Minkowski inequality states that on a measure space , for and measurable real or complex of finite Lp norm,
For , integrate the scalar triangle inequality . For , the almost everywhere bounds and give the same result by taking the essential supremum.
For , first ensure that the left side is finite. The convex function on gives
so has finite Lp norm. Set and . Since , Holder inequality gives
If the result is immediate; otherwise divide by . This proves the triangle inequality for every claimed exponent.
Use Lebesgue measure restricted to the Lebesgue measurable set . For , start with the measurable real-valued functions on satisfying . Define an equivalence relation by when almost everywhere, and let consist of their equivalence classes. Addition and scalar multiplication are defined using representatives. The Lp norm is
For , use measurable functions bounded almost everywhere, apply the same identification, and define the L-infinity norm by
These expressions are independent of the representative. For finite , zero norm is equivalent to almost everywhere: each set must have measure zero, and their union is . The same implication follows from the essential supremum for . Absolute homogeneity is immediate; Minkowski inequality proves the triangle inequality and closure under addition. Thus these are normed vector spaces. Using complex-valued representatives gives their complex versions by the same construction.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space , choosing measurable representatives. There is a subsequence with
Write and . Repeated Minkowski inequality gives . As increases pointwise, the monotone convergence theorem gives
Hence is finite almost everywhere and represents an L2 function. Define
where the series converges, and set on the exceptional Lebesgue null set. It is a measurable function, and almost everywhere, so Minkowski inequality gives .
For fixed , Fatou's lemma applied to squares of finite tails and then Minkowski inequality give
Thus the subsequence converges to in norm. Given , choose a sufficiently late with and with for every sufficiently large , using the original Cauchy sequence property. The triangle inequality then gives . Therefore
This proves the needed instance of completeness of Lp spaces without assuming the result being proved.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.