Set and . Replace the last sampled value by , and call the resulting absolute-increment sum . This is a sum over a genuine partition of an interval of , and
by right continuity. This is the dyadic approximation of total variation. Let be the total variation of a function on , allowing . Every is at most . Conversely, take any finite partition of an interval of . Approximate its interior points from the right by dyadic grid points, retaining the endpoint . For large these approximating points remain distinct, and right continuity makes their absolute-increment sum converge to that of the original partition. The triangle inequality makes at least this selected sum. Taking the supremum over all partitions proves
The limit is the total-variation function; for locally finite variation it is the total-variation process.
There is a missing hypothesis in the assertion about being càdlàg. A general càdlàg function can have infinite total variation of a function arbitrarily close to zero. For example,
is continuous. At the successive points its values alternate in sign with magnitude . The variation along these points dominates a divergent harmonic series. Thus for every , but , so even extended-valued right continuity fails at zero.
The correct càdlàg conclusion holds when has finite variation on every compact interval. Indeed is then finite and nondecreasing, so it has finite left limits. To prove right continuity at , fix and choose a partition of whose sum is within of its variation. If lies before the first interior partition point, changing the first endpoint from to changes that sum by at most . Additivity of total variation of a function therefore gives
Let and then . This proves right continuity. This proves càdlàg regularity of finite total variation. Under that qualification, the jump formula is
If the variation is infinite, a difference of two infinite variation values is not a defined jump.
Fix . By uniform continuity of each path of the continuous local martingale on , its modulus
tends to zero almost surely. For every , comparison of powers of each increment gives
The squared-increment sum converges in probability to , by the dyadic definition of quadratic variation. Including the last full grid interval instead of the last partial interval changes that sum by a quantity bounded by , so the ceiling convention has the same limit. In particular these squared-increment sums are bounded in probability.
Since , a quantity tending to zero almost surely multiplied by a family bounded in probability tends to zero in probability. Hence
This is uniform convergence on compacts in probability, and proves the superquadratic case of dyadic power variation of a continuous local martingale.
Fix the specified time . With the path modulus on as above, comparison of increment powers now gives
The hypothesis makes the second factor eventually bounded almost surely, while the first tends to zero almost surely because . Thus the squared-increment sums tend to zero almost surely. They also converge in probability to the quadratic variation , so uniqueness of the limit in probability implies almost surely.
The quadratic variation is nondecreasing, hence it vanishes throughout . To see explicitly that the continuous local martingale must then be constant, localize it to square-integrable stopped martingales. The Itô isometry gives
Remove the localization, apply the conclusion at every rational , and use continuity. Since , this proves
Thus is indistinguishable from the zero process on that interval. This is the subquadratic case of dyadic power variation of a continuous local martingale.
No quadratic variation argument is needed. For deterministic , the martingale property and square integrability give
Consequently
Apply this identity separately to each consecutive grid increment. The second moments telescope, giving
This uniform bound follows directly from martingale-difference orthogonality, including the final interval specified by the ceiling.
The gradient bound makes a Lipschitz function, with , so its value at a Gaussian random variable is integrable and square integrable. The future Brownian increment is independent of and has distribution . Conditioning on the current location therefore gives
This is the Markov property expressed through the Brownian transition semigroup. In particular and .
Let for . Differentiating the Brownian transition semigroup in the spatial variables is justified by the bounded gradient and gives
The heat equation for this semigroup is the backward equation . Applying the multidimensional Itô formula yields
The finite-variation term vanishes. Thus
Initially this calculation holds on . The vector of stochastic integral coefficients has norm at most , so the Itô isometry lets the integrals extend to time one. Also in by the Lipschitz function bound and continuity of Brownian motion. The same representation therefore holds on the entire interval.
Let . The triangle inequality for the conditional average gives
The independent coordinate Brownian motions have zero cross-variation, so the quadratic variation of a stochastic integral gives
The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem says that a continuous local martingale starting at zero whose quadratic variation diverges admits a Brownian motion , with the inverse-clock filtration, such that . If the total clock is finite, one may enlarge the probability space and append independent Brownian motion after the clock terminates. This gives the same identity up to the original lifetime.
Apply this theorem to . The clock bound implies the event inclusion
The latter event is contained in the union of the upper and lower crossing events. Symmetry of Brownian motion gives
This uses only an event inclusion; independence between the Brownian motion and its random clock is neither assumed nor needed.
The Brownian reflection principle and Brownian scaling give
where has the standard normal distribution. Combine part (c) with the allowed Gaussian tail bound to obtain
This is the Brownian martingale proof of Gaussian concentration. It proves the intended Gaussian concentration inequality. The denominator printed in the initial bound is , whereas the gradient hypothesis and part (c) give . The stronger printed bound is false in general. For a concrete counterexample, take , , and . At ,
where the first strict inequality follows by integrating the decreasing normal density over . The rightmost term is the printed bound. Thus the square on is a necessary source correction, rather than a change of proof technique.
Use the following form of the Girsanov theorem. If is Brownian motion, is predictable, and
is a uniformly integrable martingale with , then the probability measure with terminal density makes a Brownian motion. The analogous finite-horizon statement uses the terminal density at that horizon.
Here take and . Before , , so the stochastic integral is well-defined. The assumed uniform integrability of the stopped stochastic exponential gives
Thus the proposed weighting really defines a probability measure, and the Girsanov theorem gives the Brownian motion
under that measure. In particular
All calculations are first made on this compact stopped interval. The integral involving is naturally defined on ; at its quadratic variation may diverge. The density will have a zero limiting extension there, as established below, rather than a finite stochastic logarithm at the hitting time.
For in , the radial function has
The multidimensional Itô formula, initially stopped away from zero, gives
The martingale term has quadratic variation , since . The Lévy characterization of Brownian motion says that a continuous local martingale starting at zero with quadratic variation is a standard Brownian motion. Consequently the radial equation is
On the drift is Lipschitz continuous. Extend it to a bounded globally Lipschitz function on the real line. The standard existence and pathwise uniqueness theorem for stochastic differential equations with globally Lipschitz coefficients applies to this extension, and gives uniqueness in law up to the first exit from . Both this radial process and the process in part (a) solve the same equation from . Thus
where each exit time is computed from its own coordinate path.
For completeness, the radial equation is valid globally: the three-dimensional Bessel process does not hit zero. Apply the Itô formula to on the annulus. Its drift is zero, and the stopped process is a bounded martingale. At the first exit,
so
The exit time is finite because one coordinate of the underlying Brownian motion reaches in finite time. Letting and then considering arbitrarily large proves that zero is never reached. The radial martingale therefore has quadratic variation on the whole time axis, completing the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion argument.
Under Wiener measure, and
The definition of the stochastic exponential gives
On the other hand, the Itô formula applied to the logarithm gives precisely
Their initial values differ by , so
almost surely under Wiener measure. In particular,
Write . The stopped Bessel process has the same law as the weighted stopped Brownian motion, so for every bounded measurable functional of a continuous path,
The Bessel process hits in finite time and never hits zero. Its minimum before that hitting time is strictly positive. Thus for sufficiently small , depending on the path, its stopped path equals exactly. Under Wiener measure, the events increase to , and on that event the stopped paths eventually equal . The remaining term is bounded by . The dominated convergence theorem therefore yields the precise limiting identity
The bounded stopped martingale gives
Hence the limiting identity says
This establishes Brownian conditioning by a stopped Bessel density.
The displayed density in the question requires a stopping convention. On the full, unstopped path space, the probability measure
is well-defined, but its paths continue as Brownian motion after . Its pushforward by the stopping map is the law of the stopped Bessel process. Equivalently, if denotes the law of Brownian motion stopped at , then the actual stopped laws satisfy
Literal absolute continuity of the stopped law with respect to unstopped Wiener measure is false: paths that become permanently constant at have probability one for the stopped law and zero under Wiener measure. The same density is also valid on the stopped sigma-algebra of the original coordinate space. Thus the corrected stopped-law formulation proves the intended conclusion without equating these different full-path measures.
The conformal invariance of planar Brownian motion is a time-change statement. If is a conformal bijection of planar domains and is planar Brownian motion started in , let be its exit time and define
Before exit this clock is strictly increasing. Its inverse makes a planar Brownian motion started at , up to its transformed lifetime . The image of the stopped trajectory is therefore invariant in law after this change of time. A holomorphic map with nonzero derivative gives the corresponding local statement even without global injectivity.
Here is the proof. Write and . The real and imaginary parts are harmonic. The Itô formula therefore gives the two continuous local martingales
stopped on compact subsets of . The Cauchy-Riemann equations imply
Thus both coordinate quadratic variations equal and their quadratic covariation is zero. After inverse time change, the covariance matrix of the two continuous local martingales is . The multidimensional Lévy characterization of multidimensional Brownian motion states that a continuous vector local martingale starting at zero with this covariance matrix is standard vector Brownian motion. Apply it after subtracting , and exhaust by compact subsets. This proves the theorem, with killing at the transformed exit lifetime. The clock is the conformal Brownian clock; omitting it would generally give an incorrect speed.
The exponential map is a conformal bijection from the strip
to the wedge containing the starting point . The restriction makes it injective. A planar Brownian motion started at zero in this strip maps, after the conformal Brownian clock, to the required Brownian motion in the wedge.
Let be the first time exits . It is finite almost surely, and is a bounded martingale. The optional stopping theorem gives
The strip exit maps to the corresponding bounding ray. The exponential clock is finite at , because its integrand is continuous on the compact time interval . Thus it does not remove or reverse the exit event. We obtain
This is the Brownian wedge-exit probability obtained directly from the strip, using conformal invariance of planar Brownian motion.
Put . The hitting times are finite almost surely by recurrence of planar Brownian motion, and increase with . At , the position is . By the Strong Markov property, Brownian scaling, and rotational invariance of planar Brownian motion, the future process
is a standard planar Brownian motion started at , independent of . The random rotation does not change its conditional law, since that law is rotationally invariant.
The first time this rescaled process reaches radius corresponds to the original time . Its continuous argument starts at zero and equals the increment of the original winding angle. Hence
For any ordered finite collection of levels, apply this assertion successively. Earlier winding values are measurable at the current hitting time, so all increments are independent and their laws depend only on the level differences. This proves the Lévy process property of winding at logarithmic radial passage levels.
One can also verify stochastic continuity and identify this process. The logarithmic-radius and argument martingales have the common clock
The same Cauchy-Riemann equations calculation as in part (a), applied locally to the logarithm and joined along the continuous argument, gives independent Brownian motions such that and . This clock diverges: if it had a finite limit, convergence of martingales with finite total quadratic variation would make converge to a finite value, forcing the clock integral itself to diverge.
Thus, with , we have . The Brownian first-passage Laplace transform is . It follows either from the Exponential martingale for Brownian motion stopped at , or from the one-dimensional exit equation. Conditioning on the independent process gives
So this is a symmetric Cauchy process, with level parameter . The formula implies stochastic continuity at zero and, by stationary increments, everywhere. Under the usual definition requiring càdlàg paths, use the right-continuous passage clock . It agrees with for each fixed level almost surely, and is the càdlàg modification. This distinction concerns simultaneous passage levels and does not alter any increment law.
A left-continuous adapted process is a predictable process. Define the elementary predictable approximation
At every , its sample time approaches from the left, including when is itself a grid point. Thus pathwise by left continuity.
Use the continuous semimartingale decomposition , with a continuous local martingale and a continuous finite-variation process. Localize so that on a fixed horizon , the integrands are bounded by a deterministic constant, is bounded, and the total-variation process of at is bounded. This is possible using local boundedness and the finite pathwise clock and variation.
For the finite-variation integral, the dominated convergence theorem gives
almost surely. For the martingale integral, the Itô isometry and the Doob L2 maximal inequality give
Here the localized bounds justify dominated convergence also in expectation. Remove localization to conclude that the full elementary integrals converge in uniform convergence on compacts in probability to .
The sum of completed intervals differs from the full elementary integral at time by
Its maximum on tends to zero almost surely, by the local bound on and uniform continuity of . Therefore
This proves left-endpoint approximation of a continuous semimartingale integral, including the unfinished interval convention.
Define the quadratic covariation of two continuous semimartingales by polarization:
The available quadratic variation convergence theorem and the polarization identity imply that the sums of products of simultaneous grid increments converge in uniform convergence on compacts in probability to . The quadratic covariation is a continuous finite-variation process, vanishing at time zero.
For a grid ending at , the elementary algebraic identity
telescopes. The first two sums converge by part (a), with the continuous processes as integrands; continuous paths are left-continuous and locally bounded. The last sum converges to the quadratic covariation by the preceding polarization argument. Finally, locally uniformly by continuity. Hence
This is the Itô product rule, or stochastic integration by parts. Uniqueness of the limit in uniform convergence on compacts in probability, followed by continuity, makes the identity hold simultaneously for all outside one null set. The proof used finite-grid algebra, part (a), and the permitted quadratic variation theorem; it did not use the Itô formula.
Use the local convention for the martingale problem, which is appropriate for arbitrary measurable coefficients. A continuous adapted process solves if the coefficient integrals are locally finite and, for every ,
is a local martingale. Here locally finite means almost surely for each . Suitable localization upgrades the identities to true martingale identities. With bounded coefficients and bounded test derivatives, this distinction disappears on finite horizons.
A Markov diffusion generated by is a time-homogeneous Markov process with continuous paths whose infinitesimal generator on the stated test domain is . Its transition operators satisfy the generator limit, and Dynkin formula gives precisely the preceding martingale problem identities. Some terminology uses L-diffusion for the test-function identities alone; the Markov property is an additional assertion unless uniqueness supplies it.
Suppose now . Use smooth compactly supported functions agreeing with and on , and stop before exiting this interval. Removing these stops shows that
is a continuous local martingale. Consequently is a continuous semimartingale. The martingale problem applied to the second cutoff function says that
is a local martingale. The Itô formula for also says that
is a local martingale. Subtracting, the continuous finite-variation process is a local martingale and starts at zero. The theorem that a continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant gives
Define
The integrand is predictable and is stochastically integrable, since its integral against the bracket is exactly . Thus is a continuous local martingale with and . The Lévy characterization of Brownian motion states that these conditions make a Brownian motion relative to the given filtration. Associativity of stochastic integrals recovers , and therefore
The original process is a weak solution of a stochastic differential equation, with its driving Brownian motion constructed on the original space.
Conversely, the Itô formula applied to any weak solution with locally integrable coefficients gives the martingale problem identities. A Markov diffusion with generator gives them by Dynkin formula. A well-posed martingale problem, with the usual measurable path-space setup, identifies a unique family of diffusion laws and yields the Strong Markov property. Without uniqueness, the test-function identities alone do not assert that every chosen solution is Markov. This specifies both the equivalence with weak equations and the role of uniqueness in identifying a diffusion.
Set and use the accelerated grid time . At population , the fluctuation increment is , , or zero. Its first and second conditional moments, multiplied by , are
Thus and , uniformly on every compact set. The centered conditional variance has the same limit, since the squared conditional mean contributes only .
Here is the diffusion approximation theorem being applied. For Markov chains sampled with time step , suppose the first and second conditional increment moments multiplied by converge uniformly on compact sets to continuous coefficients ; the large-jump conditional second moments satisfy the local Lindeberg condition; the initial laws converge; compact containment holds on finite time intervals; and the limiting martingale problem is well-posed and nonexplosive. Then the interpolated chains converge weakly, uniformly on finite time intervals, to that problem's continuous solution. The step versions converge in the Skorokhod J1 topology. Local moment bounds supply the stopped-process tightness, and the limiting test-function identities identify every subsequential limit by the martingale problem.
We verify the global condition rather than assume it. Before the stopping rule is triggered, , and implies . Therefore
For the Lyapunov function , the exact one-step generator is consequently
After stopping, the process is constant. Applying the elementary stopped supermartingale inequality for , and stopping also on first reaching , gives
This is compact containment. At zero population we use the natural absorbing convention ; the same calculation is valid there.
The invalid-probability threshold is at the positive root
Because , we have . The corresponding fluctuation level tends to infinity, so the stopping rule changes none of the compact-set moment limits. The initial fluctuation satisfies and hence tends to zero. All jumps have magnitude at most , so the Lindeberg condition is immediate. The limiting equation has globally Lipschitz coefficients and is well-posed and nonexplosive. The theorem therefore gives
This is the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck fluctuation limit at a stable population equilibrium. The limiting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process has explicit solution
The PDF samples the linearly interpolated population at , so its displayed process is actually the step version. Using instead gives the continuous interpolation; their uniform distance is at most . Both therefore have the asserted continuous diffusion limit, with the step version interpreted in Skorokhod J1 topology.
Finally, if , the stopped fluctuation reaches a value greater than . The preceding Lyapunov function bound gives directly
This also shows explicitly why the artificial stopping rule is asymptotically irrelevant.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.