2016 paper: Public original PDF, physical page 779. Student-answer availability for this paper remains unverified.
Original source: Released original, physical PDF pages 779–782. All three questions and every essay option are covered.
Take the field along and write , with Bohr magneton . The printed Hamiltonian uses dimensionless angular-momentum operators, with eigenvalues and ; physical angular momenta carry an additional . Thus and are energies. Assume the usual positive spin-orbit interaction coefficient . Reversing its sign reverses the zero-field ordering but not the state count.
An electron has . addition of angular momentum givesThe coupled angular-momentum state count can be checked directly. The product basis contains states. The coupled basis containsCoupling therefore reorganizes the states rather than creating or losing them. There is no hyperfine multiplicity because .
Use to obtainThe two spin-orbit interaction energies are and . In a weak field, project the Zeeman effect onto a fixed multiplet:This is the first-order energy formula, not a statement that has no matrix elements between different values. For a common and a conventional choice of relative phase, its complete coupled-basis block isThe inter-multiplet Zeeman coupling terms give second-order weak-field corrections because the two spin-orbit interaction multiplets are already separated.
In the strong-field basis the Zeeman part is diagonal, . WriteIts diagonal matrix elements are . Its off-diagonal matrix elements connect to with coefficientand the reverse spin change has replaced by in the corresponding ladder coefficient. These terms preserve but mix the two product states. To first order in , the energy correction is simply .
For the P state, . Measured relative to its gross-structure centroid, the six low-field levels areThus the upper quartet starts at with slopes in a plot against ; the lower doublet starts at with slopes . Their zero-field separation is .
At high field all six product-state energies, retaining the term linear in , areThe two zero-slope levels have different and no mutual matrix element, so their first-order degeneracy does not require an additional degenerate perturbation. At finite field they split at order .
An exact interpolation makes the requested whole-field sketch unambiguous. The stretched levels areFor , use product states and . Their Hamiltonian block issoThese energies reduce to the quartet and doublet at zero field and to the six strong-field expressions above. Within a fixed , the nonzero off-diagonal element prevents a crossing of the two branches. Levels in different sectors can cross without hybridizing. For the S state, and the spin-orbit interaction term vanishes, leavingthroughout this Hamiltonian's range of validity.
For electric dipole transitions at low field, and apply, with the usual exclusion of . Each P state has opposite parity to the S state. The transition has four allowed sublevel pairs. For , the two stretched upper states each have one destination and the other two each have two, giving six. Hence there are 10 allowed state-to-state channels at weak nonzero field. Relative to the two zero-field transition energies, their Zeeman shifts are
In the decoupled high-field limit, an electric dipole acts on orbital coordinates, so . Each of the six P product states connects to the S state with the same spin and . Thus there are 6 allowed channels in the limiting product-state description. Their photon energies areThis Paschen-Back transition-channel count is not the count of distinct frequencies: to first order in the two channels coincide, giving 5 distinct frequencies, with shifts . If the residual spin-orbit interaction splitting is unresolved there are the three usual orbital Zeeman groups.
The apparent loss of four channels is a change in eigenstate mixing, not a change in Hilbert-space dimension. At finite large field, four weak spin-forbidden Paschen-Back lines arise from small opposite-spin admixtures, with intensities vanishing as . A generic finite-field calculation therefore retains ten nonzero channels; six carry finite strength in the complete-decoupling limit. Observation direction and polarization select which of these channels a detector actually receives.
evaporative cooling removes atoms selectively from the high-energy tail of a trapped gas. The remaining sample has less energy per atom; elastic collisions then redistribute energy and restore a thermal distribution at lower temperature. Random atom loss would generally remove average energy and would not provide the same cooling mechanism. Repeated energy selection and rethermalization, rather than one removal event, is the essential cycle.
Using the evaporation truncation parameter , let the escape threshold be . As the gas cools, a fixed threshold is populated by fewer atoms, so evaporation stalls. In forced evaporative cooling the threshold is lowered during the sequence. In a magnetic trap, a radiofrequency evaporation knife flips trapped weak-field-seeking atoms into untrapped spin states where the Zeeman splitting matches the photon energy. Energetic atoms reach that resonance surface; sweeping the radiofrequency lowers the energy knife. In an optical dipole trap, lowering the trap depth offers a different implementation, although it usually also weakens confinement.
A simple evaporative cooling energy balance shows when atom loss is useful. For a classical gas in a three-dimensional harmonic trap of fixed frequencies, equipartition gives , counting both kinetic and potential energy. Suppose escaping atoms remove average energy , with a distribution-dependent excess above the threshold. For ,Thus preferential removal cools when the removed energy exceeds . More stringently, cooling must raise the phase-space density of an atomic gas, not merely lower the temperature:For this harmonic-trap phase-space density, with fixed geometric-mean trap frequency , . Therefore phase-space density rises during atom loss if . The numerical factors here belong to the stated harmonic-trap model, not every evaporative apparatus.
There must be enough elastic collisions to repopulate the tail: should exceed damaging loss and heating rates, and the ramp should allow rethermalization. Increasing density can improve elastic collisions but also enhances inelastic and three-body losses. Very rapid removal can leave a nonequilibrium cloud; very slow removal exposes it to background-gas losses. Lowering an optical trap can reduce density and collision rate, so a falling temperature is not by itself evidence of efficient evaporation.
The dilute-gas condensation experiments made this tradeoff concrete. Eric A. Cornell and Carl Wieman's account explains how selective escape and contraction of a trapped cloud raise phase-space density, while the need for rapid two-body equilibration and slow three-body loss restricts usable density. It also describes expansion imaging as an experimental diagnostic.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute gas, the first 70 years and some recent experiments by Eric A. Cornell and Carl Wieman. pp. 876–878, equilibration, selective escape and imaging of expanded clouds
Useful controls compare different knife ramps and hold times, measure both atom number and expansion temperature, and check trap-frequency calibration. Pure adiabatic expansion can cool without increasing phase-space density. Successful evaporation pays an atom-number cost to increase the remaining gas's phase-space occupancy.For an ideal weakly driven two-level atom, opposing red-detuned beams give velocity-dependent absorption and a friction force near zero velocity. Random photon recoils also cause momentum diffusion. Their balance gives the minimum Doppler temperatureat detuning in the low-saturation model, where is the spontaneous population-decay rate, equivalently the natural full linewidth expressed as an angular frequency. This limit assumes the atom has no useful ground-state internal structure.
Real atoms possess magnetic sublevels. In a suitable multilevel transition, position-dependent polarization gives different optical couplings and different AC Stark energy shifts for those sublevels. Counterpropagating beams with orthogonal linear polarizations have nearly uniform total intensity but a periodically varying polarization. Thus spatially varying light shifts can exist even without an intensity standing wave.
In Sisyphus cooling, an atom on one ground-state branch climbs a light-shift hill and loses kinetic energy. Near the upper part of the hill, optical pumping tends to transfer population to a lower branch. spontaneous emission makes this transfer dissipative and randomizes the emitted photon direction. The atom can then climb another hill. Finite pumping time is essential: instantaneous local equilibration would remove the delayed internal-state response that produces friction. The original multilevel analysis relates these optical-pumping cycles to the spatially displaced light shifts.[ref]
For large detuning compared with the natural linewidth, useful scales areup to angular-coupling and Rabi-frequency convention factors. Here is the optical Rabi angular frequency. The slow-atom capture range is of order . Typical energies in the Sisyphus regime track the light-shift scale rather than only , so reducing intensity can lower temperature below the Doppler limit. Capture becomes narrower, however, and recoil heating, imperfect polarization, magnetic fields and scattered light eventually matter. Define recoil energy ; this is an important scale, not a claim that every sub-Doppler method has the same universal final temperature.[ref]
Manipulating Atoms with Photons by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji. §2, Sub-Doppler cooling; §2.1, Sisyphus effect
The experimental test must establish a narrow velocity distribution independently of fluorescence brightness. William D. Phillips's account describes moving a time-of-flight probe above and below the cloud, deliberately heating the atoms to check a previously absent signal, and release-and-recapture comparisons that included gravity and finite beam geometry. These tests separated very cold atoms from an insensitive detector or a faulty thermometer.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms by William D. Phillips. pp. 731–732, Figs. 15–16; pp. 733–734, multilevel interpretation
In a modern implementation, field cancellation and polarization checks test the mechanism, while independent expansion thermometry checks the inferred temperature. sub-Doppler cooling exploits internal-state dynamics omitted from the two-level Doppler model; it does not contradict that model within its assumptions.A two-photon transition transfers population through two interactions with the electric-dipole operator. For absorption of two photons,The intermediate atomic states enter a second-order amplitude rather than necessarily being populated. Suppressing field-normalization factors, its structure isBoth time orderings contribute coherently. Close to a real intermediate resonance, linewidths and intermediate-state population must be treated explicitly; an off-resonant virtual-state approximation then ceases to be adequate. Well away from saturation the absorption rate scales as , or as for a single applied frequency.
Each electric-dipole interaction reverses parity, so two such interactions connect states of the same parity. The product operator contains angular tensor ranks , subject to triangle and polarization selection rules. Under the degenerate two-photon selection rule, identical equal-frequency photons have no antisymmetric rank-one contribution cancels; ranks zero and two remain. This permits a transition and excludes in that degenerate E1-E1 case. It does not universally forbid every transition, because a rank-two tensor can also connect some such pairs. For a single orbital electron, the corresponding orbital changes are , with spin unchanged in the nonrelativistic electric-dipole approximation.
In Doppler-free two-photon absorption, counterpropagating equal-frequency photons give first-order Doppler cancellation when one photon is absorbed from each beam:The laser frequency is half the transition frequency. Same-beam two-photon events can still produce a broader Doppler-shifted background; residual beam-angle errors, unequal frequencies, AC Stark shifts and finite transit time limit precision. Thus a narrow two-photon resonance requires control of beam geometry and intensity, not just high laser power.
A stimulated Raman transition is the absorption-emission version: the atom absorbs from one beam and emits into the other, transferring between two long-lived states through an off-resonant upper state. It instead obeysCounterpropagation now enhances momentum transfer rather than cancelling it. With single-photon Hamiltonian matrix elements and a common large angular detuning , eliminating the excited state givesThe two-photon detuning must include differential AC Stark and recoil shifts. Large detuning suppresses spontaneous scattering but also reduces coherent coupling at fixed optical power.
The coherent Raman route is useful for atomic beam splitters and mirrors. Mark Kasevich and Steven Chu demonstrated a laser-cooled sodium matter-wave interferometer using stimulated Raman transitions; its controlled internal-state changes accompanied separated external wave packets.[ref]
Atomic interferometry using stimulated Raman transitions by Mark Kasevich and Steven Chu. Physical Review Letters 67, pp. 181–184 (1991), abstract and interferometer principle
Testing this interpretation requires scanning the two-photon detuning, controlling relative laser phase and checking output populations against pulse timing. A two-photon process is defined by its coherent two-interaction pathway; absorption-absorption and absorption-emission have different resonance and recoil conditions.Write , , and take . The Bogoliubov spectrum is gapless and positive for . Its small- and large-momentum limits areThe low-energy excitations are collective sound modes; high-energy excitations approach particles with a mean-field energy offset. With healing length and ,The crossover occurs at of order one, not at an additional energy gap.
The critical velocity of a homogeneous condensate follows because the Landau criterion compares an excitation energy with the energy that flow can release by transferring its momentum. Creating a mode is energetically possible when . For this isotropic spectrum,The infimum is the long-wavelength speed of sound. This tests energetic stability against the stated excitations; it is not a calculation of a dissipation rate or a universal vortex-nucleation threshold.
For an external potential varying slowly on the healing scale, the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate neglects density-gradient kinetic energy in the stationary Gross–Pitaevskii equation. In occupied regions it givesHere is the appropriate local number density; in the ring it is a linear density and is the one-dimensional coupling. This is the local-density sound speed of a condensate. The formula applies where , not in an empty region where its square root would be imaginary.
Normalize the condensate order parameter to the atom number:up to an arbitrary constant phase. A wavefunction normalized to one instead has amplitude , with then providing density. Acting with gives angular momentum per atom and in total for the uniform ring. The superfluid velocity isThe interaction chemical potential is ; a flowing uniform state also has the constant kinetic contribution to its total chemical potential. Its speed of sound is set by the interaction term. Applying givesFor a uniform ring condensate, this is the continuum phonon criterion used here. Quantization of the available excitation wavelengths in a very small ring can modify a finite-size threshold.
For the nonrotating equilibrium with a raised left half, let and be the bulk linear densities. Within the same Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate,When both halves are occupied, normalization fixesand thereforeThese expressions require . Beyond that threshold, extending them would give a negative left density and is unphysical. Instead the left bulk empties, all atoms occupy a segment of length , andAt equality the left bulk just reaches zero density. kinetic energy rounds the interface and produces tails beyond the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate, so an exactly empty half is the idealized bulk result.
A nonconstant breaks rotational symmetry:Consequently angular momentum is no longer a good quantum number, and an eigenfunction need not be times a constant amplitude. Nevertheless, while the order parameter is nonzero around the whole ring, single-valuedness requiresThe integer is a phase winding of a condensate, not an assertion that the inhomogeneous state remains an angular-momentum eigenstate. A superfluid phase slip can change it if the amplitude vanishes locally.
Conservation of particles gives . For steady density the one-dimensional particle current is constant. Since the two halves have equal lengths,The current bottleneck in an inhomogeneous condensate occurs because a lower-density region has faster flow at the same current; it also has a smaller speed of sound. This makes the raised half the limiting region.
For the equilibrium approximation givesThe winding condition and equal lengths requireThus the left-hand sound-speed test isThe right-hand condition is only , so it is less restrictive.
This local sound-speed estimate for ring-flow stability uses the step-potential equilibrium in a ring condensate densities together with the local sound-speed test, as suggested by the preceding approximations. A quantitatively self-consistent finite-current solution also includes and the quantum pressure of a condensate in the stationary Gross–Pitaevskii equation, allowing flow to change the density. Smooth steps suppress reflection but do not alone remove those terms. The result is the stated local-density estimate; it should not be promoted to an exact stability theorem for every finite interacting ring.
Use the ordered basis and , withA pure quantum superposition has on the Bloch sphere. In contrast, a mixed state has , inside the sphere for . At equal populations its vector is zero. Equal populations alone therefore do not distinguish a coherent superposition from a mixture; their off-diagonal density matrix elements differ.
Choose the drive phase so the rotating-frame Hamiltonian is , where as specified. The Rabi vector is the angular-velocity vectorHere is the on-resonance population oscillation angular frequency, not the unhalved coefficient of a cosine coupling. From , rotation about at givesFor , the rotation axis is nearly transverse, the trajectory nearly a great circle, and transfer is almost complete. For , the axis bisects and , the orbit lies in , and never exceeds . Each member remains a pure state in this coherent evolution.
For the Ramsey free interval, let atom have detuning . Instantaneous ideal pulses give the Ramsey ensemble coherence factor . Averaging the free-evolution vector obtained in step (ii) givesDifferent atoms fan out around the equator, shortening the ensemble Bloch vector even though every individual's vector remains unit length. A broad smooth detuning distribution usually makes the average spiral towards the centre and damps the Ramsey fringes towards . The dephasing time is of order . inhomogeneous ensemble dephasing is not necessarily irreversible decoherence of individual atoms; an appropriate spin echo can rephase static frequency offsets.
The given spread does not specify a probability distribution or whether it denotes an RMS width. An exact envelope is therefore not determined. The figure illustrates, rather than infers, a Gaussian distribution with RMS , for which . A uniform distribution would instead give a sinc envelope and side lobes. Both have the same qualitative initial loss of contrast on the quoted inverse-spread scale.
In the rubidium-87 ground-state hyperfine structure, and , so . Taking givesThe zero-field splitting is . Ignoring the small nuclear magnetic term, the weak-field Landé g-factors are and . The diagram labels all three and five substates, with linear shifts .
The pair and is connected by a magnetic dipole transition with , , driven with its oscillating magnetic component along the quantization axis. Both first-order shifts vanish, giving the rubidium-87 clock transition first-order insensitivity near zero field. Its insensitivity does not imply absence of quadratic shifts.
For these two levels the Breit-Rabi formula gives the quadratic Zeeman shift of a clock transition:where the last expression neglects the nuclear term and sets . HenceThis uses and the supplied . With physical moments defined by , the differential magnetic moment is . If effective magnetic moment denotes the positive energy slope instead, that slope difference is positive. The magnitude and physical frequency sensitivity are the same. Retaining the full atomic factors gives the familiar quadratic clock-frequency coefficient about ; the simplified supplied parameters give about .[ref]
Rubidium 87 D Line Data by Daniel A. Steck. §3, equations (26)–(29); table of magnetic factors and clock-transition quadratic shift
Use a far-detuned optical dipole trap, such as a red-detuned focused-beam trap, to confine both clock states. Their first-order magnetic moments vanish; their residual quadratic magnetic slopes are opposite, so a simple static magnetic-field minimum does not confine both in the same way. An optical potential acts through the electronic polarizability and can trap both ground hyperfine states. It is not perfectly state independent: differential AC Stark shifts, intensity noise and residual magnetic gradients still need control during Ramsey evolution.
During a short pulse, detuning is negligible relative to . Rotation through angle about takes the initial north-pole Bloch vector toThe corresponding state is , since . The phase of this equatorial superposition is defined relative to the oscillator that will supply the second pulse.
With the coupling off, . Precession during the dark interval givesThe populations remain during the dark interval; only their relative phase changes. For , the vector makes one complete equatorial circuit and returns to .
The second pulse has the same phase and area as the first, so another rotation by givesAt , the final vector is the south pole and all population is in . The complete path consists of a north-to-equator quarter turn, a full equatorial loop, and an equator-to-south quarter turn. At the pulses instead return the population to . Finite-pulse detuning corrections are small in ; the result is the stated short-pulse Ramsey limit.
Interpret the box as a hard-wall cube. Its one-particle levels are for positive integers, giving . Counting lattice points in a positive octant and differentiating the large-radius count gives the supplied continuum density of states. Expressing its prefactor through yieldsHere denotes the dimensionless constant requested in this question, to distinguish it from the unrelated hyperfine constant of question 1. Periodic boundary conditions would have zero ground energy and would not permit this parametrization by a nonzero .
Separate the ground-state occupation from excited particles. The finite-box ground-energy convention in Bose condensation makes the chemical potential approach the ground energy from below as that occupation becomes macroscopic. In the thermodynamic continuum approximation one shifts the energy zero to the ground state and sets the limiting chemical potential to zero in the excited-state integral. The difference between the exact shifted density and its bulk form gives finite-size corrections; at the transition . ThusThe identity follows by expanding and integrating each term. The excited states have a finite saturation capacity. Setting that capacity equal to determines condensation:Equivalently , with .
At fixed , below the chemical potential is pinned to its limiting value andAbove , and there is no macroscopic ; the chemical potential adjusts rather than allowing the saturation expression to exceed the available particles. At fixed , put . For , and is not macroscopic; for , saturates while grows linearly. This is particle saturation in a homogeneous Bose gas; the sharp threshold is a thermodynamic-limit approximation to finite-box occupations.
Ideal-box particle saturation and the heat-capacity crossover from phonons to particle-like excitations
. Details. The interaction scale compares differently with confinement and transition energies:Thus the stated range makes interactions dominate the ground-state confinement energy while remaining small on the thermal scale controlling . This is an interaction-dominated ground state with nearly ideal condensation temperature. It also gives the dilute-gas parameter . A contact model has and ; the question's suppresses order-one factors, and the uniform ground energy per particle is , rather than exactly . Weak interactions can shift slightly, but their dimensionless strength makes that a small relative effect. In a hard-wall box, boundary healing layers do not overturn bulk interaction dominance when their thickness is small compared with .
At , thermally occupied Bogoliubov modes have , with . There is one acoustic branch for this spinless gas. Its thermal energy determines the phonon heat capacity of a dilute Bose gas:The zero-temperature interaction energy does not itself contribute to this leading temperature derivative at fixed . This bulk power law also requires so that the phonon spectrum may be treated as continuous; a strictly finite box eventually has discrete-level activated behaviour.
For the noninteracting condensed Bose gas, the ideal Bose-gas heat capacity below condensation follows by integrating :Its limiting value at is about . At very low temperature the interacting phonon curve is suppressed relative to the ideal curve, has slope three on logarithmic axes, and crosses over towards particle-like behaviour around . Since , most of the interval below is approximately ideal at leading weak-coupling order. The figure marks a qualitative extrapolation near the transition: a zero-temperature Bogoliubov spectrum does not determine precise interacting critical heat capacity or its small transition shift. The illustrative fixed- interpolation is not claimed as a controlled critical-region calculation.
In the ideal point-nucleus Dirac-Coulomb problem, hydrogen levels depend on and , so and are degenerate despite their different orbital angular momenta. The Lamb shift removes this degeneracy: the level lies about above , an energy of roughly . This is distinct from the much larger fine-structure splitting.
quantum electrodynamics changes the electron's interaction with the Coulomb field. electron self-energy and vacuum polarization give state-dependent radiative corrections; a complete prediction also keeps specified recoil and nuclear-size contributions. An wave samples the nucleus differently from a wave, so equal no longer ensures equal energy. A leading-log estimate for an radiative contribution scales as , with a numerical prefactor and further state-dependent terms. This is a scale estimate, not a replacement for renormalized bound-state QED. The measurable shift is a difference relative to a specified reference Hamiltonian, rather than an unregulated absolute vacuum energy.[ref]
Theory of the Lamb shift in hydrogen and light hydrogen-like ions by Vladimir Yerokhin and others. §II, definition of level contributions relative to the point-nucleus Dirac value and bound-state QED expansion
The original microwave experiment used a tungsten oven to dissociate hydrogen, an electron beam to populate metastable atoms, and electron ejection from a metal target to measure surviving metastable atoms. Microwaves transferred population to rapidly decaying , reducing detector current. At a fixed microwave frequency, interruption of the radiation and a scan of static magnetic field revealed Zeeman-tuned resonances. Comparing resonance locations with the Dirac-level prediction showed the level shifted upward. Field calibration and homogeneity, excessive microwave intensity, unresolved hyperfine structure and stray-electric-field quenching limit the measurement; the signal is not direct absorption by a large equilibrium excited population.[ref]
Fine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method by Willis Eugene Lamb Jr. and Robert Curtis Retherford. pp. 241–243, apparatus, Fig. 1 caption and resonance-field comparison
A two-photon transition is a second-order atom-field process. For two-photon absorption, energy conservation requires . A virtual intermediate state in two-photon absorption need not be populated as a real stationary state. In the electric dipole approximation, the two time orderings give an amplitude proportional toThe electric-field amplitudes multiply this expression. Far from intermediate resonance, the denominators are large relative to linewidths and one-photon couplings, keeping real intermediate occupation small. Near an intermediate resonance, sequential absorption, linewidths and saturation require a fuller treatment. For weak unsaturated absorption the rate scales as , or when both photons come from one field. Absorption followed by stimulated emission instead gives a difference-frequency Raman transition; it is not two-photon absorption at the sum frequency.
Two electric dipole interactions change parity twice, so initial and final states have the same parity. For a one-electron orbital, the usual changes are , subject to angular-momentum and polarization constraints. For identical equal-frequency photons, exchange symmetry removes the antisymmetric rank-one tensor: ranks zero and two survive. Thus is possible, whereas is forbidden in this degenerate electric-dipole approximation. It would be too strong to prohibit every transition between nonzero angular momenta, since a rank-two tensor can connect some such pairs. Spin remains unchanged to leading electric-dipole order.
A central example is hydrogen , forbidden as a one-photon electric dipole transition but accessible with two photons near . Absorption of one photon from each of equal-frequency counterpropagating beams makes the first-order Doppler shift vanish and suppresses net recoil. The two same-direction absorption paths can still give a broad Doppler background. A primary demonstration used a frequency-doubled pulsed dye laser near this wavelength and compared with a simultaneously recorded Balmer reference.[ref]
Doppler-Free Two-Photon Spectroscopy of Hydrogen by Theodor W. Hänsch and others. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 307 (1975), abstract: 2430-angstrom source and simultaneous Balmer-beta reference
Experimentally, scan the sum frequency and detect the excited state, its subsequent fluorescence or its ionization. Counterpropagating and single-beam spectra distinguish the narrow Doppler-free contribution from its background. Varying intensity tests weak-field scaling and extrapolates AC Stark shifts and power broadening; frequency calibration, beam overlap, residual angle and second-order Doppler shifts still matter. “Doppler free” here cancels the leading velocity term, not every systematic shift.
Two complementary signatures are suppressed low-speed dissipation and quantized circulation. Condensation alone establishes macroscopic occupation, not all of these flow properties. In a uniform weakly interacting condensate, the Landau criterion givesfor the Bogoliubov spectrum. Creating an excitation in a flow changes energy by ; a negative value allows energy transfer. Boundaries and vortex nucleation can make an actual measured threshold lower than this ideal bulk sound speed.
In the moving-obstacle test of atomic superfluidity, a blue-detuned focused laser repelled atoms in a sodium condensate and was scanned at different speeds. After a fixed exposure, time-of-flight absorption imaging measured the reduction of condensate fraction as a heating indicator. Low-speed heating was small, with a pronounced onset near , below the peak-density sound speed near . A stationary-beam control showed no heating; above-transition clouds constrained heating through the noncondensed fraction. Changing scan frequency and amplitude at common obstacle velocity helped separate a flow threshold from a particular trap resonance. Density inhomogeneity, obstacle geometry and vortex nucleation limit identification of the observed onset with a unique homogeneous Landau velocity.[ref]
Evidence for a Critical Velocity in a Bose-Einstein Condensed Gas by C. Raman and others. pp. 2502–2504, Figs. 1–3, stationary-beam and above-transition controls
A second experiment stirred rubidium-87 in a magnetic trap by rotating a small transverse anisotropy generated with a far-detuned attractive laser. After stirring, the cloud expanded for and absorption imaging along the rotation axis revealed vortex cores. Below a threshold no cores appeared; faster rotation produced one or several. Ramping the stirrer down before release reduced additional excitation, and waiting after removing it tested vortex survival. Beam-centre stability and residual trap anisotropy are important controls; an isolated density dip without the rotation and persistence evidence would be less conclusive. This stirred-condensate vortex experiment is a response to rotation, distinct from merely imaging the appearance of a condensate.[ref]
Vortex Formation in a Stirred Bose-Einstein Condensate by K. W. Madison and others. preprint pp. 1–3, rotating dipole anisotropy, time-of-flight imaging and single-vortex lifetime
The superfluid velocity is . A closed loop avoiding a core must return a single-valued order parameter, soA singly quantized vortex therefore has phase winding and circulation , with depleted density in a core of order the healing length. This quantized rotational response differs from ordinary rigid-body flow. The experiment supports that interpretation through controlled stirring and vortex formation; imaging cores alone does not independently measure every phase winding or an absolute zero dissipative rate.
For hydrogen, the leading characteristic scales areOrder-one spin and nuclear magnetic factors, and state-dependent factors, are suppressed here. Gross atomic structure is Coulomb binding. Fine structure includes relativistic kinetic and spin-orbit effects, with Thomas precession affecting the spin-orbit coefficient. Hyperfine structure couples electronic motion and spin to the nuclear magnetic moment, whose inverse nuclear mass makes it much weaker. The contact spin interaction can remain in an s state where orbital spin-orbit coupling vanishes.
For positronium, the reduced mass is . Its gross levels and separation scale areThus the mean ground-state electron–Positron separation is twice the infinite-proton-mass hydrogen value: both means have the same factor multiplying their respective Bohr radii. Retaining proton recoil makes the ratio , very slightly below two. Separation is not the distance of either positronium constituent from its centre of mass.
Interpret the spin operators in units of , as required by the printed Zeeman term, so has units of energy. Two spin halves give four eigenstates. At zero field, total spin and projection label the singlet and triplet. At high field relative to the hyperfine scale, the individual projections become approximately good quantum numbers. Total projection remains exact at every field, but does not for the two mixed states.
Choose the quantization axis along . The aligned-spin states and both have because their Zeeman shifts cancel. In the other product-state sector,For physical positronium . At there is a triplet at and a singlet at . At large positive field the mixed states approach and , with energies and respectively, while the aligned pair remains degenerate at .
The dimensionless mixing parameter is . A crossover estimate is , rather than a sharp transition. The scale already gives a field of a few tesla. Using the physical hyperfine interval givesThe numerical hyperfine interval is external physical input, not a number supplied by the symbolic Hamiltonian.[ref]
New Precision Measurement of Hyperfine Splitting of Positronium by A. Ishida and others. arXiv:1310.6923, abstract, measured interval approximately 203.39 GHz
The high-field limit here still presumes that orbital distortion is negligible compared with Coulomb binding.Set the ground-state energy to zero. Bose-Einstein occupation of an excited level is , with . As particles are added, approaches zero and the excited-state population saturates. Separating the ground state from the density-of-states integral therefore givesThe excited-state integral must actually converge: alone is not a sufficient condition in complete generality. A power law with suffices at low energy, as in the stated three-dimensional box.
Let denote the density-of-states prefactor, not a heat capacity. Substitution givesThe condensate has zero energy on this reference, so a further factor of in the integral givesRelative to the classical value, the ratio is . Macroscopic occupation of the zero-energy state and the Bose distribution both lower the average energy.
At fixed volume the condensed gas has . Unbiased random loss keeps average constant, henceRemoving a condensate atom removes essentially no energy and by itself leaves the excited cloud's temperature unchanged. Removing an excited atom removes its energy; during re-equilibration, some zero-energy condensate atoms join the excited population and share the remaining energy, lowering temperature. Averaging over unbiased loss gives the stated constant energy per particle, even though each individual type of loss need not preserve it separately.
Using and the supplied volume,There is only one occupied internal spin state, so no factor belongs in the density of states. During loss, , hence . Condensation disappears at :As a consistency check, agrees with .
Both this process and evaporative cooling of atoms require particle loss and re-equilibration. Ordinary evaporation preferentially removes energetic atoms, reducing , and can cool an uncondensed classical gas. Here loss is energy independent, stays constant, and cooling relies on the condensed gas's unusual equation of state; random loss of a classical ideal gas would leave its temperature unchanged. Exact noninteraction would prevent collisional rethermalization: the imposed equilibrium assumption can be understood as weak thermalizing interactions whose equation-of-state corrections are neglected.
An electric dipole transition has amplitude proportional to . The electric dipole operator is odd under parity, so the initial and final states must have opposite parity. As a rank-one spherical tensor it also requires , excluding , and . These follow from angular-momentum addition and the Wigner-Eckart theorem; vanishing Clebsch-Gordan coefficients can impose further restrictions. Relative to the quantization axis, polarization drives , while drive .
For a single active electron, parity and the orbital triangle rule combine to give . In LS coupling, the spin-independent electric dipole operator gives and , excluding ; total parity must still change. Spin-orbit mixing can weakly relax the approximate spin rule. For resolved hyperfine states the corresponding triangle rule is , excluding , with . These labels require the appropriate coupling regime. There is no universal E1 rule demanding a particular change in principal quantum number. An E1-forbidden line may occur through another multipole or a multiphoton process.
The two-level Doppler limit, , balances velocity-dependent scattering friction with momentum diffusion. Multilevel atoms have additional, slower internal dynamics. Counterpropagating beams with orthogonal linear polarizations create a spatially varying polarization, giving different position-dependent light shifts for ground-state magnetic sublevels. A moving atom climbs a light-shift hill, loses kinetic energy and is optically pumped into a lower-energy sublevel: this repeated Sisyphus cooling cycle dissipates motion through emitted light.
Optical pumping responds with a finite delay. Its rate, rather than only the excited-state linewidth, sets the low-velocity response scale. In the opposite-circular-polarization arrangement, motion instead produces unequal sublevel populations and unbalanced radiation pressure. Both mechanisms can cool below the two-level Doppler temperature; diffusion heating still balances the cooling, and recoil matters at the lowest temperatures.[ref]
Laser cooling below the Doppler limit by polarization gradients: simple theoretical models by Jean Dalibard and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji. 1989, pages 2023–2025, two polarization-gradient mechanisms and pumping timescale
Ground-state substructure, optical pumping and polarization gradients enable the extra cooling. Magnetic fields that disturb the required sublevel dynamics can suppress it. Optical molasses damps velocity but does not by itself provide position-restoring confinement.
Sound propagation. In the 1997 experiment, a focused laser beam abruptly modified the trapping potential of a dilute condensate, producing a local excitation. A rapid sequence of nondestructive phase-contrast imaging measurements followed the resulting density motion. Measuring propagation speed at different densities tested the sound-like collective excitation spectrum, rather than individual free-particle flight.[ref]
Propagation of Sound in a Bose-Einstein Condensate by M. R. Andrews and others. 1997, primary abstract and author publication record; Physical Review Letters 79, 549–552, with 1998 erratum
For a weakly interacting uniform condensate, the Bogoliubov spectrum isDensity dependence and trapped-geometry averaging matter when comparing a measured pulse speed with this local uniform formula. A strictly ideal gas would have no nonzero interaction-supported sound speed.Moving-obstacle dissipation. In the 1999 experiment, a blue-detuned focused beam repelled atoms and acted as an obstacle swept through a sodium condensate. Heating was inferred from the condensate fraction after stirring and re-equilibration. The heating rose markedly near , below the quoted peak sound speed .[ref]
Evidence for a Critical Velocity in a Bose-Einstein Condensed Gas by C. Raman and others. pages 2502–2504, obstacle method, heating onset and comparison with sound
Landau's criterion motivates a dissipation threshold, but density variation, flow acceleration around the obstacle and vortex nucleation make the observed threshold different from simply substituting the peak sound speed. Together these experiments probe a collective excitation spectrum and the onset of dissipative flow; condensation alone is not a complete demonstration of superfluidity.For a free-space electric dipole transition, the spontaneous emission rate in SI units isHere includes the relevant dipole components; a specified single polarization requires its corresponding matrix element.
A complete scattering cycle returns the internal state to the ground state and changes the atomic momentum to . ThusFor photon-scattering recoil heating with isotropic emission of fixed momentum magnitude, , givingThe first term is the velocity-dependent work of absorption and can cool an atom if the photon opposes its motion. The last two are positive absorption and emission recoil energies. If the actual absorbed directions are also isotropic and independent of , the first term averages to zero. For approximately equal incoming and outgoing photon momenta ,Isotropic incident illumination alone would not guarantee isotropic absorption if Doppler-dependent excitation selected directions.
Source qualification for the trapped calculation. Set for the same atom. The printed Gaussian has the wrong width for the specified harmonic oscillator: the printed ground and first-excited functions have squared norms and , respectively. The normalized oscillator states fixed by the given instead useAlso, one common complex phase multiplying both off-diagonal terms does not make the Hamiltonian a Hermitian operator. Use an absorption matrix element and its Hermitian conjugate for emission; choosing the opposite propagation convention reverses the imaginary sideband phase but not a transition probability. The physical results below use these explicitly stated corrections. Parts (i) and (ii) also give the literal integrals of the printed functions.
Conditional motional heating and recoil averaging. With , an oscillator eigenstate has . Therefore the absorption outcomes haveThe same statements hold for the specified emission outcomes and . Internal excitation energy goes into, or comes from, the photon and is distinct from this external energy change. Emission into the first motional state makes the emitted photon correspondingly less energetic.
A sudden recoil from gives probabilities , so while . The rare first sideband transfers a whole trap quantum, much larger than ; the mean is neverthelessThe emission average is the same for a one-dimensional recoil of the same magnitude. Projecting isotropic three-dimensional emission onto one axis instead gives a factor for that axis.
A sudden unobserved kick initially raises kinetic energy by and leaves the position distribution, hence potential energy, unchanged. It creates a coherent superposition of motional states. The equal kinetic/potential increments above concern energy-eigenstate-conditioned outcomes, or time-averaged/dephased motion; these are different measurement conditions. There is no contradiction.
With , motional sidebands are not cleanly resolved, and a short-lived excited atom has little time to move before decay. In the stronger sudden limit the recoil-kick picture is direct. For only the stated inequality, finite linewidth weights can change numerical factors; it does not fix an exact continuous-wave scattering rate. The average heating remains of recoil order per absorption or emission, and of order when both absorption and emission kicks are counted at full magnitude. For the axial component of isotropic three-dimensional emission, the emission contribution instead carries the factor noted above. Strong confinement suppresses the chance of changing , but does not make its averaged recoil energy disappear. This agrees with free-space recoil heating while replacing small continuous energy changes by rare quantized motional changes.
Write , with Rabi frequency , for the internal coupling and use normalized oscillator states. The motional carrier transition matrix element is the Gaussian characteristic function,In the Lamb-Dicke regime, . The diagonal internal-energy terms cannot connect to .
If the two unnormalized printed functions are used verbatim, the literal ground-state integral is instead . This is not a matrix element between normalized eigenstates of the stated trap; even its zero-recoil value is incorrectly .
For the harmonic-oscillator recoil matrix element, using and differentiating the Gaussian transform with respect to ,Consequently . Reversing the travelling-wave phase changes the sign of the imaginary amplitude. For small , the sideband is weaker by in amplitude and in probability.
With the printed unnormalized Gaussians, the literal integral would be . It is distinguished from the physical normalized-oscillator result rather than silently treating inconsistent wavefunctions as normalized.
For the Bogoliubov spectrum, define and . For repulsive interactions and ,Thus the low-momentum excitations are gapless phonons and the high-momentum branch approaches free-particle curvature. The crossover occurs when kinetic and interaction energy are comparable. The Landau criterion follows because an obstacle moving at velocity can supply energy to an excitation. HereThis is the homogeneous phonon kinematic threshold, not a guarantee that every perturbation dissipates immediately above it.
In two dimensions, has units of inverse area and has units of energy times area. Therefore is dimensionless. Neglecting the kinetic term in the Gross–Pitaevskii equation, with positive coupling, giveswith outside the radius in the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate. Multiplication givesThe sharp edge is an approximation; the neglected gradient term rounds it over a healing length scale.
Using the local sound-speed criterion for circular condensate stirring, the moving beam has speed . The local interaction chemical potential is , soThe onset equality is and the permitted excitation condition isThis uses the beam speed as the local relative-flow scale. A finite hole can distort the surrounding flow or nucleate vortices, so the result is the requested local phonon estimate, not a universal necessary condition for all experimental stirring.
For the loss-driven onset of condensate stirring, first integrate the density:At fixed coupling and trap frequency, and . Hence while stays fixed. For , threshold requires . Starting at ,At onset, , and the beam is still inside the cloud. Excitations become kinematically allowed just beyond this equality, provided the stipulated adiabatic regime of the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate remains valid.
The Lamb shift is a radiative displacement of atomic energy levels beyond the values from the Dirac equation in a Coulomb potential. In hydrogen, the and levels are degenerate for a point Coulomb potential in the Dirac equation, yet the level lies higher by roughly a gigahertz. This is distinct from the fine structure splitting between different levels and from nuclear-spin hyperfine structure.
Electron self-energy in the quantized electromagnetic field is the dominant contribution to the familiar hydrogen splitting; vacuum polarization contributes too. Renormalization separates the physical electron mass from its divergent free-electron self-energy. A useful leading-log scale for a hydrogenic level isnot an exact numerical formula. The enhanced sensitivity of S states follows from their nonzero wavefunction at the nucleus; leading short-distance corrections act like contact perturbations. A precision prediction also includes finite nuclear size and recoil, and must consistently separate those effects from the radiative contribution.[ref]
Theory of the Lamb shift in hydrogen and light hydrogen-like ions by Vladimir Yerokhin and others. §III A, equations (7)–(8), one-loop self-energy and vacuum-polarization scale; introduction, separation of radiative, recoil and nuclear effects
The original Lamb-Retherford experiment used a beam of hydrogen atoms, electron-impact excitation into metastable , and microwave-induced transfer into short-lived states. Those atoms decayed before reaching the detector. Metastable atoms surviving to a metal target ejected electrons, so a drop in the measured current signalled a resonance. Varying the microwave excitation and magnetic field established the displacement from the Dirac equation expectation. Microwave quenching converted a small energy difference into a measurable loss of a long-lived population, avoiding optical Doppler widths that obscure the splitting.[ref]
Fine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method by Willis Eugene Lamb Jr. and Robert Curtis Retherford. 1947, pp. 241–243, metastable beam, target-current readout and microwave resonance
A Paul trap uses a time-dependent electric quadrupole field to provide dynamic confinement, avoiding the impossibility of trapping a charge in a stable three-dimensional static electrostatic minimum. Its dynamics follows a Mathieu equation: stable drive parameters produce slow Paul trap secular motion with superposed fast Paul trap micromotion. If denotes the peak oscillating field, the effective energy for small Paul trap micromotion isThe radiofrequency pseudopotential of a Paul trap is an averaged mechanical energy, not a static electrostatic potential. Doppler cooling and, where needed, resolved sideband cooling reduce Paul trap secular motion; the Lamb-Dicke regime suppresses higher motional sidebands.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger’s cat by David J. Wineland. Sections III–IV, confinement, internal-state control and quantized ion motion
Two long-lived internal states encode a qubit, for example hyperfine states, while an optical metastable transition provides another option. Optical pumping initializes it. Resonant or Raman transition pulses make coherent single-qubit rotations, and state-dependent fluorescence distinguishes a bright state from a dark shelved state. Shared quantized normal modes let one ion's internal state influence another, providing entangling gates in the proposal of J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller; the motional bus must be returned to its intended state rather than left carrying unwanted information.[ref]
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions by J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller. 1995, pp. 4091–4093, shared motion and conditional gates
A concrete early experiment demonstrated a controlled-NOT gate between the internal hyperfine and motional degrees of freedom of a single trapped ion. This was an internal–motion two-qubit gate, not yet a gate between two separate ions.[ref]
Demonstration of a Fundamental Quantum Logic Gate by Christopher Monroe and others. 1995, pp. 4714–4717, encoding and gate demonstration
Challenges include electric-field-noise heating of the motional bus, excess Paul trap micromotion from stray fields, magnetic and laser phase noise, off-resonant spontaneous scattering, imperfect preparation and readout, and unwanted excitation of spectator modes. Scaling to many ions adds mode crowding, individual-addressing crosstalk and transport requirements. Cooling and quantum error correction must remove entropy without erasing stored qubits. Long storage coherence is necessary but not sufficient: gates and measurements must also be accurate and reproducible. The original gate experiment explicitly identified laser, field, trap-drive and motional decoherence limitations.[ref]
Demonstration of a Fundamental Quantum Logic Gate by Christopher Monroe and others. p. 4716, decoherence sources and limits to extended computations
For a nucleus of spin and electronic , the magnetic-dipole hyperfine interaction is , using dimensionless angular-momentum operators. The electric-quadrupole hyperfine contribution vanishes for . In zero field, labels the levels:Their signed separation is . For , the larger- multiplet lies higher; negative reverses this order. If there is no such hyperfine splitting.
Let the field define and writeHere is the signed nuclear Zeeman coefficient expressed in Bohr-magneton units, including its nuclear-to-Bohr-magneton factor; it is not an unconverted nuclear factor. Total projection is conserved, while need not be. In the basis , , the two-state block isFor , define . Diagonalization gives the Breit-Rabi formula,For either sign of , the block itself remains valid; its ordered eigenvalues are .
For a stretched hyperfine Zeeman state at projection there is only one state each. Their energies are exactlyAssigning two branches to each stretched projection would double-count states.
In weak fields the shift is , with for ; an state has no first-order Zeeman shift. At strong hyperfine-decoupling fields the eigenstates approach product states withThis is the hyperfine regime of the Paschen-Back effect, still assuming the field is weak enough not to invalidate the electronic manifold. States of the same mix and avoid crossing when their off-diagonal coupling is nonzero; different- levels can cross.
Original examination: Physical PDF pages 445–447; printed Paper 170, 18 January 2012. All three optional questions and all three optional notes are treated below.
Use the condensate wavefunction convention , so is the number density and is a normalized one-particle orbital. The contact interaction strength is for dilute atoms with s-wave scattering length . The chemical potential fixes the stationary time dependence and enforces normalization when minimizing the energy. The Gross–Pitaevskii equation follows from an energy functional that contains the pair-counting factor :Varying gives the stationary Gross–Pitaevskii equation; the interaction contribution to that equation is , without the factor .
For the broadening discussed here assume repulsive interactions, . The Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate neglects the gradient kinetic energy compared with the trapping and interaction energies. At fixed spatial scale, increasing increases the mean-field potential. Expansion then reduces the kinetic energy further: for a cloud radius , its scale per atom is , whereas the trap energy scale is . Their ratio decreases as . In the weak-interaction limit the kinetic energy instead balances confinement, giving the Gaussian wave packet ground state of the quantum harmonic oscillator.
The spherical Thomas–Fermi condensate hasIntegrating this density gives . ThusAt fixed , stronger repulsion produces a wider, lower wavefunction: the Gaussian wave packet crosses over towards the square root of an inverted parabola, with an almost flat central region and a steeper outer drop. The density is the inverted parabola; the wavefunction is its square root. The exact wavefunction remains smooth and has a tail, since kinetic energy cannot be neglected near the Thomas–Fermi condensate edge rounding region. The healing length must be small compared with the cloud size in the bulk. Attractive interactions would not follow this large- expansion argument.
The original plot compares the noninteracting endpoint with two normalized repulsive spherical Thomas–Fermi condensate profiles. The latter are asymptotic shapes, rather than exact intermediate solutions of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. Each has the same integrated atom number; labels the illustrative interaction strengths.
Choose real and positive. The Gaussian integral givesThe three zero-point energies add for each atom. The ideal-gas chemical potential is a one-atom energy; the total energy includes all atoms.
For weak interactions, the first-order correction in perturbation theory is the energy functional of the contact interaction evaluated on the unperturbed Gaussian wave packet. The integral needed isConsequently the Gaussian interaction energy of a trapped condensate isHere . These are the mean-field expressions consistent with the supplied equation and . Exact first-order perturbation theory for precisely atoms in one orbital replaces by through the number of distinct pairs; this distinction is negligible in the large- regime of the crossover estimate.
To judge the ideal-gas approximation, compare the interaction energy with the total ideal energy, or compare the interaction energy per atom with :Thus the crossover from Gaussian to Thomas–Fermi condensate is governed by : perturbation theory is reliable for , while the regime of the Thomas–Fermi approximation for a condensate requires . The characteristic crossover number is ; there is no sharp critical atom number here. If one specifically defines crossover by using the weak-interaction expression, it gives . That prefactor is a convention-dependent estimate extrapolated to the edge of perturbation theory, not a phase transition. Comparing itself to a single would incorrectly omit a factor of .
For the numerical estimate use and . ThenThe particular equality would instead give about atoms. These quantify different choices within a smooth crossover; a well-developed spherical Thomas–Fermi condensate profile requires going substantially beyond the characteristic scale.
Fix the qubit polarization convention by , where the Pauli matrices are ordered in the basis and . Thus the ground state is the north pole of the Bloch sphere. In a rotating frame and within the rotating-wave approximation, choose the drive phase and detuning sign so thatFor example, with this ground-state convention one may take and choose the transverse coupling positive. The Bloch vector precesses around the effective field at angular frequency , tracing a circle at fixed projection on that axis. Its length is conserved under coherent unitary time evolution. On resonance the axis is transverse and the Rabi oscillation can fully invert an initially ground-state atom. Away from resonance the axis tilts, andThere is no relaxation towards an equilibrium Bloch vector in this ideal model. An inhomogeneous ensemble can nevertheless lose its averaged qubit polarization through dephasing even without spontaneous emission; the circle description assumes a common drive and detuning.
For , the stated quantum state givesThe diagonal elements are the two state populations. The off-diagonal elements are quantum coherences: they retain the relative quantum phase and determine interference under a subsequent pulse. This is a pure state, even if both populations are nonzero: , , and . A mixed state averages projectors over preparation probabilities and generally has . Equal populations alone do not distinguish an equal coherent superposition from an unpolarized mixture.
For use in all three cases, multiplication of the gates gives the Hadamard-phase-Hadamard qubit rotationThe global phase cancels in . Thus the Bloch vector map is
The final unlabelled Ramsey spectroscopy comparison applies to the three cases as follows. In an atomic clock, an initial coherent pulse prepares a superposition, a free interval accumulates a relative quantum phase proportional to detuning times , and a final coherent pulse converts that phase to a population. Here plays the role of that accumulated phase, with sign and fringe offset set by pulse conventions. In (a), the first Hadamard gate creates the needed superposition and the final gate reveals full-contrast Ramsey interferometry. In (b), the first Hadamard gate instead puts the state in , so the intervening phase gate has no relative quantum phase to imprint: the output is independent of . In (c), the unpolarized density matrix remains unchanged under every gate, so the ensemble has no Ramsey interferometry contrast. A coherent unitary gate alone cannot initialize a maximally mixed ensemble into a pure clock state.
The Ramsey interferometry analogy concerns preparation, phase accumulation, and readout; a Hadamard gate is not literally a transverse rotation on every input. In this basis , and its Bloch sphere action is a rotation about , up to a global phase. The phase conventions of physical Ramsey spectroscopy pulses must be specified to compare their outputs for arbitrary initial states.
Following the pure state through the first two gates gives . After the last Hadamard gate it isUsing the qubit polarization convention defined above,The output remains pure and has unit Bloch vector length. The population oscillation is the Ramsey interferometry fringe: the first gate supplies quantum coherence, and the last turns the acquired relative quantum phase into a measurable population difference.
The first Hadamard gate maps the prepared superposition to . The phase gate leaves that state unchanged, and the last Hadamard gate returns it to . ThereforeThis is a fully polarized pure state, not an unpolarized ensemble. Its Bloch vector lies along the rotation axis of the combined operation. There is no Ramsey interferometry fringe as varies, because the state during phase accumulation occupies only one basis level. Quantum coherence in the final state alone does not guarantee phase sensitivity to the specified sequence.
For an unpolarized ensemble . Every unitary gate satisfies , soThe purity remains . Equal populations here come with zero quantum coherence, unlike the state in (b). There is no Ramsey interferometry fringe: the two orthogonal components of any equal-weight ensemble decomposition give cancelling population responses. Quantum state preparation that reduces the ensemble entropy is needed for the usual polarized clock interrogation.
Gate sequence populations
. Details. The original plot compares the three excited-state populations. The constant lines coincide despite the very different purities in (b) and (c).
Laser cooling removes atomic kinetic energy through a velocity-dependent optical force, with scattered photons carrying away energy and entropy. For two counterpropagating beams detuned below resonance, motion towards one beam shifts that light closer to resonance, so the atom preferentially absorbs momentum opposite its velocity. At small velocity the net force is with . Three orthogonal beam pairs form optical molasses. Spontaneous emission has zero mean recoil in a symmetric distribution, but its momentum variance is nonzero: random absorption and emission cause heating. The cooling and heating balance sets a finite temperature.
For a weakly saturated two-level transition, write and let be the excited-state population decay rate. A useful one-axis Doppler cooling expression isThis limit belongs to the weak-intensity Doppler cooling model, with recoil energy small compared with . Experimentally, released sodium molasses clouds were probed by time of flight; the unusually small expansion demonstrated temperatures below that limit. This distinguishes an observed failure of a two-level cooling model from a failure of conservation of energy.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms by William D. Phillips. pp. 729–732, Doppler limit, optical molasses, and release/time-of-flight thermometry
Multilevel atoms permit polarization-gradient cooling: spatially varying light polarization produces different light shifts of ground-state sublevels. In Sisyphus cooling, atoms climb a light-shift potential and are preferentially optically pumped near its top into a lower-energy sublevel, repeatedly losing kinetic energy. The optical pumping and emitted light supply dissipation. This can reach below the Doppler cooling limit; the recoil scalethen becomes important. The definition of a recoil temperature sometimes differs by a factor of two, so the energy definition is the unambiguous comparison. Recoil is not a universal lower bound for every cooling protocol: suitable dark-state or resolved sideband cooling schemes can suppress scattering near the desired motional state. Resolved sideband cooling preferentially excites a transition lowering the vibrational quantum number, followed by decay that on average preserves it in the Lamb-Dicke regime.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schrödinger’s cat by David J. Wineland. Section IV, cooling of quantized ion motion
Optical molasses supplies damping rather than a position-restoring force. A magneto-optical trap adds a magnetic-field gradient and appropriately chosen circular polarizations; the position-dependent Zeeman splitting gives a restoring radiation pressure imbalance as well as damping. In real alkali atoms, repumping light returns population that would otherwise accumulate in an uncoupled hyperfine level. Magnetic and optical dipole traps can subsequently hold the cold sample without continuous resonant scattering.
Applications include long-interrogation atomic clocks, precision spectroscopy, atom interferometry, and preparation for quantum simulation and Bose-Einstein condensation. Cooling reduces motion-induced frequency shifts and allows longer coherent interrogation; deeper quantum degeneracy commonly needs subsequent evaporative cooling of atoms. Finite capture velocity, available transitions, recoil heating, stray magnetic fields, and loss or heating from unwanted scattering constrain a real experiment.
A quantum computing apparatus needs a scalable quantum register of controllable qubits, reproducible initialization, a universal quantum gate set, sufficiently long quantum coherence, and selective readout. A qubit is a two-dimensional state space; several qubits occupy a tensor product space and can develop entanglement. Quantum state preparation must establish a known low-entropy input and supply fresh ancillas during quantum error correction. A universal quantum gate set may use arbitrary single-qubit rotations with an entangling two-qubit gate such as controlled-NOT gate. Quantum coherence and control fidelity must suffice for the intended circuit, and measurement must recover chosen output probabilities without uncontrolled disturbance of other qubits. These are the five DiVincenzo criteria.[ref]
The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation by David P. DiVincenzo. Section III, requirements 1–5
An atomic implementation can encode qubits in two long-lived internal levels, initialize them by optical pumping, drive coherent transitions with laser or microwave pulses, couple selected qubits through a shared interaction, and distinguish states by state-dependent fluorescence. For trapped ions, a shared vibrational mode can mediate entangling gates, so motional control and cooling are part of the computational apparatus. The motion is a resource only while uncontrolled heating does not erase the required quantum coherence.
The computational resource is coherent control of amplitudes and entanglement, with interference making useful outcomes likely. An -qubit pure state has basis amplitudes, but a single measurement does not reveal those amplitudes or all possible answers. Algorithms exploit structure rather than simply reading out parallel classical computations. The Shor algorithm gives factoring with polynomial resource scaling in the input bit length, compared with the best known classical algorithms' superpolynomial scaling; an exponential classical lower bound has not been proved.[ref]
Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer by Peter W. Shor. Abstract, polynomial running time in the number of input digits
Grover's algorithm uses order oracle queries for unstructured search among possibilities, a quadratic query improvement.[ref]A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search by Lov Grover. Abstract and algorithmic query scaling
Quantum simulation is a further motivation because interacting quantum systems can require exponentially many classical amplitudes for a direct generic representation.The main challenges are quantum decoherence, fluctuating control fields, imperfect gates, leakage out of the qubit subspace, readout errors, crosstalk, and the difficulty of scaling connectivity and calibration. Faster control can introduce extra errors, while stronger isolation can make preparation and readout harder. Quantum error correction encodes logical information redundantly in several physical qubits and extracts error syndromes without measuring the unknown logical state itself. Fault-tolerant quantum computation prevents the correction apparatus and gates from spreading a few faults into uncorrectable logical errors. It requires error rates below an architecture- and noise-dependent threshold and substantial resources; there is no universal numerical threshold for all implementations. Advantages are task-dependent, while reliable scaling requires both coherent hardware and error control.
Evaporative cooling of atoms selectively removes atoms with unusually high total energy, then elastic collisions rethermalize those remaining. Loss of particles alone is insufficient: the lost atoms must carry more than the mean energy per particle if the temperature is to fall. The process is open and dissipative, so it can increase the phase-space density of an atomic gas in the remaining sample while reducing its atom number. As the temperature falls, the cutoff must be lowered to keep replenishing a useful escaping tail; a fixed high cutoff eventually gives negligible evaporation.
An experimental sequence first loads laser-cooled atoms into a conservative trap and suppresses resonant-light heating. In a trap using magnetic trapping of neutral atoms, a radiofrequency evaporation knife drives a Zeeman splitting transition from a trapped weak-field-seeking state to an untrapped state on a surface where the splitting matches the radiofrequency photon energy. Only atoms energetic enough to reach that surface escape. Lowering the radiofrequency cutoff progressively removes less energetic atoms. Alternatively, lowering an optical dipole trap's depth permits energetic atoms to spill out. This changes confinement as well as the escape cutoff, so it can reduce the collision rate. Radiofrequency-selective evaporation and the need for favourable elastic-collision and background-loss rates are documented in the original condensate experiments.[ref]
Nobel Lecture: Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute gas, the first 70 years and some recent experiments by Eric A. Cornell and Carl Wieman. pp. 880–882, elastic/background collisions, magnetic confinement, and radiofrequency evaporation
The elastic collision rate must be large enough for elastic rethermalization of a trapped atomic gas throughout evaporation, and much faster than unwanted loss and heating. A clean vacuum reduces background collisions; suitable trapping states suppress inelastic spin-changing loss, and density must not make three-body recombination dominant. The cutoff ramp should allow equilibration without taking so long that background losses dominate. A large evaporation truncation parameter selects energetically valuable atoms, but an excessively large value suppresses their escape rate. A very small value discards too many useful low-energy atoms. If elastic collisions become more frequent as evaporation proceeds, the resulting runaway evaporative cooling can improve efficiency; it is not automatic in a weakening optical trap.
The energy selectivity for evaporation to increase phase-space density can be made precise in a classical three-dimensional harmonic trap with fixed frequencies. Equipartition gives . If each escaping atom removes mean energy , energy balance is with , soThe peak harmonic-trap phase-space density is . ThereforeCooling requires ; increasing despite atom loss requires the stronger condition . These inequalities assume rapid thermalization and no work from changing trap frequencies. They distinguish lower temperature from genuinely improved quantum degeneracy. Eventually quantum statistics and inelastic processes require a refinement of this classical estimate. Efficient evaporation combines energy-selective loss, rapid elastic redistribution, and low unwanted loss; it can bring a precooled gas to Bose-Einstein condensation.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
















