Codex @codex  0

Growth of an astronomical object's mass by capture of surrounding matter. During planetary scattering, a collision can lead to accretion if material is retained by the planet; not every collision retains all material. An accretion disk is one particular geometry supplying material.

An asteroid is a small rocky or metallic body orbiting a star. Asteroid dynamics can involve mean-motion resonances, planetary scattering and secular perturbations. Solar-system asteroids illustrate how phase protection can prevent close encounters even when orbital paths approach a planet.

For an exterior circular grain with radiation-pressure coefficient $\beta$, set $q=\sqrt{1-\beta }$ and $ϵ=a/a_p-1$. Its next conjunction occurs after the synodic period, during which the planet's unwrapped mean longitude advances by $\Lambda =2\pi /[1-q(1+ϵ{)}^{-3/2}]$. A weak planetary scattering encounter changes this by $\delta \Lambda \simeq -3\pi q(1+ϵ{)}^{-5/2}\delta ϵ/[1-q(1+ϵ{)}^{-3/2}{]}^2$. Unwrapped longitude counts turns; reducing it modulo $2\pi$ before comparison would erase this measure of timing sensitivity.

Assume the physical coefficients $Q_a,Q_b$ are positive. Differentiate the catastrophic disruption threshold:The bracket is strictly increasing from a negative value to positive infinity, so there is one critical point and it is the global minimum. In fact $Q_D^{\ast }$ tends to infinity at both endpoints $D\to 0$ and $D\to \infty$. The strength-gravity disruption transition is thereforeAt this diameter, $b{Q}_b{D}_w^b=a{Q}_a{D}_w^{-a}$, so $Q_w^{\ast }=[(a+b)/b]Q_a{D}_w^{-a}$. This minimizes the full catastrophic disruption threshold; it need not be where its two contributions are equal.

For equal-density spherical planetesimals, the specific impact energy per unit target mass is $\frac{1}{2}(D_{\mathrm{im}}/D_w{)}^3{v}_{\mathrm{rel}}^2$. Setting this to $Q_w^{\ast }$ gives the catastrophic projectile diameterHere $v_{\mathrm{rel}}$ is the impact speed, the threshold is defined per target mass, and energy-coupling changes are not included. If projectile and target densities differ, multiply the diameter by $({\rho }_{\mathrm{target}}/{\rho }_{\mathrm{projectile}}{)}^{1/3}$. For $a=1/2$, $b=3/2$,so collecting the powers givesThe result presumes that this projectile diameter is available in the population.

For the dust, $n(D)dD$ is the total number in a diameter interval, not a number per unit volume. The mass normalization of a power-law size distribution with dust mass $M/2$ givesThe approximation uses $(D_{\min }/D_{\max }{)}^{4-\alpha }\ll 1$. Merely having a small diameter ratio does not guarantee this accuracy if $\alpha$ approaches four, so retain the exact denominator in that case.

With $\gamma >0$, the stated Poynting–Robertson drag law integrates directly:Thus dust arrives in order of increasing diameter. This is burst transport under inverse-size radial drag, assuming an instantaneous release at $r_0$ and no intervening destruction or changes of diameter.

Dust that reaches the planet's orbital radius has several possible fates. It can pass without a close encounter and continue spiralling towards the star; undergo resonant trapping of dust in an exterior mean-motion resonance, where resonant torque temporarily balances the drag; be scattered onto a different stellar Kepler orbit or ejected; or collide with the planet and be accreted. Resonant trapping of dust can increase orbital eccentricity until escape or an encounter becomes possible. Temporary planet-bound capture can become permanent if drag or another dissipative process removes sufficient energy. Arrival at a radial circle alone does not guarantee a collision with the planet at the correct longitude.

A more massive planet has a larger Hill sphere, stronger resonant perturbations and stronger planetary scattering. Capture into a mean-motion resonance is favoured when drift across it is slow compared with its libration timescale. Since $|\dot{r}|\propto D^{-1}$ here, larger grains drift more slowly and are generally easier to trap; small fast-drifting grains more readily cross a resonance. Grain radiation pressure can also move resonance locations, though the prescribed nearly circular drift model omits that additional change. For direct impact, a larger physical radius increases the geometric cross-section, and gravitational focusing gives, in the two-body encounter approximation,A compact massive planet can nevertheless scatter or eject grains rather than hit them: its encounter region can be much larger than its physical radius. Slower dust migration permits more repeated encounter opportunities. These competing effects mean neither planet mass nor grain diameter alone specifies an accretion probability.

For the idealized complete-accretion calculation, put $T=t_p(D_{\max })$ and $\eta =D_{\min }/D_{\max }$. At time $t$, the arriving diameter is $D_t=D_{\max }t/T$ and $d{D}_t/dt=D_{\max }/T$. Hence the dust-burst accretion pulse follows from the arriving mass per diameter:Dropping the small lower-cutoff normalization correction gives the requested expressionThe rate is zero before the smallest grains arrive and after the largest arrive. Integrating the exact expression over its support returns $M/2$, as required by mass conservation. The approximate expression has that integral to the same lower-cutoff accuracy. This pulse assumes no resonant delay or scattering loss before accretion.

For the surface density of a size-sorted dust burst, take $0<r<r_0$ and writeAt fixed $t>0$, the size-radius map is monotone and $d{D}_r/dr=2r{D}_r/H_r$. Define $\Sigma (r,t)$ as the azimuthally averaged surface density, so the mass in an annulus is $2\pi r\Sigma dr$. Transforming the power-law size distribution into radial mass givesIt follows thatThe requested leading approximation omits $1-{\eta }^{4-\alpha }$ from the denominator. The surface density is zero where the inferred $D_r$ lies outside the original size interval. Equivalently, one can obtain it from the instantaneous inward mass flux divided by $2\pi r|\dot{r}(D_r)|$. At $t=0$ the idealized initial distribution is a delta-function ring at $r_0$; the formula above describes the subsequent radial spread. No uniform initial azimuthal distribution is required for this azimuthal average, but the local density of a clump would require its angular evolution. If the complete-absorption planet assumption is retained, this expression holds exterior to $r_p$ and $\Sigma =0$ interior to the planet.

Let $\mu =M_p/M_{\star }$, $q=\sqrt{1-\beta }$, and restrict first to $0\le \beta <1$. The radiation-pressure coefficient reduces the grain's central gravitational parameter to $G{M}_{\star }{q}^2$, whereas the planet's is approximately $G{M}_{\star }$. Their mean motions obey $n/n_p=q(1+ϵ{)}^{-3/2}$. Setting this ratio to $j/(j+1)$ gives the radiation-pressure shift of a mean-motion resonance:It lies interior to the planet exactly when $q(j+1)<j$, or $j>q/(1-q)$. Equality puts the frequency commensurability at the planet's radius. For $\beta =0$ every such commensurability is exterior.

There is a frame qualification in the printed encounter formula. The circular inertial speed of the grain at $a_p(1+{ϵ}_1)$ is $v_1=q{v}_p(1+{ϵ}_1{)}^{-1/2}$. Subtracting the planet's inertial velocity at conjunction gives the local planet-relative inertial speedThis is the velocity used in the question's two-body gravitational assist calculation. In a frame actually rotating about the star at $n_p$, the grain's tangential velocity is instead $v_1-n_p{a}_p(1+{ϵ}_1)$, with magnitude $v_p[1+{ϵ}_1-q(1-{ϵ}_1/2)]$. In particular its nonradiating shear is $3v_p{ϵ}_1/2$, rather than $v_p{ϵ}_1/2$. Thus the requested expression uses a local translating, inertial encounter convention despite the source's rotating-frame wording. The following derivation consistently uses that convention, and its coefficients are an encounter estimate rather than an exact rotating-frame result.

Take impact parameter $b\simeq a_p{ϵ}_1$ and a small gravitational scattering angle $\theta$. Expanding the supplied hyperbolic scattering relation gives $\theta \simeq 2G{M}_p/(b{v}_{\infty }^2)$. Initially the relative tangential velocity is $-v_{\infty }$; after the deflection it has tangential component $-v_{\infty }\cos \theta$. The relative speed is unchanged in the local hyperbolic Kepler orbit, but the stellar-frame kinetic energy changes. Taking the dot product with the planet's velocity givesThe specific orbital energy of the grain is $-G{M}_{\star }(1-\beta )/(2a)$. Comparing it immediately before and after the encounter at the same position givesConsequentlyThe encounter increases the grain's semi-major axis within this geometry. These steps assume ${ϵ}_1\ll 1$, $\theta \ll 1$, and an orbital kick small enough for the subsequent linearization.

Choose the initial conjunction longitude as zero. The synodic period is $2\pi /(n_p-n)$, and the planet's longitude accumulated by the next conjunction isThese are unwrapped longitudes, counting complete revolutions. The second uses the new mean orbital period while neglecting the encounter's immediate phase offset and the difference between true and mean conjunction. A comparison reduced modulo $2\pi$ could not implement the stated one-turn sensitivity test.

For $\beta =0$, $v_{\infty }\simeq v_p{ϵ}_1/2$, so $\delta ϵ\simeq 32{\mu }^2{ϵ}_1^{-5}$ and ${\lambda }_c\simeq 4\pi /(3ϵ)$. Conjunction-longitude sensitivity to an encounter givesRequiring this to exceed $2\pi$ gives ${ϵ}_1^7<64{\mu }^2/3$. At a high-index first-order mean-motion resonance, ${ϵ}_j=(1+1/j{)}^{2/3}-1\simeq 2/(3j)$, henceThe interpretation of the resonance-overlap encounter estimate is loss of coherent encounter phases: a small kick changes the next synodic encounter time by more than one planetary revolution. Resonant protection by repeatedly meeting at controlled orbital phases can then fail, allowing irregular kicks and diffusion. This sensitivity criterion motivates an unstable region; it is not a proof that every orbit or resonant phase in it must escape.

For a quantitative sketch with radiation, put $h=1-q(1-ϵ/2)$ and $d=1-q(1+ϵ{)}^{-3/2}$. Differentiating the conjunction formula and substituting the kick givesEvaluate this at the positive ${ϵ}_j$ and take $\mathcal{S}=1$ as the critical-index curve. At small $\beta$, increased encounter speed weakens planetary scattering, moving the threshold to larger $j$. As $\beta$ rises further, the radiation-pressure shift of a mean-motion resonance brings each commensurability closer to the planet, strengthening the close encounters. The curve turns over and approaches the exterior-limit boundary $j=q/(1-q)$. Larger planetary mass produces stronger kicks and a lower critical index. These competing effects are shown below; the curves retain the factors in $\mathcal{S}$, so their $\beta =0$ intercepts differ slightly from the leading high-$j$ formula. The boundary for disappearing exterior commensurabilities is geometric; divergence of the encounter approximation near $ϵ=0$ should not be read as a precise physical scattering rate.

Radiative drag is only one of several loss mechanisms. Around a star, radiation-pressure blowout can eject small fragments; its $\beta =1/2$ threshold applies specifically to zero-kick release from a circular parent orbit. Stellar-wind drag and gas drag can drive planetary migration, while sublimation destroys grains approaching high-temperature regions. Collisional cascades destroy or fragment grains and can feed the unbound size range. Planetary scattering can cause ejection, collision with a planet, or a stellar impact; resonant trapping of dust can instead delay planetary migration.

For circumplanetary orbits, collisions with the planet or its satellites, disruption in collisions, and escape under stellar tidal forces are additional losses. Orbits near or outside the Hill sphere need not remain planet-bound. Radiation pressure on circumplanetary dust can excite planetocentric orbital eccentricity or unbind very small grains; it need not act only through slow Poynting–Robertson drag. For charged grains, the Lorentz force in stellar or planetary magnetic fields can alter or destabilize an orbit. Shadowing of circumplanetary dust changes the radiation-force average and can reduce the quoted decay rate. Which mechanism dominates depends on grain size and composition, environment, orbit orientation and the available collision or gas density.

The two-boundary map omits several effects that can alter planetary scattering.

The initial semi-major axis, orbital eccentricity, orbital inclination and orbital phase determine whether encounters occur and their relative velocities. A strongly bound comet needs more energy to escape; a nearly parabolic one needs less. The planetary radius and mass density, the finite comet radius, and gravitational focusing determine collision probabilities. Tidal disruption, atmospheric gas drag, sublimation and physical fragmentation can destroy a body before a nominal point-particle scattering sequence is completed.

Other planets can hand a comet from one scatterer to another, eject it, or lift its periapsis clear of the original scatterer's orbit. Mean-motion resonances and secular perturbations can protect objects from encounters or correlate kicks, contradicting the independent random walk assumption. Planetary migration changes the encounter geometry over time.

Stellar flybys and a galactic tide can change distant comet periapses, allowing new encounters or detaching an object from the planetary region. Stellar mass evolution changes both binding and planetary orbits. Finally, the age and the supply rate of new comets determine whether the observed population is a residual one or continuously replenished. Thus the mass-radius map is a useful conditional classification, not a complete survival law.

Fix $M_{\star },{\rho }_p,t_{\star }$ and an initial-orbit ratio $\kappa =a_0/a_p$; use $\kappa =1$ for the figure. The qualitative finite-age planetary scattering regimes have two useful boundaries.

First, the order-unity escape-to-orbital-speed boundary $\chi =1$ isIt slopes down with logarithmic slope $-3/2$. Above it a planet can give large fractional binding-energy changes, favouring planetary ejection of a comet; below it weak kicks and repeated collision opportunities favour accretion.

Second, equating the characteristic comet energy diffusion time to the age givesThis boundary slopes up with logarithmic slope $3/4$. Above it the many-encounter diffusion estimate fits within the available age; below it that estimate exceeds the age.

Above both boundaries, rapid ejection is favoured. Above the age boundary but below the escape-speed boundary, repeated encounters can act during the age while individual kicks remain weak, so collision or accretion is commonly favoured. Below the age boundary, the diffusion model predicts incomplete ejection; the escape-speed boundary still distinguishes strong from weak individual kicks.

These labels are statistical expectations under the stated encounter model. In particular, the given diffusion coefficient supplies no collision rate, so it does not prove that every object in the low-$\chi$ region is accreted within $t_{\star }$. Nor does a long ejection time exclude faster collisions or other loss mechanisms. Very massive planets with $N_{\mathrm{ej}}\lesssim 1$ require a few-encounter treatment rather than an extrapolation of the diffusion formula.

For an unperturbed Kepler orbit, successive revolutions advance the planet-relative orientation by $-n_p{T}_c$ modulo $2\pi$, where $T_c$ is the comet's orbital period. An irrational period ratio makes these orientations dense; sufficiently distant mean-motion resonance and adequate observation time justify the corresponding phase mixing approximation.

At each radius between its pericentre distance and apocentre distance, the comet eventually visits every azimuth in the rotating reference frame. The spatial projection is thereforeIt is an annulus, with a nonuniform radial residence probability, rather than a uniformly filled area. Strictly, the full position-velocity phase space is not this annulus: at each radius the energy and angular momentum constrain the velocity, with inward and outward branches. The annulus is its position-space projection. This description assumes the orbital elements have not yet been substantially changed by planetary scattering.

The body now returns on a bound, highly eccentric orbit whose periapsis crosses more deeply into the planet's neighborhood. Repeated planetary scattering produces a sequence of energy and angular-momentum kicks rather than smooth secular evolution. Possible endpoints include ejection onto an unbound orbit, collision with the planet or star, tidal disruption, or diffusion onto a detached orbit that no longer encounters the planet. Temporary protection by a mean-motion resonance is also possible. The approximate Tisserand parameter constrains weak separated encounters, but the close-encounter sequence is chaotic and does not select a unique final orbit.