Let be a finite Galois extension of number fields, with Galois group , and let be a nonzero prime ideal of . Write its prime ideal factorization as
The Galois group acts transitively on the primes above . One proof uses the Chinese remainder theorem. If were outside the orbit of , choose an integral element which is zero modulo and one modulo every conjugate of . Its field norm belongs to , hence to . But each factor is one modulo , a contradiction. Transitivity also makes all equal to a common ramification index and all equal to a common residue degree .
Fix above . Its decomposition group is the stabilizer
The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives . Elements of act on the residue field over ; the group kernel is the inertia group
Thus inertia measures the automorphisms invisible after reduction, whereas decomposition measures all automorphisms preserving the chosen prime.
The completion is a Galois extension with group : preservation of lets an automorphism extend continuously to the completion, and the local embeddings of this normal extension arise in this way. The degree of a field extension formula is . Reduction gives the exact sequence
For surjectivity, lift a primitive residue-field generator by the Hensel lemma to obtain the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension of . Its automorphisms are the residue-field automorphisms. They extend to because the latter is normal. Since a finite residue field extension has a cyclic Galois group of order , the exact sequence yields
The fixed field of local inertia is the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension, and the extension above it is totally ramified. Primes in the same global orbit have conjugate decomposition groups and inertia groups, so the orders do not depend on the chosen prime.
If , inertia is trivial and is generated by the unique Frobenius automorphism acting on residues by . Its order is . In a ramified extension this residue action determines only a coset modulo inertia. A prime splits completely exactly when , equivalently its decomposition group is trivial. A totally ramified prime has and ; an unramified prime has . In an abelian extension, conjugation does nothing, so the associated groups and unramified Artin symbol are independent of the prime above .
Use arithmetic Frobenius automorphisms: residues are raised to the size of the base residue field. Let contain the finite primes ramified in the finite abelian extension . The Artin map is the group homomorphism
where is the group of fractional ideals supported outside . The Artin symbol is independent of the prime above , since the extension is abelian. Commutativity makes the displayed extension from prime ideals well defined. Defining this map does not yet assert the Artin reciprocity law, which describes its congruence group kernel.
For an intermediate field , restriction gives
To prove it, start with an unramified prime and a prime of above it. Its Frobenius automorphism acts on the residue of every integral element of by raising it to . Its restriction is therefore the Frobenius automorphism for at the restricted prime. The identity for all allowed fractional ideals follows by the group homomorphism property. On Galois groups, restriction is the quotient by , so passing to a subextension quotients the Artin map accordingly.
Now let be any finite extension and put . This is the translated extension: is abelian, and restriction identifies with . A prime of above a prime is unramified in , because forming a compositum with preserves an unramified extension. Put . The residue-field sizes satisfy . Consequently the restriction to of Frobenius at acts on its integral residues by raising them to , giving
But the ideal norm is . Multiplying this prime-by-prime identity proves
This is restriction and norm compatibility of the Artin map. The fractional ideal must be supported over primes unramified in . No assumption that itself is unramified or Galois is needed. With geometric rather than arithmetic Frobenius, both maps are inverted and the compatibility identities remain unchanged.
A useful strong form of the Hensel lemma is the following. Let be a complete discretely valued field, with valuation ring , normalized valuation , and . If satisfies
then there is a unique root in the ball . When the assertion is immediate; otherwise the condition includes .
Here is a proof by Newton iteration over a valued field. Write and , and set
Suppose and . The correction has valuation , so . Taylor expansion over cancels the linear term and gives
Thus the derivative still has valuation , and . Unless an exact root is reached earlier, the corrections tend to zero with exponentially increasing valuations. Completeness gives , and continuity gives and . For uniqueness, if are in this ball, polynomial expansion around gives
The second factor has valuation exactly and is nonzero, so two roots in the ball must be equal. In particular, a simple residue root lifts uniquely: and satisfy the hypothesis.
For the square-class group of a p-adic field, write every element as with . Multiplication by a square changes by an even integer, so valuation parity gives one independent factor .
For odd , a unit is a square if and only if its residue is a square in . Necessity follows by reduction; sufficiency applies the simple-root Hensel lemma to , whose derivative is a unit at a nonzero residue root. The cyclic group has square subgroup of index two. If is a unit with nonsquare residue, then
For , every odd square is one modulo eight. Conversely, if , take and . Then , so the strong Hensel lemma gives a square root. Thus unit square classes are exactly their residues modulo eight. The classes and generate this group of order four independently, and valuation parity supplies the class . Hence
For , the quadratic Hilbert symbol is one if is a field norm from , and minus one otherwise; a square gives the trivial extension and symbol one. It depends only on the two square classes. Equivalently, the conic has a nonzero rational point precisely when the symbol is one. Interchanging and in the conic gives . The Hilbert norm residue symbol is a group homomorphism in each argument; for nonsquare , the cyclic local norm index makes its group kernel a subgroup of index two. The resulting pairing on square classes is nondegenerate. Also
since . In the language of local class field theory, ; in the Brauer group, it records whether the quaternion cyclic algebra splits. These are compatible norm-obstruction descriptions.
An unramified extension of local fields of degree two has norm group consisting precisely of elements with even valuation. Indeed,
and the norms on units are surjective. For the latter assertion, the norm on the finite residue fields is surjective. On successive higher principal-unit groups, the congruence
allows one to correct a proposed unit norm one digit at a time: the residue field trace is surjective, and completeness makes the corrections converge. An unramified quadratic field is unique up to isomorphism. Therefore, if is its defining nonsquare class,
For odd , choose the nonsquare unit from part (i). The polynomial has irreducible separable reduction, so it defines the unramified quadratic extension. Thus
The trivial class is included in , since a degree-one extension is unramified. The two units pair trivially, while . Any class outside has odd valuation and consequently pairs nontrivially with . This proves directly
For , the unit square classes from part (i) give . The element satisfies ; its reduction is irreducible and separable over . This shows that is unramified of degree two, giving
For a fully explicit pairing check, use the generators . We have and , since and from . But : a norm equal to would be a sum of two squares. If either summand had negative valuation, the sum would have negative valuation (equal negative valuations give valuation ); if both were integral, their squares could not sum to . Finally, the unramified norm criterion gives . The identity and determine the remaining entries. Writing , the exponent matrix is
For , annihilating both generators of requires , so . Annihilating alone requires , so is a unit class. Hence
These are the Hilbert-symbol annihilators of units and unramified square classes. Annihilators here are taken with respect to this pairing, or equivalently in the character group of a finite abelian group after identifying square classes with their Hilbert-symbol characters.
We give the detailed norm-index argument for a cyclic extension of p-adic fields; thus is a finite extension of . Write , . For an additive -module , put and . The two periodic Tate cohomology of a cyclic group groups and the Herbrand quotient are
when these groups are finite. For multiplicative modules, is the product of conjugates and .
The periodic complex alternating and gives a six-term exact sequence for every short exact sequence of modules. Taking the alternating product of the finite group orders in that exact sequence proves
For a finite module, the counting fibers gives and , so the two Tate groups have equal order. This proves the Herbrand quotient of a finite module is one. It follows that replacing a module by a finite-index submodule does not change its quotient, whenever the cohomology groups are finite.
Two basic calculations drive the norm computation. For the trivial module , and is multiplication by , so . For a regular lattice , with , invariants are constant coefficient vectors and every such vector is a norm: put its constant coefficient in just one coordinate before applying . The group kernel of consists of the coefficient vectors of sum zero. Successively taking partial sums solves the cyclic difference equation for every such vector . Thus both Tate groups vanish and . This is cyclic cohomology of a regular lattice.
Let and . For sufficiently large , the p-adic logarithm and p-adic exponential are inverse -equivariant isomorphisms
To make the range explicit, suffices: the higher terms in the logarithm and exponential have greater valuation than their leading terms, their series converge there, and the identities and remain valid. Thus a deep multiplicative unit group becomes an additive -lattice in .
By the normal basis theorem, as a -module. As a -module it is therefore . Transport the regular lattice into . Both and are full -stable -lattices, so their intersection has finite index in each. The exact sequences with finite quotients show that the Tate groups of are finite and that
Since is finite, the exact-sequence formula for the Herbrand quotient gives . Finally, the valuation sequence
has trivial -action on . Hence the Herbrand quotient of the local multiplicative group is
For completeness, the denominator vanishes by Hilbert theorem 90. If , put and . Independence of distinct field automorphisms lets us choose with . Since , shifting the sum gives . Thus , a multiplicative coboundary. Therefore . The invariant subgroup of is , so
This proves the cyclic local norm index without assuming local reciprocity. If the extension has ramification index and residue degree , the valuation formula shows that the valuation contribution to the index is . A norm is a unit only when is a unit, so the remaining contribution is
In particular, unit norms are surjective in an unramified cyclic extension. The norm subgroup is open: on deep units its logarithm is , a nonzero full lattice in , and therefore contains a sufficiently deep principal-unit group. This connects the index calculation to the open finite-index norm subgroups classified by local class field theory.
To finish, the Hasse norm theorem for a cyclic extension of number fields states that a nonzero element is a global norm if and only if it is a norm at every finite and infinite completion. Here is its Brauer-theoretic proof outline. Associate to the cyclic algebra , with relations and . The splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra says that it splits exactly when : if , multiplication by and the operator realize it as ; conversely, in a split matrix representation, the underlying -dimensional space is one-dimensional over , so must act as and .
Apply this criterion at every completion, using the restricted cyclic character and any one completion of above that place. If is a local norm everywhere, every localized Brauer class is zero. Injectivity in the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem forces in ; the global splitting criterion gives . Conversely, a global norm is a local norm after completion, since the norm on is the product of the component norms, whose images coincide in the Galois case. The cyclic hypothesis is essential; the stated local-global principle does not hold for arbitrary extensions.
The Brauer group of a field consists of equivalence classes of central simple algebras, with addition induced by tensor product, zero represented by matrix algebras, and inverse represented by the opposite algebra. Localization sends a global algebra to its scalar extensions at the completions. For a non-Archimedean completion of a number field, the local Brauer invariant is an isomorphism
Normalize it so that an unramified cyclic algebra of degree , with arithmetic Frobenius generator and parameter , has invariant . For a real completion, with the Hamilton quaternion algebra mapped to ; for a complex completion the Brauer group is zero.
The global computation is the exact sequence in the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem:
Thus a global Brauer class is determined uniquely by a finite-support family of local invariants. Such a family occurs if and only if its sum is zero; at real places the only allowed entries are , and at complex places the entry is zero. Injectivity is a local-global splitting principle; the middle exactness is the reciprocity constraint; surjectivity of the sum follows already from any one finite local summand. These are separate assertions, not merely different descriptions of the sum formula.
For an explicit group description, choose one finite place . Assign arbitrary finite-support invariants at all other finite places and arbitrary allowed invariants at the real places, then set the invariant at equal to minus their sum. This gives
The description by the entire invariant family is canonical; this displayed elimination of one coordinate depends on the choice of .
The connection with Artin reciprocity is especially transparent for cyclic algebras. Let describe a cyclic extension, with . Write for the class of . The local reciprocity pairing is
It follows from the local fundamental class construction of the Local Artin map; on an unramified character it is precisely the normalization . The group kernel in the parameter is the local norm group, and restriction/corestriction give the norm compatibility of this pairing.
For a principal parameter , the zero-sum identity for its global cyclic algebra therefore reads
On the other hand the idelic Artin reciprocity law is
and evaluating this product by gives exactly that zero-sum identity. Conversely, testing every cyclic character of a finite abelian Galois group separates its elements, so the zero-sum identities for cyclic algebras imply this principal-idele reciprocity law for every finite abelian extension. At almost all places a unit and an unramified character pair trivially, so the sums and products are finite.
The full idelic statement identifies the group kernel as and induces . It explains why the local norm-residue pairings must glue globally. The global Brauer theorem supplies, in addition, the injectivity and realization statements needed to compute all algebra classes; the principal-product identity alone would not prove those statements. For cyclic algebras its injectivity yields the Hasse norm theorem, as in Question 3. In degree two, an invariant is either zero or , so the zero-sum law becomes the Hilbert reciprocity law . For example, a quaternion algebra over can be ramified at precisely a prescribed finite set of places, including possibly the real place, if and only if that set has even cardinality; the invariants uniquely determine its Brauer class. This illustrates how arithmetic reciprocity becomes a concrete constraint on global algebra structure.
For a number field and a modulus of a number field , let be the group of fractional ideals prime to its finite part. Let consist of principal ideals generated by elements congruent to one modulo its finite part and positive at each real place in its infinite part. The ray class group is .
The classification theorem of class field theory asserts the existence of a ray class field and an Artin map isomorphism
Its intermediate fields correspond contravariantly to subgroups of this ray class group. Equivalently, for each congruence subgroup of fractional ideals there is a unique finite abelian extension with Artin group kernel and group . Every finite abelian extension occurs for some modulus. For a fixed modulus, these are exactly the extensions whose conductor divides that modulus; the same field may be presented using larger moduli, with the appropriate pulled-back group kernel.
We quote the conductor facts needed to specialize this classification. The finite conductor exponent is zero exactly at the unramified primes. A real place occurs in the conductor exactly when it becomes complex. Thus conductor one means unramified at every finite prime and split at every real place. With the ray class group is the ordinary ideal class group, so classification gives an extension with
It is unramified at all finite primes, and its real places split. Conversely, every finite abelian extension with those properties has conductor one and lies in . This proves the existence and maximality of the ordinary Hilbert class field. Its degree is finite by finiteness of the ideal class group. The real-place convention matters: allowing real places to become complex gives the narrow class field instead; for the imaginary quadratic field in part (ii) this distinction disappears.
Put and . The ring of integers is , and the fundamental discriminant is . For a reduced positive definite binary quadratic form of discriminant , reduction gives
The coefficient is even; checking and , with the usual nonnegative sign choice at boundary equalities, leaves precisely
The correspondence between proper quadratic forms and ideal classes therefore gives . All four classes equal their inverses, since inversion replaces by . Hence
The three nontrivial classes may be represented by the ramified prime ideals , and . They square to principal ideals and satisfy . None is principal: an integral generator of norm , or would require to equal that number, which is impossible. The relation then makes the three classes distinct, consistently with the four-form calculation.
Consider
The three rational square classes are independent, so . Their radical product is , so and ; the extension is abelian. To verify that it is unramified, rather than assuming that radical adjunctions are harmless at , use the conductor-discriminant formula. The seven quadratic subfields have fundamental discriminants
The formula gives
The discriminant tower identity now gives
Thus the relative discriminant is the unit ideal and no finite prime ramifies. The base has no real places, so there is no infinite ramification to check. This unramified abelian degree-four extension has degree , and part (i) proves
This is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus thirty.
Next translate prime representation into an ideal class. For , we claim
If a representation exists, lies in and has . The integral ideal has norm , so it is a prime ideal . Its class is . Conversely, if , the product is principal, say . Since this ideal lies in , its generator has the form with integers . Taking norms gives , proving the reverse implication. This is prime representation via an ideal class, and it proves sufficiency as well as necessity.
Identify the required class in through the Artin map. We can use the explicit representation : has norm , so the prime above obtained from has class . Its Frobenius in the multiquadratic extension acts on the three radicals with signs
Their product is one, so this automorphism fixes . Because is abelian, for any unramified rational prime that splits in , the Frobenius at either prime of of norm is its rational Frobenius restricted to . The Artin isomorphism therefore makes the required class condition equivalent to
Conversely, these signs already imply splitting in , since their product is . No extra splitting condition is missing.
The supplementary law for , quadratic reciprocity for and , and then the Chinese remainder theorem turn these sign conditions into
Their four simultaneous residue classes modulo are . Finally, is represented by , whereas and cannot be represented: gives a value at least , and gives twice a square. We have proved the complete criterion

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.