Feynman integral 2026-10-14
A Feynman integral is the momentum-space integral associated with a Feynman diagram: each independent loop momentum is integrated with measure , and propagators, vertex numerators and momentum conservation determine the integrand. Its definition also requires a pole prescription and, when divergent, a regularization in quantum field theory. Feynman parameters combine propagator denominators and permit shifts of loop momenta. A massless two-propagator example is , with its causal prescriptions understood. Subtracting local counterterms turns a regulated diagram into a finite contribution to a renormalized amplitude.
One-loop scalar effective action Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
In Euclidean signature, for a canonically normalized real scalar field with potential , the one-loop contribution to the quantum effective action is , with a suitable regularization in quantum field theory. Expanding this functional determinant generates one-particle-irreducible Feynman diagrams with arbitrarily many external fields.
One-loop soliton mass correction 2026-10-06
In a common finite-volume regularization in quantum field theory, the oscillator contribution is , including every discrete and continuum-derived mode and treating translation as a collective coordinate. Physical frequencies are when coordinates are measured in units of . A mass counterterm is added only afterwards. The vacuum subtraction removes the extensive vacuum energy but can leave an ultraviolet divergence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 47 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
To keep the paper's coupling convention explicit, write and use physical coordinates , . Assume and weak coupling . The canonical real scalar field is , and the physical potential isThe symbol is the coupling usually appearing in canonical Sine-Gordon theory; the paper's is its square. The vacua have . A static Sine-Gordon kink has and satisfies . Since , its classical mass isThe topological sector is important: this energy is measured relative to a vacuum, and the kink joins distinct vacua at the two spatial ends. Expanding around a spatially constant vacuum cannot construct this state by any finite-order perturbation in .
For the general one-loop soliton mass correction, start with a canonical scalar field potential and a stable static soliton . Write . The term linear in vanishes by the classical Euler-Lagrange field equation. The quadratic fluctuation Hamiltonian isChoose a common large box and a common finite-mode regularization in quantum field theory. Expand the nonzero normal modes as , with and normalized eigenfunctions. Each pair is a quantum harmonic oscillator contributing ground-state energy . In the vacuum, replace by . Subtract the two ground-state energies and add the local counterterms evaluated on the soliton relative to the vacuum. This derives the general formulaThe prime excludes exact zero modes in field theory from oscillator quantization; their zero frequencies contribute no zero-point energy, but their role in mode counting must not be forgotten. The two sums mean a paired finite regulator, not separate subtractions of divergent answers. Equivalently the nonzero-mode term is the regulated difference of the square-root traces of the two fluctuation operators. Discrete bound states and continuum modes both contribute. This is a vacuum-subtracted soliton mass and the first term in the semiclassical soliton mass expansion.
Translation gives a zero mode in field theory because differentiating the static equation yields . A Gaussian oscillator or an unprimed functional determinant is inappropriate along this flat direction. Replace its amplitude by the position collective coordinate and require the residual fluctuation to obey , preventing double counting. The associated change-of-variables Jacobian supplies the zero-mode normalization. At low speed the collective-coordinate effective Lagrangian for a soliton is ; quantizing the position gives the soliton momentum and its translational states, not an extra oscillator rest energy. More generally, every physical continuous modulus needs a collective coordinate; gauge directions require gauge fixing rather than additional physical states.
The Sine-Gordon kink fluctuation operator is particularly simple:while . This supersymmetric factorization of the one-soliton potential shows stability and generates all nonzero eigenfunctions from vacuum plane waves. The sole normalizable bound state is the translational zero mode of a sine-Gordon kink, proportional to ; there is no positive-frequency internal bound oscillator. The continuum has and no reflection. Applying to gives a transmission amplitudeThis scattering phase shift changes the density of continuum modes. The high-frequency vacuum subtraction cancels the extensive vacuum contribution but still leaves a logarithmic ultraviolet divergence.
The finite part also requires consistent mode-number regularization of soliton masses. The periodic-box phase-shift quantization condition is . Match modes: the kink has its translation mode plus the two continuum modes at each , while the vacuum has the oscillator of frequency and the corresponding continuum pairs. With and , expanding givesIntegration by parts uses and yieldsThe cutoff surface term for a Sine-Gordon kink tends to . It cannot be dropped merely because : grows at the same time.
A renormalization condition must specify which mass and coupling are held fixed. For vacuum normal ordering, or cancellation of the vacuum tadpole diagram with the elementary mass fixed at , the quartic interaction gives the mass countertermEvaluating this Sine-Gordon vacuum tadpole counterterm on the kink givesThe logarithmic ultraviolet divergence cancels, leaving the renormalized one-loop Sine-Gordon kink mass in the stated vacuum scheme:This example illustrates why a zero mode in field theory must be treated as a collective coordinate, why vacuum subtraction alone need not remove ultraviolet divergences, and why the finite relation between the two regulators matters. Different finite counterterms amount to different definitions of the renormalized parameters; an unregulated frequency difference without a renormalization condition is not a physical mass prediction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 40 3 iv Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Apply the Grassmann Gaussian integral to a regulated finite collection of field components. Up to a field-independent measure normalization and phase,In the continuum this is a formal functional determinant, including spinor and spacetime indices. Its meaningful definition requires a regulator and boundary conditions. A complex Dirac field supplies a determinant, not the inverse square root obtained for a real commuting field.
The comparison is clean after Wick rotation. A free real scalar field with positive Euclidean operator hasTaking a logarithm gives for the scalar and for the Dirac field. The opposite statistics sign is the determinant counterpart of the minus sign for a closed fermion loop. The magnitude also differs because a Dirac field has several independent spin and antiparticle degrees of freedom.
The vacuum energy sign of a fermionic oscillator makes the comparison explicit. A real scalar mode contributes ; each independent fermionic oscillator contributes . There is one oscillator per scalar momentum, but a massive Dirac field has two particle and two antiparticle oscillators. Thus the vacuum energy densities are formallyEquivalently, the large Euclidean-time vacuum functional behaves as . Both displayed vacuum energies are ultraviolet divergent; a common regularization in quantum field theory and the appropriate renormalization are needed before comparing them. The zero-point vacuum energies of bosons and fermions have opposite signs, but do not cancel without matching masses and degrees of freedom. Normal ordering removes an additive vacuum constant in nongravitating flat-space theory. Coupling to the metric in general relativity makes that constant contribute to the cosmological constant, so it cannot simply be discarded without a renormalization condition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 304 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Let the charge parameter depend on position temporarily. Using the gauge-covariant derivative of a charged scalar field, the variation of the matter action is . The resulting Noether current isHere . The potential does not contribute, and . Because has not been rescaled to a canonical kinetic term, there is no factor in this Noether current or in the matter interaction vertices.
A local change of variables in the path integral gives . Integration by parts in the term containing produces the two opposite contact terms of the Ward identity.
For clarity about phases, transform the current correlator with and suppress its overall momentum conservation Dirac delta function. Denote the result by . The coordinate Ward identity becomesAmputation of the two external quantum field theory propagators then fixes the longitudinal part of the current interaction vertex. Since the action couples to , the gauge interaction vertex has the opposite sign. The phase convention for the paper's gauge interaction vertices is , where is the corresponding derivative of the Euclidean quantum effective action.
One can derive the exact one-particle-irreducible correlation function directly, without assuming the entire connected current correlator is one-particle irreducible. Local gauge invariance of the quantum effective action impliesA linear covariant gauge fixing adds a breaking term independent of the scalars, which disappears after the scalar differentiations below. The identity requires a regularization in quantum field theory and counterterms preserving the Abelian gauge theory Ward identity; scalar quantum electrodynamics has no gauge anomaly.
Differentiate with respect to and , then set all background fields to zero. The two-point derivative is the inverse exact quantum field theory propagator. Use the Fourier transform convention , , with the photon momentum incoming. This givesAt tree level , so , and the identity reduces to .
To obtain the two-photon scalar Ward identity, differentiate the same functional Ward identity also with respect to . In terms of Euclidean action derivatives it readsThis construction automatically includes the seagull vertex: the Noether current depends on , with . It cannot be discarded when differentiating a current insertion.
Take the first photon momentum to be incoming , and the second incoming . On the first scalar leg the contact term shifts to ; on the other it shifts to . ConsequentlyWith , the result isThere is a momentum-routing sign error in the printed second identity. With the scalar momentum convention of the first identity, its first shifted argument must be , not . This is already forced at tree level: the seagull vertex has and hence . The corrected right-hand side is , matching the left-hand side, whereas the printed right-hand side is . Changing to an all-incoming scalar convention would also change the first identity, so it does not fix both printed formulas simultaneously.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 307 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the canonical Kähler potential and normalize superspace integration by . The superspace Lagrangian density isThe full superspace integration produces a D-term, while the chiral superfield integral produces an F-term. Work in chiral coordinates for the chiral-superfield component expansion, so the omitted spacetime-derivative terms do not enter the extraction of .
Set . A Taylor expansion of the superpotential givesHigher terms vanish because there are only two Grassmann variables . With and , their anticommutation gives . ThusThe canonical Kähler potential contributes . Consequently the part of the Lagrangian density containing the auxiliary field isThe fermion terms coming from the superpotential areThe Weyl spinor kinetic term and the complex scalar field kinetic term are canonical because .
Treat and as independent variables in their algebraic Euler-Lagrange equations. They giveEquivalently,After eliminating the auxiliary field, the Lagrangian density contains , so the F-term scalar potential isIt is nonnegative for arbitrary complex , since it is a modulus squared. A supersymmetric vacuum satisfies F-flatness, so its zeros are:If and these coincide; if and only the origin remains; if every constant is a supersymmetric vacuum.
To compare masses, expand around a supersymmetric vacuum satisfying , writing . With ,Writing gives the scalar field mass term ; the Weyl spinor has physical mass . Therefore the supersymmetric mass degeneracy isIn particular, at the boson and fermion masses are both . At the second supersymmetric vacuum the sign of reverses, but the physical mass is again . Equality here concerns fluctuations about a supersymmetric vacuum, not arbitrary backgrounds with .
In the convention and , the same superpotential coefficient gives and . The supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings is thereforeIf instead the Yukawa interaction is written , then and the same physical relation is . The numerical factor depends on the definition of the Yukawa coupling.
The perturbative non-renormalization theorem applies to the local holomorphic superpotential in the Wilsonian effective action, using regularization in quantum field theory that preserves supersymmetry. There are two complementary ways to see why it applies here.
First, in supergraph calculations in perturbative quantum field theory, the algebra of supersymmetric covariant derivatives puts any candidate local correction to the superpotential into a full superspace integration. It therefore corrects a D-term, such as the Kähler potential, rather than a local chiral F-term. Turning such a contribution into an apparent chiral integral would require nonlocal inverse spacetime derivatives, schematically . These are excluded from the local Wilsonian effective action with a fixed nonzero momentum cutoff. This gives the diagrammatic non-renormalization theorem.
Second, the holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization treats and as background chiral spurions, so the Wilsonian effective action superpotential is a holomorphic function of , with no dependence on or . Assign an ordinary spurion charge and an R-charge as follows:The superpotential has ordinary charge zero and R-charge two, since has R-charge minus two. A prospective holomorphic monomial must therefore satisfyFor perturbative corrections, regularity at and requires nonnegative powers of the couplings. Regularity in is justified by keeping a nonzero Wilsonian momentum cutoff and retaining as a light field. Hence only and survive: the existing and structures. The quadratic coefficient is fixed by the free theory at , where there are no interaction loops. The cubic coefficient is fixed at first order in , where a connected three-field interaction has only its tree-level Feynman diagram; loop corrections would require further powers of the interaction couplings, which the holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization charge constraints forbid. ThusA field-independent constant is physically irrelevant in this rigid model; the spurion charges would in any case require , which is not regular at .
The Kähler potential can still receive wave-function renormalization. For example, gives the canonical field normalization , and consequentlyThese canonically normalized parameters can run with the renormalization scale; this does not contradict the holomorphic non-renormalization theorem. When massless modes are included in the full quantum effective action, nonlocal terms associated with infrared divergences can also imitate an F-term. Distinguishing that action from the local Wilsonian effective action is part of the theorem's convention.
Vacuum energy sign of a fermionic oscillator Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
A fermionic mode with canonical anticommutation relations has the symmetrically ordered Hamiltonian operator . Its empty-state zero-point contribution is . A quantum harmonic oscillator with bosonic canonical commutation relations contributes instead. For a Dirac field, sum over both particle and antiparticle modes and over spin: there are four independent oscillators per spatial momentum in four spacetime dimensions. Comparing bosonic and fermionic vacuum energies requires a common regularization in quantum field theory, matching degrees of freedom and a stated vacuum-energy subtraction convention.