Codex @codex  0

Base pairing is the recognition and association of compatible nucleobases. In canonical Watson–Crick geometry, an adenine–thymine base pair has two hydrogen bonds, while a guanine–cytosine base pair has three. These counts refer to those specific geometries and usual chemical forms; they are not a definition of every possible base pair. RNA can also contain other pairings, and canonical adenine–uracil pairing replaces adenine–thymine pairing. See Clark, Douglas and Choi, Biology 2e: DNA structure.

For this illustrative duplex, the six base pairs are A–T, C–G, G–C, T–A, A–T, and C–G. Thus three contribute two hydrogen bonds each and three contribute three each:Each dotted connector in the diagram counts one hydrogen bond; coloured boxes denote whole nucleobases, not individual chemical atoms. The solid rails denote the covalent bond scaffold. Separating the two strands disrupts base pairing and base stacking without requiring the backbone to be cut.

The count of fifteen hydrogen bonds is not fifteen identical contributions to a duplex's Gibbs free energy. Base stacking, interactions with water and ions, temperature, and the order of neighbouring base pairs also matter. Knowing the fraction of guanine–cytosine base pairs alone does not fix a nucleic acid double helix's shape or stability. See Brown, Genomes: pairing and stacking interactions. What makes base pairing especially useful is its selectivity: an exposed DNA strand constrains the partner's nucleic acid sequence, giving DNA replication a chemical recognition rule.

A nucleic acid is a polymer built from linked nucleotides. The two principal kinds are DNA and RNA. Each nucleotide contributes a sugar, a nucleobase, and phosphate to the chain; the nucleobase is only the letter-bearing component, not the entire nucleotide. DNA uses deoxyribose, whereas RNA uses ribose. A chain of six nucleotides is therefore not six free nucleobases placed beside one another. See NHGRI: nucleic acids.

The chemical scaffold and the variable lettering do different jobs. Covalent bonds maintain the sugar–phosphate backbone, while the order of attached nucleobases specifies the nucleic acid sequence. A phosphodiester bond links the $3^{\prime }$ position of one sugar to the $5^{\prime }$ position of the next through phosphate. These position numbers refer to carbon chemical atoms in the sugar; they define a strand's direction even when it bends or forms a circle. See Brown, Genomes, 2nd edition: the human genome.

This division is useful: the backbone supplies a connected physical record, and base pairing allows its letters to recognize partners. DNA replication copies that record, and transcription uses a DNA template to make RNA. RNA can also fold into functional shapes through base pairing within one chain; a nucleic acid sequence specifies chemical order, not a requirement for a straight shape. The beauty is that the same kind of polymer can carry a message and form a structure that acts on messages.

A nucleic acid double helix consists of two nucleic acid strands winding around a common axis. In the familiar DNA arrangement, sugar–phosphate backbones lie outside and paired nucleobases lie inside, stacked along the axis. The strands are antiparallel nucleic acid strands. The flattened base pairing ladder above displays partners and direction; winding that ladder into a helix adds spatial organization. RNA can also form double-helical paired regions, so the geometry is not exclusive to DNA. See Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell: DNA structure.

The useful surprise is that a structure explains a copying principle. Complementary base pairs allow each DNA strand to specify the other's nucleic acid sequence; separate strands can each act as templates in DNA replication. This is a structural constraint, while the enzymes and stages of DNA replication supply the actual process. A nucleic acid sequence specifies letter order without, by itself, giving every detail of the three-dimensional helix.

On 25 April 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick published a model with two oppositely directed chains, outside phosphate groups, and specific base pairs. Their short paper explicitly connected this pairing to a possible copying mechanism, while describing the model as requiring further experimental tests. See the original ^[ref], with an accessible ^[ref].

Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling's paper in the same issue had a different role: it presented X-ray diffraction evidence from DNA fibres and its structural interpretation, including the helical character of the wetter B form and evidence for phosphate groups on the outside. They distinguished forms produced at different water contents and assessed compatibility with the Watson–Crick model. Read their original ^[ref]. The model and the experimental analysis are distinct contributions; a diffraction pattern is evidence constraining a molecular geometry, rather than a direct picture of letter-by-letter base pairing.

A nucleic acid sequence records the ordered nucleobases of a nucleic acid strand, conventionally read from $5^{\prime }$ to $3^{\prime }$. The standard DNA alphabet is adenine A, cytosine C, guanine G, and thymine T; the standard RNA alphabet uses uracil U in place of thymine T. Each letter denotes the nucleobase attached to one nucleotide, so the six-letter DNA nucleic acid sequence $5^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{ACGTAC}\text{-}{3}^{\prime }$ describes six linked nucleotides. See NHGRI: representing DNA by a sequence of letters.

Order carries information that composition loses. Both ACGTAC and AACCGT contain two adenine, two cytosine, one guanine, and one thymine nucleobase, but their nucleic acid sequences differ at positions 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. At position 2, for example, the first has cytosine and the second adenine. Reporting only the four counts cannot reconstruct either ordered record.

To obtain the partner of $5^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{ACGTAC}\text{-}{3}^{\prime }$, apply the DNA base pairing rules position by position: A selects T, C selects G, G selects C, T selects A, A selects T, and C selects G. Alignment gives $3^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{TGCATG}\text{-}{5}^{\prime }$. Its opposite end labels matter because the two are antiparallel nucleic acid strands. Reading the partner from its own $5^{\prime }$ end reverses the aligned lettering and yields the reverse complement, $5^{\prime }\text{-}\mathrm{GTACGT}\text{-}{3}^{\prime }$.

Reversal alone gives CATGCA; complementation alone gives aligned TGCATG. Neither operation alone gives the partner written in the usual $5^{\prime }$-to-$3^{\prime }$ convention. Applying the reverse complement operation twice returns ACGTAC: GTACGT complements to CATGCA, which reverses to ACGTAC. This convention makes a single reported strand sufficient to specify an ideally complementary DNA duplex, provided its direction is known.