Angular-diameter ratio under a collinear boost Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-10-20
For two coincident observers with relative motion along the sightline to a small distant source, its angular diameter changes by a rapidity factor. A boost toward the source compresses its incoming angular cone: for angular radius . For a small source the larger-to-smaller diameter ratio is , giving the displayed relative speed. A finite angular size requires the half-angle formula, and arbitrary transverse relative motion cannot be inferred from one diameter ratio alone.
Angular size under a collinear relativistic boost Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Let an observer move towards the centre of a small distant source with velocity , where is the speed of light. For source-direction angle , the photon arrives with longitudinal momentum . A Lorentz transformation gives and therefore the relativistic aberration lawwhere is the rapidity. For a small angular diameter , the displayed angular-size ratio follows by linearizing at . Two momentarily coincident observers can consequently measure different angular sizes without any change in their observation event. If their diameter ratio is , their relative speed is .
Bound-state fusion of factorized S-matrices Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
For an equal-mass bound pair at fusion rapidity , scatter a third particle off its two constituents with shifted rapidities and project onto the bound-state residue. Scalar amplitudes give the displayed product. With internal indices, bound-state coupling tensors perform the projection. The Yang-Baxter equation makes different scattering orders consistent; factorization eliminates independent many-body scattering contributions.
Faddeev-Zamolodchikov algebra 2026-10-06
Particle operators obey a rapidity-dependent exchange rule , with repeated species indices summed. A consistent associative algebra must give the same coefficients when a triple product is brought to decreasing or increasing rapidity order by either sequence of adjacent exchanges. This is the Faddeev-Zamolodchikov associativity constraint. Rapidity ordering here is distinct from the creation/annihilation convention of ordinary normal ordering.
Starting with three ordered rapidities, the adjacent-exchange sequences and must give identical coefficients for every final species word in the Faddeev-Zamolodchikov algebra. The exchange parameters are , and because rapidity differences add. These coefficient identities express the spectral Yang-Baxter equation. One scalar identity is necessary but generally does not exhaust all the constraints.
Replace instantaneous acceleration and braking by legs of constant proper-acceleration magnitude , retaining the same cruise rapidity and fixed endpoint separation. Each leg takes proper time and displaces in the endpoint rest frame. Subtracting the proper cruise time displaced by both legs gives the displayed correction. A cruise segment exists only if the total endpoint separation exceeds twice this acceleration distance.
A narrow outgoing energy packet has phase , so stationary phase gives the arrival shift . For two equal-mass solitons with relative rapidity , . The convention instead gives . Classical time delays determine only the energy-dependent phase difference, not its constant branch.
In a real species basis, the two-particle S-matrix satisfies under the usual scattering analyticity assumptions. On the real rapidity axis this relates inverse-rapidity amplitudes to complex conjugates. Combined with the algebraic inverse relation , it gives physical unitarity.
In units , constant signed proper acceleration givesPosition data determine but leave the initial rapidity free. Proper-acceleration magnitude alone also leaves its orientation unspecified. The familiar centred hyperbola follows for the additional initial data , , and acceleration toward increasing .
Integrable quantum field theory Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
A quantum field theory with enough mutually compatible conserved quantities to constrain its dynamics exactly. In massive relativistic theories in one spatial dimension, suitable higher-spin conserved charges imply elastic factorized scattering: the set of incoming rapidities is preserved and multiparticle amplitudes are assembled from two-particle S-matrices.
Iterated collinear boosts with equal rapidity Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
Starting from rest, compose positive collinear Lorentz boosts, each with the same finite rapidity . Each step has relative velocity , measured in the preceding rest inertial frame. The relativistic velocity-addition formula givesThese are equal increments of rapidity, not equal increments of velocity measured in the original inertial frame. They can describe a chain of relatively moving inertial frames or successive idealized changes of a massive particle's motion; no particular acceleration schedule is assumed. [ref]
https://davidtong.org/teaching/general-relativity/grhtml/S1. David Tong, General Relativity, §1.2.4: collinear boost composition and rapidity
.For a relative velocity at each step,The first four velocities are , , , and . At step eight, . The rapidities grow by the same amount at each step, while the successive velocity increments become smaller.
Equal collinear boosts add rapidities linearly while their composed velocities approach the speed of light
. The illustrative sequence uses relative velocity per step and . The horizontal coordinate counts boosts, rather than elapsed time. The line at marks the speed of light; every plotted velocity is strictly below it. Details.A short derivation applies the hyperbolic-function identity for to the recurrence, giving . Substituting and gives the displayed closed expression. In particular,for every finite nonnegative integer . The limit is as , but no finite sequence reaches the speed of light. This illustrates the beauty of rapidity: unbounded additive parameters coexist with bounded physical velocities. Replacing every step by a negative rapidity gives the corresponding approach to .
Orthogonal-invariant scattering channels 2026-10-06
The two-vector tensor product splits into a trace singlet, symmetric traceless tensors and antisymmetric tensors. For an O(N)-invariant S-matrix, the corresponding eigenvalues are , and . For , analytic unitarity requires . With Hermitian analyticity of a two-particle S-matrix, each channel has unit modulus on the real rapidity axis.
Parton momentum fraction 2026-10-25
In the collinear approximation, a parton carries a fraction of its parent hadron's longitudinal momentum. A parton distribution function gives its distribution at the specified factorization scale. For production of one on-shell particle with no transverse recoil, and , where is its rapidity.
Past exam of the groups and representations course of the University of Oxford 2025 3 a Solution 2026-10-25
Adopt the Minkowski metric and the Clifford algebra convention . The source's Pauli matrices giveThey satisfy , and , which verifies the required Clifford algebra. Raising the indices gives and .
Fix the sign of the rapidity by taking the Lorentz boostThe corresponding Spinor representation of the Lorentz group isFor example and , establishing Lorentz covariance by .
Thus the Dirac spinor transforms as , with infinitesimal lawThese variations compare the fields at corresponding spacetime points. At a fixed coordinate one adds the usual orbital term . Reversing the rapidity convention reverses both boost signs consistently. Infinitesimal transformations describe the proper orthochronous Lorentz group.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 ib Paper 4 9A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a standard collinear Lorentz boost, put and . Its equations are and . Define the rapidity . Since and , and . ThereforeAdding and subtracting, and using , givesA second boost multiplies these factors by , so the combined rapidity is . The hyperbolic tangent addition formula then gives the relativistic velocity addition lawVelocities are signed along the common axis, so this formula also covers oppositely directed boosts.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 ib Paper 2 7C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a standard collinear Lorentz transformation, put and , with . Then and . Define the rapidity . The identities and , with , give and . Substitution proves the desired hyperbolic form.
Adding and subtracting those transformed coordinates uses and yieldsA second collinear Lorentz transformation of rapidity multiplies these two null coordinates by and . Their total factors are therefore and , provingThe hyperbolic tangent addition formula now gives the velocity composition lawAll velocities here are signed along the same axis; the speed is the absolute value if either frame moves in the opposite direction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 4 4B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Write the standard Lorentz transformation as , , with Lorentz factor and . In the null coordinates in two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, addition and subtraction giveSince both factors are positive,Their product is one, so Lorentz invariance of the interval follows immediately:Two successive collinear Lorentz boosts multiply the positive-coordinate factor by and the negative-coordinate factor by its reciprocal. Thus they have the same form with a velocity determined byCross multiplication yields the relativistic velocity-addition formula formulaFor , the denominator is positive andso is admissible. The positive square roots then verify the factor identity itself, not merely its square. In terms of rapidity , this same calculation is addition of rapidities because .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 46 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Continue with metric signature . The Pauli matrices obey . Block multiplication in the chiral gamma-matrix representation givesandHence , the required Clifford algebra. Multiplying the Dirac equation by yieldsThe antisymmetric part of drops out because partial derivatives commute. Therefore every component of the Dirac spinor satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation. The converse is not true: four arbitrary scalar solutions need not obey the first-order Dirac equation.
The Lorentz group consists of real invertible matrices preserving the Minkowski metric: . Writing gives , so there are six continuous parameters: three spatial rotation angles and three boost rapidities. The proper orthochronous Lorentz group is the connected component with determinant that preserves time orientation. Parity and time reversal are additional discrete operations and are not encoded by the six real parameters in an exponential near the identity.
For the real-generator convention used here, vector generators can be writtenTake and use the same parameters in the spinor representation. The Lorentz-spinor generators from a Clifford algebra areTo verify the Lorentz algebra, first commute a generator with one gamma matrix:For example, this follows by moving through each product using the Clifford anticommutator. Applying the commutator derivation rule to then givesNo extra factor of belongs in these generators with this commutator convention. Hermitian-generator conventions shift the factors of into the brackets and the exponential instead.
The same gamma commutator provesIndeed, to first order , exactly the infinitesimal vector action defined above. Exponentiating proves the finite relation. The spinor field transforms as with ; combining this relation with preserves the Dirac equation. A rotation gives , so the spinor matrices give the double-cover spin representation, rather than a single-valued ordinary representation of the Lorentz group itself.
For a boost in direction , is Hermitian, with eigenvalues . A real rapidity therefore produces eigenvalues in , whose moduli are not one. The finite-component spinor representation is not unitary for boosts, although the rotation matrices are unitary. The Lorentz group is noncompact; this does not forbid the unitary infinite-dimensional action on the physical Hilbert space of states.
Nevertheless, since ,This Dirac spinor pseudo-unitarity implies , and consequentlyThe Dirac adjoint is precisely the adjoint needed to form this Lorentz scalar; ordinary alone is not a scalar.
Let . It anticommutes with every gamma matrix and commutes with every , so . Thus the axial current transforms as a four-vector under proper Lorentz transformations:Under parity it is an axial vector, acquiring the additional pseudovector sign. Contracting two axial currents cancels that sign and uses the invariant metric. Therefore is compatible with Lorentz invariance, including parity invariance of this contraction. Lorentz invariance of the interaction does not require the axial current to be conserved.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 47 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Take and use the complex sine-Gordon theory reduced density , with physical lengths and times . Physical rest energy is , and the dimensionless Noether charge is obtained from the reduced action. Put , , , so . Initially take , avoiding the singular target-space boundary.
The canonical Hamiltonian density isHere , , and . Since , the kinetic contribution is simply . ConsequentlyTo fix the charge sign, take the Noether current directly from , :Thus positive internal rotation has positive charge in this convention. With and the supplied integral,Reversing the definition of the generator would reverse all charge labels but not any mass. The limit is the vacuum with zero mass and charge. At the field reaches at its center and the current's coordinate expression becomes singular. The mass still has the finite limiting value , butThe displayed local density does not assign a unique endpoint charge merely by substituting .
The four collective parameters. Translation, a Lorentz boost of rapidity , and the global phase symmetry produceThe independent real parameters are , with periodic modulo . A further time translation is absorbed into these parameters. The energy and momentum are and , while is invariant. The internal angle is the collective coordinate whose canonical momentum is this Noether charge.
Semiclassical quantization. For one rest-frame internal rotation, the period in dimensionless time is . The action around the orbit isEquivalently this is , where is the reduced rest energy. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization with gives . Because the internal orbit is a cyclic angle, not a one-dimensional oscillator between turning points, there is no half-integer Maslov index shift. HenceOn the nonsingular branch . The elementary charge-one mass approaches at weak coupling. For positive with , , where , . Thus : the charge- soliton cannot fragment into smaller like-charge particles. For a general charge-conserving partition, a constituent with already has mass at least ; if every , the decreasing ratio gives , strictly for nontrivial fragmentation. Thus opposite-charge constituents cannot open a lower-energy decay either. This is charged rather than topological stability, and the semiclassical spectrum is reliable at weak coupling.
Counting states and the endpoint. Write . If is not an integer, the regular branch givesIf is an integer, the local nonsingular calculation gives only regular states. The formal closed-branch list has charge labels, but its last two labels are limits of the same singular static solution. Counting them needs a global completion; it cannot be decided from a regular current integral at .
In the additional integer-level completion, at leading semiclassical order and charges are identified modulo integer . There are then nonzero charge sectors. For odd , positive and negative labels are distinct; for even , the endpoint labels describe one self-conjugate state. This supplies states when , rather than endpoint labels. This global interpretation, and the distinction between classical and renormalized couplings, are discussed in Dorey and Hollowood, section 2. A generic classical does not automatically define an integer or specify this quantum completion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 47 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Take and . The Sine-Gordon kink-antikink scattering solution tends to the same vacuum at both spatial ends and hence has zero net topological charge. At large , the two transition centers, found by setting the magnitude of the inverse-tangent argument to one, obeyThey are a kink and an antikink moving with asymptotic speeds , with no outgoing radiation. Their left-right orientations interchange at the collision. To define the soliton time delay, label a transmitted trajectory by its preserved rapidity rather than its left-right position. The right-moving asymptotes areAfter restoring physical lengths, the forward shift is . The arrival-time difference is thereforeThis is a time advance relative to the extrapolated incoming free motion.
The semiclassical scattering phase. For an outgoing energy wave packet with full S-matrix phase , stationary phase in shifts its arrival time by . The full S-matrix phase from a classical soliton delay uses the paper's , twice the phase in a convention . In the center-of-momentum frame, , so . It follows thatThe literal PDF normalization gives and consequentlyThe integrable logarithmic singularity at zero causes no divergence of this phase difference. With the intended standard angular-field prefactor , the result is insteadThe soliton time delay determines only phase differences, not an energy-independent constant or a choice of branch. Keeping this distinction avoids an arbitrary high-energy subtraction.
Bound-state poles. Set . Each factor of the exact amplitude can be written . Its denominator vanishes in the physical rapidity strip atThe corresponding numerator is nonzero, and no other numerator cancels the pole. In the direct kink–antikink fusion interpretation, analytically continue the constituent rapidities to . Their momenta sum to , so the relativistic bound-state mass from a rapidity pole givesThese neutral particles form the Sine-Gordon breather spectrum at reflectionless couplings: there are breathers, none for , and the putative state is at the unbound threshold. The amplitude fixes these ratios to the physical kink mass; its rapidity dependence alone cannot fix the overall mass scale or a mass-renormalization prescription relating that mass to .
It is important to distinguish direct and crossed interpretations rather than count every occurrence of a pole twice. Crossing symmetry sends to . At the original angle the momentum-difference invariant is , so the crossed interpretation exchanges the complementary member of the same tower. In particular the transmission residue alternates sign: direct evaluation of the remaining factors gives , . Thus one must retain charge-channel/crossed-channel information, not reject every negative-imaginary transmission residue or declare an additional particle for a crossed pole. Direct and crossed locations coincide in the reflectionless pole set. The familiar case has one breather of mass despite the negative-imaginary transmission residue; this diagonal reflectionless example is also displayed in Castro-Alvaredo, Chen, Doyon and Hoogeveen, section 4.2.
Matching the exact phase. For the unwrapped reflectionless sine-Gordon transmission phase, at real choose the continuous unwrapped branch with . ThenEvery factor has unit modulus, consistent with purely transmitting elastic scattering. Differentiating is simpler than integrating its complex logarithm:For fixed the sum becomes a Riemann sum, and the elementary integral yieldsSince and , replacing by changes this only at subleading order. The leading phase difference agrees with the standard semiclassical result. The derivative approximation is not uniform as at fixed ; integrating its logarithm gives a finite leading phase difference nevertheless. A compatible constant is the given branch , whose choice is supplied by the exact amplitude rather than the classical trajectory.
As a useful endpoint check, , obtained by expanding the two logarithms . Thus the leading phase with coefficient tends to . The exact unwrapped endpoints arewhere the extra is subleading. Neither should be replaced by zero by an unannounced branch convention. Finally, the literal action gives a phase derivative of order , whereas the printed exact amplitude gives order . The requested exact/semiclassical matching requires correcting the overall action normalization to . This is an actual inconsistency between pages 2 and 4, not a change to the sine-Gordon equation or the classical scattering field.
