Exponential-disk asymmetric drift 2026-10-14
For a stationary axisymmetric tracer with isotropic velocity dispersion, vanishing tilted stress, density , and , the radial Jeans equation gives the displayed expression. More generally its right side is . It requires a nonnegative streaming-speed square; the density and dispersion laws must describe the same tracer and the chosen height or consistent vertical average.
Reflection symmetry makes odd in height, so its value at the midplane vanishes while its derivative need not vanish. The radial Jeans equation includes this derivative in the stellar asymmetric drift. For a velocity ellipsoid locally aligned with spherical coordinates, , and its midplane contribution is . Dropping a mixed moment at the symmetry plane does not justify dropping its derivative.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 40 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the spherical Abel deprojection, put and . Then and . Consequently the integral appearing in the reconstruction of isDifferentiate before substituting the numerical value of :For the projected second stellar velocity moment, . The identical substitution in isotropic stellar pressure deprojection givesFor completeness, setting yields , where is the Euler beta function. The Gamma function recurrence gives and . This also checks the normalization of the power-law spherical projection kernel.
The radial Jeans equation is . Since , division by the tracer number density givesWriting , the total gravitational acceleration is thereforeTo find all gravitating mass density, apply the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity, with the same sign convention:Equivalently, the enclosed mass is , and . The inferred total mass is and its relative potential is , a Plummer model. The tracer number density has a different radial exponent from this total mass density. One must not multiply by an arbitrary stellar mass and identify it with all matter: the inferred field can include unobserved stars, gas, and dark matter.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 40 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The pressure tensor has Cartesian components . With zero mean velocity and an isotropic galactic distribution function, off-diagonal components vanish by reflection symmetry and diagonal components are equal by rotational symmetry. ThereforeHere is a tracer number-weighted random-motion stress, rather than thermodynamic pressure per volume. Its tensor divergence is . The time-independent, nonstreaming Jeans equation consequently reduces toThe gravitational acceleration convention is : this differs by a sign from the usual Newtonian gravitational potential .
Let measure distance along the line of sight. Spherical density projection givesBecause isotropy makes the local second stellar velocity moment along every line of sight equal to , and because there is no streaming motion, the projected moment isThis is the forward relation for isotropic stellar pressure deprojection.
Both inversions follow from one Abel transform calculation. Write and , so . Compose the transforms, using Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative densities, or absolute convergence for signed profiles:Assume sufficient decay to make these integrals finite and sufficient regularity for the last derivative. Then . Setting gives the spherical Abel deprojectionReplacing by and by provesThese are the requested expressions, with . The composed-transform argument avoids an invalid separate differentiation of a divergent lower-end kernel.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Assume a stationary, spherical, nonrotating collisionless stellar system, a constant mass-to-light ratio , and vanishing boundary stresses at infinity. Let be the luminosity density, so , and set . Distinguish spatial radius from projected radius . The enclosed luminosity and radial force areHere is the velocity dispersion of either one of the two tangential components; thus . If a combined tangential variance is used instead, its contribution must be divided by two in this definition.
To derive the Jeans equation, start with the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation . Multiply by and integrate over all velocities. Integration by parts in velocity, with decaying fast enough to eliminate boundary terms, givesThe same equation holds with luminosity weighting because the tracer's luminosity is conserved along its orbit. Spherical symmetry makes the local stellar velocity moment tensor diagonal, with entries , , . Its radial divergence is : the second term accounts for the changing directions of the radial and tangential unit vectors. ThereforeThis is the Spherical Jeans equation; it follows from a stellar velocity moment rather than requiring a particular form of the galactic distribution function.
Integrating the luminosity density along a line of sight gives its surface brightness:The second identity is Spherical Abel deprojection. For the second stellar velocity moment, the angle between the radial direction and the line of sight has . The line-of-sight velocity dispersion is therefore , andFrom the Spherical Jeans equation, . Substitution producesThe primary PDF has a genuine symbol error in its projected gravity term: it prints a second multiplying inside the integral, where is required. The corrected projected spherical Jeans residual isTo justify the derivative at the singular-looking lower limit, write . Differentiation then gives . In particular, . If tends to zero both at zero and infinity, as for a finite isolated equilibrium with sufficiently decaying stresses,If a boundary stress survives, its contribution must be retained; the zero-integral statement is not a finite-aperture identity.
Now identify each integral with a term in the virial theorem. Let be the total kinetic energy, including all three random components, and the gravitational potential energy. Averaging over spatial directions in a spherical system gives one third of the total stellar velocity moment along any chosen line of sight, even if the velocities are locally anisotropic. ThusBuilding the spherical mass shell by shell givesFinally, Fubini theorem and give the gravitational contribution to the residual integral explicitly:ConsequentlyThe global projected virial estimate of a mass-to-light ratio is independent of the velocity-anisotropy parameter under these assumptions. It does not remove the mass--anisotropy--density degeneracy for arbitrary radial mass profiles. In particular, if an independent dark matter halo makes mass fail to follow light, a single constant is no longer the physical enclosed mass-to-light ratio at every radius.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In an axisymmetric cylindrical coordinate system, the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation isLet and . Multiply by and integrate over velocities. The spatial terms give . Integration by parts in supplies , and the derivative supplies . The force term vanishes because does not depend on . This assumes sufficient decay of the galactic distribution function to discard all velocity boundary terms. The radial Jeans equation is consequentlyReflection symmetry about makes even and odd. At the midplane the latter vanishes, and . Multiplying by provesAll quadratic velocities here are population moments, not individual stellar velocities. In particular, symmetry does not make the midplane tilt contribution to asymmetric drift disappear: an odd mixed moment can have a nonzero derivative at zero.
For application to the Milky Way, assume negligible mean radial and vertical flows, and define the circular speed by . Write and . Rearranging gives the exact stress-support relationThus the stellar asymmetric drift is the right-hand side divided by . For , this denominator is approximately . If and locally, the bracket becomes , making the density and dispersion-gradient contributions explicit.
A radially declining random-motion stress supplies some of the force needed to support a galactic disk, so its stars need less ordered azimuthal motion than a population on circular orbits. Hotter, often older, stellar populations therefore generally rotate more slowly than cold populations in the same gravitational potential; this is the observed stellar asymmetric drift. It is a stress-support effect, not a frictional slowing of each orbit. For a velocity ellipsoid aligned approximately with spherical coordinates, , and the midplane tilt term contributes rather than zero.
Local measurements of mean rotation and all components of the velocity dispersion, combined with tracer-density and dispersion gradients, can therefore constrain and the radial Newtonian gravitational field. A hotter sample's mean rotation must not be identified directly with the circular speed. The tracer number density need not be the gravitating mass density. Nonaxisymmetric streaming, a nonstationary disk, poorly measured radial gradients, or a neglected tilt term can bias this inference; these are assumptions of the derivation rather than extra free corrections to the circular force.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 72 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use cylindrical coordinates and tracer density . A steady axisymmetric Jeans equation, with no mean radial or vertical flow, isWrite , , and . Rearrangement gives the stellar asymmetric drift equationFor an isotropic velocity ellipsoid, all three dispersions equal and the cross stress vanishes. Therefore the required general result isThe positive root is for a prograde galactic disk. A declining radial stress gives : random motions supply some support, so mean stellar rotation is slower than cold-gas circular rotation. For , . The condition alone is insufficient; one also needs .
There is no universal numerical coefficient expressible from and alone. For constant velocity dispersion and , . Thus gives the often-used estimate , while gives a different answer with the same and . For an exponential galactic disk tracer with and , the exponential-disk asymmetric drift has .
Real galactic disks generally have anisotropic velocity dispersions, often . In the small-random-motion epicyclic motion limit for a flat galaxy rotation curve, , so even the non-gradient term matters. The velocity ellipsoid can tilt, and bars or spiral structure can violate steady axisymmetry. Age-dependent galactic disk heating makes the lag population dependent. Gas has finite turbulent and thermal stresses too, though a cold gas disk often approximates much better than a hot stellar population.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 62 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and use summation over repeated Cartesian indices. A mass-normalized galactic distribution function obeys the Collisionless Boltzmann equationAssume decays in velocity sufficiently fast that the necessary boundary terms vanish. Its zeroth velocity moment gives the continuity equationFor the first velocity moment, multiply by and integrate. In the gravitational term, integration by parts gives . ThereforeThe velocity-dispersion tensor is the centered second moment, so . Expanding the streaming terms, the factor multiplying cancels by the continuity equation:Hence the Jeans equation isIts fluid analogue is the momentum equation with pressure tensor . For isotropic random motion, , and this becomes the Euler equations for an inviscid fluid:The tensor form allows anisotropic stellar stresses. In a fluid an equation of state can provide a pressure closure; the Jeans equation alone does not determine the velocity-dispersion tensor of a collisionless stellar system.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 65 4 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The stellar population has appreciable random velocity dispersion, and its declining radial density creates an outward stress gradient that supplies some support against gravity; cold gas has much less random-motion support and follows nearly the local circular speed. Neglecting velocity-ellipsoid tilt, the radial Jeans equation gives , generally positive for the stellar disk. The slower mean stellar rotation is asymmetric drift.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 60 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Older disc stellar populations generally have larger velocity dispersions, partly through accumulated galactic disk heating, so random-motion stresses supply more of their support against gravity. The radial Jeans equation then requires a smaller mean rotation than the circular speed, producing larger stellar asymmetric drift than in dynamically colder young stars.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 59 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , , and . The Jeans equation obtained by taking the first velocity moment of the Collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor an equilibrium population multiply by and integrate. Integration by parts givesAssume the integrals exist and the boundary flux vanishes, as for an isolated finite system with adequate decay. With the stellar kinetic-energy tensor, stellar pressure-energy tensor and stellar potential-energy tensor defined bywe obtain the equilibrium tensor virial theoremThe stellar kinetic-energy tensor describes ordered motion, whereas the stellar pressure-energy tensor describes random motion. In particular, does not mean the stars have no kinetic energy. If a surface flux is retained, the right side of the displayed equilibrium identity is that surface tensor; it cannot be discarded for an arbitrary finite aperture. For an isolated self-gravitating population, is symmetric by pairwise interchange in the Newtonian interaction integral, and the time-dependent identity is with .
For the spherical Newtonian gravitational potential, . In the pressure-supported case the tensor virial theorem gives . The notation used in this question is the planar virial trace , not just the integral of the local cylindrical radial velocity dispersion. In cylindrical coordinates this trace includes both and . Summing the two Cartesian components therefore givesThe distinction explains the factor of two in the spherical limit.
Use ordinary spherical coordinates, , . The mass density separates as , whereBoth potential-energy integrals have the same radial factor . When this factor is finite and positive it cancels, leaving the scale-free tracer virial ratioThe angular factor in the printed intermediate formula has its sine and cosine interchanged. Keeping its sine/cosine weights while using that printed factor would instead produce the opposite sign in the final small-flattening correction. Merely measuring from the equatorial plane cannot fix this: the measure and both moment weights would have to change as well.
The angular ratio is finite and positive for every fixed and finite real , because is positive and bounded above and below. However, the claim that the unrestricted global virial integrals are always well-defined needs a hypothesis. In a point-mass Newtonian gravitational potential, the common radial factor is proportional to : convergence at zero requires , while convergence at infinity requires . There is no such . If the global energies diverge, the boxed angular ratio is still the ratio of the two potential-energy integrals with identical spherical inner and outer cutoffs, independent of the cutoffs. It is not a quotient of two finite global stellar pressure-energy tensors; applying a finite-aperture tensor virial theorem additionally requires its surface terms. These convergence and boundary qualifications are separate from the printed angular typo.
Set . For modest flattening, the Taylor expansion is . The required elementary angular integrals areThese follow directly by , or from the supplied Gamma function identity. Hence the numerator is and the denominator is . The flattening–anisotropy virial relation becomesFor a decreasing tracer mass density (), oblate flattening () requires more random kinetic support per in-plane direction than vertically. In a spherical Newtonian gravitational field, directional orbital anisotropy supplies the flattening rather than an anisotropic force law. A steeper radial mass density amplifies the required velocity dispersion anisotropy. A prolate tracer reverses the leading inequality. The relation constrains integrated velocity dispersions, not a unique local galactic distribution function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 62 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use a mass-normalized galactic distribution function , so that and . Multiplying the stationary Collisionless Boltzmann equation by and integrating over velocity space givesAssume the galactic distribution function decays sufficiently rapidly for the velocity boundary term to vanish. Integration by parts then gives , and therefore the Jeans equations areThe second moment includes both ordered motion and velocity dispersion; no assumption of zero mean velocity was needed.
To obtain the tensor virial theorem, multiply the th Jeans equation by and integrate over position. For an isolated, finite system with a vanishing spatial surface term,Since the left side is , . This convention puts all stellar second moments into ; it does not separate ordered and random kinetic energies.
For a self-gravitating system, the trace is the Newtonian gravitational potential energy. Indeed, symmetrizing the pair integral givesThus the trace of the tensor virial theorem is , and the total energy obeysThese identities require self-gravity without an additional external potential or an omitted confining boundary pressure.
Let now denote a mass-weighted average over the entire initial system. Then . The gravitational radius is defined by , so the virial theorem immediately yieldsThe gravitational radius measures total binding energy, rather than a particular geometric edge or half-mass radius.
For the accreted systems define the mass-weighted internal mean-square speed by . If each satellite initially satisfies the virial theorem, its internal energy contributes to . In parabolic dry-merger energy accounting, the orbital energy at large separation is zero. Assume a dry galaxy merger, no loss of mass or energy through escaping stars, no external work, and a final relaxed system satisfying the virial theorem. Then conservation of energy gives and . Energy transferred by Chandrasekhar dynamical friction remains part of the total energy under these assumptions. Consequently,Applying the final virial theorem and dividing by the initial relation givesFor a mass doubling, . A merger of two identical equilibrated galaxies has , hence . For accretion through many minor galaxy mergers whose satellites have much smaller internal mean-square speeds, , hence , tending to in the cold-satellite limit. Equivalently, nearly fixed total energy makes the gravitational radius scale as during cold minor-merger size growth. Small satellite mass alone does not logically imply : the factor four also requires this weak-binding assumption. Likewise, equal masses require comparable internal binding to give the factor two. These are the physical limits behind the two stated merger comparisons.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A small-angle gravitational encounter between a test star and a field star of mass gives a transverse kick , where is the impact parameter and the relative speed. For number density , encounters in occur at rate . Independent kicks add in mean square, giving the random-walk derivation of stellar relaxationThe Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics has of order system size , and of order the strong-deflection scale . For a virialized -star system, , so is of order . The stellar relaxation time is the time for accumulated velocity variance to become comparable with :Using gives . With a diameter-crossing convention , this is , conventionally rounded toThe coefficient is approximate: spatial profile, velocity averages and crossing-time convention change it by factors of order unity. The robust result is crossing times.
For and years, the estimate is about years, enormously longer than a Hubble time. Most galaxies therefore behave as collisionless stellar systems. Dense nuclei and star clusters can relax more rapidly. Negligible stellar encounters do not mean negligible collective gravitational instabilities.
Define the mass-weighted galactic distribution function by , so . Hamiltonian gravitational motion preserves phase space volume by the Liouville theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics. In the collisionless regime no encounter term redistributes stars between neighbouring phase space trajectories, so . With acceleration , the Collisionless Boltzmann equation is
For a steadily rotating galactic bar, write the inertial polar angle as . The inertial radial and angular equations are and . Substitution gives the equations of motion in a rotating frame:Here the velocities are measured in the bar frame. Set , and define the positive-force rotating-frame relative effective potentialThe centrifugal sign is positive in this relative-potential convention. The characteristics areConsequently the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor these planar equations, integrate over and interpret as the planar or vertically integrated mass density. Define . Boundary terms in velocity vanish for a sufficiently decaying distribution.
Let the velocity accelerations above be . Their velocity divergence is . Thus integration by parts in the zeroth moment contributes , producing the cylindrical continuity equation for a rotating stellar systemThis is conservation of mass: change of density balances flux through the radial and azimuthal sides of a small cylindrical element. The factor is geometric; the physical phase space measure is .
For the radial first moment, multiply the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation by . Its velocity integrations are and . Hence the radial cylindrical Jeans equations in a rotating frame areFor the azimuthal first moment, the velocity integral vanishes, while . This givesThe Jeans equations are local momentum-balance equations. The second moments include streaming momentum flux and random-velocity stress, while gravity, centrifugal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration supply the frame-dependent forces. They do not by themselves close the full distribution: a stress prescription or a galactic distribution function is also needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 349 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use a stationary, non-streaming tracer population with spherical symmetry in its full velocity distribution. In particular, the mean velocities vanish, the mixed covariances vanish, and the two tangential components have equal velocity dispersions. WriteHere is the variance of one tangential component. In the alternative convention using the sum of both tangential variances, the same velocity-anisotropy parameter is . These definitions agree; they must not be mixed by inserting an extra factor of two.
The time derivative and mean-velocity terms in the supplied Jeans equation vanish, as do its angular mixed-moment terms. Its remaining geometric term is . Thus the Spherical Jeans equation becomesThe no-streaming assumption excludes a steady radial flow; stationarity of the density alone would not remove its advective terms.
By the shell theorem, the gravitational potential of a spherical mass distribution satisfies . Expanding the derivative above, dividing by , and using logarithmic derivatives givesThe tracer density need not be the density of the gravitating matter. The circular speed is , whether or not the tracers themselves follow circular orbits.
Now let be constant, , and . With , the Spherical Jeans equation readsFor a power-law ansatz , , so . Therefore the scale-free spherical Jeans solution isThe positivity condition is necessary for this particular solution to be a physical velocity dispersion.
There is a boundary condition implicit in selecting this solution. The integrating factor gives, when ,The homogeneous term represents an additional radial-pressure boundary contribution. It is removed, for example, by requiring at infinity. Under that condition,and convergence requires , giving the boxed result. If , the solution instead has the logarithmic formso the quoted constant proportionality does not apply. A finite outer boundary can retain a homogeneous term even when .
To derive the heliocentric projection of a spherical velocity dispersion, put the Sun at vector of length , and a tracer at . Its heliocentric line of sight isIf is the angle between and the Galactocentric radial direction, thenAfter correction for the Sun's motion, the intrinsic covariance matrix has eigenvalues in the local spherical basis. Projection onto the line of sight therefore givesAt fixed , and are constant across the spherical shell. Averaging its squared line of sight velocity, with zero mean, givesFor a uniformly sampled Galactocentric shell, the solid angle measure makes uniform on , giving the geometric correction for heliocentric velocity dispersionTo evaluate it, set and , and divide the integrand:The odd term integrates to zero, while . For , , and , this givesThe removable limit at is . As , , while as , . If , and the observed velocity dispersion is exactly radial. For isotropic velocities, , the correction vanishes at every radius.
The averaging measure matters. If directions are instead uniform in heliocentric solid angle at a fixed Galactocentric radius , let be the angle between the line of sight and . Geometry gives , so that particular weighting gives exactly. The logarithmic expression above uses uniform tracer weighting on a Galactocentric shell. For an observational sample, use its actual angular selection weights in ; the boxed dispersion relation remains valid.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 346 3 Solution 2026-09-29
For a spherical orbit,so the galaxy rotation curve is flat. The isotropic spherical Jeans equation with constant dispersion isSince ,
WriteFor ,so Chandrasekhar dynamical friction is linear in at low speed. At , , so its acceleration magnitude decays as . At zero speed the wake is symmetric and the drag vanishes; at high speed the subhalo spends too little time deflecting each background particle efficiently.
For a circular orbit , so and . The tangential acceleration isThe specific angular momentum is , hence andIntegration from to zero gives
The friction acceleration is antiparallel to velocity, so locally and . Applying the chain rule givesBecause and , at pericentre gives : friction circularizes. At apocentre gives : it makes the orbit more eccentric. Orbit averaging produces substantial cancellation; the denser pericentre region generally gives modest net circularization, but the eccentricity changes much less dramatically than the orbital energy and radius.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 346 1 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
DefineUsing mass conservation to differentiate a material moment givesMultiply the Jeans equation for component by , integrate over space, discard the surface term of an isolated system, and symmetrize in . The result isDecompose and defineThis proves the tensor virial theorem
For a steady oblate system rotating about , , while symmetry gives . The and equations areUsing , , and givesWith , the edge-on curves areAt fixed ellipticity, increasing anisotropy lowers ; the curve starts only once . The line is the oblate isotropic rotator reference.
At inclination , line-of-sight rotation is reduced approximately by , and the projected ellipticity also decreases as the spheroid is viewed closer to its symmetry axis. A galaxy therefore moves down and left from its edge-on location, with the exact track set by intrinsic thickness and anisotropy.
Low-mass elliptical galaxies mostly occupy the fast-rotating, flattened, nearly isotropic region close to the oblate-rotator line. High-mass systems mostly occupy the slow-rotating region below it and require anisotropy or triaxiality. Gas-rich dissipative evolution retains angular momentum, forms a compact rotating stellar component, and produces low-mass fast rotators. Repeated dry major mergers randomize orbits, lower specific angular momentum, scour central cores through black-hole binaries, and build massive slow rotators.
Four characteristic contrasts are:
- high-mass ellipticals rotate slowly, while low-mass ellipticals are commonly fast rotators;
- high-mass systems are anisotropic and often triaxial or boxy, while low-mass systems are closer to oblate and disky;
- high-mass systems commonly have shallow central cores, while low-mass systems have steep central cusps or extra central light;
- high-mass systems are generally older, redder, more alpha-enhanced, and richer in hot X-ray gas, while lower-mass systems more often show younger populations, cold gas, and residual star formation.
These are population trends rather than sharp boundaries in the fast and slow rotator galaxy classification.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 346 2 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
A galaxy contains so many stars that its two-body relaxation time is generally much longer than its age. Individual encounters can therefore be neglected and each star moves in the smooth collective potential. Liouville conservation along these Hamiltonian trajectories gives the Collisionless Boltzmann equationIn spherical phase-space coordinates this is
The spherical line element is , soFor a unit-mass star in a spherical potential,The Euler--Lagrange equations, followed by differentiating and , give
Integrating the Boltzmann equation over velocity space, with vanishing velocity-space boundary terms, gives spherical mass conservation:Multiplication by and integration gives the radial Jeans equation. With isotropic dispersionthe geometric dispersion terms cancel, and use of continuity yieldsThe factor on the right is required dimensionally.
In a Lambda-CDM background, the local excess mass contributes , homogeneous matter inside radius contributes , and the cosmological constant contributes outward acceleration . HenceSince , , and ,
Write , where is the peculiar velocity. ThenThe acceleration equation gives , which cancels the background term in . Therefore
Stellar asymmetric drift 2026-10-14
Stellar asymmetric drift is the lag of a pressure-supported stellar population's mean rotation behind the local circular speed. Neglecting the tilted velocity ellipsoid, radial Jeans equation balance givesA declining density and larger random velocities generally increase the lag; gravitational balance is supplied partly by random-motion stresses.