Minkowski inequality states that on a measure space , for and measurable real or complex of finite Lp norm,For , integrate the scalar triangle inequality . For , the almost everywhere bounds and give the same result by taking the essential supremum.
For , first ensure that the left side is finite. The convex function on givesso has finite Lp norm. Set and . Since , Holder inequality givesIf the result is immediate; otherwise divide by . This proves the triangle inequality for every claimed exponent.
Use Lebesgue measure restricted to the Lebesgue measurable set . For , start with the measurable real-valued functions on satisfying . Define an equivalence relation by when almost everywhere, and let consist of their equivalence classes. Addition and scalar multiplication are defined using representatives. The Lp norm isFor , use measurable functions bounded almost everywhere, apply the same identification, and define the L-infinity norm byThese expressions are independent of the representative. For finite , zero norm is equivalent to almost everywhere: each set must have measure zero, and their union is . The same implication follows from the essential supremum for . Absolute homogeneity is immediate; Minkowski inequality proves the triangle inequality and closure under addition. Thus these are normed vector spaces. Using complex-valued representatives gives their complex versions by the same construction.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space , choosing measurable representatives. There is a subsequence withWrite and . Repeated Minkowski inequality gives . As increases pointwise, the monotone convergence theorem givesHence is finite almost everywhere and represents an L2 function. Definewhere the series converges, and set on the exceptional Lebesgue null set. It is a measurable function, and almost everywhere, so Minkowski inequality gives .
For fixed , Fatou's lemma applied to squares of finite tails and then Minkowski inequality giveThus the subsequence converges to in norm. Given , choose a sufficiently late with and with for every sufficiently large , using the original Cauchy sequence property. The triangle inequality then gives . ThereforeThis proves the needed instance of completeness of Lp spaces without assuming the result being proved.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.