Minkowski inequality states that on a measure space , for and measurable real or complex of finite Lp norm,For , integrate the scalar triangle inequality . For , the almost everywhere bounds and give the same result by taking the essential supremum.
For , first ensure that the left side is finite. The convex function on givesso has finite Lp norm. Set and . Since , Holder inequality givesIf the result is immediate; otherwise divide by . This proves the triangle inequality for every claimed exponent.
Use Lebesgue measure restricted to the Lebesgue measurable set . For , start with the measurable real-valued functions on satisfying . Define an equivalence relation by when almost everywhere, and let consist of their equivalence classes. Addition and scalar multiplication are defined using representatives. The Lp norm isFor , use measurable functions bounded almost everywhere, apply the same identification, and define the L-infinity norm byThese expressions are independent of the representative. For finite , zero norm is equivalent to almost everywhere: each set must have measure zero, and their union is . The same implication follows from the essential supremum for . Absolute homogeneity is immediate; Minkowski inequality proves the triangle inequality and closure under addition. Thus these are normed vector spaces. Using complex-valued representatives gives their complex versions by the same construction.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space , choosing measurable representatives. There is a subsequence withWrite and . Repeated Minkowski inequality gives . As increases pointwise, the monotone convergence theorem givesHence is finite almost everywhere and represents an L2 function. Definewhere the series converges, and set on the exceptional Lebesgue null set. It is a measurable function, and almost everywhere, so Minkowski inequality gives .
For fixed , Fatou's lemma applied to squares of finite tails and then Minkowski inequality giveThus the subsequence converges to in norm. Given , choose a sufficiently late with and with for every sufficiently large , using the original Cauchy sequence property. The triangle inequality then gives . ThereforeThis proves the needed instance of completeness of Lp spaces without assuming the result being proved.
False. A typewriter sequence sweeps successively through finer dyadic partitions. For and , define the indicator functionIts L2 norm satisfiesAs tends to infinity so does its block index , proving norm convergence to zero. However, every belongs to exactly one of the half-open intervals in each block, so infinitely often. For there is also an interval in each block that does not contain , so infinitely often. Thus there is no pointwise convergence at any , let alone convergence almost everywhere.
True. Replace the dominating representative by if necessary, and take the countable union of the exceptional Lebesgue null sets so that every bound holds off a single null set. Since the interval has Lebesgue measure one, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality givesThus is a Lebesgue integrable function. The squared functions satisfy pointwise and almost everywhere. The dominated convergence theorem therefore yieldsThis uses the Lp inclusion on a finite measure space to turn the assumed fourth-power bound into the second-power domination actually needed.
Let , the essential supremum of . If , almost everywhere and every Lp norm is zero. Suppose . Since almost everywhere and ,For any with , the measurable set has positive Lebesgue measure; otherwise would be an essential upper bound. HenceFor fixed , . Thus . Letting and combining with the upper bound provesThe positive-measure superlevel sets explain why the Lp norms converge to the supremum norm even when the essential maximum is never attained.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.