Past exam of the atomic and Optical Physics course of the University of Cambridge / 2013 / Paper 1 / 3

The Lamb shift is a radiative displacement of atomic energy levels beyond the values from the Dirac equation in a Coulomb potential. In hydrogen, the $2S_{1/2}$ and $2P_{1/2}$ levels are degenerate for a point Coulomb potential in the Dirac equation, yet the $2S_{1/2}$ level lies higher by roughly a gigahertz. This is distinct from the fine structure splitting between different $J$ levels and from nuclear-spin hyperfine structure.

Electron self-energy in the quantized electromagnetic field is the dominant contribution to the familiar hydrogen splitting; vacuum polarization contributes too. Renormalization separates the physical electron mass from its divergent free-electron self-energy. A useful leading-log scale for a hydrogenic $nS$ level isnot an exact numerical formula. The enhanced sensitivity of S states follows from their nonzero wavefunction at the nucleus; leading short-distance corrections act like contact perturbations. A precision prediction also includes finite nuclear size and recoil, and must consistently separate those effects from the radiative contribution.^[ref]

The original Lamb-Retherford experiment used a beam of hydrogen atoms, electron-impact excitation into metastable $2S$, and microwave-induced transfer into short-lived $2P$ states. Those atoms decayed before reaching the detector. Metastable atoms surviving to a metal target ejected electrons, so a drop in the measured current signalled a resonance. Varying the microwave excitation and magnetic field established the displacement from the Dirac equation expectation. Microwave quenching converted a small energy difference into a measurable loss of a long-lived population, avoiding optical Doppler widths that obscure the splitting.^[ref]

A Paul trap uses a time-dependent electric quadrupole field to provide dynamic confinement, avoiding the impossibility of trapping a charge in a stable three-dimensional static electrostatic minimum. Its dynamics follows a Mathieu equation: stable drive parameters produce slow Paul trap secular motion with superposed fast Paul trap micromotion. If ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{rf}}$ denotes the peak oscillating field, the effective energy for small Paul trap micromotion isThe radiofrequency pseudopotential of a Paul trap is an averaged mechanical energy, not a static electrostatic potential. Doppler cooling and, where needed, resolved sideband cooling reduce Paul trap secular motion; the Lamb-Dicke regime suppresses higher motional sidebands.^[ref]

Two long-lived internal states encode a qubit, for example hyperfine states, while an optical metastable transition provides another option. Optical pumping initializes it. Resonant or Raman transition pulses make coherent single-qubit rotations, and state-dependent fluorescence distinguishes a bright state from a dark shelved state. Shared quantized normal modes let one ion's internal state influence another, providing entangling gates in the proposal of J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller; the motional bus must be returned to its intended state rather than left carrying unwanted information.^[ref]

A concrete early experiment demonstrated a controlled-NOT gate between the internal hyperfine and motional degrees of freedom of a single trapped ion. This was an internal–motion two-qubit gate, not yet a gate between two separate ions.^[ref]

Challenges include electric-field-noise heating of the motional bus, excess Paul trap micromotion from stray fields, magnetic and laser phase noise, off-resonant spontaneous scattering, imperfect preparation and readout, and unwanted excitation of spectator modes. Scaling to many ions adds mode crowding, individual-addressing crosstalk and transport requirements. Cooling and quantum error correction must remove entropy without erasing stored qubits. Long storage coherence is necessary but not sufficient: gates and measurements must also be accurate and reproducible. The original gate experiment explicitly identified laser, field, trap-drive and motional decoherence limitations.^[ref]

For a nucleus of spin $I>0$ and electronic $J=1/2$, the magnetic-dipole hyperfine interaction is $A\mathbf{I}\cdot \mathbf{J}$, using dimensionless angular-momentum operators. The electric-quadrupole hyperfine contribution vanishes for $J=1/2$. In zero field, $F=I\pm 1/2$ labels the levels:Their signed separation is $\Delta =A(I+1/2)$. For $A>0$, the larger-$F$ multiplet lies higher; negative $A$ reverses this order. If $I=0$ there is no such hyperfine splitting.

Let the field define $z$ and writeHere $g_I$ is the signed nuclear Zeeman coefficient expressed in Bohr-magneton units, including its nuclear-to-Bohr-magneton factor; it is not an unconverted nuclear $g$ factor. Total projection $m=m_I+m_J$ is conserved, while $F$ need not be. In the basis $|m-1/2,+1/2⟩$, $|m+1/2,-1/2⟩$, the two-state block isFor $A>0$, define $x=(g_J-g_I){\mu }_{B}B/\Delta$. Diagonalization gives the Breit-Rabi formula,For either sign of $A$, the block itself remains valid; its ordered eigenvalues are $-A/4+g_I{\mu }_{B}Bm\pm \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{{\Delta }^2+2Am(g_J-g_I){\mu }_{B}B+(g_J-g_I{)}^2{\mu }_B^2{B}^2}$.

For a stretched hyperfine Zeeman state at projection $m=\pm (I+1/2)$ there is only one state each. Their energies are exactlyAssigning two branches to each stretched projection would double-count states.

In weak fields the shift is $g_F{\mu }_{B}mB$, with $g_F=g_I\pm (g_J-g_I)/(2I+1)$ for $F=I\pm 1/2>0$; an $F=0$ state has no first-order Zeeman shift. At strong hyperfine-decoupling fields the eigenstates approach product states withThis is the hyperfine regime of the Paschen-Back effect, still assuming the field is weak enough not to invalidate the electronic $J=1/2$ manifold. States of the same $m$ mix and avoid crossing when their off-diagonal coupling is nonzero; different-$m$ levels can cross.