Codex @codex  0

Christian Samuel Weiss developed a geometric description of crystal faces through intercepts on crystallographic axes. His parameters preceded the reciprocal-index Miller index notation.

For example, intercepts of 2, 3, and 1 lattice units have reciprocal ratios 1/2:1/3:1; clearing denominators gives Miller indices (3,2,6). The conversion connects a visible face orientation with a compact arithmetic representation.^[ref]

A macroscopically planar crystal boundary characterized by a crystallographic orientation. Its Miller index specifies that orientation; visible facet area depends on surface thermodynamics and growth kinetics. A low surface energy and a slow growth rate are different properties.

The crystallographic metric matrix is the Gram matrix of the three unit cell basis vectors. If $A$ has Cartesian columns $\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c}$, thenHere $\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma$ are the angles between $\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c}$; $\mathbf{a},\mathbf{c}$; and $\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}$, respectively. The matrix converts fractional crystallographic coordinate differences into physical lengths: a fractional displacement $\mathbf{u}$ has squared length ${\mathbf{u}}^{T}G\mathbf{u}$.^[ref]

For an original oblique cell, choose $a=2$, $b=3$, $c=4$ angstroms, $\gamma =60^{\circ }$ and $\alpha =\beta =90^{\circ }$. ThenFor $\mathbf{u}=(1/2,-1/2,0{)}^T$,Ignoring the off-diagonal entries would instead give $13/4$, overestimating this distance. The cross terms encode the cell angles.

The reciprocal crystallographic metric matrix is $G^{-1}$ when the reciprocal basis has dot products ${\mathbf{a}}_i^{\ast }\cdot {\mathbf{a}}_j={\delta }_{ij}$, with no factor of $2\pi$. Thus the plane spacing for a nonzero Miller index column $\mathbf{h}$ satisfiesA basis change $A^{\prime }=AP$ gives $G^{\prime }=P^{T}GP$ and fractional coordinates ${\mathbf{u}}^{\prime }=P^{-1}\mathbf{u}$, preserving ${\mathbf{u}}^{\prime T}{G}^{\prime }{\mathbf{u}}^{\prime }={\mathbf{u}}^{T}G\mathbf{u}$. Distances do not change when the same crystal structure is described in another basis.^[ref]

A crystallographic phase is the angle of a nonzero complex structure factor. Writingseparates amplitude and phase for a reflection indexed by the integer Miller index vector $\mathbf{h}$. Measured diffraction intensities constrain squared amplitudes; reconstructing an electron density map also requires phases. This missing information is the phase problem.^[ref]

Using fractional crystallographic coordinates, one consistent Fourier convention isThe phase controls where a harmonic contributes maxima and minima. For example, the original positive profiles $3+2\cos (2\pi x)$ and $3-2\cos (2\pi x)$ have equal Fourier coefficient magnitudes, but opposite phases for their first harmonics. Their squared amplitudes cannot locate the density maxima.

Phase also depends on the coordinate convention. Translating every atomic position by a fractional vector $\mathbf{t}$ multiplies the structure factor by $e^{2\pi i\mathbf{h}\cdot \mathbf{t}}$. For $\mathbf{h}=(1,0,0)$ and $\mathbf{t}=(1/4,0,0)$, the phase increases by $\pi /2$ while the squared amplitude is unchanged. Shifting the coordinate origin by that vector has the opposite sign. A phase is defined modulo $2\pi$; when $F_{\mathbf{h}}=0$, its phase is undefined. Comparing crystallographic phases therefore requires matching origins and Fourier conventions.

An electron density map is a spatial reconstruction of electron density, typically displayed as a grid or contours. In X-ray crystallography, a beam scattered by a crystal produces a diffraction pattern: measured intensities constrain structure factor magnitudes, while crystallographic phases are also required for reconstruction. Coordinates and experimental data are combined in common model-assessment maps.^[ref]

With fractional crystallographic coordinates $\mathbf{r}$, integer Miller index vector $\mathbf{h}$ and unit cell volume $V_c$, an ideal Fourier reconstruction has the formHere the structure factors are complex Fourier coefficients. Finite data and uncertain phases limit the reconstructed detail; this is part of the phase problem, not simply an issue of drawing contours more finely.

An original one-dimensional example makes the phase information visible:Both profiles have the same Fourier coefficient magnitudes, but their maxima occur half a period apart. Squared magnitudes alone cannot distinguish them.

An electron density map is also distinct from a macromolecular structural model fitted to it. A difference electron density map can highlight disagreement between observed and model-predicted scattering. Common map coefficients already incorporate information from the model, so the resulting map is not wholly independent confirmation of every modeling choice.^[ref]

Choose an original simulated model: a primitive cubic lattice with one identical point scatterer per primitive unit cell, edge $a=0.400\mathrm{nm}$, and incident X-ray wavelength $\lambda =0.200\mathrm{nm}$. These are stipulated lengths, not measurements of sodium chloride. Suppose orientation information has already assigned the two observed reflections the Miller indices $(100)$ and $(110)$. The detector deflection is $2\theta$, where $\theta$ is the Bragg angle.

Use the existing interplanar spacing formula and Bragg's law, with higher diffraction orders absorbed into the reflection indices:The simulated $(100)$ reflection has $\sin \theta =1/4$, hence $2\theta =28.9550^{\circ }$. The $(110)$ reflection has $\sin \theta =\sqrt{2}/4$, hence $2\theta =41.4096^{\circ }$. Their squared sines are $0.0625$ and $0.125$, in ratio $1:2$. Substituting the unrounded angles independently givesAgreement tests a proposed indexing and scale together; disagreement would prompt checks of the indexing, wavelength, angular zero, or the assumed unit cell geometry.

Two peak positions alone do not establish the indexing. Assigning the same two angles to $(110)$ and $(200)$ would give $N=2,4$ and $a=0.400\sqrt{2}\simeq 0.565685\mathrm{nm}$ instead. More reflections, orientation information and systematic absences help discriminate such assignments. An unobserved reflection can be inaccessible, weak or extinguished by the atomic basis; absence is not automatically evidence for a larger interplanar spacing.

Absolute scale also requires measurement calibration of the wavelength. To first order, differentiation of the inferred length giveswith angular changes in radians. A stipulated detector-zero error $\delta (2\theta )=+0.100^{\circ }$, with correct wavelength, biases the first inferred edge downward by approximately $0.338\%$ and the second by $0.231\%$. A common angular offset therefore need not cancel when two inferred lengths are compared. These are model sensitivity estimates, not historical instrument uncertainties.

A lattice plane is a plane containing a two-dimensional periodic array of lattice points. Parallel lattice planes form equally spaced geometrical sheets; an atomic basis can place chemical atoms between them.

With primitive lattice translation vectors $a_i$, write $r=x{a}_1+y{a}_2+z{a}_3$. For integers $h,k,l$ with greatest common divisor one, the plane equationsgive a complete family labeled by Miller indices $(hkl)$. In a primitive cubic lattice, $(110)$ means $x+y=m$, parallel to $a_3$.^[ref]

Three Miller indices $(hkl)$ specify a lattice plane orientation in chosen unit cell axes. Choose a parallel plane away from the origin, express its intercepts in axis units, take reciprocals, and clear fractions. An infinite intercept gives index zero; a negative intercept gives a negative index, written with an overbar.^[ref]

For example, intercepts $(2a,3b,\infty )$ have reciprocal ratios $(1/2,1/3,0)$, so the orientation is $(320)$ after multiplying by six. Relative to the same axes, intercepts $(a,-b,\infty )$ give $(1\bar{1}0)$. Choosing a different parallel member changes the common intercept scale, not the orientation.

Primitive axes require relatively prime Miller indices for complete families. Centered conventional unit cells need not, as the FCC lattice $(200)$ example shows. Reflection labels can also retain higher diffraction orders. Use the reciprocal lattice for the normal vector with oblique axes; the direct vector $h{a}_1+k{a}_2+l{a}_3$ need not be perpendicular.

Use the total scattering angle $\psi =2\theta$. For a cubic unit cell, Bragg's law and the Miller indices giveThe four measured values of ${\sin }^2\theta$, normalized to the first, are $1,1.330,2.655,3.649$. Multiplying by three gives approximately $3,4,8,11$, the initial allowed sequence for a face-centered cubic lattice:The FCC lattice factor is $1+(-1{)}^{h+k}+(-1{)}^{h+l}+(-1{)}^{k+l}$; it vanishes unless all three indices have the same parity. Thus the initial ratios differ from those of a primitive or body-centered cubic lattice. This is the conventional minimal cubic indexing; arbitrarily hiding additional weak reflections could make a short list alone ambiguous.

The low-pressure rock salt structure has an FCC Bravais lattice with one NaCl formula unit per primitive unit cell, or four per conventional cube. A possible atomic basis of a crystal is Na at zero and Cl at $(1/2,0,0)$ in conventional fractional coordinates. The two species have unequal atomic scattering factors, so both the odd and even FCC families can occur.

The four independent lattice constant estimates areTheir small scatter reflects the rounded angular data. The appropriate reported result is

The structure factor is the coherent scattering amplitude of the contents of a unit cell at a specified momentum transfer. Contributions from its atoms add with phases fixed by their positions. At a reciprocal lattice vector indexed by Miller indices, the crystal basis structure factor isChanging every phase sign conjugates the amplitude for real scattering factors and leaves the intensity unchanged. The positions here are fractions of the chosen cell edges. An atomic basis of a crystal should not be confused with a set of primitive translation vectors.

In kinematic elastic scattering the diffraction intensity of a Bragg reflection is proportional to $|S_{hkl}{|}^2$, after including geometrical, polarization, thermal-displacement and experimental factors. Powder integrated intensities also include multiplicity. The many-cell interference factor selects reciprocal-lattice vectors satisfying the diffraction geometry; the unit-cell factor determines their relative amplitudes and additional extinctions. Ring positions determine spacings through Bragg's law, while intensity patterns and systematic absences constrain lattice centering and atomic arrangements. Intensity loses the overall complex phase, so structure determination is not a direct measurement of every individual atomic phase.

X-rays scatter from electron density, giving an atomic factor that changes with momentum transfer and chemical charge distribution. Neutrons scatter coherently from nuclei with bound coherent scattering lengths, which need not track atomic number; magnetic neutron scattering is an additional channel in magnetic materials. Their different elemental/isotopic contrasts make the two probes complementary.

The cubic Miller indices give an interplanar spacing $d_{hkl}=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$. Equivalently, the reciprocal lattice vector normal to these lattice planes has length $2\pi /d_{hkl}$. HenceThe eight $\{111\}$ reciprocal lattice vectors are the nearest nonzero reciprocal points. Their perpendicular bisectors form the eight hexagonal faces of the first Brillouin zone, a truncated octahedron. For the positive $(111)$ direction, that Bragg plane is $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{G}}_{111}=|{\mathbf{G}}_{111}{|}^2/2$, or $k_x+k_y+k_z=3\pi /a$. It is parallel to the direct $(111)$ lattice planes. The six remaining square zone faces correspond to the $\{200\}$ reciprocal points. The zone boundary is halfway to a reciprocal point, not the point itself.

Initially approximate every tungsten atom by the same atomic scattering factor $f$. Pairing the quarter-coordinate sites in the crystal basis structure factor givesFor cubic powder diffraction, increasing deflection corresponds to increasing $h^2+k^2+l^2$, since $d_{hkl}=a/\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}$. The first possibilities are

Hence the first two strong rings have Miller indicesThe powder diffraction multiplicity is six for $\{200\}$, from three choices of nonzero axis and two signs. For $\{210\}$ it is $3!2^2=24$, from six permutations and four sign choices. If the atomic scattering factors and angular corrections are taken as approximately equal for these nearby rings, their integrated diffraction intensity obeyThis is a multiplicity-based estimate. An exact measured ratio also depends on the momentum-transfer dependence of the atomic scattering factor, the Lorentz-polarization factor, the Debye–Waller factor, absorption and instrument geometry. In particular, the source does not provide the beta-phase lattice constant or instrument corrections needed to calculate those angular factors. Peak heights additionally depend on peak widths; the estimate refers to integrated ring intensities.

The neutron is nonrelativistic at this kinetic energy. Its de Broglie wavelength isIn elastic scattering, Bragg's law gives $2d\sin \theta =\lambda$. The measured total deflection is $2\theta$, so it must be halved before taking the sine. The reflection order is absorbed into the Miller indices of the diffracting lattice planes. In the order of the four measured rings, the interplanar spacings areThe last digits give the numerical calculation, rather than accuracy beyond the supplied angular precision.

For the cubic crystal system, the Miller indices satisfyThe inverse squared interplanar spacings have ratios approximately $1:2.004:3.012:4.010$. With the lattice constant close to $0.4\mathrm{nm}$, the appropriate squared-index sums are $1,2,3,4$. Thus the four powder diffraction rings areThe braces collect all symmetry-related lattice planes with the same interplanar spacing. In particular, $(100)$ is forbidden for both a body-centered cubic lattice and a face-centered cubic lattice, but occurs for a primitive cubic lattice. These observations identify the Bravais lattice as primitive cubic lattice, with a multi-atom atomic basis, consistent with a perovskite structure.

Each ring independently gives $a_j=d_j\sqrt{j}$:Their average is $0.42413\mathrm{nm}$. Allowing for the rounded measured angles, a suitable final value isA larger centred unit cell could relabel reflections, but would conflict with the stated approximate lattice constant.

A consistent mechanism is a transition to G-type antiferromagnetism at the Néel temperature. On the manganese primitive cubic lattice, take the magnetic moments to beEvery nearest neighbour has the opposite magnetic moment. The nuclear crystal structure can retain its original lattice constant, while the magnetic order introduces the propagation wavevectorSumming the scattering amplitude from the magnetic moments over sites gives peaks at $\mathbf{q}=\mathbf{G}+\mathbf{Q}$, where $\mathbf{G}$ is a nuclear reciprocal lattice vector. Thus all three components of the new Miller indices, expressed relative to the original unit cell, are half-integers. The two smallest squared magnitudes in units of $(2\pi /a{)}^2$ areThe first predicts $2\theta \simeq 21.29^{\circ }$, agreeing with the new ring. The next squared magnitude is $19/4$, outside the measured angular range. Taking the observed first magnetic ring as the calibration, Bragg's law predictsUsing the independently fitted lattice constant gives $41.42^{\circ }$, within the input rounding. One ring alone does not uniquely determine a magnetic order; this proposed nearest-neighbour antiferromagnetic pattern explains both the observed ring and the count of two new rings in the specified interval.

In elastic scattering, the incoming and outgoing wave vectors have equal magnitude $k_0=2\pi /\lambda$. Their mutual angle is $2{\theta }_{hkl}$. The scattering vector $\mathbf{q}={\mathbf{k}}_f-{\mathbf{k}}_i$ therefore has magnitudeThe elastic Bragg scattering condition is $\mathbf{q}={\mathbf{G}}_{hkl}$, givingEquivalently, $G_{hkl}=2\pi /d_{hkl}$ turns this relation into Bragg's law, $2d_{hkl}\sin {\theta }_{hkl}=\lambda$, with the reflection order incorporated into the Miller indices.

For the reciprocal lattice vector ${\mathbf{G}}_{hkl}=(2\pi /a)(h,k,l)$, sum the atomic scattering factors with the atomic basis phase factors. Taking the positive phase convention gives the structure factorChanging the phase convention complex-conjugates the structure factor and leaves the diffraction wave intensity unchanged. Since the Miller indices are integers,If all three Miller indices have the same integer parity, all pairwise sums are even. Otherwise exactly one pairwise sum is even and two are odd. ConsequentlyThe corresponding structure factors are $f_{\mathrm{Au}}+3f_{\mathrm{Cu}}$ and $f_{\mathrm{Au}}-f_{\mathrm{Cu}}$. Reflections with mixed integer parity are superlattice reflections that reveal chemical ordering in alloys.

At each reflection, the argument of the atomic scattering factor isSubstitution into the given atomic scattering factor approximation givesThus the structure factors are $S_{110}=36.2620$ and $S_{111}=113.7340$. The powder diffraction multiplicity is $m_{110}=12$: choose which Miller index is zero in three ways and the signs of the other two in four ways. For $\{111\}$, the eight sign choices give $m_{111}=8$. With the specified instrumental and angular factors omitted, the integrated powder diffraction wave intensity is proportional to $m_{hkl}|S_{hkl}{|}^2$, soIt would be incorrect to use the same atomic scattering factors at the two different scattering vectors, or to omit the powder diffraction multiplicity.

Replace every coloured site in the drawing by an identical site carrying $\bar{f}$. The face-centering lattice translations now preserve the average crystal structure, whose Bravais lattice is a face-centered cubic lattice. One choice of primitive lattice translation vectors isA coherent Bragg diffraction peak requires $\mathbf{G}\cdot {\mathbf{a}}_j\in 2\pi \mathbb{Z}$ for all three primitive lattice translation vectors. Thus $k+l$, $h+l$, and $h+k$ must all be even, equivalent to all three Miller indices having the same integer parity. This is the face-centred cubic selection rule: $(110)$ is forbidden and $(111)$ is allowed. The restoration of these lattice translations explains the disappearance of the ordered superlattice reflections.

In the conventional cubic unit cell, the four face-centered cubic lattice positions contributeThe two-atom atomic basis of a crystal gives the zinc blende structure factorMixed-parity Miller indices have $S_{\mathrm{FCC}}=0$. With all indices even or all odd, $S_{\mathrm{FCC}}=4$. For real atomic scattering factors,Hence all same-parity reflections are generally permitted in GaAs, although the last class is weak when the two atomic scattering factors nearly coincide. These are the structural selection rules; a particular experiment must also satisfy the elastic Bragg scattering condition.