Assume stellar homology: fixed dimensionless profiles, uniform fixed composition, negligible radiation pressure, ideal gas support, and radiative transport throughout the model. Mass conservation gives . The hydrostatic pressure support equation gives ; combining with gives .
Integrating specific proton–proton chain energy generation over mass gives
For radiative diffusion in a star, , hence . With the Kramers' opacity law ,
Equating generated and transported luminosity gives , so the radiative homology with proton-proton burning and Kramers opacity relation is
The proportionality constants are fixed only within the adopted homologous family, not for arbitrary evolving stars.
Retain the same stellar homology and gas-pressure assumptions, but use the specified CNO cycle law and constant electron-scattering opacity. The nuclear luminosity now scales as
The radiative diffusion in a star scaling becomes
Equating the two yields . Therefore radiative homology with CNO burning and electron scattering gives
Since , the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives
This is a model comparison using the exponent 16 prescribed here. Actual massive stars may have appreciable radiation pressure and convective cores, which violate the assumptions of this purely radiative gas-pressure family.
The radiative diffusion in a star equation gives the homology scaling
Using the central scalings from part (i) and the electron-scattering opacity yields
The radius cancels because an electron-scattering opacity is independent of density and temperature.
Radiative diffusion in a star can be written
Dividing by hydrostatic equilibrium gives
which is constant by assumption. Since both and vanish at the surface, integration gives with constant .
Eliminating between the gas and radiation equations of state now gives
Thus the star is an stellar polytrope. Put
The structure equations become the Lane-Emden equation
The surface is the first zero . Writing
the Lane-Emden mass formula gives
Therefore
where
The additional radiative-equilibrium relation is .
Let
be the local isothermal sound speed squared. Steady spherical mass conservation gives
The momentum equation, with radiative acceleration represented by the radiation-pressure gradient, is
Radiative diffusion in a star gives
Using and
this becomes
Substitution of and the continuity equation yields the wind equation
Its topology is that of the Parker wind equation. The coefficient of vanishes at the sonic line . A smooth transonic solution must pass through a critical point where the right-hand side also vanishes; generic subsonic solutions are breezes or turn back, while generic supersonic branches cannot be joined smoothly to a quasi-static stellar atmosphere.
At the critical point,
The assumed inequality makes the second factor positive and close to one. Since ,
Thus acceleration through a regular sonic point requires radiation to cancel most, but not all, of the effective gravity and in particular
If the local luminosity reached or exceeded in this diffusion model, the numerator would have the wrong sign for the subsonic branch to cross the sonic line smoothly under the cold-wind assumption.
At , define
Differentiating the temperature profile gives
Since the luminosity is already constant there, the radiative diffusion in a star equation yields
For the Kramers' opacity law , substitution gives
where
Thus and in the notation of the question.
For constant electron-scattering opacity ,
where
Hence and : the radius cancels, and the mass dependence is shallower than under Kramers opacity.
Suppose first that the gas-pressure fraction is spatially constant, with . This is a sufficient condition for a stellar polytrope. Since
the ratio gives
Therefore
with
For an ordinary positive polytropic index one also assumes .
The radiative diffusion in a star equation can be written as
Because and is constant, hydrostatic equilibrium gives
Equating them and using yields
For a family in stellar homology, dimensionless radial profiles are fixed. Mass conservation and hydrostatic equilibrium then give the central scalings
The ideal gas equation of state, with fixed mean molecular weight, consequently gives
where fixed dimensional constants such as are suppressed in homology relations.
The proton–proton chain law gives the nuclear luminosity
On the other hand, radiative diffusion in a star gives
Using the Kramers' opacity law ,
Thermal equilibrium requires . Their common mass factor cancels, leaving , and hence
This model captures the gas-pressure support, pp-chain burning, and strongly mass-dependent luminosity of the lower main sequence, including the Sun approximately. Its fully radiative assumption is an idealization: the Sun has a convective envelope, and sufficiently low-mass red dwarfs become largely or fully convective, so real radii are not exactly constant.
Because and , the envelope has nearly constant area and nearly constant surface gravity of a star . Plane-parallel hydrostatic equilibrium is
Since , one has . Taking the pressure to vanish with at the surface gives
The spherical stellar energy equation is . With and ,
Division by gives
Likewise, radiative diffusion in a star gives
and therefore
Power-law opacity radiative envelope Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A thin radiative envelope with constant enclosed mass, luminosity and mean molecular weight, ideal gas pressure and opacity has , , and . Combining radiative diffusion in a star with hydrostatic equilibrium gives , so for nonzero exponents. Zero exponents give logarithmic limits. The model must be stopped or modified if the Schwarzschild criterion predicts convection.
Radiative conductivity 2026-10-14
In the optically thick radiative diffusion in a star approximation, the heat flux is . The conductivity depends on opacity, mass density and temperature. It relates a material temperature gradient to energy transport and must not be confused with the emergent effective temperature.
Radiative core 2026-10-14
A stellar core in which radiative diffusion in a star carries most of the energy, rather than convection. Its formation in a pre-main-sequence star breaks the fully convective assumption behind an idealized Hayashi track.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with and specific nuclear heating , the central scalings give and radiative diffusion in a star gives . Equating them yields the displayed laws. The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives , hence . Composition and dimensionless profiles are held fixed.
For gas-pressure-supported stellar homology with opacity and stellar energy-generation rate , radiative diffusion in a star gives . Integrating the heating rate instead gives . Equality in stellar thermal equilibrium yields the displayed radius law and . This fixes the dimensionless profiles and coefficients, and neglects radiation pressure; it is a model comparison rather than a universal law for all main sequence stars. At fixed mass and metal mass fraction, homogeneous hydrogen burning gives the homogeneous fuel-depletion luminosity feedback through .
For a chemically uniform, ideal-gas-supported stellar homology sequence with nuclear energy generation and opacity , radiative diffusion in a star fixes and nuclear heating fixes . Eliminating gives , hence
The absence of in the radius law is a consequence of these particular power laws; it is not a universal relation for real stars. At fixed initial and , the Stefan–Boltzmann law gives at fixed luminosity.
Radiative-zero white-dwarf envelope Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
In a negligible-mass white dwarf envelope, take enclosed mass and luminosity constant, neglect radiation pressure, and use an ideal gas with the Kramers' opacity law. Dividing hydrostatic pressure support equation by radiative diffusion in a star gives . Neglecting the surface integration constant produces the displayed pressure and mass density laws. It is a deep-envelope approximation, not a finite-temperature photospheric boundary condition.
Stellar radiative temperature gradient Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
The radiative temperature gradient needed to carry a spherical stellar luminosity follows by dividing radiative diffusion in a star by the hydrostatic pressure support equation. It is a logarithmic pressure gradient, not itself. Comparing it with the adiabatic temperature gradient by the Schwarzschild criterion determines whether purely radiative transport is locally unstable at uniform composition.