Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 52 1 b iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write and . The Killing equation makes antisymmetric. Expanding hypersurface orthogonality and contracting with givesHere metric compatibility gives . Thereforeand the normalized Killing one-form satisfiesThus the required exponent is . The notation in this paper denotes the negative scalar , rather than a positive squared norm; the answer uses only its real reciprocal. More generally, for a multiplier the antisymmetric derivative is , so is the universally valid choice. If is constant, other exponents can work in that particular metric.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 52 2 b iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The metric dependence of the minimally coupled scalar field Lagrangian is . Part (ii) therefore gives the stress-energy tensorUse metric compatibility and the symmetric Hessian of a scalar field to computeThis is the scalar stress-energy divergence identity, an instance of the diffeomorphism Noether identity for a scalar field. On the scalar equation of motion it gives stress-energy conservation, .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 52 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
On the other hand, metric compatibility givesUsing the Christoffel trace identity in the last term yieldsSince the volume density never vanishes in a valid chart, the harmonic coordinate conditions are equivalent:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 52 4 b ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The Levi-Civita connection is the unique affine connection that has both vanishing torsion tensor and metric compatibility. The affine connection decomposition shows exactly how an arbitrary affine connection departs from it: the contorsion tensor contributes the metric-compatible torsion correction, and the disformation tensor contributes the nonmetricity correction. The torsion and nonmetricity tensor, together with the metric tensor, determine the difference uniquely.
In the paper's convention the actual contorsion correction is , with the corrected half factor from part (i), and the disformation correction is . Both corrections are tensors, although the separate connection coefficients and are not tensors. If both torsion and nonmetricity vanish, then . Vanishing nonmetricity alone permits torsion, and vanishing torsion alone permits nonmetricity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 118 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Fix the convention that the Hermitian metric is conjugate-linear in its first argument. In a holomorphic local frame , let , so . Write , or equivalently .
Compatibility with the holomorphic vector bundle structure means . Since the frame is holomorphic, this forces . Metric compatibility meansor, in the chosen frame, . Conjugate transpose here also conjugates the one-form factors. Taking the component gives , and henceThis proves uniqueness and suggests existence. The proposed has type , and its conjugate transpose obeys , since . Therefore , proving metric compatibility as well.
Under a change of holomorphic local frame , we have and . A direct computation yieldsBecause is holomorphic, ; this is exactly the transformation rule for a connection one-form. The locally defined connections therefore glue to a global connection on a vector bundle. The Chern connection exists uniquely, and its local formula for the Chern connection on a vector bundle is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 118 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The orthogonal projection is a smooth bundle map, since the Hermitian metric and the subbundle vary smoothly. The mapis independent of the representative, bijective on each fibre, and smooth with smooth inverse supplied by the quotient map on . Hence it is a natural isomorphism of smooth vector bundles. It need not be holomorphic. The quotient Hermitian metric isIt is well-defined and positive definite because represents each quotient class uniquely.
On sections of , set . The Leibniz rule makes a connection on a vector bundle. For , the orthogonal terms vanish in the metric pairing, soThus has metric compatibility. Because is a holomorphic subbundle, the part of preserves and restricts to . Therefore . The uniqueness of the Chern connection in part (b) gives the projected Chern connection formulaIt follows that is a quotient-valued one-form. The printed target is missing a dual: the cotangent bundle is the correct factor,Complex-valued forms use the complexified cotangent bundle here. In fact the part cancels, so is the second fundamental form of a holomorphic subbundle, an element of . Finally the two connection Leibniz rules giveThis proves its tensoriality and all the asserted quotient and projection properties.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 115 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
An affine connection on is an operation on smooth vector fields that is real-bilinear, linear over in the differentiating field, and satisfiesIt is a connection on a vector bundle for the bundle , also called a linear connection on the manifold. Its curvature form of a connection has the operator formThis convention fixes its sign. Expanding the two connection product rules shows that the extra derivatives of a scalar cancel, so is linear over smooth functions in all three fields. For a Levi-Civita connection, this is the Riemann curvature tensor.
The torsion form is . For a Riemannian metric , its Levi-Civita connection is the unique torsion-free connection satisfying metric compatibilityExistence and uniqueness follow from the Koszul formula. In coordinates its coefficients areSymmetry in gives zero torsion, and substitution verifies metric compatibility.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 115 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The product Riemannian metric isIt is smooth and symmetric. If , at least one component is nonzero and contributes a strictly positive squared norm; the other contributes a nonnegative term. Thus is positive definite.
Let the factor connections be Levi-Civita connections. The torsion form of the product affine connection vanishes on two lifted fields from one factor because it equals the factor torsion; on opposite-factor fields it vanishes because both covariant derivatives and the Lie bracket of vector fields vanish. By tensoriality, torsion vanishes for all fields.
Check metric compatibility on lifted fields as well. When the two paired fields are from one factor, their metric pairing depends only on that factor. Differentiation along that factor gives the usual factor compatibility identity, and differentiation along the other factor gives zero on both sides. When the paired fields are from different factors, their pairing is identically zero and their derivatives stay in their original summands, so both sides are again zero. Since has tensoriality, these checks imply globally.
The Existence and uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection therefore givesEquivalently, applying the Christoffel symbol formula to the block metric gives the factor coefficients and zero mixed coefficients, because each factor metric is independent of the other coordinates.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 309 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a timelike tangent , put and , and use the Euler-Lagrange equations. For the quadratic geodesic Lagrangian, they reduce toHere the first equation has been multiplied by an irrelevant minus sign. For the length Lagrangian, its derivatives are times those of , and differentiating that factor yields insteadThis is the unparametrized geodesic equation, the key to why timelike length and energy have the same geodesic images. Define proper time locally by and put . The product rule then gives and . Conversely an affinely parametrized timelike geodesic has constant , by metric compatibility, and therefore satisfies both equations.
Thus the two variational problems have the same oriented timelike geodesic images, after reparametrization. They do not have exactly the same parametrized solutions with an arbitrary fixed : in Minkowski spacetime, , , , satisfies the length equation but not the quadratic equation. The timelike assumption excludes , where this argument and the length derivative would fail.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 309 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Put , , , , with primes denoting . The exterior derivatives are , , . For a Levi-Civita connection, the connection 1-forms obey both Cartan's first structure equation and metric compatibility. With lower indices , the result isAll other lower-index forms vanish or follow from . Raising the first time index changes its sign: for example , whereas and .
For direct verification, , and the same holds for index two. For indices zero and three each term wedges or with itself, so it is zero. These forms are metric-compatible, and uniqueness follows from the Existence and uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection. The printed uniqueness statement implicitly includes metric compatibility: the torsion equation alone permits adding nonzero forms with , since their wedge with vanishes.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 312 1 a i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Using the normalization of the timelike unit normal, the spatial projection tensor satisfiesLikewise and . The spacetime form of the induced metric is thereforeIts restriction to the slice is the given three-metric. Metric compatibility of the four-dimensional Levi-Civita connection givesApply the three projectors defining the spatial covariant derivative. In the first summand , and in the second . Both summands vanish, soThis proves the metric compatibility of the spatial covariant derivative without treating the spatial projection tensor itself as covariantly constant.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ii Paper 1 36D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
Put . For the equatorial geodesic, the geodesic Lagrangian is , where dots denote derivatives with respect to the affine parameter. The cyclic coordinates give constants and . A third constant is the tangent norm , preserved by the geodesic equation and metric compatibility. For a timelike geodesic rescale the affine parameter to proper time so ; for a null geodesic .
Substitute , into the norm identity and multiply by . It gives the effective potential equationOutside the horizon , its derivative is . A nontrivial circular null geodesic requires , givingFor a circular timelike geodesic,At it , and its radius exceeds . If no finite circular timelike radius exists. Thus all finite circular null and timelike orbits in this five-dimensional exterior are radially unstable. The energy of a circular orbit is fixed by , not independently arbitrary.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 309 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Put , , and . Throughout this part use the Riemann curvature tensor convention printed in the paper. Varying gives the inverse-metric variation. The determinant identity gives the volume form variation. Together these areIn Lorentzian coordinates the latter reads .
For the connection, vary metric compatibility :Add the equations with derivatives , subtract that with derivative , and use symmetry of the lower indices of the Levi-Civita connection. This givesThe difference of two connections is a tensor, so this formula is covariant.
Varying the coordinate curvature formula yields the Palatini identityThe contractions of the connection variation areFinally, gives the metric variation of scalar curvature:The double divergence may equivalently be written : relabeling the contracted dummy indices and using symmetry of gives the same expression. The derivative terms are a covariant divergence, useful when varying a curvature-dependent action.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 118 4 b Solution 2026-10-03
In a unitary frame the metric matrix is . If is the connection one-form, metric compatibility gives , sothe matrix is Skew-Hermitian. In a holomorphic local frame, every frame vector is annihilated by , and compatibility with the holomorphic structure gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 118 4 c Solution 2026-10-03
In a holomorphic local frame , let and write . Holomorphic compatibility forces , while metric compatibility forces the local formula for the Chern connection on a vector bundleThis proves uniqueness. The formula transforms by the connection one-form law under a holomorphic frame change, so the local definitions glue and satisfy both conditions. This proves existence of the unique Chern connection.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 309 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
At each point, apply the indefinite-signature version of the Gram-Schmidt process to any local coframe, choosing one timelike and three spacelike one-forms. This produces an orthonormal coframe in spacetime satisfyingIt is unique only up to a local Lorentz transformation. The torsion-free connection 1-forms are then determined by Cartan's first structure equation and metric compatibility,Cartan's second structure equation gives the curvature 2-formsand contraction gives the Ricci tensor .
For the displayed metric, takeThen and . The nonzero connection forms are thereforewith . A second application of the structure equations givesEquivalently,so this is a constant sectional curvature spacetime with . In four dimensions,The Vacuum Einstein equations with a cosmological constant are , and henceThe metric is the contracting flat slicing of de Sitter spacetime with curvature radius one.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 1 38D iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
First differentiate the unit normalization . Metric compatibility givesThe timelike geodesic vector field equation gives the other contraction,For the spatial projector of a timelike congruence,and symmetry also gives . Thus
Splitting the deformation tensor of a timelike geodesic congruence into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and substituting the definitions givesMoreover, the orthogonality of implieswhile in four dimensionsIt follows thatHencewhich is the kinematic decomposition of a timelike geodesic congruence.
At an arbitrary point choose normal coordinates, so the Christoffel symbols vanish there. Torsion freedom and commutation of partial derivatives then give the algebraic first Bianchi identityDifferentiate the coordinate curvature expression and cyclically antisymmetrize. Third derivatives cancel, giving the second Bianchi identityBoth statements are tensorial and hence hold in every coordinate system. Contracting the differential identity, using the curvature symmetries and metric compatibility, yieldsthe contracted Bianchi identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 309 1 d i Solution 2026-09-28
Parallel propagation means , where . By metric compatibility,The inner products therefore retain their initial values , so the parallel-propagated orthonormal frame remains orthonormal.