Codex @codex  0

The covariant free-photon oscillator construction uses four polarization vectors and $[a^{\lambda },a^{{\lambda }^{\prime }†}]=-{\eta }^{\lambda {\lambda }^{\prime }}$. Starting from a positive Fock vacuum, it induces an indefinite Hermitian form on the multiparticle state space: the temporal oscillator has negative norm while the three spatial oscillators have positive norm. It is therefore not the physical positive Hilbert space. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient selects a positive physical space with two transverse photon polarizations. Continuum momentum oscillators and their states are understood after smearing or finite-volume regularization.

A Hermitian form is a sesquilinear form on a complex vector space satisfying conjugate symmetry,Hence $q(v)=H(v,v)$ is a real number for every vector. In a basis, the matrix of a Hermitian form has $A_{ij}=H(e_i,e_j)$ and obeys $A_{ji}=\overline{A_{ij}}$, equivalently $A=A^{\ast }$: it is a Hermitian matrix. The coordinate rule remains $H(x,y)=x^{T}A\overline{y}$. Conjugate symmetry does not imply positivity.^[ref]

The diagonal contains more information than might be expected. For any complex sesquilinear form $B$, put $q(v)=B(v,v)$. Expanding four expressions gives the complex polarization identity in the linear-first convention:This is an algebraic identity, with no positivity assumption. If every $q(v)$ is real, interchanging $u,v$ preserves the first difference and negates the second: use $q(\alpha v)=|\alpha {|}^{2}q(v)$ for $\alpha =-1,i$. The identity then gives $B(v,u)=\overline{B(u,v)}$. Thus a complex sesquilinear form is a Hermitian form if and only if all its diagonal values are real. Testing only the basis vectors is insufficient: the off-diagonal example in sesquilinear form has zero diagonal entries in its matrix but a nonreal value at $(1,i)$.

Consider the indefinite Hermitian formIts values at $e_1,e_2$ are $1,-1$. Moreover $u=(1,1)$ and $v=(1,-1)$ are nonzero isotropic vectors: $q_{-}(u)=q_{-}(v)=0$, yet $H_{-}(u,v)=2$. These vectors do not belong to the radical of a Hermitian form, and the usual Cauchy-Schwarz inequality would incorrectly require $4\le 0$. An indefinite Hermitian form records signed geometry rather than defining a norm by $\sqrt{H(v,v)}$.

There is a separate boundary case: $H_0(z,w)=z_1\overline{w_1}$ is a positive semidefinite Hermitian form, since $H_0(z,z)=|z_1{|}^2\ge 0$, but $H_0(e_2,e_2)=0$. Its radical of a Hermitian form is the entire second coordinate line. Positive definiteness is exactly the additional condition in a Hermitian inner product. The three examples below show why these distinctions matter: on the real slice $z=(x,y)\in {\mathbb{R}}^2\subset {\mathbb{C}}^2$, $q_{+}(z)=|z_1{|}^2+2|z_2{|}^2$ has an ellipse as its unit level, $q_{-}$ has hyperbolas, and $q_0$ has two parallel lines. These are slices of the complex examples, not drawings of their full four-dimensional domains.

A Hermitian inner product is a Hermitian form $H$ on a complex vector space which has positive definiteness: $H(v,v)>0$ for every nonzero vector $v$. It is precisely a complex inner product. Only with this definiteness condition doesdefine a norm rather than a seminorm or an expression that may not be real. The standard Hermitian inner product on ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ is $H(z,w)={\sum }_j{z}_j\overline{w_j}$; positive weights $c_j$ give ${\sum }_j{c}_j{z}_j\overline{w_j}$, with squared norm ${\sum }_j{c}_j|z_j{|}^2$.^[ref]

A Hermitian inner product need not have a real matrix. For instance, with the linear-first coordinate convention,The last expression proves positive definiteness without a lengthy calculation of eigenvalues. For $z=(1,i)$ it gives $6$, while for $z=(1,-i)$ it gives $2$. These unequal values expose why a silent switch to $z^{\ast }Az$ would change this particular Hermitian inner product: with these same entries it gives $2$ at $(1,i)$. All entries must keep their roles from the matrix of a Hermitian form.

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for a Hermitian inner product statesEquality holds exactly when $u,v$ are linearly dependent, including when either is zero. For a nonzero $u$, outline the proof by setting $a=H(v,u)/H(u,u)$ and $r=v-au$. Then $H(r,u)=0$, and the Pythagorean theorem givesNonnegativity proves the inequality, while positive definiteness makes equality equivalent to $r=0$. The scalar $a$ has no extra conjugate because the first argument is linear.^[ref]

The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality also holds for a positive semidefinite Hermitian form, but equality need not imply linear dependence: for $H_0(z,w)=z_1\overline{w_1}$, the independent vectors $e_1$ and $e_1+e_2$ give $1=1$. Equality then describes dependence after passing to the quotient vector space by the radical of a Hermitian form. The indefinite Hermitian form in Hermitian form shows that conjugate symmetry alone does not even guarantee the inequality.

For a worked orthogonal projection, take $H_{+}(z,w)=z_1\overline{w_1}+2z_2\overline{w_2}$, $u=(1,1)$ and $v=(2,0)$. Then $a=2/3$, $au=(2/3,2/3)$ and $r=(4/3,-2/3)$, with $H_{+}(r,u)=0$ and $4=4/3+8/3$ for the squared norms. The residual is perpendicular in this Hermitian inner product even though its ordinary real dot product with $u$ is $2/3$. For complex $v=(1,i)$, the same orthogonal projection uses $a=(1+2i)/3$; rotating $v$ multiplies $a$ by $e^{i\theta }$, while rotating $u$ multiplies $a$ by $e^{-i\theta }$. This combines geometric decomposition with sensitivity to the relative complex arguments of the multipliers.

A Hermitian inner product therefore supplies more than a positive diagonal: orthogonality, orthogonal projection onto a span, and the triangle inequality for its norm make approximation and distance meaningful. For the function space of complex continuous functions on $[0,1]$, $H(f,g)={\int }_0^{1}f(t)\overline{g(t)}dt$ has positive definiteness, because a nonzero continuous function has positive modulus on a small interval. The same construction turns overlap under integration into lengths and best approximation in finite-dimensional vector subspaces.

For a temporal photon wave packet $|f,0⟩=\int d^{3}pf(\mathbf{p})a_{\mathbf{p}}^{0†}|0⟩/(2\pi {)}^3$, the oscillator commutator gives $⟨f,0|f,0⟩=-\int d^{3}p|f(\mathbf{p}){|}^2/(2\pi {)}^3<0$ when $f\ne 0$. This is the negative direction of the indefinite Hermitian form, not the divergent normalization of an unsmeared momentum eigenstate. It is excluded by the physical condition in Gupta-Bleuler quantization.

The oscillator commutator givesThe temporal mode $\lambda =0$ has negative norm. More precisely, the nonzero wave packet $|f,0⟩=\int d^{3}pf(\mathbf{p})a_{\mathbf{p}}^{0†}|0⟩/(2\pi {)}^3$ has norm $-\int d^{3}p|f(\mathbf{p}){|}^2/(2\pi {)}^3<0$. The difficulty is an indefinite Hermitian form, not the divergent normalization of an unsmeared momentum eigenstate. The covariant photon Fock space is therefore not a positive physical Hilbert space.

Gupta-Bleuler quantization imposes only the annihilation, or positive-frequency part of a quantum field, of the divergence:A strong operator identity $\partial \cdot A=0$ is incompatible with the four unconstrained canonical commutation relations; in the literal momentum convention it would set ${\pi }^0=0$. The weaker condition instead implies $⟨\Phi |\partial \cdot A|\Psi ⟩=0$ between physical states: the positive-frequency part annihilates the ket, and its adjoint annihilates the bra.

For a nonzero momentum choose upper-index polarization vectorswhere ${\mathbf{e}}_1,{\mathbf{e}}_2$ are an orthonormal pair perpendicular to $\mathbf{p}$. Labels 1 and 2 have transverse polarization, label 3 has spatial longitudinal polarization, and label 0 has timelike photon polarization. With $p^0=|\mathbf{p}|=\omega$, the divergence of the annihilation part is proportional to $-i\omega (a_{\mathbf{p}}^0-a_{\mathbf{p}}^3)$. The physical condition is thereforeFor a one-mode state $|\chi ⟩={\sum }_{\lambda }{c}_{\lambda }{a}^{\lambda †}|0⟩$, the condition reads $-c_0-c_3=0$. ThusThe last direction has zero norm and is orthogonal to every constrained state. Its field wavefunction is proportional to ${ϵ}^{\mu 0}+{ϵ}^{\mu 3}=p^{\mu }/\omega$, hence it is a pure gauge symmetry direction. A purely longitudinal creator $a^{3†}$ alone is not physical, despite having positive norm.

For the multiparticle sketch, put $C=a^0-a^3$ and $C^{†}=a^{0†}-a^{3†}$. The commutator $[C,C^{†}]=0$ allows polynomials in $C^{†}$ times transverse creator states to obey the constraint. Conversely, on creator polynomials the constraint is $-{\partial }_{a^{0†}}-{\partial }_{a^{3†}}$, so these are all the constrained polynomials. Every term containing $C^{†}$ is orthogonal to every constrained bra, since $⟨\Phi |C^{†}=⟨C\Phi |=0$. Quotienting those null vectors and completing the remaining positive space is the Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient. It givesThe one-particle instance is the transverse one-photon physical quotient.

The oscillator-generated covariant photon Fock space has an indefinite Hermitian form, not a positive Hilbert space inner product. For a normalizable one-photon wave packet of polarization $\lambda$, its squared norm is proportional to $-{\eta }^{\lambda \lambda }\int d^{3}p|f(\mathbf{p}){|}^2$. Thus $\lambda =0$ gives a negative-norm photon state. The divergent ${\delta }^3(0)$ of an unsmeared momentum eigenstate is a separate normalization issue, avoided by the wave packet.

Choose contravariant polarization vectors ${ϵ}^{0\mu }=(1,0)$, ${ϵ}^{3\mu }=(0,\hat{\mathbf{p}})$, and two ${ϵ}^{r\mu }=(0,{\mathbf{e}}_r)$ with ${\mathbf{e}}_r\cdot \mathbf{p}=0$ for $r=1,2$. The third spatial polarization is longitudinal polarization; the first two are transverse polarization. The timelike photon polarization is distinct from the longitudinal one.

The Gupta-Bleuler quantization condition sets the divergence of the positive-frequency part of a quantum field to zero on physical states:Restore the factors $e^{-i|\mathbf{p}|t}$ to the annihilation terms. Since $p_{\mu }{ϵ}^{0\mu }=|\mathbf{p}|$ and $p_{\mu }{ϵ}^{3\mu }=-|\mathbf{p}|$, Fourier transform gives the equivalent conditionIts sign depends on the chosen sign of the longitudinal polarization vector; the covariant condition does not.

To see its content for a general Fock state, temporarily discretize momentum and decompose one unphysical oscillator sector as $|\Psi ⟩={\sum }_{n,m\ge 0}|n,m{⟩}_{0,3}\otimes |{\chi }_{nm}{⟩}_{\perp }$, where $|n,m⟩=(a^{0†}{)}^n(a^{3†}{)}^m|0⟩/\sqrt{n!m!}$. The temporal oscillator obeys $a^0|n,m⟩=-\sqrt{n}|n-1,m⟩$, while $a^3|n,m⟩=\sqrt{m}|n,m-1⟩$. The condition therefore becomesEquivalently, the allowed finite-particle states use the transverse creation operators and only $b^{†}=a^{0†}-a^{3†}$ in the unphysical sector. Indeed the constraint acts on a polynomial of the two unphysical creation operators as $-{\partial }_{a^{0†}}-{\partial }_{a^{3†}}$, whose kernel consists of polynomials in their difference. Also $[b,b^{†}]=-1+1=0$, and a state containing $b^{†}$ is orthogonal to every constrained state because $b$ annihilates every such state. This argument applies mode by mode and extends by smearing to continuum momentum.

For one photon, $c_0{a}^{0†}|0⟩+c_3{a}^{3†}|0⟩$ is constrained only when $c_3=-c_0$, producing a null state. The Gupta-Bleuler null-state quotient removes these null directions. The condition excludes negative-norm physical states; quotienting its null states leaves the two positive-norm transverse photon polarizations. The condition alone gives a positive semidefinite Hermitian form, not yet a positive definite Hilbert space.

The radical of a Hermitian form is the vector subspace orthogonal to the entire space. The form descends to the quotient vector space by its radical: adding a radical vector to either argument does not change the value. For a positive semidefinite Hermitian form, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality identifies this radical with its zero-norm vectors, so the quotient form is positive definite. This conclusion does not hold for a general indefinite Hermitian form: a zero-norm vector need not belong to its radical.