For identical bosons the full wave function is symmetric under the particle exchange operator:In the given position-only model this is the spatial parity under the particle exchange operator. If additional spin variables are present, the symmetry applies to the complete state including them.
For identical fermions the full wave function is antisymmetric:In particular it vanishes when the two complete one-particle arguments coincide. Applying this to the position-only model assumes that no independent spin symmetry changes the required spatial parity.
The orthogonal coordinate change preserves the kinetic energy and takes the particle exchange operator to . Thus the spatial wave function is even in for bosons and odd for fermions.
The total potential energy and Hamiltonian separate asAssume so the relative oscillator is confining. Its spectrum is , and its parity in the two-particle relative coordinate is .
The lowest boson state uses , whereas the lowest fermion state uses , . ThereforeFor an oscillator of frequency , . Since ,The factor three is the extra relative-coordinate excitation required by antisymmetry. The supplied oscillator wave functions correspond to kinetic energy ; the extra factor printed before that term in the hint is inconsistent with those functions and the stated energies. The calculation uses the conventional kinetic energy dictated by particle mass .
Use the normalized Rayleigh quotient . Its real directional derivative in an arbitrary complex direction isIt vanishes for every direction precisely when , since testing gives its squared norm. Conversely an eigenvector makes every derivative zero. Stationarity over all states is stronger than stationarity in a restricted trial family.
Normalize the Gaussian as , with . Its moments are , and . The printed potential energy consequently givesPut . Then , whose second derivative is . It diverges at both positive endpoints, so its sole stationary point is the unique global minimum. Its equation isThe variational principle therefore yields the optimized upper boundThe printed minimizer is inconsistent with the printed quartic coefficient. At the derivative is , so this is not the stationary Gaussian for that potential energy. It is nevertheless a legitimate trial vector and gives the simple, weaker bound . If the quartic coefficient were instead , four times the printed value, then would indeed minimize the family and its energy would be . This possible coefficient correction is identified explicitly rather than silently used. The reusable calculation is Gaussian trial for a quadratic-plus-quartic oscillator.
Let and take the reduced positive operator . Choose orthonormal eigenvectors for its positive eigenvalues . DefineThe defining identity of the partial trace gives , so the are orthonormal. Expansion in a full eigenbasis of yields ; zero-eigenvalue terms have zero squared norm and contribute nothing. ThusThe zero vector has the empty decomposition. Unit normalization would give , but no normalization is needed for the theorem itself.
For the given vector, the coefficient matrix is . Its second reduced operator is , whose eigenvalues are and eigenvectors , . The corresponding normalized first-factor vectors areTheir norms are one and their inner product is zero. HenceExpanding the two terms returns the original three contributions. The vector has squared norm ; if a normalized state is wanted, divide by two and the Schmidt coefficients become and .
The no-cloning theorem states that no fixed deterministic quantum operation can perfectly duplicate every unknown pure state. For a unitary copier with a fixed blank, suppose it cloned two normalized vectors . Preservation of inner products would give , impossible for a nonorthogonal distinct pair with overlap strictly between zero and one in modulus. Including an environment does not help: its final overlap has modulus at most one, so one would require . Thus a universal perfect copier is impossible. Orthogonal known alternatives do not contradict this restriction.
Label the three qubits as input , Alice's entangled qubit and Bob's qubit . Initially their joint state isThe controlled-NOT gate from to changes this toApply and to the first qubit and group by Alice's two computational-basis outcomes. The result isIn expanded form the last two Bob factors are and . Their Alice labels must be and ; the repeated labels in the source are printing errors.
Alice measures her two qubits and sends the two classical bits to Bob. Each outcome has probability and Bob's conditional state is . He applies to recover the input, up to physically irrelevant global phase. Explicitly the corrections for are . This is quantum teleportation: Alice's input is consumed by measurement, so no second surviving copy is created. Before her classical message, Bob's reduced density operator is , independent of the input, so the protocol also supplies no faster-than-light communication.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.