The strong law of large numbers states that, for independent and identically distributed random variables with ,
Thus, outside an event of probability zero, the sample mean converges to the common expected value.
For a Borel set , the joint probability density gives
For each , substitute . The change of variables for probability densities contributes , with the absolute value accounting for the reversed orientation when . The line has two-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero, so omitting it changes no probability. By the Tonelli theorem,
The bracket is nonnegative and its integral over is one. This proves the probability density of a product of random variables formula:
As usual, a probability density function is determined only almost everywhere; exceptional infinite values are harmless.
For the independent random variables with the specified uniform distribution, on and zero elsewhere. When , the conditions and are equivalent to . Therefore
The value assigned at zero is arbitrary. Substitution checks normalization of a probability distribution: . This is the product of independent uniform random variables law.
Direct integration of the uniform distribution yields and . The expectation of a product of independent random variables gives
Subtracting the square of the expected value gives the variance:
Since , Markov's inequality implies, for every ,
Hence The first moment suffices: the variance need not tend to zero throughout this range.
If , then almost surely. Intersecting these events over all still gives an event of probability one. On it, , so the products have a finite nonnegative limit .
For every , the inclusion and part (c)(i) imply . Taking for positive integers proves almost surely. Thus
The monotonicity is the extra ingredient that upgrades convergence in probability to almost sure convergence here.
For , integration and independence of random variables give
By the fractional moment criterion for convergence in probability,
The parenthesized factor is less than one precisely when . This expression vanishes at and has derivative there. If , the derivative is negative, so some sufficiently small makes the factor strictly less than one. The bound then tends to zero geometrically, proving
The inverse transformation of a random variable is , with absolute derivative . The condition becomes . The change of variables for probability densities gives
Equivalently, has the exponential distribution of rate one. Applying a separate measurable transformation of a random variable to each independent preserves independence of random variables, so the are independent and identically distributed.
Taking logarithms of the product gives
By part (d)(i), in probability distribution, where has the exponential distribution of rate one. Thus and . The strong law of large numbers gives
If , choose . Eventually , so . If , choose ; eventually . Therefore
In particular, the second range cannot have almost sure convergence to zero. This is the almost-sure growth rate of independent products. At the logarithmic limit is zero, which by itself decides neither behavior; that boundary case is not requested.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.