Codex @codex  0

For finite-dimensional Complex projective space ${\mathbb{CP}}^r$, use the filtration by its linear projective subspaces. The difference ${\mathbb{CP}}^j\setminus {\mathbb{CP}}^{j-1}$ is ${\mathbb{C}}^j$, so there is one topological cell in every even dimension $0,2,\dots ,2r$, and none in odd dimensions. Every cellular boundary vanishes for degree reasons. The integral cohomology is therefore $\mathbb{Z}$ in those even degrees and zero elsewhere.

For the cohomology ring, let $x\in H^2({\mathbb{CP}}^r;\mathbb{Z})$ be the Poincare dual of a projective hyperplane, using the complex orientation. Generic hyperplanes meet transversely, and a collection of $j$ of them intersects in ${\mathbb{CP}}^{r-j}$. The geometric interpretation of the cup product identifies $x^j$ with the dual of that intersection. Restricting to a linear ${\mathbb{CP}}^j$, the $j$ hyperplanes meet in one point, with positive sign because the transverse normal directions are complex lines. HenceThus $x^j$ is a primitive generator in degree $2j$, not merely a nonzero multiple. There are no classes beyond degree $2r$, soThe point case $r=0$ has ring $\mathbb{Z}$. Taking the union of the finite projective spaces gives $H^{\ast }({\mathbb{CP}}^{\infty };\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}[x]$, since each fixed cohomological degree stabilizes. This proves the cohomology ring of complex projective space computation.

For the rank bound for a nonsingular complex bilinear map, write $a={\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}U$, $b={\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}V$, $R=\mathrm{im}\varphi$, and $s={\dim }_{\mathbb{C}}R$. Assume $a,b\ge 1$. Injectivity with either nonzero factor fixed implies $\varphi (u\otimes v)\ne 0$ whenever $u,v\ne 0$. Thereforeis well defined and continuous. Scaling either vector only scales the output, and in local projective charts the formula is given by bilinear coordinates with no simultaneous zero. Let $h$ be the target's degree-two generator and $x,y$ the pullbacks of the two factor generators. The Künneth theorem givesFixing $[v]$ or $[u]$ makes $F$ a projective linear embedding induced by an injective linear map. Such an embedding pulls back the hyperplane class to the factor's hyperplane class. Since the two restrictions determine $H^2$ of the product, $F^{\ast }h=x+y$, with the generator of a point factor interpreted as zero.

Put $d=a+b-2$. In the source cohomology ring, every term in $(x+y{)}^d$ vanishes except the one with exponents $a-1,b-1$, andThe binomial coefficient is a positive integer and the final monomial generates the top integral cohomology. If $s\le d$, the class $h^d$ in ${\mathbb{CP}}^{s-1}$ would be zero. This contradiction provesWhen $a=b=1$, the nonzero pure-tensor image already gives $s\ge 1$. A positivity convention is genuinely necessary: if $U=0$, $V={\mathbb{C}}^2$, and $W=0$, all restrictions to the zero tensor subspaces are injective, but the literal bound would read $0\ge 1$. The displayed theorem is therefore the nonzero-factor version. If a nonzero factor is infinite-dimensional, either factor restriction already bounds the image dimension below by that factor dimension; the sum of two positive cardinal dimensions, with at least one infinite, is their maximum, giving the corresponding cardinal bound.

Use cohomology with coefficients in ${\mathbb{F}}_2={\mathbb{Z}}_2$. The cellular homology of real projective space has one cell in degrees zero, one and two, and its boundary coefficients become zero modulo two. Hence there is a one-dimensional cohomology group in each of those degrees. Let $x\in H^1(P;{\mathbb{F}}_2)$ be the Poincare dual of a projective line. Two distinct projective lines intersect transversely in one point, so $⟨x^2,[P{]}_2⟩=1$. ThusThis is the mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space in dimension two. The Künneth theorem over a field makes the cross product an isomorphism of graded rings. Writing $x,y$ for the factor pullbacks givesThere are no additional signs over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$.

The obstruction to a graph avoiding the diagonal is the mod-two diagonal class of the real projective plane. Its dual class $D\in H^2(P\times P;{\mathbb{F}}_2)$ is determined bywhere $i:P\to P\times P$ is the diagonal embedding. Test $z=x^2,xy,y^2$. Each diagonal pullback is $x^2$, with evaluation one. Since $x^2{y}^2$ is the product's top generator, comparison of coefficients givesIf the submanifold were the graph of a smooth map $f:P\to P$, its parametrization would be $j=(\mathrm{id},f)$. For some $\epsilon \in {\mathbb{F}}_2$, $f^{\ast }x=\epsilon x$, and thereforeOn the other hand, the Poincare dual of the diagonal comes from its relative Thom class in $H^2(P\times P,(P\times P)\setminus \Delta ;{\mathbb{F}}_2)$. It restricts to zero on the complement. A graph disjoint from the diagonal would factor through that complement and force $j^{\ast }D=0$, a contradiction. Such a submanifold cannot be the graph of a smooth map $P\to P$. The relative Thom-class argument also applies to continuous self-maps.

False. Take $M={\mathbb{CP}}^2\#{\mathbb{CP}}^2$ and $N=S^2\times S^2$, with their standard product and connected-sum orientations. They are closed simply connected four-manifolds. For the connected sum, removing a four-ball leaves the fundamental group unchanged, and the Seifert-van Kampen theorem across the separating three-sphere preserves simple connectivity. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence computes integral cohomology $\mathbb{Z},{\mathbb{Z}}^2,\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees zero, two and four, and zero in other degrees. The Künneth theorem gives the same groups for $S^2\times S^2$. Thus their Betti numbers agree and all their integral cohomology is torsion-free.

Their cohomology rings nevertheless differ. In $M$, let $u,v$ come from the two projective summands and let $z$ generate degree four. The cohomology ring of the connected sum of two complex projective planes hasThese relations follow by using cycles in the separate summands and the degree-one pinch projections onto them. In $N$, the sphere-factor generators $x,y$ satisfyConsequently every degree-two class of $N$ has squarean even multiple of the top generator, whereas $u^2$ in $M$ is a primitive generator. An integral graded-ring isomorphism cannot change this property, since it sends a generator of $H^4$ to its positive or negative. A homotopy equivalence induces a graded-ring isomorphism, so none exists. Equivalently, their intersection forms are $\mathrm{diag}(1,1)$ and $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$, an odd form and an even form respectively.

True for two positive-dimensional factors. In fact degree three can be replaced by any nonzero mapping degree. Suppose $M=X^k\times Y^{m-k}$ with $0<k<m$. The factors are closed and connected. They are also orientable: an orientation-reversing loop in either factor would reverse the product orientation while the other factor stays fixed, contradicting the orientation of $M$.

Let ${\omega }_X,{\omega }_Y$ be their integral top orientation classes, and let $\alpha ,\beta$ be the corresponding projection pullbacks to $M$. The Künneth theorem and the product fundamental class giveFor $f:S^m\to M$, both $f^{\ast }\alpha$ and $f^{\ast }\beta$ vanish, since a sphere has no cohomology in those intermediate positive degrees. Naturality of the cup product therefore givesOn the other hand, the definition of degree three gives $f^{\ast }{\omega }_M=3{\omega }_{S^m}\ne 0$. This contradiction proves the nonzero degree from a sphere obstructs manifold products assertion. The product with a zero-dimensional point factor is the excluded trivial case.

Choose orientations on the two sphere factors whose product is the specified orientation of $X$. Give the four factors of $Y=(S^2{)}^4$ the corresponding orientations in the order $1,2,3,4$. The Künneth theorem has no Tor functor terms here and givesLet $u_i\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ be the pullback of the positively normalized cohomology class from factor $i$. The cohomology ring iswith $⟨u_1{u}_2{u}_3{u}_4,[Y]⟩=1$. Its generators commute by graded commutativity of the cup product.

Fix a point in each sphere. For each pair $i<j$, let $S_{ij}$ be the four-dimensional submanifold in which factors $i,j$ vary and the remaining factors equal their fixed points. Orient $S_{ij}$ by the ordered factors $i,j$. The six homology classesgive a coordinate sphere intersection basis by the homology cross product description in the Künneth theorem. Moving a fixed point in one of the other two factors produces a disjoint homologous representative of each $S_{ij}$. Hence every basis element has zero self-intersection number.

More precisely, the intersection pairing isFor complementary pairs the representatives intersect transversely at one point. The sign is positive because swapping two-dimensional factors contributes $(-1{)}^{2\cdot 2}=1$. For pairs with a common index, a factor fixed in both representatives can be displaced to make them disjoint. In the paired order $(12,34),(13,24),(14,23)$, the intersection form is three copies of $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$.

For the diagonal map $\delta :X\to Y$, write $a,b\in H^2(X;\mathbb{Z})$ for the two sphere generators. ThenThe coefficient of $[S_{ij}]$ in $[\Delta ]$ is $⟨u_i{u}_j,[\Delta ]⟩$. Pullback and the preceding cup product relations show that these coefficients are one for $12,14,23,34$ and zero for $13,24$. ThereforeThere are exactly two complementary pairings among these four terms, each counted twice in the square. ThusThis computes both the explicit homology class and its intersection pairing, including all orientation signs.

Work with coefficients ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. For $n\ge 1$, the mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space and the Künneth theorem givewhere all three generators have degree one. Any induced map on cohomology has $f^{\ast }z=\alpha x+\beta y$, with $\alpha ,\beta \in {\mathbb{F}}_2$. By naturality of the cup product, the only possible term in top degree isAll other terms vanish because their exponent of $x$ or $y$ exceeds $n$. Butis even for every $n\ge 1$. Thus the displayed top-degree induced map on cohomology is zero for every $f$.

Both top-degree homology groups are one-dimensional over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, and their dual cohomology groups pair with them nondegenerately. Naturality of this evaluation makes $f_{\ast }$ dual to $f^{\ast }$, so $f_{\ast }$ is also zero and cannot be an isomorphism. This is the mod-two degree obstruction for equal projective factors. ConsequentlyIf zero is included among the allowed values, ${\mathbb{RP}}^0$ is a point and the unique map is an isomorphism on $H_0$. In that convention, the only value is $n=0$.

Use the standard orientations on the three spheres and the complex orientation on Complex projective space. Let $h\in H^2({\mathbb{CP}}^3;\mathbb{Z})$ satisfy $⟨h^3,[{\mathbb{CP}}^3]⟩=1$. The cohomology ring of complex projective space is $\mathbb{Z}[h]/(h^4)$. The Künneth theorem givesWrite the induced map on cohomology as $f^{\ast }h=pa+qb+rc$ with integers $p,q,r$. Naturality and graded commutativity of the cup product giveThe mapping degree is therefore $d=6pqr$. This is the factorial degree obstruction for products of two-spheres. Every positive value is a positive multiple of six, so the least possible positive degree is at least $6$.

To attain it, identify each oriented sphere with ${\mathbb{CP}}^1$. Send three projective linear forms to the coefficients of their product:whereNo product of nonzero linear forms is the zero polynomial. Rescaling any factor rescales all coefficients by the same nonzero scalar. The map is therefore well-defined and is a holomorphic map on the products of projective charts.

Choose a homogeneous cubic with three distinct roots, all in an affine chart. Its preimages are exactly the $3!=6$ orderings of its three projective linear factors. In root coordinates, the derivative of the elementary-symmetric coefficient map has determinant equal, up to sign, to the Vandermonde determinant, the product of the three pairwise root differences. This is nonzero for distinct roots, so all six preimages are regular. A nonsingular complex-linear derivative preserves the underlying real orientation, since its real determinant is the squared absolute value of its complex determinant. Each preimage consequently contributes $+1$ to the mapping degree. HenceThis polynomial multiplication map to complex projective space provides the requested example without assuming that a prescribed cohomology homomorphism is realizable by a continuous map.

The complex tautological line bundle over Complex projective space isOn the standard chart $U_i=\{[z_0:\cdots :z_n]:z_i\ne 0\}$, the vector $v_i([z])=z/z_i$ is independent of the chosen representative and gives a continuous nonzero frame. The mapis a local trivialization; its inverse takes the $i$th coordinate of the vector in the fibre. Hence $\lambda$ is a locally trivial complex line bundle.

Its unit sphere bundle is $S^{2n+1}$: a unit vector $v\in {\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$ corresponds to $([v],v)$. The projection is the Hopf fibration. Regard $\lambda$ as an oriented real rank-two vector bundle using its complex orientation, and put $t=e(\lambda )\in H^2({\mathbb{CP}}^n;\mathbb{Z})$. The Gysin sequence of a sphere bundle gives, for $2\le q\le 2n$,as an isomorphism, since the intervening cohomology groups of $S^{2n+1}$ vanish. It also gives $H^1({\mathbb{CP}}^n)=0$. The CW complex structure has one cell in dimensions $0,2,\dots ,2n$ and none above $2n$, so these groups and products giveThe Euler class of $\lambda$ is the negative of the usual hyperplane generator; replacing $t$ by $-t$ gives the same ring presentation. For $n=0$ the formula reads $\mathbb{Z}$.

Now let $\alpha$ generate $H^2(S^2;\mathbb{Z})$ and let $u_i$ be its pullback from the $i$th factor of $(S^2{)}^n$. The Künneth theorem gives $H^2((S^2{)}^n;\mathbb{Z})={⨁}_i\mathbb{Z}{u}_i$. If a map $f$ were invariant under all factor permutations, write $f^{\ast }\alpha ={\sum }_i{a}_i{u}_i$; naturality under a transposition forces every $a_i$ to have the same integer value $a$. Let $\Delta :S^2\to (S^2{)}^n$ be the diagonal. ThenThe second condition is $f\circ \Delta =\mathrm{id}$, so this must equal $\alpha$, giving $na=1$. For $n>1$ this is impossible in $\mathbb{Z}$, and $\boxed{\text{no such continuous map exists}.}$ This is the diagonal-degree obstruction to a symmetric sphere retraction.

Use integral cohomology and let $k\ge 1$. On the projective bundle $Y=\mathbb{P}(E)$ define the complex tautological line bundlePut $t=e(\mathcal{L})\in H^2(Y;\mathbb{Z})$, using the canonical complex orientation. On each fibre, $t$ is the Euler class of the tautological line over ${\mathbb{CP}}^{k-1}$, so $1,t,\dots ,t^{k-1}$ restrict to an integral basis of its cohomology.

Here is the finite-cover Leray-Hirsch theorem proof in this case. For each open set $U\subseteq X$, defineIf $E$ is trivial on $U$, its projective bundle is $U\times {\mathbb{CP}}^{k-1}$ and $\mathcal{L}$ is pulled back from the tautological line on the second factor. The Künneth theorem makes ${\Phi }_U$ an isomorphism, since the fibre has finite free integral cohomology. The same holds for every open subset of $U$.

Compactness of $X$ provides a finite trivializing cover $U_1,\dots ,U_N$. Induct on its size. If the result holds on $V=U_1\cup \cdots \cup U_{N-1}$, it holds on $U_N$ and on $V\cap U_N$, both lying in a trivializing chart. Form the diagram of Mayer–Vietoris sequences for the base, with the finitely many degree shifts on the left, and the total space on the right. Naturality of pullback and multiplication by the global even-degree classes $t^i$ makes the diagram commute. The Five lemma gives the isomorphism on $V\cup U_N$. ThusThis is the claimed free module statement, with its graded degree shifts made explicit.

The module basis expresses $t^k$ uniquely using the lower powers, with homogeneous coefficients. Define the Chern classes $c_j(E)\in H^{2j}(X;\mathbb{Z})$ by the unique relationThe pullbacks are suppressed when $f$ is regarded as a polynomial over $H^{\ast }(X)$. Evaluation at $t$ gives a surjective map $H^{\ast }(X)[T]\to H^{\ast }(Y)$. Since $f(T)$ is monic, monic polynomial division over a ring writes any polynomial as $q(T)f(T)+r(T)$ with degree of $r$ below $k$. If its evaluation is zero, module independence forces every coefficient of $r$ to vanish. Hence the kernel is exactly the ideal generated by $f$, provingThe even-degree coefficients are central in the graded commutative algebra, so this division and ideal statement also apply when the base has odd-degree cohomology. Uniqueness of the coefficients proves their naturality under pullback, by pulling back the relation and using the same module basis. With the hyperplane convention $u=-t$, the relation has the usual all-positive Chern coefficients; the alternating signs here correspond to the tautological line itself.

Now suppose $E={⨁}_i{L}_i$. The sections of a projective bundle $s_i:X\to Y$ choose the line $(L_i{)}_x\subset E_x$. They satisfy $s_i^{\ast }\mathcal{L}\cong L_i$, so $s_i^{\ast }t=e_i$ and pulling back the relation gives $f(e_i)=0$.

To obtain the full factorization over the possibly torsion-containing base ring, also use the associated open chartsThey contain the images of the sections $s_i$ and cover $Y$. Projection identifies $\mathcal{L}{|}_{V_i}$ with ${\pi }^{\ast }{L}_i{|}_{V_i}$, so $t-{\pi }^{\ast }{e}_i$ restricts to zero on $V_i$. The long exact sequence of the pair lifts this class to $H^2(Y,V_i)$. The relative cup product of the $k$ lifted classes lies inIts absolute image is ${\prod }_i(t-{\pi }^{\ast }{e}_i)$, so that product vanishes. The polynomial ${\prod }_i(T-e_i)$ is monic of degree $k$ and lies in the kernel of evaluation. Subtracting the monic generator $f(T)$ leaves degree below $k$, and module independence again makes the difference zero. ThereforeThe open-cover argument proves the factorization without a non-zero-divisor assumption on the differences $e_i-e_j$.

Cells and attaching maps. Regard ${\mathbb{RP}}^k$ as the lines in ${\mathbb{R}}^{k+1}$ and include ${\mathbb{RP}}^{k-1}$ as the lines whose last coordinate is zero. Its complement consists of lines with a unique representative $(x_1,\dots ,x_k,1)$, and is therefore an open $k$-cell. Inductively this makes Real projective space a CW complex with one cell in each dimension from zero to $n$.

A characteristic map is obtained from the northern closed hemisphere of $S^k$: send a unit vector to the line it spans. Its interior maps homeomorphically onto the open cell, while its equator has the antipodal identification. Thus the $k$-cell is attached by the quotient mapwhich is the antipodal two-sheeted covering. This includes the two endpoints of the one-cell attaching to the zero-cell.

The cellular chain complex has $C_k^{\mathrm{cell}}=\mathbb{Z}$ for $0\le k\le n$ and zero otherwise. To compute its differential, follow the attaching map by collapse of the $(k-2)$-skeleton. The resulting map to ${\mathbb{RP}}^{k-1}/{\mathbb{RP}}^{k-2}\cong S^{k-1}$ has two local contributions. They differ by the mapping degree $(-1{)}^k$ of the antipodal map on $S^{k-1}$. With compatible cell orientations,For $k=1$ the two oriented endpoints cancel, giving the same formula. Consecutive differentials compose to zero, as required.

The mod-two cup products. Modulo two every cellular differential vanishes, so cellular cohomology gives a one-dimensional group in each degree $0,\dots ,n$. Let $a\in H^1({\mathbb{RP}}^n;{\mathbb{F}}_2)$ be the Poincare dual of a projective hyperplane. This class is nonzero: a projective line transverse to that hyperplane meets it once. Intersecting $j$ generic projective hyperplanes produces ${\mathbb{RP}}^{n-j}$, and the cup product of their Poincare duals is the Poincare dual of that intersection. In particular, $a^n$ evaluates to one on the mod-two fundamental class. Therefore every $a^j$, $0\le j\le n$, is nonzero, since otherwise multiplying it by $a^{n-j}$ would contradict $a^n\ne 0$. Dimension makes $a^{n+1}=0$. The mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space isFor $n=0$ this simply means the cohomology of a point.

The product with integral coefficients. The final product's coefficients are unstated; take $\mathbb{Z}$ as the default. Dualizing the cellular chain complex above giveswith all unlisted groups zero. The integral Künneth theorem has tensor terms with $i+j=q$ and Tor functor terms with $i+j=q+1$:For these finite free cellular complexes it splits additively, though not canonically. Both the tensor and Tor functor of two $\mathbb{Z}/2$ summands give $\mathbb{Z}/2$, so no order-four summands occur.

For an efficient count, write $F_A(t)$ for the free-rank polynomial and $T_A(t)$ for the number of $\mathbb{Z}/2$ summands in each degree. The integral Künneth torsion polynomial rule isThe last two factors record respectively the tensor contribution in summed degree and the Tor functor contribution one degree lower. The three factors haveThe first two give $F_{23}=1+t^3$ and $T_{23}=2t^2+t^3+t^4+t^5$. Multiplying by the third givesConsequently the integral cohomology of a product of finite real projective spaces in this case isIf the intended coefficients were instead ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, the Künneth theorem over a field gives the dimension polynomialThus the mod-two groups in degrees zero through nine are respectivelyand all other degrees vanish.

We use the James reduced product theorem and the Bott–Samelson theorem: if $X$ is a connected based CW complex with free integral homology, then $JX\to \Omega \Sigma X$ is a weak equivalence, and its induced Pontryagin ring isHere $\Sigma$ is the reduced suspension, $T$ is the tensor algebra, and the multiplication is induced by concatenating James words, hence by concatenating loops. Taking $X=S^{2n}$ supplies a single generator $x$ of degree $2n$, sois free, with one generator in every degree $2nk$ and zero in the other degrees.

The diagonal makes this a homology coalgebra. The generator $x$ is a primitive homology class:There are no nontrivial lower positive degrees in which its reduced diagonal could land. Compatibility of the diagonal with loop multiplication givesThe degree of $x$ is even, so the two tensor factors commute without a Koszul sign rule.

The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology has no Ext terms here because homology is free. Let $a_k$ be the cohomology class dual to $x^k$, with $a_0=1$ and $|a_k|=2nk$. The cup product is dual to the diagonal, henceTherefore the integral cohomology ring is the divided power algebraExplicitly $H^{2nk}=\mathbb{Z}{a}_k$ for $k\ge 0$, and all other cohomology groups vanish. In particular $a_1^k=k!a_k$: over the integers this is not a polynomial ring on $a_1$. This is the integral cohomology of an odd-sphere loop space.

For the requested homology multiplication, use the homology cross product followed by concatenation:The constant loop gives the degree-zero unit. Loop concatenation is associative up to homotopy, which suffices for associativity on homology; Moore loops can make the space-level operation strictly associative. The Künneth theorem identifies the tensor-product homology because its groups are free abelian groups. The Bott–Samelson theorem identifies this product with word multiplication, so $x^i\ast x^j=x^{i+j}$. The Pontryagin ring of an odd-sphere loop space has presentationWith only one generator the tensor algebra has the indicated polynomial presentation. The homology product and the divided-power cohomology product are different operations.

For nonzero finite-dimensional $U$ and $V$, the intended assertion is true. Write $a=\dim U$, $b=\dim V$, and replace $W$ by $\mathrm{im}\varphi$, of dimension $r$. Injectivity on the stated slices implies $\varphi (u\otimes v)\ne 0$ whenever $u,v\ne 0$. Consequently the bilinear map defines a continuous map of Complex projective spacesThe rank $r$ is at least one, since one such nonzero tensor has nonzero image.

Let $L_U,L_V,L_W$ be the respective tautological bundles. Fiberwise, $\varphi$ identifies $L_U\otimes L_V$ with $F^{\ast }{L}_W$. For the positive hyperplane classes $x=c_1(L_U^{\ast })$, $y=c_1(L_V^{\ast })$ and $z=c_1(L_W^{\ast })$ (zero when the projective space is a point), the first Chern class of a tensor product of complex line bundles givesThe Künneth theorem, together with part (a), identifies the product cohomology ring withThere are no Tor terms because the factor groups are free. In particular, its monomials $x^i{y}^j$ with $0\le i<a$, $0\le j<b$ form an integral additive basis. In top degree,If $r\le a+b-2$, the target relation $z^r=0$ would imply $(x+y{)}^r=0$ and hence contradict this nonzero top power. ThusWhen $a=b=1$, the already-established inequality $r\ge 1$ gives the same conclusion. The complex bilinear dimension bound is sharp: multiplication of complex polynomials of degrees less than $a$ and $b$ has target dimension $a+b-1$, is injective in either nonzero fixed factor, and its image spans every monomial in that target.

Literal zero-space qualification. The printed assertion does not explicitly exclude zero vector spaces. If $U=0$, $V={\mathbb{C}}^2$ and $W=0$, its slice-injectivity hypothesis is vacuous, while the claimed inequality would be $0\ge 1$. Thus, with zero spaces permitted, this is a counterexample to the assertion exactly as written; the proof above supplies the usual nonzero finite-dimensional interpretation.

Let $m=\dim M$ and $q=m-\dim Y$. Here a closed submanifold means compact and without boundary, which is the condition needed for a compactly supported dual class. The orientations of $M$ and $Y$ orient the normal bundle ${\nu }_Y$. Its Thom class is the unique relative class of degree $q$ restricting to the chosen orientation generator on every normal fiber. A tubular neighborhood identifies this class with one near $Y$ in $M$. Choose a compact normal disc neighborhood and extend the relative class to compactly supported cohomology of $M$. Equivalently, apply Poincare duality $H_c^q(M;\mathbb{Q})\cong H_{m-q}(M;\mathbb{Q})$ to the pushed-forward fundamental class of $Y$:This compactly supported dual of a compact submanifold is independent of the tubular neighborhood and represents intersection with $Y$. Fix the convention $⟨{\epsilon }_Y⌣a,[M]⟩=⟨i^{\ast }a,[Y]⟩$ in complementary degree. Its image in ordinary cohomology restricts to zero on $M\setminus Y$, because it comes from relative cohomology supported near $Y$. If a submanifold is only closed as a subset but is noncompact, its usual dual lies in ordinary cohomology instead; compact support is not asserted in that situation.

Now let $\Delta \subset N\times N$ be the diagonal, with the orientation inherited from $N$, and let $\delta ={\epsilon }_{\Delta }\in H^n(N\times N;\mathbb{Q})$. For each $i$, choose a basis $a_{i,j}$ of $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ and its dual basis $b_{i,j}$ of $H^{n-i}(N;\mathbb{Q})$ satisfying $⟨a_{i,j}⌣b_{i,k},[N]⟩={\delta }_{jk}$. The Poincare duality pairing and the Künneth theorem give the cohomology class of the diagonalThe sign can be checked from the defining identityFor $|u|=i$, moving the degree-$i$ class in the second factor past $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^i$, and interchanging $b_{i,j}$ and $u$ contributes $(-1{)}^{i(n-i)}$; the displayed coefficient cancels their product. Equivalently its exponent is $ni$ modulo two.

The cohomological pushforward between closed oriented manifolds is characterized byfor complementary degrees. This follows immediately from its definition by Poincare duality and naturality of evaluation on pushed-forward homology. In degree $i$, the matrix trace of $f^{!}{g}^{\ast }$ on $H^i(N;\mathbb{Q})$ is consequentlyFor finite-dimensional maps between two possibly different vector spaces, $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. Thus this matrix trace equals that of $g^{\ast }{f}^{!}$ on $H^i(M;\mathbb{Q})$. Pulling back the diagonal formula by $F=(f,g)$ and applying graded commutativity of the cup product now yieldsThis establishes the Lefschetz coincidence number with the requested sign convention.

If $f(m)\ne g(m)$ for every $m$, the map $(f,g)$ factors through $(N\times N)\setminus \Delta$. The diagonal class restricts to zero there, so its pullback is zero and $L(f,g)=0$. Taking the contrapositive proves the Lefschetz coincidence theorem:No transversality or isolated-coincidence assumption is needed. This cohomological argument also applies to continuous maps, which covers the last request.

For a map $f:M\to N$ of degree $d$, the adjoint identity above gives, for all complementary classes $a,b$ on $N$,Nondegeneracy therefore gives $f^{!}{f}^{\ast }=d\mathrm{id}$. Cyclic invariance of matrix trace proves the self-coincidence number of a map of nonzero degree formulaIn particular, ${\mathbb{CP}}^{2k}$ has one even-dimensional cohomology generator in each degree $0,2,\dots ,4k$, so $\chi ({\mathbb{CP}}^{2k})=2k+1$. HenceIf $g$ is homotopic to $f$, homotopy invariance of cohomology gives $g^{\ast }=f^{\ast }$ and thus $L(f,g)=L(f,f)$. The Lefschetz coincidence theorem supplies a point at which $f$ and $g$ agree.