sigma$ generate its Galois group. The $F$-linear operator $\sigma$ satisfies $X^p-1$, a product of distinct linear factors in characteristic zero. Thus it is diagonalizable. Because $\sigma \ne 1$, it has an eigenvector $a\ne 0$ with eigenvalue ${\zeta }_p^j\ne 1$. Then $a^p\in F$ and $a\notin F$, so $E=F(a)$ by primeness of the degree. Applying this at every step produces a radical tower containing $L$.

If “radical extension” instead means that $L/K$ itself must be such a tower, the printed statement is false without this qualification. For example the real cubic subfield of $\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_7)$ is cyclic and solvable, but contains no nonrational $a$ with $a^n\in \mathbb{Q}$: all three conjugates are real roots of the same equation $X^n=a^n$, which has at most two real roots, while any nonrational element of the cubic field has three distinct conjugates. Consequently no nontrivial radical adjunction can start a tower inside it. Containment in a radical tower is the valid general conclusion.

Let $a=\sqrt[3]{3}$ and let $\zeta$ be a primitive cube root of unity. The splitting field is $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(a,\zeta )$. The polynomial $X^3-3$ is an Eisenstein polynomial, so $[{\mathbb{Q}}_3(a):{\mathbb{Q}}_3]=3$. Meanwhile $(1+2\zeta {)}^2=-3$ shows that ${\mathbb{Q}}_3(\zeta )$ is quadratic: $-3$ is not a square because its valuation is odd. A quadratic field cannot lie in the degree-three field. Consequently $[L:{\mathbb{Q}}_3]=6$, and the action on the three roots identifies its Galois group with the symmetric group $S_3$.

A useful uniformizer isSince $(\zeta -1{)}^3=-3\zeta (\zeta -1)$, we obtainThus $\pi$ is a root of the Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$. Its degree is six, so $L={\mathbb{Q}}_3(\pi )$, the extension is totally ramified, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. With $v_L(\pi )=1$,This is the Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3.

Let $\tau (a)=\zeta a$, $\tau (\zeta )=\zeta$, and let $s(a)=a$, $s(\zeta )={\zeta }^{-1}$. Then $\tau$ has order three, $s$ has order two, and $s\tau s={\tau }^{-1}$. Their actions on the uniformizer areThe two nonidentity elements of $⟨\tau ⟩$ therefore satisfyEach transposition sends $\pi$ to $-{\zeta }^j\pi$ for some $j$, so its displacement has valuation one: $1+{\zeta }^j$ is a unit, reducing to $2$ modulo the maximal ideal. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups now givesFor real indices, this is $S_3$ on $[-1,0]$, $C_3$ on $(0,3]$, and $1$ for $t>3$. In particular the lower breaks are $0$ and $3$.

On $(0,3]$ the index $[G_0:G_t]$ is two; beyond three it is six. Thus the Herbrand function isThe positive lower break $3$ becomes the upper break $3/2$. ThereforeThe fractional upper break is allowed because the full extension is nonabelian. As a check, the different exponent from ramification groups is $5+3\cdot 2=11$. The derivative of the minimal polynomial $X^6+3$ gives the same result: $v_L(6{\pi }^5)=6+5=11$. This is the $p=3$ case of ramification groups of the splitting field of Xp minus p over the p-adic numbers.

Let $K^{\mathrm{ur}}$ be the maximal unramified extension of $K$, with residue field $\overline{k}$. First show that every geometric solution of $nQ=P$ lies in $E(K^{\mathrm{ur}})$.

The multiplication-by-n morphism on the reduced elliptic curve is surjective over $\overline{k}$. Choose $\overline{Q}$ with $n\overline{Q}=\overline{P}$, defined over some finite finite field extension $k^{\prime }/k$. Let $L/K$ be the corresponding finite unramified extension. By the surjectivity of good reduction over a local field, lift $\overline{Q}$ to $Q_0\in E(L)$. Then $P-n{Q}_0\in E_1(L)$. The multiplication isomorphism of a formal group law gives a unique $R\in E_1(L)$ with $nR=P-n{Q}_0$, so $Q_0+R$ is an $n$-division point of $P$ defined over $L$.

Taking $P=O$ gives every element of $E[n]$ over $K^{\mathrm{ur}}$: reduction is injective on this torsion point of an elliptic curve group because $[n]$ is injective on the formal kernel, and each reduced $n$-torsion point has the unique corrected lift just constructed. Every other division point differs from one lift by an element of $E[n]$. Hence the entire field $K([n{]}^{-1}P)$ is unramified, not merely a field containing one choice of $Q$.

To bound the composite uniformly in $P$, put $f=[K(E[n]):K]$. This division field of an elliptic curve is unramified. The Galois group of $K^{\mathrm{ur}}/K$ is procyclic, generated topologically by its Frobenius element $\sigma$, and ${\sigma }^f$ fixes every element of $E[n]$. If $nQ=P\in E(K)$, thenIteration gives ${\sigma }^{jf}Q=Q+jT$. In particular ${\sigma }^{nf}Q=Q$. Thus every such $Q$, for every $P$ together, lies in the unique unramified extension of degree $nf$. If $M$ is the composite of all these fields, the uniform unramified division field over a local field givesThe prime-to-$p$ hypothesis is essential to the inverse-series argument; no assertion about arbitrary $p$-division is being made.

A suitable version of the Hensel lemma is this: if $R$ is a complete discrete valuation ring, $h\in R[X]$, and $\overline{a}$ is a root of $\overline{h}$ with ${\overline{h}}^{\prime }(\overline{a})\ne 0$, there is a unique $a\in R$ reducing to $\overline{a}$ with $h(a)=0$. Starting with any lift, Newton iteration over a valued field $a_{j+1}=a_j-h(a_j)/h^{\prime }(a_j)$ keeps the derivative a unit and doubles the error valuation, giving convergence. Uniqueness follows by factoring $h(u)-h(v)$ when two roots have the same residue.

The field in the rest of this question is not assumed complete, so that version cannot simply be applied to it. Instead use the stated uniqueness of the extension of an absolute value. Let ${\alpha }_i,{\alpha }_j$ be any two roots of a polynomial $f$, which is irreducible. The field embedding sending ${\alpha }_i$ to ${\alpha }_j$ identifies $K({\alpha }_i)$ with $K({\alpha }_j)$. Pulling the latter field's absolute value back gives an extension on $K({\alpha }_i)$, which must coincide with the given one. More generally, for every $h\in K[X]$,This proves equal absolute values of algebraic conjugates without assuming separability or a transitive action of a Galois group; repeated roots cause no difficulty.

Every root of the monic $f\in {\mathcal{O}}_K[X]$ has absolute value at most one. Indeed, if $|\alpha |>1$, then each lower term satisfies $|c_j{\alpha }^j|\le |\alpha {|}^j<|\alpha {|}^n$. The ultrametric inequality makes the leading term dominate their sum, contradicting $f(\alpha )=0$. Thus

All roots lie in the valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_M$, so their residues are defined in the residue field $k_M$. Let $\phi \in k_K[X]$ be the monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element of ${\overline{\alpha }}_1$; this residue is algebraic because it satisfies the monic $\overline{f}$. Choose a coefficientwise lift $\Phi \in {\mathcal{O}}_K[X]$. Then $|\Phi ({\alpha }_1)|<1$, and the conjugacy argument gives $|\Phi ({\alpha }_i)|<1$ for every $i$. Hence every ${\overline{\alpha }}_i$ is a root of $\phi$.

Reduction of the splitting-field factorization, with multiplicities, givesEvery monic irreducible factor of $\overline{f}$ over $k_K$ has a root among these residues. That root also satisfies $\phi$, so its minimal polynomial is $\phi$. Unique factorization therefore proves the pure-power reduction of a monic irreducible polynomial:This does not assert that $\phi$ is separable or that the reduction is square-free.

Finally, factor the monic $g$ over $K$ as $g={\prod }_j{h}_j^{e_j}$ with distinct monic irreducible polynomials $h_j$. The same leading-term argument bounds every root of $g$ by one. Coefficients of any $h_j$ are elementary symmetric polynomials in some of these roots, so they lie in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. By the preceding result each ${\overline{h}}_j$ is a power of a single monic irreducible residue polynomial ${\phi }_j$.

Since the prescribed ${\overline{g}}_1,{\overline{g}}_2$ are coprime, every ${\phi }_j$ occurs on exactly one side. Assign the entire factor $h_j^{e_j}$ to that side and form the two products. Comparing irreducible-factor multiplicities in the reduction proves the coprime factor lifting from valuation-extension uniqueness:Empty products are one, covering constant prescribed factors. The construction proves the required factor-lifting form of the Hensel lemma directly from extension uniqueness, without adding completeness as an unstated hypothesis.

Let $L/K$ be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, let $G=\mathrm{Gal}(L/K)$, and normalize the discrete valuation by $v_L(L^{\times })=\mathbb{Z}$. The lower ramification numbering isHere $G_0$ is the inertia group and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group. For real $s\ge -1$, put $G_s=G_{\lceil s\rceil }$; thus $G_s=G_0$ for $-1<s\le 0$. Define the Herbrand function and its inverse byextending $\phi (s)=s$ on $[-1,0]$. The upper ramification numbering is $G^u=G_{\psi (u)}$ for $u\ge -1$.

Let ${\alpha }^p-\alpha =t^{1-p}$ over $K={\mathbb{F}}_p((t))$, with $t$ its uniformizer. The Artin–Schreier polynomial has derivative $-1$ in characteristic $p$, so all its roots are distinct. If $\alpha$ is one root and $\beta$ another, then $(\beta -\alpha {)}^p=\beta -\alpha$, so $\beta -\alpha \in {\mathbb{F}}_p$. Conversely every $\alpha +a$, $a\in {\mathbb{F}}_p$, is a root. Thus $L=K(\alpha )$ contains all roots and is a splitting field of a separable polynomial; it is Galois. Every automorphism has the form ${\sigma }_a(\alpha )=\alpha +a$, and its Galois group embeds in the additive group of ${\mathbb{F}}_p$.

There is no root in $K$. If $v_K(z)\ge 0$, then $z^p-z$ cannot have negative valuation. If $v_K(z)<0$, the ultrametric inequality gives $v_K(z^p-z)=p{v}_K(z)$, divisible by $p$, whereas $v_K(t^{1-p})=1-p$ is not. The Galois group is consequently nontrivial. Its order divides the prime $p$, so

Let $e=e(L/K)$ be the ramification index. The equation forces $v_L(\alpha )<0$, and henceAs $\gcd (p,p-1)=1$, $p\mid e$. Since $e\le [L:K]=p$, we get $e=p$, residue-field degree one, and $v_L(\alpha )=1-p$. Thus this is a totally ramified extension, andThis is a uniformizer. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups states that for a totally ramified Galois extension, $\sigma \in G_i$ exactly when $v_L(\sigma ({\pi }_L)-{\pi }_L)\ge i+1$. Here every nonidentity automorphism satisfiesTherefore the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole occurs at $p-1$, and the lower groups areThis includes $p=2$, where the break is one. There is no off-by-one shift: the condition is $v_L(\sigma {\pi }_L-{\pi }_L)\ge i+1$.

For the upper groups, compute the Herbrand function explicitly:Hence the upper break is also $p-1$ and, with the stated real-index convention,As a consistency check, ${\pi }_L$ satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial $X^p-t^{p-1}X-t$. Its derivative in characteristic $p$ is $-t^{p-1}$, giving different exponent $p(p-1)$, equal to ${\sum }_{i\ge 0}(|G_i|-1)=p(p-1)$ from the different exponent from ramification groups.

Fix a non-Archimedean local field $K$, its valuation ring $R={\mathcal{O}}_K$, a uniformizer $\pi$, and a residue field with cardinality $q$. The construction below applies both in mixed and equal characteristic. A one-dimensional commutative formal group law is $F(X,Y)\in R[[X,Y]]$ with identity, associativity and commutativity, and $F(X,Y)=X+Y+$ higher-degree terms. It has a unique formal inverse. Its morphisms are series $h(T)\in TR[[T]]$ with $h(F(X,Y))=G(h(X),h(Y))$; a unit linear coefficient makes such a morphism invertible by recursive coefficient comparison. Evaluating its integral series on the maximal ideal of a finite extension of $K$ is legitimate because the series converge there.

Choose a Lubin–Tate series $f(T)$ satisfyingA useful choice is $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$. The Lubin–Tate functional equation lemma constructs a unique series with any prescribed linear form $\ell$ and satisfyingHere is its coefficient argument. If terms below degree $d$ have been found, the unknown homogeneous degree-$d$ term appears with multiplier $\pi -{\pi }^d$. The already known error has every coefficient divisible by $\pi$: after reduction, the equation becomes $H(X{)}^q=H(X_1^q,\dots ,X_r^q)$, valid because the residue coefficients lie in ${\mathbb{F}}_q$. Since $\pi -{\pi }^d$ is $\pi$ times a unit for $d\ge 2$, the next term is uniquely determined and integral. Recursion proves existence and uniqueness.

Use $\ell =X+Y$ to construct $F_f$, and $\ell =aT$ to construct $[a{]}_f$ for every $a\in R$. Uniqueness gives $F_f(X,0)=X$ and $F_f(0,Y)=Y$. Comparing $[a{]}_f(F_f(X,Y))$ with $F_f([a{]}_f(X),[a{]}_f(Y))$, which satisfy the same functional equation and have the same linear form, proves that $[a{]}_f$ is an endomorphism of the law. The same uniqueness applied to three variables proves associativity: $F_f(F_f(X,Y),Z)$ and $F_f(X,F_f(Y,Z))$ have the same linear form and functional equation. It also proves commutativity and the identitiesThus this Lubin–Tate formal group is equipped with an action of the whole ring $R$, not only its integers. For a unit $a$, the inverse of $[a{]}_f$ is $[a^{-1}{]}_f$. The same recursion, with two series for the fixed $\pi$, gives a unique strict Lubin–Tate change of series. Its integral series and inverse converge on torsion points, so it identifies their torsion fields. We may compute with $f(T)=\pi T+T^q$ without losing the general construction for that uniformizer.